K253004 · Lap GmbH Laser Applikationen · IYE · Jun 4, 2026 · Radiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K253004
Device Name
LUNA 3D
Applicant
Lap GmbH Laser Applikationen
Product Code
IYE · Radiology
Decision Date
Jun 4, 2026
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 892.5050
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The LUNA 3D system is used to support reproducible patient positioning and monitor patient surface motion during radiotherapy and radiosurgery treatments and during CT simulation for radiation therapy planning. The LUNA 3D system provides data exchange to radiotherapy imaging and radiotherapy treatment systems to synchronize image acquisition and treatment delivery. LUNA 3D may also be used to guide patients through breath-holds. The LUNA 3D system can be used for all patients, undergoing radiotherapy and radiosurgery treatments and CT simulation for radiation therapy planning.
Device Story
LUNA 3D is an optical camera system for surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT). It uses camera pods to project a visible blue pattern onto the patient's skin and capture 3D surface data. Software registers this live surface against a reference surface (generated by the system or imported from a Treatment Planning System). The system calculates spatial deviations to support patient positioning relative to the treatment isocenter. During CT simulation, it provides motion data for 4DCT reconstruction. During treatment, it monitors surface motion; if deviations exceed pre-defined tolerances, it triggers an automatic beam hold. It also sends correction data to motorized treatment couches. Used in clinical radiotherapy environments by trained personnel; output is visualized on a workstation to guide positioning and monitor motion. Benefits include improved reproducibility of patient setup, motion-synchronized imaging/treatment, and automated safety gating, reducing potential for geographic miss during radiation delivery.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing and clinical workflow simulations were performed. Accuracy tests using a 6-degree-of-freedom motion phantom confirmed displacement and rotation detection <0.5mm. Latency tests confirmed system response times meet clinical requirements. Functional safety testing verified essential performance under single-fault conditions. Clinical validation included full workflow simulations for gating, 4DCT synchronization, and automated couch control, confirming the system functions as intended. Usability testing with trained users confirmed ergonomic workflows and no safety-related user errors.
Technological Characteristics
System comprises PC workstation, camera pods (video cameras and projector), and calibration phantom. Projects visible blue light pattern. Connectivity via 100 Mbit/s network. Compliant with IEC 60601-1 (electrical safety) and IEC 60601-1-2 (EMC). Software developed per IEC 62304. Risk management per ISO 14971. Multi-pod system accuracy <0.5mm for shift and rotation.
Indications for Use
Indicated for all patients undergoing radiotherapy, radiosurgery, and CT simulation for radiation therapy planning, requiring reproducible patient positioning, surface motion monitoring, breath-hold guidance, and synchronization of image acquisition or treatment delivery.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A medical charged-particle radiation therapy system is a device that produces by acceleration high energy charged particles (e.g., electrons and protons) intended for use in radiation therapy. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, treatment planning computer programs, component parts, and accessories.
{0}
**FDA** **U.S. FOOD & DRUG**
ADMINISTRATION
June 4, 2026
LAP GmbH Laser Applikationen
Sebastian Boldhaus
Regulatory Affairs Manager
Zeppelinstraße 23
Lüneburg, 21337
Germany
Re: K253004
Trade/Device Name: LUNA 3D
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.5050
Regulation Name: Medical charged-particle radiation therapy system
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: IYE
Dated: October 8, 2025
Received: October 9, 2025
Dear Sebastian Boldhaus:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K253004 - Sebastian Boldhaus
Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, ISO 13485 clause 7.3 (Design controls), ISO 13485 clause 8.3 (Nonconforming product), ISO 13485 clause 8.5.2 (Corrective action), and ISO 13485 clause 8.5.3 (Preventative action). Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QMSR requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (ISO 13485 clause 7.3 and ISO 13485 clause 7.5) and document changes and approvals in the Medical Device File (ISO 13485 clause 4.2.3).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-
{2}
K253004 - Sebastian Boldhaus
Page 3
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Lora D. Weidner, Ph.D.
Assistant Director
Radiation Therapy Team
DHT8C: Division of Radiological
Imaging and Radiation Therapy Devices
OHT8: Office of Radiological Health
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120
Expiration Date: 07/31/2026
See PRA Statement below.
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
K253004
Device Name
LUNA 3D
Indications for Use (Describe)
The LUNA 3D system is used to support reproducible patient positioning and monitor patient surface motion during radiotherapy and radiosurgery treatments and during CT simulation for radiation therapy planning. The LUNA 3D system provides data exchange to radiotherapy imaging and radiotherapy treatment systems to synchronize image acquisition and treatment delivery. LUNA 3D may also be used to guide patients through breath-holds. The LUNA 3D system can be used for all patients, undergoing radiotherapy and radiosurgery treatments and CT simulation for radiation therapy planning.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
*DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Chief Information Officer
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff
PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
FORM FDA 3881 (8/23)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740 EF
{4}
# **510(k) Summary K253004**
In accordance with the requirements of the Safe Medical Device Act, LAP GmbH Laser Applikationen herewith submits a Summary of Safety and Effectiveness.
This 510(k) summary for the LUNA 3D meets the requirements of 21 CFR 807.92.
