SAC2 is intended for use in clinical and research EEG/EP recordings from humans. It is used with external electrodes as the conductor between the scalp and recessed electrodes to reduce impedance between the electrode surface and the skin.
Device Story
SAC2 is an electroconductive cream used in clinical and research EEG/EP recordings. It acts as a conductive interface between the patient's scalp and external recording electrodes to reduce impedance and improve signal quality. The cream is composed of water, talc, celite, glycerol, carboxymethylcellulose, sodium chloride, potassium chloride, phenoxyethanol, and ethylhexylglycerin. It is supplied in 100g aluminum tubes. The device is applied topically to intact skin by neurologists or trained clinical staff. By lowering skin-electrode impedance, the cream facilitates better signal acquisition for electrophysiological monitoring. It is a non-invasive, single-use, non-sterile product.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. No clinical data. Performance testing included accelerated aging (ASTM F1980-16) to validate a 3-year shelf life, and electrical performance testing (AC impedance and DC offset) per ANSI/AAMI EC12:2000/(R)2015. Biocompatibility testing (ISO 10993-5, ISO 10993-10) confirmed cytotoxicity, irritation, and sensitization safety.
Technological Characteristics
Electroconductive cream; aqueous solvent base with NaCl and KCl conductors, thickening agents (CarboxyMethylCellulose, Glycerol), and preservatives (Phenoxyethanol, Ethylhexylglycerin). pH 8-10; impedance 50 ± 10 Ohm at 10Hz; conductivity 20 mS/cm. Non-sterile, single-use. Packaged in 100g aluminum tubes. Complies with ANSI/AAMI EC12:2000/(R)2015 for electrical performance.
Indications for Use
Indicated for use in clinical and research EEG/EP recordings in adults and children. Used as a conductive medium between scalp and external electrodes to reduce impedance.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Electroconductive media are the conductive creams or gels used with external electrodes to reduce the impedance (resistance to alternating current) of the contact between the electrode surface and the skin.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: a symbol on the left and the FDA acronym with the full name of the agency on the right. The symbol on the left is a stylized representation of a human figure, while the FDA acronym is in blue, followed by the full name of the agency, "U.S. Food & Drug Administration," in a smaller font size.
January 17, 2020
Spes Medica S.r.l. Giorgio Facco Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance Via Europa - zona industriale Battipaglia (SA), 84091 Italy
Re: K192606
Trade/Device Name: SAC2 - Electrode Cream Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.1275 Regulation Name: Electroconductive Media Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: GYB Dated: September 16, 2019 Received: September 20, 2019
Dear Giorgio Facco:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you. however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal
{1}------------------------------------------------
statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
For Vivek Pinto, Ph.D. Director DHT5B: Division of Neuromodulation and Physical Medicine Devices OHT5: Office of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K192606
Device Name SAC2 - Electrode cream
Indications for Use (Describe)
SAC2 is intended for use in clinical and research EEG/EP recordings from humans. It is used with external electrodes as the conductor between the scalp and recessed electrodes to reduce impedance between the electrode surface and the skin.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <div> <span> <span style="font-size: 20px;">☑</span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) </span> </div> | <div> <span> <span style="font-size: 20px;">☐</span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) </span> </div> |
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.* The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the
time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
| Image: Globe logo | SAC2 – Electrode cream | REV. | 2 | Date<br>REV. | 01.16.2020 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|---|--------------|------------|
