MINIMATIC VARIOUS IMPLANT SYSTEMS
Device Facts
| Record ID | K952905 |
|---|---|
| Device Name | MINIMATIC VARIOUS IMPLANT SYSTEMS |
| Applicant | Minimatic, Inc. |
| Product Code | DZE · Dental |
| Decision Date | Apr 16, 1997 |
| Decision | SESE |
| Submission Type | Traditional |
| Regulation | 21 CFR 872.3640 |
| Device Class | Class 2 |
Device Story
Dental devices designed, manufactured, and marketed by Minimatic; intended for use in dental procedures; claimed substantially equivalent to currently marketed dental devices.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided; manufacturer attests to safety and effectiveness based on intended use.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An endosseous dental implant is a prescription device made of a material such as titanium or titanium alloy that is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw arches to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, in order to restore a patient's chewing function.
Special Controls
*Classification.* (1) Class II (special controls). The device is classified as class II if it is a root-form endosseous dental implant. The root-form endosseous dental implant is characterized by four geometrically distinct types: Basket, screw, solid cylinder, and hollow cylinder. The guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Root-Form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Implant Abutments” will serve as the special control. (See § 872.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.)(2) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is classified as class II if it is a blade-form endosseous dental implant. The special controls for this device are:(i) The design characteristics of the device must ensure that the geometry and material composition are consistent with the intended use; (ii) Mechanical performance (fatigue) testing under simulated physiological conditions to demonstrate maximum load (endurance limit) when the device is subjected to compressive and shear loads; (iii) Corrosion testing under simulated physiological conditions to demonstrate corrosion potential of each metal or alloy, couple potential for an assembled dissimilar metal implant system, and corrosion rate for an assembled dissimilar metal implant system; (iv) The device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible; (v) Sterility testing must demonstrate the sterility of the device; (vi) Performance testing to evaluate the compatibility of the device in a magnetic resonance (MR) environment; (vii) Labeling must include a clear description of the technological features, how the device should be used in patients, detailed surgical protocol and restoration procedures, relevant precautions and warnings based on the clinical use of the device, and qualifications and training requirements for device users including technicians and clinicians; (viii) Patient labeling must contain a description of how the device works, how the device is placed, how the patient needs to care for the implant, possible adverse events and how to report any complications; and (ix) Documented clinical experience must demonstrate safe and effective use and capture any adverse events observed during clinical use.
Related Devices
- K101332 — AMC-20 PORTABLE DENTAL CART MODEL AMC-20 · Aseptico, Inc. · Apr 11, 2011
- K102241 — ANTHOGYR IMPLANTEO IMPLANTOLOGY AND DENTAL SURGICAL MOTOR UNIT · Anthogyr Sas · Mar 23, 2011
- K981990 — MRS-400, MAXI 400, MRSL-400, MAXI 400L · D.B.I. America Corp. · Jun 22, 1998
- K982658 — KSEA ENDOSCOPES FOR DENTAL PROCEDURES · KARL STORZ Endoscopy-America, Inc. · Oct 15, 1998
- K955573 — OPTIBLAST INTRAORAL SANDBLASTER · Buffalo Dental Mfg. Co., Inc. · May 3, 1996
