K202762 · Smith & Nephew, Inc. · KTT · Nov 16, 2020 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K202762
Device Name
Circular Fixation with Balanced Cable Transport
Applicant
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Product Code
KTT · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Nov 16, 2020
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3030
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic, Pediatric
Indications for Use
External fixation devices are used on adults or pediatric patients as required. External fixation systems consist of various components that are used to build fixator assemblies unique to the patient's needs. These devices are modular therefore, a multitude of different fixator frame configurations are possible. External fixation devices are used for the following indications: 1. Fractures and disease which generally may result in joint contractures or loss of range of motion and fractures requiring distraction 2. Open and closed fracture fixation 3. Pseudoarthrosis of long bones 4. Limb lengthening by distraction (not applicable for use with COMPASS Universal Hinge) 5. Correction of bony or soft tissue deformities (not applicable for use with COMPASS Universal Hinge). 6. Joint arthrodesis (not applicable for use with COMPASS Universal Hinge) 7. Infected fractures 8. Nonunions The indications for use listed above cover many of the external fixation systems marketed by Smith & Nephew. These indications are similar to the indications of the predicate device is intended for single use.
Device Story
Circular fixation system for bone transport and limb lengthening; consists of cables, pulleys, and telescopic struts attached to ring-based circular fixation construct. Cable routed through bone segment, exiting soft tissue; struts act as motor to pull cable, moving bone segments. Used by surgeons in clinical settings to build patient-specific fixator assemblies. Reduces need for half pins and wires; minimizes soft tissue disruption; eliminates need to pull pins/wires through skin during bone movement. Benefits include improved patient comfort and reduced soft tissue trauma.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Bone transport testing demonstrated no significant difference in maximum load-carrying capacity compared to the predicate device. Biocompatibility assessment concluded struts are equivalent to the predicate system.
Technological Characteristics
Modular external fixation system; components include wires, cables, pulleys, and telescopic struts. Materials and processing equivalent to predicate ILIZAROV Pulley System. Struts classified as Class II non-sterile, non-patient contacting instruments. Mechanical actuation via cable tensioning.
Indications for Use
Indicated for adults or pediatric patients requiring external fixation for fractures, disease resulting in joint contractures or loss of range of motion, fractures requiring distraction, open/closed fracture fixation, pseudoarthrosis of long bones, limb lengthening, correction of bony/soft tissue deformities, joint arthrodesis, infected fractures, and nonunions.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Single/multiple component metallic bone fixation appliances and accessories are devices intended to be implanted consisting of one or more metallic components and their metallic fasteners. The devices contain a plate, a nail/plate combination, or a blade/plate combination that are made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, stainless steel, and titanium, that are intended to be held in position with fasteners, such as screws and nails, or bolts, nuts, and washers. These devices are used for fixation of fractures of the proximal or distal end of long bones, such as intracapsular, intertrochanteric, intercervical, supracondylar, or condylar fractures of the femur; for fusion of a joint; or for surgical procedures that involve cutting a bone. The devices may be implanted or attached through the skin so that a pulling force (traction) may be applied to the skeletal system.
{0}------------------------------------------------
November 16, 2020
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
Crystal Higgenbottom-Shaffer Regulatory Affairs Specialist I 7135 Goodlett Farms Parkway Cordova, Tennessee 38016
Re: K202762
Trade/Device Name: Circular Fixation with Balanced Cable Transport Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3030 Regulation Name: Single/Multiple Component Metallic Bone Fixation Appliances And Accessories Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: KTT Dated: September 15, 2020 Received: September 21, 2020
Dear Crystal Higgenbottom-Shaffer:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for
{1}------------------------------------------------
devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
Ting Song, Ph.D., R.A.C. Assistant Director DHT6A: Division of Joint Arthroplasty Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
### Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
K202762
#### Device Name
Circular Fixation with Balanced Cable Transport
Indications for Use (Describe)
External fixation devices are used on adults or pediatric patients as required. External fixation systems consist of various components that are used to build fixator assemblies unique to the patient's needs. These devices are modular therefore, a multitude of different fixator frame configurations are possible. External fixation devices are used for the following indications:
1. Fractures and disease which generally may result in joint contractures or loss of range of motion and fractures requiring distraction
2. Open and closed fracture fixation
- 3. Pseudoarthrosis of long bones
- 4. Limb lengthening by distraction (not applicable for use with
- COMPASS Universal Hinge)
- 5. Correction of bony or soft tissue deformities (not applicable for use with COMPASS Universal Hinge).
