Retrospective clinical study; Clinical experience/medical records (mitral valve annulus and other intracardiac positions)
Retrospective clinical data was used to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the bovine pericardium patch in intracardiac and great vessel repair applications, supporting substantial equivalence to predicate devices.
Peri-Guard Retrospective study; Retrospective study; Follow-up/Duration: Mean of 17 months post-op (for calcification evaluation)
Patients undergoing intracardiac and great vessel repair
Alternative intracardiac and great vessel patch materials
Safety, effectiveness, and calcification
Indications for Use
CV Peri-Guard™ is intended for use as a patch for intracardiac, great vessel, valve repair and suture line buttressing (i.e. atrial septal defect (ASD) patch, atrial patch, valve annuloplasty, coronary graft buttress). May be used for repair of ventricular septal defect (VSD) using either a single patch or reinforced patch technique. May also be used in other applications exposed to peak systolic pressure using a reinforced patch technique (i.e. ventricular aneurysm patch, aortic graft suture line buttress).
Device Story
CV Peri-Guard is a cardiovascular patch composed of glutaraldehyde-crosslinked bovine pericardium. Used by surgeons in clinical settings for intracardiac and great vessel repair, valve repair, and suture line buttressing. The patch provides structural reinforcement for defects such as atrial or ventricular septal defects and aortic graft suture lines. It functions as a biocompatible, non-hemolytic implant material to repair soft tissue deficiencies and withstand peak systolic pressures. The device is provided in various configurations to accommodate different surgical requirements.
Clinical Evidence
Evidence includes a retrospective clinical study, a juvenile rat subcutaneous calcification model, and a canine implant study. The rat model demonstrated clinically insignificant calcification, outperforming glutaraldehyde-treated controls and competitor bovine patches. Clinical evaluation in mitral valve annulus and other intracardiac positions showed no calcification up to 17 months post-op. Canine studies confirmed performance similarity to ePTFE. Retrospective clinical data indicated the material performed safely and effectively, equivalent to alternative patch materials.
Technological Characteristics
Material: Glutaraldehyde-crosslinked bovine pericardium. Form factor: Sheets ranging from 1 cm x 1 cm to 14 cm x 16 cm. Biocompatibility: Non-hemolytic, established history since 1982. Mechanical properties: Designed for high-pressure applications including intracardiac and great vessel repair.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring intracardiac, great vessel, septal defect, and annulus repair, or suture-line buttressing. Prescription use only.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An intracardiac patch or pledget made of polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate, or polytetrafluoroethylene is a fabric device placed in the heart that is used to repair septal defects, for patch grafting, to repair tissue, and to buttress sutures.
Predicate Devices
Gore-Tex Cardiovascular Patch
Peri-Guard
Vascu-Guard
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
K91726
# SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS
| | Applicant Name & Address: Bio-Vascular, Inc., 2575 University Ave.,St. Paul, MN 55114-1024 |
|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contact: | Barbara Atzenhoefer, Regulatory Affairs Manager |
| Date Prepared: | May 7, 1997 |
| Common or Usual Name: | Cardiovascular patch |
| Device Classification Name: | Intracardiac and Great Vessel Repair |
| Substantial Equivilance: | Gore-Tex Cardiovascular Patch, Peri-Guard and Vascu-Guard |
#### Device Description:
CV Peri-Guard™ - Cardiovascular Patch. CV Peri-Guard is composed of bovine pericardium, crosslinked with glutaraldehyde. Available in configurations ranging from 1 cm x 1 cm to 14 cm x 16 cm.
#### Statement of Intended Use:
CV Peri-Guard™ is intended for use as a patch for intracardiac, great vessel, valve repair and suture line buttressing (i.e. atrial septal defect (ASD) patch, atrial patch, valve annuloplasty, coronary graft buttress). May be used for repair of ventricular septal defect (VSD) using either a single patch or reinforced patch technique. May also be used in other applications exposed to peak systolic pressure using a reinforced patch technique (i.e. ventricular aneurysm patch, aortic graft suture line buttress).
