An electrical peripheral nerve stimulator (neuromuscular blockade monitor) used to apply an electrical current to a patient to test the level of pharmacological effect of anesthetic drugs and gases
Device Story
STIMPOD NMS450 is a quantitative Neuromuscular Transmission (NMT) monitor and nerve locator. It uses tri-axial acceleromyography (AMG) or electromyography (EMG) to monitor muscle relaxation during surgery. For nerve localization, it delivers electrical current via needles or probes to identify neural pathways by measuring threshold currents. The device is used in operating theaters by anesthetists. It processes electrical signals from EMG electrodes or motion data from AMG sensors to provide quantitative feedback on neuromuscular blockade efficacy. The output assists clinicians in managing anesthetic drug administration, potentially improving patient safety by ensuring appropriate muscle relaxation levels.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Substantial equivalence supported by bench testing only, including functional performance, electrical safety (IEC 60601-1), electromagnetic compatibility (IEC 60601-1-2, IEC 60601-2-40), biocompatibility (ISO 10993-1), usability, battery life, tensile strength, and electrode stimulation performance (charge/current/power density).
Technological Characteristics
Battery-powered (4xAAA) electrical nerve stimulator. Waveform: monophasic, constant current, square pulse (200μs width). Connectivity: proprietary wireline interface for NMT cables. EMG monitoring via reusable cable with intelligent signal processing module (µEMG) and single-use self-adhesive electrodes. Biocompatibility per ISO 10993-1; electrical performance per AAMI EC12.
Indications for Use
Indicated for use by an anesthetist during: 1. General anesthesia, for the purpose of establishing the efficacy of a Neuromuscular Blocking Agent using non-invasive surface electrodes. 2. Regional anesthesia, for the purpose of: i. nerve mapping using the non-invasive Nerve Mapping Probe (supplied) ii. nerve locating using invasive needles (not supplied). Patient population includes all ages and weights, excluding neonates for electromyography.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An electrical peripheral nerve stimulator (neuromuscular blockade monitor) is a device used to apply an electrical current to a patient to test the level of pharmacological effect of anesthetic drugs and gases.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA text logo on the right. The FDA text logo is in blue and includes the words "FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION".
October 16, 2022
Xavant Technology (Pty) Ltd Roche Van Rensburg Chief Executive Officer Unit 102 Tannery Industrial Park, 309 Derdepoort Road Silverton Pretoria, Gauteng 0184 South Africa
Re: K213049
Trade/Device Name: STIMPOD NMS450 Nerve Stimulator Regulation Number: 21 CFR 868.2775 Regulation Name: Electrical Peripheral Nerve Stimulator Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: BXN Dated: September 1, 2022 Received: September 12, 2022
Dear Roche Van Rensburg:
We have reviewed vour Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal
{1}------------------------------------------------
statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE(@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
James J. Lee, Ph.D. Division Director DHT1C: Division of Sleep Disordered Breathing, Respiratory and Anesthsia Devices OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT and Dental Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
### Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K213049
Device Name STIMPOD NMS450 Nerve Stimulator
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
This device is a nerve stimulation device designed to be used by an anesthetist during:
1. General anesthesia, for the purpose of establishing the efficacy of a Neuromuscular Blocking Agent using non-invasive surface electrodes.
2. Regional anesthesia, for the purpose of:
i. nerve mapping using the non-invasive Nerve Mapping Probe (supplied)
ii. nerve locating using invasive needles (not supplied)
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image is a logo for Xavant Technology. The logo features a stylized letter X with a circular orbit around it. The word "AVANT" is in red, and the word "TECHNOLOGY" is in gray below it.
This 510(k) Summary was prepared in accordance with the requirements of 21CFR807.92
#### 5.1 Date Prepared
08 September, 2022
#### 5.2 Submitter's Information
| Company Name: | XAVANT TECHNOLOGY (PTY) LTD |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Street Address: | Unit 102 Tannery Industrial Park<br>309 Derdepoort Road<br>Silverton |
| City: | Pretoria |
| State/Province: | Gauteng |
| Country: | South Africa |
| Telephone: | +27(0) 12 743 5959 |
| Fax: | +27(0) 86 547 0026 |
| Contact Person: | Roche Janse van Rensburg |
| Contact Title: | Chief Executive Officer |
| Contact Email: | compliance@xavant.com |
#### 5.3 Trade Name, Common Name, Classification
| Type of 510(k) submission | Traditional |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
| Trade Name: | STIMPOD NMS450 Nerve Stimulator |
| Common Name: | Battery Powered Peripheral Nerve Stimulator |
| Classification Name: | Battery Powered Nerve Stimulator |
| per 21 CFR § 868.2775 | |
| Regulatory Class: | Class II |
| Product Code: | BXN |
| Panel: | Anesthesiology |
| Reason for Submission | New Accessory |
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### 5.4 Identification of Predicate/Reference Device(s)
| PREDICATE DEVICE |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Xavant Technology, STIMPOD NMS450<br>(K102084) |
| This predicate device has not been subject to a design-related recall. |
| REFERENCE DEVICE |
| Senzime, Tetragraph<br>(K190795) |
| This reference device has not been subject to a design-related recall. |
#### 5.5 Description of the Device
The STIMPOD NMS450 is a quantitative Neuromuscular Transmission (NMT) Monitor which provides real-time quantitative feedback utilizing tri-axial accelerometery.