| Traditional 510(k) | Spes Medica S.r.l. Via Europa , Zona Industriale – 84091<br>Battipaglia (SA) | 510(k) Summary | | | |
| | | | | Page 1 of 7 | |
# 510(k) Summary
| Manufacturer's Name: | Spes Medica S.r.l.<br>via Europa (Zona Ind.le), 84091 Battipaglia (SA) - Italy |
|----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Official Correspondent: | Giorgio Facco<br>Quality Assurance and Regulatory Affairs |
| Telephone Number: | 0039 0828 614191 |
| Fax Number: | 0039 0828 341788 |
| Trade Names: | SAC2 - Electrode cream |
| Common or Usual Name: | Media, Electroconductive |
| Classification Name: | Electroconductive Media |
| Device Class: | Class II |
| Product Code: | GYB |
| Classification Regulation: | 882.1275 |
| Predicate Device: | Tech Dots – Adhesive and Conductive Gel<br>510(k) number: K190050 |
| Device Description: | SAC2 is intended for use in clinical and research EEG/EP recordings from humans. It<br>is used with external electrodes as the conductor between the scalp and recessed<br>electrodes to reduce impedance between the electrode surface and the skin.<br>SAC2 is provided in an aluminum tube of 100g.<br>It's characterized by light grey colour, no crystallization, no flocculation, no adverse<br>smell, opaque.<br>SAC2 function is of conductor between the electrode used and the patient's skin and<br>of getting the impedance lower for a better recording of the signal. SAC2 is for<br>external use with recording electrodes only.<br>SAC2 is made of powders, Potassium Chloride and Sodium Chloride as conductors,<br>combined with thickening agents and humectants, all in an aqueous solvent.<br>The composition is the following:<br>Water, Talc, Celite, Glycerol, CarboxyMethylCellulose, Sodium chloride, Potassium<br>chloride, Phenoxyethanol, Ehylhexylglycerin<br>The pH range is 8÷10, and Impedance at 10Hz is 50 ± 10 Ohm. |
{4}------------------------------------------------
| | SAC2 – Electrode cream | REV. | 2 | Date<br>REV. | 01.16.2020 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|---|--------------|------------|
| | | 510(k) Summary | | | |
| Traditional 510(k) | Spes Medica S.r.l. Via Europa , Zona Industriale – 84091<br>Battipaglia (SA) | | | Page 2 of 7 | |
| The Conductivity is 20 mS/cm<br>Shelf life of SAC2 is 3 years if stored properly in the closed aluminum tube kept<br>away from the sunlight. | | | | | |
| Intended Use: | SAC2 is intended for use in clinical and research EEG/EP recordings from humans. It<br>is used with external electrodes as the conductor between the scalp and recessed<br>electrodes to reduce impedance between the electrode surface and the skin. | | | | |
| Technological Comparison: | SAC2 is a conductive electrode cream contained in an aluminum tube.<br>The characteristics of SAC2 are substantially equivalent to the predicate device. No<br>new questions of safety or effectiveness are raised.<br>SAC2 employs the same technological characteristics as the predicate device with<br>just different appearance: the predicate device is a gel instead SAC2 is a cream. | | | | |
| | To support the technological comparison the ingredients, pH, impedance, weight<br>and conductivity of the SAC2 were evaluated internally and compared to the<br>predicate device. | | | | |
| | Both devices are water based with salt as conductive material and with thickening<br>agents (Glycerin is used for both the products). | | | | |
| | The impedance of the SAC2 is comparable to the predicate device: the impedance<br>evaluated by Spes Medica is 50 ± 10 Ohm. The pH of the SAC2 is between 8 and 10<br>higher than the Predicate Device. | | | | |
| | The predicate device is a gel while the SAC2 is a cream, the different texture was<br>created just to allow the user to choose what he/she prefers to use during the exam<br>(cream or gel). It's just different way of usability of the product. | | | | |
| Substantial Equivalence: | SAC2 is equivalent to the device cleared under K190050 as is presented below in<br>Table. | | | | |
lt has been shown in this 510(k) submission that the differences between SAC2 and the predicate device Tech Dots do not raise any questions regarding its safety and effectiveness. The SAC2 device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device as it has the same intended use and similar technological characteristics as the previously cleared predicate devices.
