K230746 · Shandong Haidike Medical Products Co., Ltd. · GAW · Sep 14, 2023 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K230746
Device Name
Non absorbable Surgical Polypropylene Suture
Applicant
Shandong Haidike Medical Products Co., Ltd.
Product Code
GAW · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Sep 14, 2023
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.5010
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
Non absorbable Surgical Polypropylene Suture is indicated for use in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, but not for use in ophthalmic procedures, cardiovascular and neurological procedures. The device is limited to use where short term wound support (7-10 days) is required and can be left in place for a maximum of 10 days.
Device Story
Nonabsorbable monofilament surgical suture composed of polypropylene; dyed blue with [phtalocyaninato(2-)] copper. Available in USP sizes 6-0 through 2; lengths 75cm or 150cm; supplied with or without stainless steel needles. Sterilized via ethylene oxide. Used by clinicians for general soft tissue approximation and ligation. Provides short-term wound support for up to 10 days. Device performance verified through bench testing against USP and ASTM standards; biocompatibility confirmed via ISO 10993 series testing.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Bench testing only. Performance verified via USP <861> (diameter), <871> (needle attachment), <881> (tensile strength), and ASTM standards for needle penetration/bending. Biocompatibility validated per ISO 10993 (cytotoxicity, sensitization, intracutaneous reactivity, systemic toxicity, genotoxicity, implantation, hemolysis) and USP <151>/<85> (pyrogen/endotoxin).
Technological Characteristics
Monofilament polypropylene suture; dyed with [phtalocyaninato(2-)] copper (<0.1%). Sizes 6-0 to 2. Stainless steel needles. Sterilized via ethylene oxide. Complies with USP <861>, <871>, <881>; ASTM F88, F1929, F756, F3014, F1874; ISO 10993-3, -5, -6, -7, -10, -11.
Indications for Use
Indicated for general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation in patients requiring short-term wound support (7-10 days). Contraindicated for ophthalmic, cardiovascular, and neurological procedures. Maximum duration of use is 10 days.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Nonabsorbable polypropylene surgical suture is a monofilament, nonabsorbable, sterile, flexible thread prepared from long-chain polyolefin polymer known as polypropylene and is indicated for use in soft tissue approximation. The polypropylene surgical suture meets United States Pharmacopeia (U.S.P.) requirements as described in the U.S.P. Monograph for Nonabsorbable Surgical Sutures; it may be undyed or dyed with an FDA approved color additive; and the suture may be provided with or without a standard needle attached.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control for this device is FDA's “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Surgical Sutures; Guidance for Industry and FDA.” See § 878.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA logo on the right. The FDA logo is in blue and includes the agency's name, "U.S. Food & Drug Administration."
September 14, 2023
Shandong Haidike Medical Products Co.,Ltd. Yan Wang Registration Manager Tianfu Road, Dongcheng District, Shan County, Heze, Shandong 274300 China
Re: K230746
Trade/Device Name: Non absorbable Surgical Polypropylene Suture Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.5010 Regulation Name: Nonabsorbable Polypropylene Surgical Suture Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: GAW Dated: March 15, 2023 Received: March 17, 2023
Dear Yan Wang:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
| Tek N.<br>Lamichhane -<br>S | Digitally signed by<br>Tek N. Lamichhane -S<br>Date: 2023.09.14<br>09:51:31 -04'00' |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Tek N. Lamichhane, Ph. D. Assistant Director DHT4B: Division of Infection Control and Plastic Surgery Devices OHT4: Office of Surgical and Infection Control Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K230746
Device Name
Non Absorbable Surgical Polypropylene Suture
Indications for Use (Describe)
Non absorbable Surgical Polypropylene Suture is indicated for use in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, but not for use in ophthalmic procedures, cardiovascular and neurological procedures. The device is limited to use where short term wound support (7-10 days) is required and can be left in place for a maximum of 10 days.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <div> <span> <span style="font-size: 10pt;">☑</span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) </span> </div> |
| <div> <span> <span style="font-size: 10pt;">□</span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) </span> </div> |
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
## 510(k) Summary
This 510(k) Summary is being submitted in accordance with requirements of Title 21, CFR Section 807.92.