The STIMPOD NMS450 is also a precision nerve locating tool used for localizing specific neural pathways. Localization of nerves by electrical stimulation involves connecting the nerve stimulator to a conducting needle through which local anaesthetics can be injected. The distance of the needle (cathode) from the nerve can be estimated by establishing the minimum threshold current required, to facilitate a neuromuscular response.
The STIMPOD NMS450 currently makes use of 3 dimensional acceleromyography (AMG) as the measurement technology of choice for objective Neuromuscular Transmission (NMT) monitoring in surgery. Although AMG is still the de-facto standard in industry, the use of electromyography (EMG) has gained renewed interest in NMT monitoring applications where the introduction of robotic surgeries, new surgical techniques, and changes in workflow, for instance, made the use of AMG impracticable.
In order to address this steadily increasing market demand for EMG sensor technology in NMT monitoring applications, Xavant identified the need to design and develop a dedicated NMT Monitoring Cable (EMG) that could be used interchangeably with the existing NMT Monitoring Cable (AMG) already in use with the STIMPOD NMS450.
The NMT Monitoring Cable (EMG) was specifically designed for use with the STIMPOD NMS450 to assist anaesthesiologists in theatre with monitoring the efficacy of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents (NMBAs).
The NMT Monitoring Cable (EMG) was designed with an intelligent EMG signal processing module (henceforth referred to as the µEMG) on one end of the cable for connection to an EMG electrode, and with a standard FireWire connector on the other end for connection to the STIMPOD NMS450.
{5}------------------------------------------------
The µEMG makes provision for the following interfaces:
- 1. a wireline communications interface to exchange information with the STIMPOD NMS450,
- 2. an electrical interface to condition and sample the EMG signals picked up by the measurement contact points of an attached EMG electrode array,
- 3. an electrical interface to (i) detect the stimulation signals generated by the STIMPOD NMS450, and (ii) route them to the stimulation contact points of an attached EMG electrode array,
- 4. a visual interface to indicate the state (powered, connected etc.) of the device.
#### 5.6 Substantial Equivalence Discussion
The following device comparisons are made:
- 1. The STIMPOD NMS450 to the predicate device STIMPOD NMS450. STIMPOD NMS450's 510(k) clearance (K102084) means it is legally marketed;
- 2. The STIMPOD NMS450 to the reference device Tetragraph Neuromuscular Transmission Monitor from Senzime AB. Tetragraph's 510(k) clearance (K190795) means it is legally marketed.
#### Intended Use
FDA product Code of the predicate device and that of the subject device is given as "BXN" while that of the reference device is given as "KOI" - both products codes, however, are assigned under Regulation No. 21 CFR 868.2775 which applies to "Electrical Peripheral Nerve Stimulators" with the following intended use:
"An electrical peripheral nerve stimulator (neuromuscular blockade monitor) is a device used to apply an electrical current to a patient to test the level of pharmacological effect of anesthetic drugs and gases".
#### Indications for Use
This device is a nerve stimulation device designed to be used by an anaesthetist during:
- 1. General anaesthesia, for the purpose of establishing the efficacy of a Neuromuscular Blocking Agent using non-invasive surface electrodes.
- 2. Regional anaesthesia, for the purpose of:
- i. Nerve mapping using the non-invasive Nerve Mapping Probe (supplied)
- ii. Nerve locating using invasive needles (not supplied).
The subject and predicate devices have identical Indications for Use. The subject and reference devices are compared with respect to their mutual indications only. Both the devices are indicted for monitoring the efficacy (which can be defined as "the relaxation of the patient" as indicated in the reference device Indications for Use statement) of a Neuromuscular Blocking Agent.
