INFINITY Total Ankle System

K172633 · Wrightmedicaltechnologyinc · HSN · Apr 26, 2018 · Orthopedic

Device Facts

Record IDK172633
Device NameINFINITY Total Ankle System
ApplicantWrightmedicaltechnologyinc
Product CodeHSN · Orthopedic
Decision DateApr 26, 2018
DecisionSESE
Submission TypeTraditional
Regulation21 CFR 888.3110
Device ClassClass 2
AttributesTherapeutic

Intended Use

INFINITY Total Ankle System is intended to give a patient limited mobility by reducing pain, restoring alignment and replacing the flexion and extension movement in the ankle joint.

Device Story

Fixed-bearing, bone-sparing ankle replacement prosthesis; restores mobility to failing ankle joints. System comprises three components: tibial tray, poly insert, and talar dome. Talar dome manufactured via additive manufacturing (Direct Metal Laser Sintering). Device implanted by orthopedic surgeons in clinical/surgical settings. Restores flexion/extension movement, reduces pain, and corrects alignment. Benefits patients with severe arthritis or failed prior surgery.

Clinical Evidence

No clinical data; substantial equivalence demonstrated via non-clinical bench testing. Bench testing included chemical analysis, abrasion resistance, stereological evaluation, compressive/shear/tensile strength, fatigue testing, MRI safety analysis, and DMLS process validation (mechanical/microstructure).

Technological Characteristics

Fixed-bearing, three-component ankle prosthesis (tibial tray, poly insert, talar dome). Talar dome produced via Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) additive manufacturing. MR Conditional. Sterilization methods identical to predicates.

Indications for Use

Indicated for patients with ankle joints damaged by severe rheumatoid, post-traumatic, or degenerative arthritis, or patients with a failed previous ankle surgery. In the US, intended for cement use only.

Regulatory Classification

Identification

An ankle joint metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace an ankle joint. The device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces and has no linkage across-the-joint. This generic type of device includes prostheses that have a talar resurfacing component made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, and a tibial resurfacing component made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene and is limited to those prostheses intended for use with bone cement (§ 888.3027).

Predicate Devices

Related Devices

Submission Summary (Full Text)

{0}------------------------------------------------ Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. Tara Conrad Regulatory Affairs Specialist II 1023 Cherry Road Memphis, Tennessee 38117 April 26, 2018 ## Re: K172633 Trade/Device Name: INFINITY Total Ankle System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3110 Regulation Name: Ankle joint metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: HSN Dated: March 26, 2018 Received: March 27, 2018 Dear Ms. Conrad: We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading. If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050. {1}------------------------------------------------ Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance. For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100). Sincerely, # Katherine D. Kavlock -S for Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health Enclosure {2}------------------------------------------------ #### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration ## Indications for Use 510(k) Number (if known) #### K172633 Device Name INFINITY Total Ankle System #### Indications for Use (Describe) The INFINITY Total Ankle System is indicated for patients with ankle joints damaged by severe theumatoid, posttraumatic, or degenerative arthritis. The INFINITY Total Ankle System is additionally indicated for patients with a failed previous ankle surgery. CAUTION: In the United States, the ankle prosthesis is intended for cement use only. Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) __ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) ### PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED. #### FOR FDA USE ONLY Concurrence of Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) (Signature) {3}------------------------------------------------ This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. #### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.* The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: > Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov "An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number." {4}------------------------------------------------ Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image shows the Wright logo. The logo consists of two overlapping trapezoids, one red and one orange, followed by the word "WRIGHT" in red, and the words "FOCUSED EXCELLENCE" in gray below. The logo is simple and modern, and the colors are bright and eye-catching. 1023 Cherry Road Memphis, TN 38117 wright.com ### 510(K) SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS In accordance with the Food and Drug Administration Rule to implement provisions of the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990 and in conformance with 21 CFR 807.92, this information serves as a Summary of Safety and Effectiveness for the use of the INFINITY™ Total Ankle System. | (a)(1). Submitted By: | Wright Medical Technology, Inc.<br>1023 Cherry Road<br>Memphis, TN 38117 | |------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Date: | April 25, 2018 | | Contact Person: | Tara Conrad<br>Regulatory Affairs Specialist II<br>Office (901) 867-4367<br>Fax (901) 867-4190 | | (a)(2). Proprietary Name: | INFINITY Total Ankle System | | Common Name: | Total Ankle Prosthesis | | Classification Name and Reference: | 21 CFR 888.3110 - Class II | | Device Product Code, Device Panel: | HSN - Orthopedic | | (a)(3). Predicate Device: | K123954, K140749 –INFINITY Total Ankle<br>System<br>K141740 - INBONE and INFINITY Total Ankle<br>Systems<br>K161742- Aequalis PerFORM Reversed,<br>Aequalis PerFORM+ Reversed Glenoid | #### (a)(4). Device Description The subject INFINITY™ Total Ankle System is a fixed-bearing, bone-sparing ankle replacement prosthesis that restores mobility to a failing ankle joint. The system includes three components (i.e., tibial tray, poly insert, and talar dome) that are assembled together to create the two-piece prosthesis. The talar dome is manufactured using additive manufacturing technology. #### (a)(5). Intended Use INFINITY Total Ankle System is intended to give a patient limited mobility by reducing pain, restoring alignment and replacing the flexion and extension movement in the ankle joint. {5}------------------------------------------------ ### Indications for Use INFINITY Total Ankle System is indicated for patients with ankle joints damaged by severe rheumatoid, post-traumatic, or degenerative arthritis. INFINITY Total Ankle System is additionally indicated for patients with a failed previous ankle surgery. CAUTION: In the United States, the ankle prosthesis is intended for cement use only. ## (a)(6). Technological Characteristics Comparison The INFINITY Total Ankle System has identical indications, utilizes similar instrumentation, is made from identical materials, and has identical sterilization methods when compared to the legally marketed predicate devices. ## (b)(1). Substantial Equivalence- Non-Clinical Evidence Non-clinical performance bench testing was performed to demonstrate substantial equivalence to the predicate devices. - Chemical Analysis - Abrasion Resistance - Stereological Evaluation - Compressive Strength - Shear and Tensile Strength - Fatigue Testing - MRI Safety Analysis - Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) Process Validation - Operational Qualification-Mechanical validation and Microstructure o - Performance Qualification- Mechanical validation and Microstructure o - . Powder Bed Position Validation - . Powder Recycling Validation - Endotoxin (<20EU/device) ## (b)(2). Substantial Equivalence- Clinical Evidence Clinical Studies were not required to demonstrate substantial equivalence between the subject device and the predicate devices. #### (b)(3). Substantial Equivalence- Conclusions The design characteristics of the subject system do not raise any new types of questions of safety or effectiveness. From the evidence submitted in this 510(k), the subject devices can be expected to perform at least as well as the predicate devices. In addition, the subject device is expected to pose minimal risk to patients when placed in an MR environment and is categorized as MR Conditional.
Innolitics

Panel 1

/
Sort by
Ready

Predicate graph will load when search results are available.

Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.

PDF viewer will load when search results are available.

Loading panels...

Select an item from Submissions

Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.

Section Matches

Results will appear here.

Product Code Matches

Results will appear here.

Special Control Matches

Results will appear here.

Loading collections...