### Summary/Comparison of Technological Characteristics:
We maintain that CV Peri-Guard™ is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices and that the extended indication for use in intracardiac and great vessel repair does not pose new questions of safety and effectiveness. This claim of substantial equivalence is based upon the following elements.
#### 1.Configuration
The additional sizes of CV Peri-Guard are configured for intracardiac and great vessel repair and are substantially equivalent to those sold by the predicate device.
#### 2.Extension of Indications (Labeling)
Processed bovine pericardium and the material used in the predicate device have a history of being used in similar prosthetic applications. The material used in CV Peri-Guard is already indicated for pericardial closure and repair of soft tissue deficiencies. As summarized below and discussed earlier, we have shown that extension of these indications to include intracardiac and great vessel repair does not pose new questions of safety and effectiveness.
#### 3.Physical/Mechanical Properties
The physical and mechanical properties critical for performance as an intracardiac and great vessel patch are substantially equivalent between CV Peri-Guard and the predicate device.
{1}------------------------------------------------
#### 4. Biocompatibility
Processed bovine pericardium has a long history of biocompatibility. Peri-Guard has been marketed since 1982 with no indication of biocompatibility problems. The biocompatibility testing summarized herein is consistent with this clinical experience and the nonhemolytic nature of CV Peri-Guard is especially relevant to the intracardiac and great vessel repair indication under consideration in this premarket notification.
#### 5.Calcification Studies
Peri-Guard has been evaluated in a proven model for calcification: the juvenile rat subcutaneous mode. Peri-Guard and Supple Peri-Guard have demonstrated clinical insignificant calcification and significantly less calcification that either a glutaraldehyde-treated control or a competitor's bovine pericardial patch product. Additionally, Peri-Guard has been evaluated clinically in the mittal valve annulus position, and other intracardiac patch positions, and has demonstrated no calcification related to the Peri-Guard patch up to a mean of 17 months post-op.
#### 6.Canine Studies
A Canine implant study show that Supple Peri-Guard and ePTFE perform in a similar manner, in vivo.
#### 7.Clinical Report
The clinical data, gathered under the Peri-Guard Retrospective study protocol, demonstrated that our bovine material performed safe and effectively, and in a substantially equivalent fashion to alternative intracardiac and great vessel patch materials.
#### 8.History of Safety and Effectiveness
Peri-Guard (and thus CV Peri-Guard) processed bovine pericardium has been used widely as an implant material for well over two decades and has been shown to be safe and effective in a variety of medical applications.
{2}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/2/Picture/1 description: The image shows the seal for the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. The seal is circular, with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. In the center of the seal is an abstract image of an eagle.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
Ms. Barbara Atzenhoefer Regulatory Affairs Manager Bio-Vascular, Inc. 2575 University Avenue Saint Paul, MN 55114-1024
APR 1 0 1998
Re: K971726 CV Peri-Guard - Cardiovascular Patch Regulatory Class: II (Two) Product Code: DXZ Dated: February 11, 1998 March 23, 1998 Received:
Dear Ms. Atzenhoefer:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: . General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in assumptions. requlatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
{3}------------------------------------------------
#### Page 2 - Ms. Barbara Atzenhoefer
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4648. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html."
Sincerely yours,
Thomas J. Callahan
Thomas J. Callahan, Ph.D. Director Division of Cardiovascular, Respiratory, and Neuroloqical Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radioloqical Health
Enclosure
{4}------------------------------------------------
Page 1 __of_1_
510(k) Number (if known):_K971726
Device Name:_CV Peri-Guard™
Indications For Use: CV Peri-Guard™ is intended for use as a patch material for intracardiac defects, great vessel, septal defect and annulus repair, and suture-line buttressing.
## (PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Bale L. Simperle
(Division Sign-Off) ------Division of Cardiovascular, Respiratory, and Neurological Devices 510(k) Number_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Prescription Use_X (Per 21 CFR 801.109) OR
Over-The-Counter Use__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
(Optional Format 1-2-96)
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.