K191496 · Mesa Laboratories, Inc. · FKH · Aug 5, 2019 · Gastroenterology, Urology
Device Facts
Record ID
K191496
Device Name
TDS Standard Solution
Applicant
Mesa Laboratories, Inc.
Product Code
FKH · Gastroenterology, Urology
Decision Date
Aug 5, 2019
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 876.5820
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
This TDS Standard Solution is indicated for verifying the accuracy (calibration) of TDS (Total Dissolved Solids) meters. This standard solution should be used immediately before conductivity meters are used to determine the conductivity of water obtained from water purification systems used in hemodialysis. This solution is prepared from a mixture of salts comprised of 40% Sodium Bicarbonate, 40% Sodium Sufate, and 20% Sodium Chloride which is intended to mimic natural water systems. These solutions are used remotely from the water purification equipment, and do not come into contact with the patient.
Device Story
TDS Standard Solution is a chemical calibration standard consisting of sodium bicarbonate, sodium sulfate, and sodium chloride in de-ionized water. Packaged in HDPE bottles. Used in hemodialysis clinics to verify and calibrate conductivity/TDS meters prior to their use in monitoring water purification systems. The user draws the solution into the meter or dips the sensor into the solution; if the meter reading deviates from the known value, the user performs a manual calibration. The device is used remotely from water purification equipment; no patient contact occurs. Benefits include ensuring accurate water quality monitoring for hemodialysis, which is critical for patient safety.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Validation protocols (VP-00020, VP-00021, VP-00022) confirmed accuracy of 15 ppm, 150 ppm, and 1500 ppm TDS solutions against reference conductivity meters. Shelf-life studies (VP-00030, VP-00073, VP-00074, VP-00075) confirmed stability for 18 months in sealed bottles and 60 days after opening. No clinical data.
Technological Characteristics
Solution of sodium bicarbonate, sodium sulfate, and sodium chloride in de-ionized water. Packaged in HDPE bottles. Conductivity values: 23.8, 229, and 2060 µS/cm. Shelf life: 18 months sealed, 60 days open. No energy source; non-electronic; no software.
Indications for Use
Indicated for verifying the accuracy (calibration) of TDS meters used to determine the conductivity of water in hemodialysis water purification systems. No patient population specified; device does not contact patients.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A hemodialysis system and accessories is a device that is used as an artificial kidney system for the treatment of patients with renal failure or toxemic conditions and that consists of an extracorporeal blood system, a conventional dialyzer, a dialysate delivery system, and accessories. Blood from a patient flows through the tubing of the extracorporeal blood system and accessories to the blood compartment of the dialyzer, then returns through further tubing of the extracorporeal blood system to the patient. The dialyzer has two compartments that are separated by a semipermeable membrane. While the blood is in the blood compartment, undesirable substances in the blood pass through the semipermeable membrane into the dialysate in the dialysate compartment. The dialysate delivery system controls and monitors the dialysate circulating through the dialysate compartment of the dialyzer.(1) The extracorporeal blood system and accessories consists of tubing, pumps, pressure monitors, air foam or bubble detectors, and alarms to keep blood moving safely from the blood access device and accessories for hemodialysis (§ 876.5540) to the blood compartment of the dialyzer and back to the patient. (2) The conventional dialyzer allows a transfer of water and solutes between the blood and the dialysate through the semipermeable membrane. The semipermeable membrane of the conventional dialyzer has a sufficiently low permeability to water that an ultrafiltration controller is not required to prevent excessive loss of water from the patient's blood. This conventional dialyzer does not include hemodialyzers with the disposable inserts (Kiil type) (§ 876.5830) or dialyzers of high permeability (§ 876.5860). (3) The dialysate delivery system consists of mechanisms that monitor and control the temperature, conductivity, flow rate, and pressure of the dialysate and circulates dialysate through the dialysate compartment of the dialyzer. The dialysate delivery system includes the dialysate concentrate for hemodialysis (liquid or powder) and alarms to indicate abnormal dialysate conditions. This dialysate delivery system does not include the sorbent regenerated dialysate delivery system for hemodialysis (§ 876.5600), the dialysate delivery system of the peritoneal dialysis system and accessories (§ 876.5630), or the controlled dialysate delivery system of the high permeability hemodialysis system § 876.5860). (4) Remote accessories to the hemodialysis system include the unpowered dialysis chair without a scale, the powered dialysis chair without a scale, the dialyzer holder set, dialysis tie gun and ties, and hemodialysis start/stop tray.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA logo on the right. The FDA logo includes the letters "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG" in blue, with the word "ADMINISTRATION" underneath.
