Synermed Glucose Reagent, Synermed IR-1200 Chemistry Analyzer

K153692 · Infrared Laboratory Systems, LLC (Dba Synermed) · CGA · Jun 24, 2016 · Clinical Chemistry

Device Facts

Record IDK153692
Device NameSynermed Glucose Reagent, Synermed IR-1200 Chemistry Analyzer
ApplicantInfrared Laboratory Systems, LLC (Dba Synermed)
Product CodeCGA · Clinical Chemistry
Decision DateJun 24, 2016
DecisionSESE
Submission TypeTraditional
Regulation21 CFR 862.1345
Device ClassClass 2
AttributesPediatric

Intended Use

The Synermed Glucose Reagent is for the in vitro quantitative measurement of glucose in serum on the Synermed IR-1200. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma. The Synermed IR-1200 analyzer is intended for in vitro diagnostic use as a multiparameter chemistry instrument that quantitates the levels of constituents in serum. The analyzer is an automated, random access, computer controlled, clinical chemistry analyzer for clinical chemistry tests. The instrument provides in vitro quantitative measurements for glucose in serum. The device is intended for use only in clinical laboratories.

Device Story

The Synermed IR-1200 is an automated, random-access, computer-controlled clinical chemistry analyzer for use in clinical laboratories by trained personnel. It processes serum samples using spectrophotometric measurement across 12 wavelengths (340-800 nm). The system utilizes liquid-stable reagents (e.g., Glucose Oxidase) to perform endpoint or kinetic assays. The analyzer automates sample/reagent pipetting, mixing, pre-heating, reaction monitoring, and cuvette washing/drying. An externalized computer manages the operating system, calculations, and results display. By automating manual laboratory functions, the device aims to improve efficiency, reduce errors, and enhance the accuracy and precision of quantitative test results, aiding clinicians in diagnosing and monitoring metabolic disorders.

Clinical Evidence

Bench testing only. Performance validated per CLSI guidelines: precision (EP05-A3), linearity (EP06-A6), interference (EP07-A2), and detection limits (EP17-A). Method comparison (EP09-A3) against the Hitachi 717 using 115 serum samples showed high correlation (r=0.9994, slope=0.988). Interference studies identified significant bias (>10%) from ascorbic acid, methyldopa, and uric acid at specific concentrations.

Technological Characteristics

Automated photometric chemistry analyzer. Uses glucose oxidase enzymatic reaction; detection at 650-660 nm. Reagents: glucose oxidase, peroxidase, ampyrone, N-sulfopropyl-N-ethyl-3,5-dimethylaniline. Dimensions: 51in x 34in x 44in; weight 750 lbs. Reusable PMMA cuvettes. Semiconductor cooling for reagents; 37°C incubation. Connectivity: Data transmission to computer/server (no wireless). Power: 220 VAC. Software-controlled.

Indications for Use

Indicated for in vitro quantitative measurement of glucose in serum for patients requiring diagnosis or treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders, including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.

Regulatory Classification

Identification

A glucose test system is a device intended to measure glucose quantitatively in blood and other body fluids. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.

Special Controls

*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is solely intended for use as a drink to test glucose tolerance, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.

Predicate Devices

Related Devices

Submission Summary (Full Text)