The assigned 510(k) Number: K230746
- 1. Date of Preparation: 08/12/2023
- 2. Sponsor Identification
### Shandong Haidike Medical Product Co., Ltd.
Tianfu Road, Dongcheng District, Shan County, 274300 Heze City, Shandong Province, China.
Establishment Registration Number: 3016426842
Contact Person: Yan Wang Position: Registration Manager Tel: +86-530-4660062 Fax: +86-530-4660055 Email: registration(01(@suturescn.com
- 3. Identification of Subject Device:
Trade Name: Non Absorbable Surgical Polypropylene Suture Common Name: Nonabsorbable Polypropylene Surgical Suture
#### Regulatory Information
Classification Name: Suture, Nonabsorbable, Synthetic, Polypropylene Classification: II Product Code: GAW Regulation Number: 21CFR 878.5010 Review Panel: General & Plastic Surgery
- 4. Identification of Predicate Device 510(k) Number: K080684 Regulation Number: 21CFR 878.5010 Classification: II Product Code: GAW Review Panel: General & Plastic Surgery Product name: WG-Surgical Sutures with Needle
{4}------------------------------------------------
- 5. Device description
The subject device is a nonabsorbable monofilament surgical suture which is supplied sterile. The proposed device is dyed blue. The color additive is [phtalocyaninato(2-)] copper(Color Index Number 74160), and the weight percentage for the color additive is less than 0.1%. The device will be offered in diameters ranging from USP size 6-0 through 2 and is available in length 75cm or 150cm with or without needles attached. Polypropylene suture meets all the requirements of USP for Non-absorbable surgical suture.
- 6. Indications for Use
Non absorbable Surgical Polypropylene Suture is indicated for use in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, but not for use in ophthalmic procedures, cardiovascular and neurological procedures. The device is limited to use where short term wound support (7-10 days) is required and can be left in place for a maximum of 10 days.
- 7. Technological characteristic comparison
| ITEM | Subject Device<br>(K230746) | Predicate Device<br>(K080684) | Remark |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
| Product Code | GAW | GAW | Same |
| Regulation Number | 21CFR 878.5010 | 21CFR 878.5010 | Same |
| Class | II | II | Same |
| Sterile | Ethylene Oxide (EO) | Ethylene Oxide (EO) | Same |
| Indication for Use | Non absorbable Surgical<br>Polypropylene Suture is indicated<br>for use in general soft tissue<br>approximation and/or ligation, but<br>not for use in ophthalmic<br>procedures, cardiovascular and<br>neurological procedures. The<br>device is limited to use where<br>short term wound support (7-10<br>days) is required and can be left<br>in place for a maximum of 10<br>days. | Nonabsorbable Polypropylene<br>Suture with Needle is indicated<br>for use in general soft tissue<br>approximation and/or ligation<br>including use in cardiovascular,<br>ophthalmic and neurological<br>procedures. | Analysis 1 |
| Configuration | Polypropylene Suture with or<br>without needle | Polypropylene Suture with needle | Similar |
| Suture | | | |
| Material | Polypropylene | Polypropylene | Same |
Table 1: Comparison of Technological Characteristics
{5}------------------------------------------------
| Structure | Monofilament | Monofilament | Same |
|----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
| Dyed, Un-dyed | Dyed | Dyed | Same |
| Colorant | [phtalocyaninato(2-)] copper | Blue | Analysis 2 |
| Length | 75cm, 150cm | Unknown | Analysis |
| Diameter | 6-0 through 2 | 10-0 through 2 | 3 |
| <b>Needle</b> | | | |
| Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel | Same |
| <b>Performance Test</b> | | | |
| Diameter of suture | Comply with USP <861> | All characteristics meet USP<br>Requirement | |
| Needle Attachment | Comply with USP <871> | Same | |
| Tensile Strength | Comply with USP <881> | | |
| Length | Not less than 95.0% of the<br>length stated on the label | Unknown | Analysis3 |
| <b>Suture Biocompatibility</b> | | | |
| Cytotoxicity | The viability is not reduced to less<br>than 70% | | |
| Sensitization | The Magnusson and Kligman<br>grades is less than 1. | | |
| Intracutaneous<br>Reactivity | The erythema and edema grades is<br>less than 1.0. | The specific test items are<br>unknown. However, the product<br>should meet the requirements of<br>ISO10993 series standards. | |
| Acute systemic<br>toxicity | No animal died or abnormal<br>behavior occurred. | | |
| Pyrogen | Temperature raise is less than 0.5℃<br>No behavioral change or sign of<br>toxicity was observed.<br>Clinical pathology parameter<br>within the reference range. | | |
