MAGNA ABUTMENT

K984297 · Factor, Ii, Inc. · DZE · Jan 28, 2000 · Dental

Device Facts

• Record ID: K984297
• Device Name: MAGNA ABUTMENT
• Applicant: Factor, Ii, Inc.
• Product Code: DZE · Dental
• Decision Date: Jan 28, 2000
• Decision: SESE
• Submission Type: Traditional
• Regulation: 21 CFR 872.3640
• Device Class: Class 2
• Attributes: Therapeutic

Intended Use

Magnacap is a magnetic abutment for implant retained dental and craniofacial prosthesis and root supported overdentures. Magnacap is engineered to fit several commercially available implant fixtures.

Device Story

Magnacap is a magnetic abutment system designed to provide retention for dental and craniofacial prostheses and root-supported overdentures. The device functions as a mechanical interface, attaching to commercially available dental implant fixtures to provide magnetic coupling for prosthetic appliances. It is intended for use by dental professionals in clinical settings to improve the stability and retention of removable or fixed-removable dental restorations. The device facilitates patient prosthetic function by providing a secure, removable magnetic connection.

Clinical Evidence

No clinical data provided; substantial equivalence determination based on device description and intended use.

Technological Characteristics

Magnetic abutment system for dental/craniofacial implants. Mechanical interface design compatible with existing commercial implant fixtures. Non-electronic, passive mechanical device.

Indications for Use

Indicated for patients requiring implant-retained dental or craniofacial prostheses and root-supported overdentures.

Regulatory Classification

Identification

An endosseous dental implant is a prescription device made of a material such as titanium or titanium alloy that is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw arches to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, in order to restore a patient's chewing function.

Special Controls

*Classification.* (1) Class II (special controls). The device is classified as class II if it is a root-form endosseous dental implant. The root-form endosseous dental implant is characterized by four geometrically distinct types: Basket, screw, solid cylinder, and hollow cylinder. The guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Root-Form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Implant Abutments” will serve as the special control. (See § 872.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.)(2) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is classified as class II if it is a blade-form endosseous dental implant. The special controls for this device are:(i) The design characteristics of the device must ensure that the geometry and material composition are consistent with the intended use; (ii) Mechanical performance (fatigue) testing under simulated physiological conditions to demonstrate maximum load (endurance limit) when the device is subjected to compressive and shear loads; (iii) Corrosion testing under simulated physiological conditions to demonstrate corrosion potential of each metal or alloy, couple potential for an assembled dissimilar metal implant system, and corrosion rate for an assembled dissimilar metal implant system; (iv) The device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible; (v) Sterility testing must demonstrate the sterility of the device; (vi) Performance testing to evaluate the compatibility of the device in a magnetic resonance (MR) environment; (vii) Labeling must include a clear description of the technological features, how the device should be used in patients, detailed surgical protocol and restoration procedures, relevant precautions and warnings based on the clinical use of the device, and qualifications and training requirements for device users including technicians and clinicians; (viii) Patient labeling must contain a description of how the device works, how the device is placed, how the patient needs to care for the implant, possible adverse events and how to report any complications; and (ix) Documented clinical experience must demonstrate safe and effective use and capture any adverse events observed during clinical use.

Submission Summary (Full Text)

{0}------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES

Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is an abstract image of an eagle with its wings spread.

## Public Health Service

## JAN 2 8 2000

Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850

Mr. John D. McFall Director of Research and Development Factor II, Incorporated 1972 Forest Avenue Lakeside, Arizona 85929

Re : K984297 Trade Name: Maqnacap Requlatory Class: III Product Code: DZE Dated: May 10, 1999 Received: May 19, 1999

Dear Mr. McFall:

We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Good Manufacturing Practice for Medical Devices: General (GMP) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic GMP inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.

{1}------------------------------------------------

Page 2 - Mr. McFall

This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market. If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at [phone]. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at [phone]. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 Other general information on your responsibilities CFR 807.97) . . under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number [phone] or [phone] or at its Internet address "http://www.fda.qov/cdrh/dsmamain.html".

Sincerely yours,

Susan Runne

CATimothy A. Ulatowski Director Division of Dental, Infection Control, and General Hospital Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosure

{2}------------------------------------------------

| Ver/3-4/24/96 | |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Applicant: | Factor II, Inc. ● PO Box 1339 ● Lakeside, AZ 85929 (John D. McFall) |
| 510(k) Number: | K984297 |
| Device Name: | Magnacap |

Indications For Use:

Magnacap is a magnetic abutment for implant retained dental and craniofacial prosthesis
and root supported overdentures. Magnacap is engineered to fit
several commercially available implant fixtures.

(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)

Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)

(Per 21 CFR 801.109)

(Optional Format 1-2-96)

| (Division Sign-Off) | Pamela D. Scott for Susan Runner |
|---------------------|----------------------------------|
| D | ental, Infection Control, |
| a | Hospital Devices |
| 5 | K984297 |