August 5, 2019
Mesa Laboratories, Inc. Jamie Louie Senior Manager - Quality 12100 West 6th Avenue Lakewood. CO 80228
Re: K191496
Trade/Device Name: TDS Standard Solution Regulation Number: 21 CFR 876.5820 Regulation Name: Hemodialysis system and accessories Regulatory Class: II Product Code: FKH Dated: June 5, 2019 Received: June 5, 2019
Dear Jamie Louie:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal
{1}------------------------------------------------
statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Carolyn Y. Neuland, Ph.D. Assistant Division Director DHT3A: Division of Renal, Gastrointestinal, Obesity and Transplant Devices OHT3: Office of Gastro-Renal, ObGyn, General Hospital and Urology Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K191496
Device Name TDS Standard Solution
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
This TDS Standard Solution is indicated for verifying the accuracy (calibration) of TDS (Total Dissolved Solids) meters. This standard solution should be used immediately before conductivity meters are used to determine the conductivity of water obtained from water purification systems used in hemodialysis. This solution is prepared from a mixture of salts comprised of 40% Sodium Bicarbonate, 40% Sodium Sufate, and 20% Sodium Chloride which is intended to mimic natural water systems. These solutions are used remotely from the water purification equipment, and do not come into contact with the patient.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|-------------------------------------------------|
| <div style="display:inline-flex; align-items:center;"><span style="font-size:20px">☒</span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)</div> |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <div style="display:inline-flex; align-items:center;"><span style="font-size:20px">☐</span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)</div> |
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image contains the logo for MesaLabs. The logo consists of a teal square with a white trapezoid-like shape inside. Below the square is the text "MesaLabs" in a bold, sans-serif font. The text is black.
# 510(k) Summary K191496
| Owner: | Mesa Laboratories, Inc.<br>12100 West 6th Avenue<br>Lakewood, CO 80228<br>Phone: (303) 987-8000 FAX: (303) 987-8989 |
|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contact Person: | Jamie Louie, Director of Quality |
| Date: | July 11, 2019 |
| Device Name: | TDS Standard Solution |
| Trade Name: | TDS Standard Solution |
| Common Name: | Conductivity/TDS Calibrator Solution |
| Classification<br>Name: | Solution-Test Standard-Conductivity, Dialysis |
| Device<br>Classification: | Classification: II<br>Classification Panels: Gastroenterology/Urology<br>Regulation Number: 21 CFR § 876.5820,<br>Solution-Test Standard-Conductivity, Dialysis<br>Product Code 78 FKH |
| Predicate<br>Device(s): | Conductivity/TDS Calibrator Solution<br>Mesa Laboratories Inc<br>510(k) Number K033330<br>Cleared February 4, 2004 |
| Device<br>Description: | The device consists of salts (Sodium Chloride, Sodium<br>Bicarbonate and Sodium Sulfate) dissolved in de-ionized<br>water. The solution is packaged into sealed polyethylene<br>bottles. |
| Indications<br>for Use: | This TDS Standard Solution is indicated for verifying the<br>accuracy (calibration) of TDS (Total Dissolved Solids)<br>meters. This standard solution should be used<br>immediately before conductivity meters are used to<br>determine the conductivity of water obtained from water<br>purification systems used in hemodialysis. This solution is<br>prepared from a mixture of salts comprised of 40% Sodium<br>Bicarbonate, 40% Sodium Sulfate, and 20% Sodium<br>Chloride which is intended to mimic natural water systems. |
{4}------------------------------------------------
These solutions are used remotely from the water purification equipment, and do not come into contact with the patient.