| Subacute<br>Systemic Toxicity | No macroscopic changes in the<br>viscera at necropsy.<br>Histopathology within normal<br>histomorphological limits | | |
| Bacterial<br>Reverse<br>Mutation | No obviously increase in the mean<br>number of revertant of colonies<br>between the test group and control<br>group. | | |
| Chromosome<br>Aberration | No significant difference in the<br>percentage of cells with<br>chromosome aberrations<br>between the test group and<br>control group. | | |
| Gene Mutation | There was no significant difference<br>in the TFT-resistant mutant<br>frequency between the test article | | |
{6}------------------------------------------------
| Implantation | No lesion at the implantation site.<br>The irritation score is less than 1.0. |
|--------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Hemolysis | Hemolytic index is less than 2% |
Analysis 1-Indication for Use
The indication for use for the subject device is not exactly the same as the predicate device. The proposed device is just indicated for general tissue approximation but not for use in ophthalmic procedures, cardiovascular and neurological procedures and this indication can be covered by the predicate device. In addition, the longest duration of use for the proposed device is up to 10 days, while the predicate device is a permanent contact device per the contact duration. However, the biocompatibility test has been conducted on the proposed device and the test result showed that the material and colorant of the proposed device will not have an adverse effect when used for up to 10 days.
#### Analysis 2- Colorant
The material and colorant of the proposed device is different from the predicate device. However, the biocompatibility test has been conducted on the proposed device and the test result showed that the material and colorant of the proposed device will not have adverse effects. Therefore, the difference will not affect the safety and effectiveness of the proposed device.
#### Analysis 3- Length & Diameter
The length and diameter of the proposed device is different from the predicate device. However, the length and diameter of the proposed device are within the range of that of the predicate device. In addition, the performance test about the length and diameter has been conducted on the subject device and the test result shows that the length and diameter of the proposed device met the acceptance criteria. Therefore, the difference will not affect the safety and effectiveness of the proposed device.
#### 8. Non-Clinical Performance Data
Non clinical tests were conducted to verify that the subject device met all design specifications as was Substantially Equivalent (SE) to the predicate device. The test results demonstrated that the subject device complies with the following standards:
- ASTM F88/F88M-15 Standard Test Method for Seal Strength of Flexible Barrier Materials >
- A ASTM F1929-15 Standard Test Method for Detecting Seal Leaks in Porous Medical Packaging by Dye Penetration
- A ASTM F756-17 Standard Practice for Assessment of Hemolytic Properties of Materials
- > ISO 10993-3:2014 Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 3: Tests for genotoxicity, carcinogenicity and reproductive toxicity
- > ISO 10993-5:2009 Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 5: Tests for in vitro Cytotoxicity
- > ISO 10993-6:2016 Biological evaluation of medical devices -- Part 6: Tests for local effects
- A after implantation
- > ISO 10993-7:2008 Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 7: Ethylene oxide sterilization residuals
- > ISO 10993-10 Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 10: Tests for irritation and skin
{7}------------------------------------------------
Sensitization
- > ISO 10993-11:2017 Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 11: Tests for systemic Toxicity
- USP<151> Pyrogen Test (USP Rabbit Test) A
- > USP<85>Bacterial Endotoxins Test
- > USP<861>Sutures - Diameter
- > USP<871>Sutures - Needle Attachment
- > USP<881>Tensile Strength
- > ASTM F3014-14 Standard Test Method for Penetration Testing of Needles Used in Surgical Sutures
- > ASTM F1874-98 Standard Test Method for Bend Testing of Needles Used in Surgical Sutures
- 9. Clinical Test Conclusion
No clinical study is included in this submission.
#### 10. Conclusion
The conclusions drawn from the nonclinical tests demonstrate that the proposed subject device is as safe, effective, and performs as well as the legally marketed predicate device, K080684.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.