{5}------------------------------------------------
| Image: Globe logo | SAC2 – Electrode cream | REV. | 2 | Date<br>REV. | 01.16.2020 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|------|---|--------------|------------|
| 510(k) Summary | | | | | |
| Traditional 510(k) | Spes Medica S.r.l. Via Europa, Zona Industriale – 84091<br>Battipaglia (SA) | | | Page 3 of 7 | |
| Manufacturer | Spes Medica S.r.l. | Spes Medica S.r.l. | |
|----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Trade Name | SAC 2 | Tech Dots | |
| 510(k) number | New Device | K190050 | Discussion Differences |
| Product Code | GYB | GYB | |
| Indications for use | SAC2 is intended for use in clinical and research<br>EEG/EP recordings from humans. It is used with<br>external electrodes as the conductor between the<br>scalp and recessed electrodes to reduce impedance<br>between the electrode surface and the skin | Tech Dots are intended for use in clinical and research<br>EEG/EP recordings from humans. They are used with<br>external electrodes as the conductor between the<br>scalp and recessed electrodes to reduce impedance<br>between the electrode surface and the skin | Same as predicate device |
| Regulation Name | Media, Electroconductive | Media, Electroconductive | Same as predicate device |
| Regulation Number | 882.1275 | 882.1275 | Same as predicate device |
| Environment of use | Electrophysiological | Electrophysiological | Same as predicate device |
| Intended user | Neurologists | Neurologists | Same as predicate device |
| Target patient | Adult and children | Adult and children | Same as predicate device |
| Where used | Topically on intact skin | Topically on intact skin | Same as predicate device |
| Conductive material | Salts (NaCl and KCI) | Salt (NaCl) | Same as predicate device |
| Thickening agent | CarboxyMethylCellulose, Glycerol | Sodium Acrylates Copolymers, Glycerin | Equivalent to predicate device |
| Sterilization method | Provide non sterile | Provide non sterile | Same as predicate device |
| Shelf-life | 3 years | 3 years | Same as predicate device |
| Chemical Safety | No OSHA PEL | No OSHA PEL | Same as predicate device |
| Preservative | Phenoxyethanol, Ethylhexylglycerin | No preservative | SAC2 contains preservatives which<br>prevent the spread of bacteria when<br>the tube is opened. The predicate<br>device has a different packaging so<br>preservatives are not necessary.<br>In both cases the products results to<br>be biocompatible, so for SAC2 no new<br>questions of safety or<br>effectiveness are raised. |
{6}------------------------------------------------
| | SAC2 – Electrode cream | REV. | 2 | Date<br>REV. | 01.16.2020 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|---|--------------|------------|
| | | 510(k) Summary | | | |
| Traditional 510(k) | Spes Medica S.r.l. Via Europa, Zona Industriale – 84091<br>Battipaglia (SA) | | | Page 4 of 7 | |
| Manufacturer | Spes Medica S.r.l. | Spes Medica S.r.l. | |
|------------------|-----------------------------------|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Trade Name | SAC 2 | Tech Dots | Discussion Differences |
| 510(k) number | New Device | K190050 | |
| Product Code | GYB | GYB | |
| Biocompatibility | Test in accordance with ISO 10993 | Test in accordance with ISO 10993 | Same as predicate device |
| Cytotoxicity | Yes | Yes | Same as predicate device |
| Irritation | Yes | Yes | Same as predicate device |
| Sensitization | Yes | Yes | Same as predicate device |
| Single Use | Yes | Yes | Same as predicate device |
| pH range | 8÷10 | 4÷5 | The pH of SAC2 is basic, the pH of<br>the predicate device is acid but in<br>both cases the products results to<br>be biocompatible, so for SAC2 no<br>new questions of safety or<br>effectiveness are raised. |
| Impedance | 50 ± 10 Ohm | 80 ± 10 Ohm | SAC2 has an impedance of 50±10<br>Ohms which is lower than the<br>impedance of the predicate device.<br>This can be consider as an<br>improvement as lower impedance<br>means better signal during recording<br>and more conductivity.<br>Considering that, no new questions of<br>safety or effectiveness are raised. |
| Conductivity | 20mS/cm | 2mS/cm | SAC2 results to have a higher value<br>of conductivity comparing to the<br>predicate, this is an advantage<br>(according to the intent of use) as the<br>cream results to be more |
{7}------------------------------------------------
| | SAC2 – Electrode cream | REV. | 2 | Date<br>REV. | 01.16.2020 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|------|----------------|--------------|------------|