#### Intended User and Patient Population
The intended user for both the subject device and predicate device is identical:
- The subject device and predicate device are both indicated for use by medical . professionals with knowledge of anatomy
{6}------------------------------------------------
The patient population for both the subject device and predicate device is similar:
- . The reference device is for use with patients (excluding neonates). For the subject device, the patient population includes patients of all ages, weight, and nationality (excluding neonates for electromyography).
#### Substantial Equivalence Table
To demonstrate substantial equivalence with respect to intended use, technological characteristics, and principles of operation, two tables of Comparison of Characteristics are presented. The first table shows a comparison between the STIMPOD NMS450 (subject device) and the predicate device. The second table shows a comparison between the STIMPOD NMS450 (subject) device and the reference device for those characteristics where the subject device and predicate device had differences. The tables are accompanied by a discussion of all similarities and differences between the devices and therefore provide sufficient detailed information regarding the basis for the determination of substantial equivalence.
| Characteristic | Subject Device | Predicate Device | Discussion |
|-------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Trade Name | STIMPOD NMS450 | STIMPOD NMS450 | Identical |
| Product Code | BXN | BXN | Identical |
| Device Class | Class II | Class II | Identical |
| Classification<br>Name | Electrical Peripheral Nerve<br>Stimulator | Electrical Peripheral Nerve<br>Stimulator | Identical |
| Regulation No. | 886.2775 | 886.2775 | Identical |
| Classification<br>Panel | Anaesthesiology | Anaesthesiology | Identical |
| Intended Use | An electrical peripheral nerve<br>stimulator (neuromuscular<br>blockade monitor) used to apply<br>an electrical current to a patient<br>to test the level of<br>pharmacological effect<br>of anesthetic drugs and gases | An electrical peripheral nerve<br>stimulator (neuromuscular<br>blockade monitor) used to apply<br>an electrical current to a patient<br>to test the level of<br>pharmacological effect<br>of anesthetic drugs and gases | Identical |
| Indication for<br>Use | This device is a nerve stimulation<br>device designed to be used by<br>an anaesthetist during:<br>1. general anesthesia, for the<br>purpose of establishing the<br>efficacy of a Neuromuscular<br>Blocking Agent using non-<br>invasive surface electrodes. | This device is a nerve stimulation<br>device designed to be used by<br>an anaesthetist during:<br>1. general anesthesia, for the<br>purpose of establishing the<br>efficacy of a Neuromuscular<br>Blocking Agent using non-<br>invasive surface electrodes. | Identical |
| Characteristic | Subject Device | Predicate Device | Discussion |
| | 2. regional anesthesia, for the<br>purpose of:<br>i. nerve mapping using the<br>non-invasive Nerve<br>Mapping Probe (supplied)<br>ii. nerve locating using<br>invasive needles (not<br>supplied) | 2. regional anesthesia, for the<br>purpose of:<br>i. nerve mapping using the<br>non-invasive Nerve Mapping<br>Probe (supplied)<br>ii. nerve locating using<br>invasive needles (not<br>supplied) | Identical |
| Device<br>Components | 1. Nerve Stimulator/s<br>i. STIMPOD NMS450 | 1. Nerve Stimulator/s<br>i. STIMPOD NMS450 | Identical |
| | 2. Patient Cable/s<br>i. NMT Monitoring Cable (AMG)<br>ii. Nerve Locating Cable<br>iii. Nerve Mapping/Locating Cable | 2. Patient Cable/s<br>i. NMT Monitoring Cable (AMG)<br>ii. Nerve Locating Cable<br>iii. Nerve Mapping/Locating Cable | Identical |
| | 3. Applied Part/s<br>i. AMG Sensor | 3. Applied Part/s<br>i. AMG Sensor | Identical |
| | 4. Power Cable/s<br>None. | 4. Power Cable/s<br>None. | Identical |
| Waveform | Monophasic, constant current,<br>square pulse | Monophasic, constant current,<br>square pulse | Identical |
| Pulse Width | 200μS | 200μS | Identical |
| Stimulation<br>Patterns | Waveform: Monophasic,<br>constant current, square pulse<br>with a fixed pulse width of<br>200ms<br>Pulse Repetition Frequency:<br>i. TOF: 4 pulses at 2Hz<br>ii. TWI(Twitch): 1Hz, 2Hz,<br>5Hz<br>iii. Tetanic Stimulus: 50Hz<br>or 100Hz<br>iv. PTC Stimulation: 50Hz<br>Tetanic stimulus for 5<br>seconds, followed by 20<br>TWI pulses at 1Hz | Waveform: Monophasic,<br>constant current, square pulse<br>with a fixed pulse width of<br>200ms<br>Pulse Repetition Frequency:<br>i. TOF: 4 pulses at 2Hz<br>ii. TWI(Twitch): 1Hz, 2Hz,<br>5Hz<br>iii. Tetanic Stimulus: 50Hz<br>or 100Hz<br>iv. PTC Stimulation: 50Hz<br>Tetanic stimulus for 5<br>seconds, followed by 20<br>TWI pulses at 1Hz | Identical |