{0}------------------------------------------------ Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized image of three human profiles facing right, arranged in a cascading manner. The profiles are depicted in a single, continuous line that curves and flows to create the impression of depth and connection. Encircling the image is the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" in a circular arrangement. Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002 #### INFRARED LABORATORY SYSTEMS, LLC (DBA SYNERMED) JULIE PASCHAL REGULATORY AFFAIRS SPECIALIST 17408 TILLER COURT SUITE 1900 WESTFIELD IN 40674 June 24, 2016 Re: K153692 Trade/Device Name: Synermed Glucose Reagent, Synermed IR-1200 Chemistry Analyzer Regulation Number: 21 CFR 8862.1345 Regulation Name: Glucose test system Regulatory Class: II Product Code: CGA, JJE Dated: June 20, 2016 Received: June 21, 2016 Dear Ms. Paschal: We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading. If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21. Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Parts 801 and 809); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050. {1}------------------------------------------------ If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulations (21 CFR Parts 801 and 809), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638 2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled. "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance. You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Sincerely yours. # Katherine Serrano -S For : Courtney H. Lias, Ph.D. Director Division of Chemistry and Toxicology Devices Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Center for Devices and Radiological Health Enclosure {2}------------------------------------------------ #### Indications for Use 510(k) Number (if known) K153692 Device Name Synermed Glucose Reagent Synermed IR-1200 Chemistry Analyzer #### Indications for Use (Describe) The Synermed Glucose Reagent is for the in vitro quantitative measurement of glucose in serum on the Synermed IR-1200 Chemistry Analyzer. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbolygrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma. The Synermed IR-1200 Chemistry Analyzer is intended for in vitro diagnostic use as a multiparameter chemistry instrument that quantitates the levels of constituents in serum. The analyzer is an automated, random eccess, computer controlled, clinical chemistry analyzer for clinical chemistry tests. The instrument provides in vitro quantitative measurements for glucose in serum. The device is intended for use only in clinical laboratories. | Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | | |-------------------------------------------------|--| |-------------------------------------------------|--| Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) #### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED. This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. # *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.* The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed announg the and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other oppect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: > Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov "An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number." {3}------------------------------------------------ # 510(k) Summary #### 1. Company Information Infrared Laboratory Systems, LLC 17408 Tiller Court Suite 1900 Westfield, Indiana 46074 Telephone; (317) 896-1565 FAX: (317) 896-1566 ## 2. Contact Information Julie Paschal Regulatory Affairs Specialist Telephone: 336-235-3057 Email: jpaschal(@slplabs.com - 3. Date Prepared: June 20, 2016 - 4. Device Trade Name: Synermed Glucose Reagent; Synermed IR-1200 Chemistry Analyzer - 5. Common Name: Glucose test system; Chemistry Analyzer - 6. Classification Name: Glucose test, Class II; Discrete photometric chemistry analyzer for clinical use, Class I - 7. Classification Regulation: 21CFR862.1345, 21CFR862.2160 ## 8. Classification Product Code: CGA, JJE - 9. Panel: Chemistry (75) #### 10. Reagent Device Classification: | Pro<br>Code | Classification<br>Regulation | Classification Name | Device Class | Panel | |-------------|------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|-------| | CGA | 862.1345 | Glucose test system | Class II | 75 | | JJE | 862.2160 | Discrete photometric<br>chemistry analyzer for<br>clinical use | Class I | 75 | {4}------------------------------------------------ | K-number | Manufacturer | Product | |----------|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------| | K872494 | Boehringer<br>Mannheim<br>Corp (Roche) | Hitachi 717<br>chemistry<br>analyzer | | K903063 | Synermed | Synermed<br>Glucose<br>Reagent | ## 11. Identification of Predicates: # 12. Device Description ## Synermed IR-1200 Glucose Reagent The Synermed Glucose is ready to use. The composition of the Synermed Glucose Oxidase Reagent is as follows: 280 umol/L N-sulfopropyl-N-ethyl-3, 5-dimethylaniline, 280 umol/L ampyrone, 1400 U/L peroxidase (horseradish) and 18,000 U/L glucose oxidase. # Synermed IR-1200 Chemistry Analyzer The IR-1200 Chemistry Analyzer is a multiparameter chemistry instrument that quantitates the levels of analytes in serum using spectrophotometric measurement. The system uses Synermed liquid-stable reagent systems that have been previously cleared by FDA. The IR-1200 Chemistry Analyzer is a discrete analyzer with STAT priority capabilities and an externalized computer. The instrument features a user-friendly software operating system, optical unit, precision pipetting and electronic system. Twelve wavelengths are included ranging from 340 nm to 800 nm. The instrument's capabilities include: sample pipetting, reagent pipetting, anti-interference, mixing, pre-heating, reaction monitoring, calculation, display and printing of results. After the measurement is complete, the system rinses and dries the cuvettes. The system automates the manual functions and, as a result, it enhances efficiency, diminishes errors, thus improving the accuracy and precision of test results. # 13. Intended Use # Synermed Glucose Reagent The Synermed Glucose Reagent is for the in vitro quantitative measurement of glucose on serum on the Synermed IR-1200. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma. ## Synermed IR-1200 Chemistry Analyzer The Synermed IR-1200 analyzer is intended for in vitro diagnostic use as a multiparameter chemistry instrument that quantitates the levels of constituents in serum. The analyzer is an automated, random access, computer controlled, clinical chemistry analyzer for clinical chemistry tests. The instrument provides in vitro quantitative measurements for glucose in serum. The device is intended for use only in clinical laboratories. {5}------------------------------------------------ #### 14. Comparison of Technological Characteristics with the Predicate Device The new device is substantially equivalent to the predicate because it has the same intended use and has the same or similar technological characteristics including safety and effectiveness. The same specimen type can be analyzed and both analyzers use spectrophotometry to detect the amount of absorbance which is proportional to the concentration of the analyte in the specimen. Both analyzers wash and reuse PMMA cuvettes as well as use temperature ranges and the incubation for the reaction occurs at 37°C. Analyzer performance was quantified using the same previously cleared reagent systems. {6}------------------------------------------------ | Items | Candidate Device: Synermed IR-1200 Chemistry Analyzer | Predicate Device:<br>Roche/Boehringer<br>Mannheim<br>Hitachi 717<br>Chemistry<br>Analyzer | |-------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | Similarity/Difference | | | Intended Use | The Synermed IR-1200 chemistry analyzer<br>is an automated clinical analyzer for in<br>vitro diagnostic use only in clinical<br>laboratories. It is intended to be used for a<br>variety of assay methods. The analyzer<br>provides in vitro quantitative<br>determinations for glucose in serum<br>samples. | Same | | Environment | Clinical laboratory use only | Same | | Specimen | Serum | Same | | Power | 220 VAC, 50/60 Hz | 115 VAC, 60 Hz | | Analytical Methods | Endpoint, kinetic | Same | | Calibration Methods | Linear and Nonlinear calibration | Same | | Throughput (Max) | 800 photometric tests/ hour | 600 photometric<br>tests/ hour | | Calibration/QC | Programmable Cal/QC, will repeat<br>automatically if out of range | Same | | Photometer wavelength | 340-800 (12 wavelengths) | Same | | Linear Absorbance Range | 0-3.3 Absorbance | 0-3.2 Absorbance | | Reaction Cuvettes | Reusable PMMA (Polymethylmethacrylate) | Same | | Lightpath | 0.5cm | 0.6cm | | Sample Volume | 1.5-35μL | 1-20μL | | Reagent Volume | 15-350μL | 50-350μL | | Reaction Volume | 120-450μL | 250-400μL | Differences The Synermed IR-1200 can use smaller reagent and sample volumes