- The population requiring disalysis requires that the solutions General Description of used in the dialysis machine and during the preparation of solutions used in the hemodialysis setting be verified for the Diseases or Conditions proper conductivity. The hemodialysis industry uses conductivity meters to verify the proper conductivity. The Device will treat: new device is used to verify and calibrate these meters at conductivities near the new values of the device.
- Operational Use: Prior to operating the conductivity meter, the user draws the Conductivity/TDS Calibrator Solution into the meter or dips the meter sensor into the solution to verify the meter is reading the value of the solution. If meter does not read the correct value (within the tolerances of the solution and the meter), the user will calibrate the meter to read the correct value.
No components of the device come in contact with the patient or patient fluids.
The conductivity of the fluid is determined by the amount of Scientific Concepts that electrical current flow within the solution. The dissolved form the basis salts separate into positive and negative ions. The ions are of the Device: free to move and the movement resulting from a voltage difference will result in an electrical current.
Modifications to Predicate:
The following modifications were made from the predicate to the new device:
- 1. Additional Values
- 2. Use of two different salts
- 1. Additional Values
The new device has conductivity values of 23.8 µS/cm. 229 µS/cm and 2060 uS/cm are added to the original seven values of the predicate.
# 2. Use of two additional salts
The new device uses sodium bicarbonate and sodium sulfate in addition to the sodium chloride used in the predicate device.
Technological The technological Characteristics are summarized in Characteristics: the table below.
{5}------------------------------------------------
| Technological<br>Characteristic | Mesa Laboratories, Inc. Predicate<br>Device 2004 510(k) K033330 | Mesa Laboratories, Inc.<br>New Device 2019 510(k) K191496 |
|---------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Intended Use | Conductivity/TDS Calibrator Solutions<br>are a secondary standard solution used<br>for the calibration of conductivity/TDS<br>cells together with conductivity/TDS<br>measurement instruments. The<br>conductivity/TDS cells and instruments<br>may be indicated for calibrating the<br>conductivity measurement function of<br>hemodialysis machines and water<br>purification equipment for hemodialysis,<br>or for verifying proper function of<br>hemodialysis machine or water<br>purification equipment measurement<br>functions. These solutions are used<br>remotely from the hemodialysis machine<br>or water purification equipment, and doot come into contact with the patient. | This TDS Standard Solution is indicated<br>for verifying the accuracy (calibration) of<br>TDS (Total Dissolved Solids) meters.<br>This standard solution should be used<br>immediately before conductivity meters<br>are used to determine the conductivity<br>of water obtained from water purification<br>systems used in hemodialysis. This<br>solution is prepared from a mixture of<br>salts comprised of 40% Sodium<br>Bicarbonate, 40% Sodium Sulfate, and<br>20% Sodium Chloride which is intended<br>to mimic natural water systems. These<br>solutions are used remotely from the<br>water purification equipment, and do not<br>come into contact with the patient. |
| User<br>Instructions | See attached label | See attached label |
| Appearance<br>Properties | Clear, Colorless Liquid<br>Specific Gravity: Approx. 1- 1.04 | Clear, Colorless Liquid<br>Specific Gravity: Approx. 1- 1.04 |
| Chemical<br>Properties | Odor: Odorless<br>Boiling Point: Approx. 100.1℃<br>Melting Point: Approx. -0.6-0ºC<br>Vapor Pressure: <25mmHg @ 25°C<br>Solubility in water: Infinite | Odor: Odorless<br>Boiling Point: Approx. 100.1ºC<br>Melting Point: Approx. -0.6-0ºC<br>Vapor Pressure: <25mmHg @ 25°C<br>Solubility in water: Infinite |
| Conductivity<br>Values and<br>Specifications<br>at 25ºC | 150 ± 2 microsiemen/cm<br>1.0 ± 0.002 millisiemen/cm<br>3.9 ± 0.02 millisiemen/cm<br>12.5 ± 0.02 millisiemen/cm<br>13.4 ± 0.02 millisiemen/cm<br>14.0 ± 0.02 millisiemen/cm<br>100.0 ± 0.2 millisiemen/cm | 23.8 ± 0.2 microsiemen/cm<br>229 ± 2 microsiemen/cm<br>2060 ± 0.02 microsiemen/cm |
| TDS Values<br>and<br>Specifications<br>at 25ºC | Not specified | 15 ppm ± 1%<br>150 ppm ± 1%<br>1500 ppm ± 1% |
| Salt<br>Composition | NaCl (Sodium Chloride) | NaCl (Sodium Chloride)<br>Sodium Bicarbonate<br>Sodium Sulfate |
| Disinfectant | None | None |
| Bottle | High-density Polyethylene (HDPE) | High-density Polyethylene (HDPE) |
| Shelf Life | 18 months | 18 months |
| Open Bottle<br>Shelf Life | 30 Days | 60 Days |
The new device is similar to the predicate device in that it is drawn into the conductivity meter or the conductivity meter is exposed to the solution. The conductivity meter displays the value it measures for the conductivity.