| Current<br>Characteristics | Electrode/Skin Resistance:<br>0-5000 ohm maximum<br>Current: 5-80mA peak<br>Voltage: 0 - 400V peak,<br>depending on skin impedance | Electrode/Skin Resistance:<br>0-5000 ohm maximum<br>Current: 5-80mA peak<br>Voltage: 0 - 400V peak,<br>depending on skin impedance | Identical |
| Control<br>Mechanism | Digitally controlled by a<br>microprocessor | Digitally controlled by a<br>microprocessor | Identical |
| Characteristic | Subject Device | Predicate Device | Discussion |
| Energy Type | Battery:<br>4 X AAA alkaline batteries, 6V,<br>1.2Ah<br>Charger:<br>None. | Battery:<br>4 X AAA alkaline batteries, 6V,<br>1.2Ah<br>Charger:<br>None. | Identical |
| NMT Monitoring<br>Cable (AMG) | Type: Reusable | Type: Reusable | |
| | Communications: STIMPOD<br>proprietary. | Communications: STIMPOD<br>proprietary. | Identical |
| | Attachment: Integral friction<br>strap. | Attachment: Integral friction<br>strap. | |
| NMT Monitoring<br>Cable (EMG) | Type: Reusable<br>Communications: STIMPOD<br>proprietary.<br>EMG Electrode Connector:<br>Proprietary frictional & magnetic<br>Retention mechanism. | Not applicable | The predicate<br>device does<br>not include<br>the NMT<br>Monitoring<br>Cable (EMG)<br>as this is a<br>new addition.<br>Comparison<br>provided with<br>reference<br>device. |
| EMG Electrode | Type: Self-adhesive, Single Use<br>Evoked Response Monitoring:<br>Electromyography.<br>Form Factor: 2 Stimulation<br>contact pads and 2 recording<br>contact pads.<br>Ambidexterity: Usable on left<br>and right hand.<br>Application Site: Distal<br>stimulation of the Ulnar Nerve<br>with CMAP recording of the<br>Adductor Pollicis muscle. | Not applicable | The predicate<br>device does<br>not include<br>the EMG<br>Electrode as<br>this is a new<br>addition.<br>Comparison<br>provided with<br>reference<br>device. |
#### Comparison between Subject Device and Predicate Device
{7}------------------------------------------------
{8}------------------------------------------------
### Comparison between Subject Device and Reference Device
| Characteristic | Subject Device | Reference Device | Discussion |
|-------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Trade Name | STIMPOD NMS450 | Tetragraph | Trade names are<br>different. |
| Product Code | BXN | KOI | Similar. No new<br>questions of<br>safety and<br>effectiveness<br>raised. |
| Device Class | Class II | Class II | Identical |
| Classification<br>Name | Electrical Peripheral Nerve<br>Stimulator | Electrical Peripheral Nerve<br>Stimulator | Identical |
| Characteristic | Subject Device | Reference Device | Discussion |
| Regulation No. | 886.2775 | 868.2775 | Identical |
| Classification<br>Panel | Anaesthesiology | Anesthesiology | Identical |
| Device<br>Components | 1. Patient Cable/s<br>i. NMT Monitoring Cable (EMG) | 1. Patient Cable/s<br>i. TetraCord EMG Patient Cable | Similar. No new<br>questions of<br>safety and<br>effectiveness<br>raised. |
| | 2. Applied Part/s<br>EMG Electrode | 2. Applied Part/s<br>i. TetraSense EMG Electrode | Similar. No new<br>questions of<br>safety and<br>effectiveness<br>raised. |
| NMT Monitoring<br>Cable (EMG) | Type: Reusable | Type: Reusable | Both cables are<br>reusable. |
| | Communications: STIMPOD<br>proprietary. | Communications: TetraGraph<br>proprietary | |
| | EMG Electrode Connector:<br>Proprietary frictional &<br>magnetic Retention<br>mechanism. | EMG Electrode Connector:<br>Proprietary frictional Retention<br>mechanism. | See discussion<br>of differences<br>below. |
| EMG Electrode | Type: Self-adhesive, Single<br>Use | Type: Self<br>Adhesive, Single Use | |
| | Evoked Response<br>Monitoring:<br>Electromyography. | Evoked Response<br>Monitoring:<br>Electromyography | The type,<br>measuring<br>technology, form<br>factor and<br>application site<br>are identical. |
| | Form Factor: 2 Stimulation<br>contact pads and 2 recording<br>contact pads. | Form Factor: 2 Stimulation<br>contact pads and 2 recording<br>contact pads. | |
| | Ambidexterity: Usable on left<br>and right hand. | Ambidexterity: Usable on left<br>and right hand. | See discussion<br>of differences<br>below. |
| | Application Site: Distal<br>stimulation of the Ulnar Nerve<br>with CMAP recording of the<br>Adductor Pollicis muscle. | Application Site: Distal<br>stimulation of the Ulnar Nerve<br>with CMAP recording of the<br>Adductor Pollicis muscle. | |