| Traditional 510(k) | Spes Medica S.r.l. Via Europa, Zona Industriale – 84091<br>Battipaglia (SA) | REV. | 510(k) Summary | | |
| | | | Page 5 of 7 | | |
| Manufacturer | Spes Medica S.r.l. | Spes Medica S.r.l. | |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Trade Name | SAC 2 | Tech Dots | |
| 510(k) number | New Device | K190050 | Discussion Differences |
| Product Code | GYB | GYB | |
| | | | conductive than the predicate device.<br>Considering that, no new questions of<br>safety or effectiveness<br>are raised. |
| Weight | 100g per tube | $0.14 \pm 0.01$ g per Dot | Different packaging and shape<br>The different packaging was made<br>to give to the users an alternative<br>way to conduct exams. The<br>predicate device is packaged as a<br>pre-set quantity for one electrode<br>( $0.14\pm0.001$ g per dot), with SAC2<br>the user can decide itself the<br>quantity to apply with one<br>electrode. Considering that, no new<br>questions of safety or effectiveness<br>are raised. |
| Characteristics | Salt Base<br>Non-irritating<br>Non toxic | Salt Base<br>Non-irritating<br>Non toxic | Equivalent to predicate device |
| Packaging | Aluminum tube | Aluminum/PET/PE | Different ways of packaging. Both<br>materials are validated. |
{8}------------------------------------------------
| | SAC2 – Electrode cream | | REV. | 2 | Date<br>REV. | 01.16.2020 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|----------------|---|--------------|------------|
| Traditional 510(k) | Spes Medica S.r.l. Via Europa , Zona Industriale – 84091<br>Battipaglia (SA) | | 510(k) Summary | | | |
| | Page 6 of 7 | | | | | |
### Summary of Performance Testing-Biocompatibility
Spes Medica SAC2 is no invasive product, the Biocompatibility Evaluation testing summarized below was conducted on SAC2 to demonstrate compliance of this product to the following standards:
- ●
- ISO 10993-5 Biological evaluation of medical devices -- Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity
- ISO 10993-10 Biological evaluation of medical devices -- Part 10: Tests for irritation and skin sensitization
| Component Name | Type of contact | | | Material |
|----------------|-----------------|-------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | Skin | Blood | Tissue | |
| Cream | Y | N | N | Water, Talc, Celite, Glycerol,<br>CarboxyMethylCellulose, Sodium chloride, Potassium<br>chloride, Phenoxyethanol, Ethylhexylglycerin |
Contact duration: >24h, <30days
#### Performance Testing-Bench Testing
Performance Testing was performed on device characteristics of Spes Medica SAC2. This performance mechanical testing consisted of
- Aging test
The aim of this test was to validate the shelf life of 3 years through an accelerated aging procedure according to the ASTM F1980-16 "Standard guide for accelerated aging of sterile barrier system for medical devices").
Pass/fail criteria was fixed at the beginning of the test and all the result of the parameters evaluated (colour, crystallization, flocculation, brightness, pH, impedance) comply according to the pass/fail criteria: SAC2 should be characterized by light grey colour, no crystallization, no flocculation, opaque. Also, the impedance was evaluated and was found out to comply according to the ANSI/AAMIEC12:2000/(R)2015.
- Long term conductivity
The aim of this test was to evaluate the electrical performances (in terms of AC Impedance and DC Offset Voltage) of the product SAC2 over time.
Pass/fail criteria were set at the beginning of the test according to ANSI/AAMIEC12:2000/(R)2015 : the DC Offset voltage should not exceed 100mV and AC Impedance should not exceed 2000 Ohm. The parameters of AC Impedance and DC Offset Voltage comply according to the ANSI/AAMIEC12:2000/(R)2015 limits even after 7 days testing.
Spes Medica SAC2 are tested internally for pH, impedance on a regular basis
{9}------------------------------------------------
| | SAC2 – Electrode cream | REV. | 2 | Date<br>REV. | 01.16.2020 |
|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|----------------|--------------|------------|
| | Spes Medica S.r.l. Via Europa , Zona Industriale – 84091<br>Battipaglia (SA) | | 510(k) Summary | | |
| | Traditional 510(k) | Page 7 of 7 | | | |
## Conclusion
All performance testing conducted as outlined above demonstrate that the device meets the performance and design specifications.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.