{6}------------------------------------------------
The new device is different in that there are three additional conductivity values. The new device is using additional two salts (Sodium Bicarbonate and Sodium Sulfate) to the single salt (Sodium Chloride) used in the predicate.
The new device and the predicate provide a secondary standard to be used in verifying or calibrating conductivity cells or instruments. For the purposes of verifying or calibrating Conductivity, the new device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
# Materials Used in the New Device
The following materials are used in the new device. None of these materials contact the patient or any patient fluids.
| Material | Where used | Common<br>Name | CAS Registry<br>Number | Manufacturer | Patient or Patient<br>Fluid Contact |
|------------------------------|------------|----------------|------------------------|----------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| De-lonized<br>Water | Solution | DI Water | 7732-18-5 | Produced<br>in-house | No |
| Sodium<br>Chloride | Solution | NaCl | 7440-23-5 | Rocky Mountain<br>Reagents | No |
| Sodium<br>Bicarbonate | Solution | Baking<br>Soda | 144-55-8 | Rocky Mountain<br>Reagents | No |
| Sodium<br>Sulfate | Solution | Thenardite | 7757-82-6 | Sigma-Aldrich | No |
| High-density<br>Polyethylene | Bottle | HDPE | 9002-88-4 | Silgan | No |
# Comparison of material use between the predicate and the new device.
| Where Used | Mesa Laboratories, Inc.<br>Predicate Device 1996<br>510(k) K955298 | Mesa Laboratories, Inc.<br>New Device 2019<br>510(k) K191496 |
|------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
| De-lonized Water | Solution | Solution |
| Sodium Chloride | Solution | Solution |
| Sodium Bicarbonate | - | Solution |
| Sodium<br>Sulfate | - | Solution |
| High-density<br>Polyethylene | Bottle | Bottle |
Validations were performed to to demonstrate that the materials performed equivalently for their required function.
# Performance Testing
The following validations were performed:
# VP-00020 Conductivity Values of 15ppm TDS Solutions
The purpose of this test was to validate that the value of the new device were correct. A Reference Conductivity meter was used and calibrated using Standard Reference Materials purchased from Cole-Palmer. The TDS value for (5) bottles were: 15.063 ppm, 15.032 ppm, 15.007 ppm, 14.988 ppm and 14.994
{7}------------------------------------------------
ppm. The value of the 15ppm TDS Solution was within the tolerances of the solution and the Reference Conductivity meter. This was considered acceptable as per the Validation Protocol.
# VP-00021 Conductivity Values of 150ppm TDS Solutions
The purpose of this test was to validate that the value of the new device were correct. A Reference Conductivity meter was used and calibrated using Standard Reference Materials purchased from Cole-Palmer. The TDS value for (5) bottles were: 150.546 ppm, 150.480 ppm, 150.546 ppm, 150.876 ppm and 150.744 ppm. The value of the 150ppm TDS Solution was within the tolerances of the solution and the Reference Conductivity meter. This was considered acceptable as per the Validation Protocol.
# VP-00022 Conductivity Values of 1500ppm TDS Solutions
The purpose of this test was to validate that the value of the new device were correct. A Reference Conductivity meter was used and calibrated using Standard Reference Materials purchased from Cole-Palmer. The TDS value for (5) bottles were: 1508.18 ppm, 1505.99 ppm, 1505.99 ppm, 1506.72 ppm and 14.994 ppm. The value of the 1500ppm TDS Solution was within the tolerances of the solution and the Reference Conductivity meter. This was considered acceptable as per the Validation Protocol.