{9}------------------------------------------------
### Discussion of differences:
#### NMT Monitoring
- 1. The specific means of communication that is used by the subject device to transfer measured EMG data from the electrode can be achieved in multiple different ways, and therefor does not need to be the same as that being used by the reference device.
- 2. The materials and construction of the NMT Monitoring Cable (EMG) used for the subject device differs from that of the EMG cable used for the reference device. As above, the patient cable for the two devices can be built from multiple different materials and
{10}------------------------------------------------
constructed in multiple different ways, and therefore do not need to be the same to achieve the same intended purpose.
- 3. The retention mechanism used in the construction of the patient cables for both devices is different, but the retention force offered by the connector used for the subject device is better or larger than that of the connector used for the reference device.
#### EMG Electrode
- 4. The materials used in the construction of the EMG electrodes of the two devices are different, however, both electrodes satisfy the biocompatibility requirements of IEC 10993-1.
- 5. The EMG electrodes for both devices furthermore satisfy the electrical and adhesion performance requirements of AAMI EC12.
- Finally, the EMG electrode of the subject device exhibits same or better safety and 6. performance characteristics (charge density current density and power density) at the skin/electrode interface than that of the reference device.
The comparative analysis presented above does not raise any new questions in terms of risk and performance of the subject device, and is supported by the performance data captured under paragraph 5.7.
#### 5.7 Performance Testing
The following performance tests were conducted on the subject device in support of the claim for substantial equivalence:
- 1. Functional Performance Testing.
- 2. Electrical safety (in accordance with IEC 60601-1).
- 3. Electromagnetic compatibility (in accordance with IEC 60601-1-2 and IEC 60601-2-40).
- 4. Biocompatibility testing (in accordance with ISO10993-1).
- 5. Usability testing.
- 6. Battery life testing.
- 7. Tensile strength testing of the electrode.
- 8. Stimulation Performance Testing of the electrode (Charge Density, Current Density and Power Density)
The subject device met or exceeded the stated acceptance criteria for each performance test which were all confirmed to be the same or very similar to the performance specifications of the predicate device, and/or where relevant, to the reference device. The resultant test data therefore provided sufficient evidence to support the claim that the subject device is at least as safe and as effective as the predicate device in monitoring the muscle relaxation of a patient that has been subjected to the administration of a Neuromuscular Blocking Agent.
#### 5.8 Clinical Performance
No clinical testing was conducted to demonstrate that the subject device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device, since the two devices were already proven to have similar
{11}------------------------------------------------
technological characteristics. There was no clinical testing conducted to demonstrate that the subject was substantially equivalent to the reference device, as the reference device has similar technological characteristics.
### 5.9 Conclusion (Statement of Equivalence)
A detailed comparative analysis involving the identified subject, predicate and references devices, has provided sufficient evidence in support of the following conclusion:
The subject device when compared to the predicate device and reference device has the same intended use, user profile and patient population, and the same or very similar technological characteristics. Differences in the technological characteristics of the two devices did not raise any new questions of safety and effectiveness, and the resultant test data from the performance tests, demonstrated that the subject device is at least as safe and effective as the reference device in terms of the use of EMG in NMT Monitoring applications.
There are no significant differences between the STIMPOD NMS450 Nerve Stimulator and the predicate and reference devices that would adversely affect the use of the product. It is substantially equivalent to these devices in design, function, materials, operational principles and intended use.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.