- 6. Joint arthrodesis (not applicable for use with COMPASS Universal Hinge)
- 7. Infected fractures
- 8. Nonunions
The indications for use listed above cover many of the external fixation systems marketed by Smith & Nephew. These indications are similar to the indications of the predicate device is intended for single use.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
K202762 Page 1 of 6
## 510(k) SUMMARY
| Submitted by: | Smith & Nephew, Inc.<br>Advanced Surgical Devices Division<br>7135 Goodlett Farms Parkway<br>Cordova, Tennessee 38016 |
|----------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date of Submission: | September 15, 2020 |
| Contact Person: | Crystal Higgenbottom-Shaffer, Regulatory Affairs<br>Specialist I<br>T (901) 800-3364<br>M (901) 832-2616 |
| Name of Device: | Circular Fixation with Balanced Cable Transport |
| Common Name: | External Fixation System |
| Device Classification Name<br>and Reference: | 21 CFR 888.3030- Single/multiple component metallic<br>bone fixation appliances and accessories- Class II |
| Device Class: | Class II |
| Panel Code: | Orthopedic/87 |
| Product Code: | KTT |
| Predicate Device: | ILIZAROV Pulley System – K042436<br>The predicate device has not been subject to a<br>design related recall. |
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### K202762 Page 2 of 6
#### 510(k) SUMMARY
#### Device Description:
The subject of this Traditional 510k is the Circular Fixation with Balanced Cable Transport. Originally, the subject device was identified as the ILIZAROV with Balanced Cable Transport. It has since been decided as a company's decision to change the name of the subject device to Circular Fixation with Balanced Cable Transport. In addition, there was an update to the indications for use language since the Pre-Submission. The subject Circular Fixation with Balanced Cable Transport is a product line addition to the predicate, ILIZAROV Pulley System. The Circular Fixation with Balanced Cable Transport consists of cables, pulleys, and the new subject devices, the struts. The existing cables and pulleys are cleared on a similar external fixation system, the predicate ILIZAROV Pulley System, via premarket notification K042436 S.E. 10/07/2004. In the subject, Circular Fixation with Balanced Cable Transport, the cable is routed through the bone segment and exits through soft tissue. Cables are available in diameter of 1.8mm and a length of 1200mm. The subject telescopic rod or a modified strut acting as a motor is attached to the ring-based circular fixation construct. The subject device is turned to pull the cable and move the bone segments in order to perform bone transport and limb lengthening. The advantages of using the subject Circular Fixation with Balanced Cable Transport, include the ability to use fewer half pins and wires. Fewer half pins and wires will create less soft tissue disruption, eliminating the need to pull pins and wires through the skin and soft tissue as the bone moves.
{5}------------------------------------------------
## K202762 Page 3 of 6 510(k) SUMMARY
#### Intended Use
External fixation devices are used on adults or pediatric patients as required. External fixation systems consist of various components that are used to build fixator assemblies unique to the patient's needs. These devices are modular therefore, a multitude of different fixator frame configurations are possible. External fixation devices are used for the following indications:
1. Fractures and disease which generally may result in joint contractures or loss of range of motion and fractures requiring distraction
- 2. Open and closed fracture fixation
- 3. Pseudoarthrosis of long bones
4. Limb lengthening by distraction (not applicable for use with COMPASS Universal Hinge)
5. Correction of bony or soft tissue deformities (not applicable for use with COMPASS Universal Hinge).
- 6. Joint arthrodesis (not applicable for use with COMPASS Universal Hinge)
- 7. Infected fractures
- 8. Nonunions
The indications for use listed above cover many of the external fixation systems marketed by Smith & Nephew. These indications are similar to the indications of the predicate devices. The device is intended for single use.
{6}------------------------------------------------
# K202762 Page 4 of 6 510(k) SUMMARY
### Technological Characteristics
Device comparisons described in this premarket notification demonstrate that the subject device, The Circular Fixation with Balanced Cable Transport, is substantially equivalent to the below listed legally marketed predicate device with regard to intended use, material, and performance characteristics. The design of the subject Circular Fixation with Balanced Cable Transport system is relatively similar to the predicate ILIZAROV Pulley System, with the exception of the newly modified struts added to the construct. The subject Circular Fixation with Balanced Cable Transport will consist of wires, cables, pulleys, and struts, in comparison to the predicate ILIZAROV Pulley System, consisting of rings, threaded rods, bolts, nuts, washers, pin clamps, wire fixation, pins, wires, cables and pulleys.
#### Substantial Equivalence Information
The overall materials, intended use, indications for use, and the modified subject device design for the Circular Fixation with Balanced Cable Transport, are substantially equivalent to the following commercially available predicate device.
#### Table 6.1: Predicate Devices
| Manufacturer | Description | Submission<br>Number | Clearance Date |
|----------------------|---------------------------|----------------------|----------------|
| Smith & Nephew, Inc. | ILIZAROV Pulley<br>System | K042436 | 10/07/2004 |
{7}------------------------------------------------
# K202762 Page 5 of 6 510(k) SUMMARY
### Performance Testing
To further support a determination of substantial equivalence, non-clinical bench testing was conducted on the subject Circular Fixation with Balanced Cable Transport. A review of the testing indicates that the subject Circular Fixation with Balanced Cable Transport is substantially equivalent to predicate device listed in the Table 6.1 above.
The following tests were used as a basis for the determination of substantial equivalence. The substantial equivalence of the subject devices can be found in Section 13. Provided below is a brief summary of the results that these tests yielded.
- o Bone Transport Testing
- o Based on this analysis, there is no significant difference in the maximum load carrying capacity observed in the predicate device when compared to the subject devices.
- o Biocompatibility
- o The subject struts of the Circular Fixation with Balanced Cable Transport, are equivalent to the previously marketed predicate device the ILIZAROV Pulley System (K042436) in formulation, processing, and sterilization, with the modified subject devices (struts), classified as Class II non-sterile, non-patient contacting instrument devices, that defaults to a low risk categorization and the ISO 10993-1 not applicable.
{8}------------------------------------------------
# K202762 Page 6 of 6 510(k) SUMMARY
### Conclusion
As previously noted, this 510(k) Premarket Notification is being submitted to request clearance for the subject Circular Fixation with Balanced Cable Transport. Based on the similarities to the predicate device, ILIZAROV Pulley System, and a review of the Bone Transport Testing, we believe the subject devices are substantially equivalent to the commercially available predicate device listed above.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.