# VP-00030 Open Bottle Shelf Life
The purpose of this test was to validate that the new device would remain within specification for 60 days after the bottle was opened and tightly recapped. The three values 23.8 µS/cm, 229 µS/cm, and 2060 µS/cm were all found to be within tolerance after the bottle was opened for 60 days and then tightly resealed. This was considered acceptable as per the Validation Protocol.
# VP-00073 Sealed Bottle Storage Shelf Life
The purpose of this test was to validate that the new device would remain within specification for 18 months days after the bottle was sealed. Five different batchs of 23.8 µS/cm were manufactured. The testing consisted of measuring bottles from throughout the bottling run. (5) bottles, one from the 1st 20% of the run, one from the 2nd 20% of the run, one from the 3rd 20% of the run, one from the 4th 20% of the run, and one from the last 20% of the run were measured at specified intervals over 18 months. The results showed that the solution remained in tolerance for 18 months. This was used to demonstrate that the batch had uniform properties thourghout the production. This was considered acceptable as per the Validation Protocol.
# VP-00074 Sealed Bottle Storage Shelf Life
The purpose of this test was to validate that the new device would remain within specification for 18 months days after the bottle was sealed. Five different batchs of 229 µS/cm were manufactured. The testing consisted of measuring bottles from throughout the bottling run. (5) bottles, one from the 1st 20% of the run, one from the 2nd 20% of the run, one from the 3rd 20% of the run, one from the 4th 20% of the run, and one from the last 20% of the run were measured at specified intervals over 18 months. The results showed that the solution remained in tolerance for 18 months. This was used to demonstrate that the
{8}------------------------------------------------
batch had uniform properties thourghout the production. This was considered acceptable as per the Validation Protocol.
# VP-00075 Sealed Bottle Storage Shelf Life
The purpose of this test was to validate that the new device would remain within specification for 18 months days after the bottle was sealed. Five different batchs of 2060 µS/cm were manufactured. The testing consisted of measuring bottles from throughout the bottling run. (5) bottles, one from the 1st 20% of the run, one from the 2nd 20% of the run, one from the 3rd 20% of the run, one from the 4th 20% of the run, and one from the last 20% of the run were measured at specified intervals over 18 months. This was used to demonstrate that the batch had uniform properties thourghout the production. The results showed that the solution remained in tolerance for 18 months. This was considered acceptable as per the Validation Protocol.
Additional batches of TDS Solutions were manufactured to demonstrate that the new device would remain within specification during the 18 months in sealed bottle storage. . The goal was to produce the solution with a value within the lower 10% range of the specification range for each TDS solution. This was done to ensure that the value after 18 months of sealed bottle storage remained with specification.
| TDS Solution | 15 ppm<br>Tank<br>(uS/cm) | 150 ppm<br>Tank<br>(uS/cm) | 1500 ppm<br>Tank<br>(uS/cm) |
|---------------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|-----------------------------|
| Batch | | | |
| 1 | 23.56 | 226.8 | 2040.0 |
| 2 | 23.57 | 227.3 | 2040.0 |
| 3 | 23.56 | 226.8 | 2040.0 |
| 4 | 23.57 | 227.2 | 2042.0 |
| 5 | 23.56 | 226.9 | 2042.0 |
| Lower Specification | 23.324 | 226.7 | 2039.4 |
| Upper Specification | 24.276 | 231.3 | 2080.6 |
The table below shows the conductivity value of each batch of solution in the mixing tank. The lower specification and the upper specification for each TDS Solution are given in the last two rows of the table.
Nonclinical Performance: Validation of the performance of the device was performed on units equivalent to production.
Conclusions Demonstrating Safety and Effectiveness:
The results of the validations show that the new device is equivalent to the Conductivity/TDS Calibrator Solutions. The new device is substantially equivalent to the leqally marketed Conductivity/TDS Calibrator Solutions (predicate device).
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.