than the Hitachi 717. The Synermed IR-1200 is smaller and weighs less than the Hitachi 717. The Synermed IR-1200 can use up to 4 reagents to perform an analysis while the Hitachi 717 can only use 2 reagents. {7}------------------------------------------------ | Items | Candidate Device: Synermed<br>IR-1200 Glucose Reagent | Predicate Device: Synermed Glucose<br>Reagent | |-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------| | Similarity/Difference | | | | Intended Use | For the quantitative<br>measurement of glucose in<br>serum. | For the quantitative measurement<br>of glucose in serum and plasma. | | Test Principle | Oxidase | Same | | Sample Type | Serum | Serum and Plasma | | Measuring Range | 8-885 mg/dL | Same | # 15. Summary of Performance Testing The purpose of the performance studies was to validate that the previously cleared reagents have the same performance characteristics on the proposed new analyzer (Synermed IR-1200) as compared to the previously cleared Hitachi 717. The sponsor has chosen the representative analyte Glucose using serum as the representative sample matrix. ## Analytical Performance ## a. Precision/Reproducibility Verification of precision on the Synermed IR-1200 was accomplished by implementing the study protocol laid out in CLSI document EP05-A3. Five concentrations of pooled patient serum were run for glucose. Each aliquot was run in duplicate twice a day for twenty days for a total of 80 measurements at each concentration. The mean, standard deviation and coefficient of variation were determined for glucose at each concentration. Additionally, the percentage of imprecision and total error was calculated. The results are displayed in the tables below. ## Results: | | Within Run Precision | | Total Precision | | |-------------------------|----------------------|-------------|-----------------|-------------| | Mean<br>(mg/dL glucose) | S.D.<br>(mg/dL) | C.V.<br>(%) | S.D.<br>(mg/dL) | C.V.<br>(%) | | 44.6 | 0.25 | 0.5% | 0.5 | 1.2% | | 120.7 | 1.35 | 1.1% | 1.7 | 1.4% | | 180.8 | 1.74 | 0.9% | 2.1 | 1.1% | | 375.2 | 0.6 | 0.1% | 0.8 | 0.2% | | 626.03 | 0.6 | 0.09% | 0.8 | 0.1% | #### Figure 1 - Glucose Mean, Standard Deviation & %CV for all 80 Results {8}------------------------------------------------ #### b. Linearity/Reportable Range Linearity studies were designed using CLSI EP06-A. Samples were prepared by intermixing a high serum pool with a low serum pool to obtain thirteen concentrations across the measuring range with four replicates at each concentration. The observed values were compared to the expected values and the results of linear regression are summarized below. #### Linearity Results: | Measurand | Slope | Intercept | R2 | Sample Range<br>Tested | Claimed Measuring<br>Range | |-----------------|--------|-----------|--------|------------------------|----------------------------| | Glucose (mg/dL) | 0.9928 | 1.3499 | 0.9999 | 6.5-900 | 8-885 | #### Calibrators The Synermed IR Cal II was previously cleared in K940571 and is traceable to NIST standard number 917-C; no modification was made. #### c. Analytical Specificity Interference studies were performed according to CLSI EP07-A2. Effects of common endogenous substances including bilirubin, hemoglobin, triglycerides and uric acid were evaluated by spiking serum pools with interferent at two analyte levels and at two concentrations of interferent. Additionally, common medications known to potentially affect the glucose assav were also tested at two analyte levels and at two concentrations of interferent. The sponsor defined significant interference as a bias of ≥=10% between the spiked and unspiked samples. Finally, any substance seen to interfere with the glucose assav was further studied using the dose-response procedure laid out on CLSI EP07-A2. Synermed will still reference in the product insert Young, D.S., Effects of Drugs on Clinical Laboratory Tests, 5th ed. Vol.2 AACC Press, Washington, D.C., 2000. The test results are summarized below: Effects of common endogenous substances including conjugated bilirubin (0.76 and 20 mg/dL), unconjugated bilirubin (0.76 and 20mg/dL), hemoglobin (100 and 500 mg/dL), triglycerides (176.99 and 3274.34mg/dL) and uric acid (11.77 and 23.54mg/dL) were evaluated at two different glucose concentrations (80 mg/dL and 120 mg/dL) for interference. Furthermore, the following exogenous substances: ascorbic acid (1.22 and 6.02mg/dL), acetaminophen (20.11 and 200.18ug/mL), genatmicin (7.51 and 10.05ug/mL), ibuprofen (40.08 and 500.21ug/mL), L-dopa (0.41 and 1.24µg/ml/L), methyldopa (4.24 and 14.99µg/mL), N-acetylcysteine (0.08 and 0.25mg/dL), ofloxacin (8.78 and 17.5mg/L), salicyluric acid 0.2 and 0.6ug/mL), tetracycline (3.78 and 16.27ug.mL) were evaluated at two different glucose concentrations (80 mg/dL and 120 mg/dL) for interference. The sponsor defined non-significant interference when the bias between the tested and control samples are within +/-10%. The sponsor identified ascorbic acid, methyldopa, levofloxacin, salicyluric acid, uric acid as interferants (see table). {9}------------------------------------------------ #### Figure 2 - Results Summary, Dose-Response The Synermed Glucose measurement procedure was evaluated for interference according to CLSI document EP07-A2. The following study results demonstrate that the following substances do not interfere with the Synermed Glucose assay at the highest concentration listed. A bias of < 9.99% is considered non-significant interference. * | Interfering Substance | Highest Tested Concentration of<br>Substance Without Significant<br>Interference at Glucose<br>Concentration = 80mg/dL | Highest Tested Concentration of<br>Substance Without Significant<br>Interference at Glucose<br>Concentration = 120mg/dL | |-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Ascorbic Acid | 4.82mg/dL | 4.82mg/dL | | Methyldopa | 12.31µg/mL | 12.31µg/mL | | Ofloxacin | 8.78mg/L | 8.78mg/L | | Salicyluric Acid | 0.5µg/mL | 0.6µg/mL | | Uric Acid | 20.6mg/dL | 20.6mg/dL | *Upper limit of 95% confidence interval. #### Glucose Significant interference from uric acid was observed when testing at both concentrations of glucose. Additionally, significant interference was seen with the following exogenous substances: ascorbic acid, methyldopa and salicyluric acid. See table below: | Interferent | Interferent<br>Concentration | % Bias<br>Seen at<br>Glucose<br>80mg/dL | % Bias<br>Seen at<br>Glucose<br>120mg/dL | |---------------------|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------| | Ascorbic<br>Acid | 6.02mg/dL | -11.7 | -13.0 | | Methyldopa | 14.99ug/mL | -10 | -11.1 | | Salicyluric<br>Acid | 0.6ug/mL | -13.7 | -8.7 *not<br>significant | | Uric Acid | 23.54mg/dL | -10.7 | -11.5 | ## Figure 3 – Significant Interferents and Their Bias ## d. Detection Limit Refer to the linearity data for the linearity results used to support the measuring range. Limit of Blank (LoB), Limit of Detection (LoD) and Limit of Quantitation (LoQ) were evaluated following CLSI EP17-A. Results are summarized in the table below. ## Results: | Measurand | LoB | LoD | LoQ | Claimed<br>Range | |-------------------------|-----|------|-----|------------------| | Glucose (Serum) (mg/dL) | 2.8 | 3.65 | 8.0 | 8-885 | {10}------------------------------------------------ ## e. Comparison Studies Method comparison was performed according to CLSI EP09-A3, 115 samples for glucose were tested on the IR-1200 and Hitachi 717 chemistry analyzers. Thirteen percent (15 of the 115) samples studied were modified to cover the entire claimed measuring range. Modification of samples was obtained by intermixing patient serum pools with disparate results. # Results: | Test | Sample<br>Type | Total #<br>Samples | Sample<br>Range<br>Tested | Claimed<br>Measuring<br>Range | Slope | Intercept | Correlation<br>Coefficient | |---------------|----------------|--------------------|---------------------------|-------------------------------|-------|-----------|----------------------------| | Glucose mg/dL | Serum | 115 | 15-885 | 8-885 | 0.988 | -0.178 | 0.9994 | # 16. Expected Values/Reference Range The sponsor has provided the following Expected Values in labeling: Glucose: 74-106 mg/dL # References: Tietz NW, editor: Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry, 6th ed., WB Saunders Co., PA, 2008. # 17. Conclusions The new device is substantially equivalent to the predicate because it has the same intended use and has the same or similar technological characteristics that do not raise new types of questions of safety and effectiveness.
Innolitics

Panel 1

/
Sort by
Ready

Predicate graph will load when search results are available.

Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.

PDF viewer will load when search results are available.

Loading panels...

Select an item from Submissions

Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.

Section Matches

Results will appear here.

Product Code Matches

Results will appear here.

Special Control Matches

Results will appear here.

Loading collections...