**Submitter information:** LAP GmbH Laser Applikationen
Zeppelinstrasse 23
21337 Lueneburg
Phone: +49 4131 951195
Fax: +49 4131 951196
Establishment Registration Number: 9681134
Owner/Operator Number: 9019434
**Official Correspondent:** Sebastian Boldhaus
Zeppelinstrasse 23
21337 Lueneburg
Germany
Phone: +49 4131 9511357
Email: s.boldhaus@lap-laser.com
**US Agent (Contact):** Trent Van Arkel
LAP of America Laser Applications, L.C.
161 Commerce Rd Ste 3
Boynton Beach, FL 33426
Phone: 561 4169250
Fax: 561 4169263
Email: T.vanArkel@lap-laser.com
**Date Prepared:** 08th of May 2026
510(k) Summary
LUNA 3D
Page 1 of 9
{5}
# **Device(s) Identification**
Device trade name: LUNA 3D
Common name: Surface Guided Radio Therapy System (Patient Positioning System – accessory to a linear accelerator)
# **Classification of the device**
Device Classification Name: Medical charged-particle radiation therapy system
Product Code: IYE
C.F.R. Section.: 892.5050
Classification Panel: Radiology devices
Device Class: Class II
# **Device Description:**
The LUNA 3D optical camera system captures the current 3D patient skin surface with one or multiple camera pods. The software calculates the spatial deviations between the captured live surface and a reference surface within a selected region of interest using a registration algorithm. Reference surfaces may be generated with the optical camera system or may be imported using data received from Treatment Planning Systems (TPS). Based on the registration results the user can adjust the patient position for reproducible patient positioning relative to the treatment isocenter. During the imaging (simulation) and treatment delivery process, the system continuously calculates the deviations between live- and reference surface for patient motion monitoring to ensure that the patient position remains within pre-defined tolerances.
The LUNA 3D system may provide data exchange to radiotherapy imaging and radiotherapy treatment devices.
3D motion tracking data acquired by LUNA 3D during a CT imaging scan, can be transferred to the imaging device to support motion synchronized data reconstruction (e.g. 4DCT).
Patient position correction data can be used to send shifts to a motorized couch to correct patient position without manual couch movements prior to treatment start.
During treatment delivery, LUNA 3D motion tracking data can be used to hold the treatment beam, if the patient moves out of pre-defined tolerances. If the patient position is back within the pre-defined tolerances, the treatment can be continued.
# **Indications for use:**
The LUNA 3D system is used to support reproducible patient positioning and monitor patient surface motion during radiotherapy and radiosurgery treatments and during CT simulation for radiation therapy planning. The LUNA 3D system provides data exchange to radiotherapy imaging and radiotherapy treatment systems to synchronize image acquisition and treatment delivery. LUNA 3D may also be used to guide patients through breath-holds. The LUNA 3D system can be used for all patients, undergoing radiotherapy and radiosurgery treatments and CT simulation for radiation therapy planning.
Page 2 of 9
510(k) Summary
LUNA 3D
{6}
# **Predicate device:**
Device Name: AlignRT Plus
510k number: K233622
Device Classification Name: Medical charged-particle radiation therapy system
Product Code: IYE
C.F.R. Section.: 892.5050
Classification Panel: Radiology devices
Device Class: Class II
# **Comparison to predicate device:**
The LUNA 3D is considered substantially equivalent to AlignRT Plus (K233622). There is no significant difference in intended use or technology.
The previous version of LUNA 3D (K232031) has been added as reference device, to compare comparable technological features and workflows already covered or addressed in the previous submission of LUNA 3D.
The following table presents the comparison of technological characteristics, functions and parameters of the identified predicate device, reference device and the proposed subject device.
| Description/ Parameter | Subject Device: LUNA 3D | Predicate Device: Vision RT AlignRT Plus (K233622) | Reference Device: LUNA 3D (K232031) | Comment |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| **Indications for use** | The LUNA 3D system is used to support reproducible patient positioning and monitor patient surface motion during radiotherapy and radiosurgery treatments and during CT simulation for radiation therapy planning. The LUNA 3D system provides data exchange to radiotherapy imaging and radiotherapy treatment systems to synchronize image acquisition and treatment delivery. LUNA 3D may also be used to guide patients through breath-holds. | The AlignRT Plus system is indicated for: • Tracking respiratory motion throughout the simulation process to facilitate subsequent 4DCT reconstruction and coaching the patient in breathing techniques required for Deep-Inspiration Breath Hold (DIBH). • Verification of patient identity for their radiation treatment session. • Positioning and monitoring of patients during radiation delivery, relative to the setup isocenter and/or the prescribed | The LAP LUNA 3D system is used to support reproducible patient positioning and monitor patient surface motion during radiotherapy and radiosurgery treatments and during CT simulation for radiation therapy planning. LAP LUNA 3D may also be used to guide patients through breath-holds. The LAP LUNA 3D system can be used for all patients, undergoing radiotherapy and radiosurgery treatments and CT simulation for radiation | Similar Both devices are used to track respiration motion during CT simulation processes for breath-hold and synchronized image acquisition (4DCT) Both systems ae use for patient positioning and monitor patient surface motion during radiotherapy and radiosurgery treatments relative to a prescribed isocenter. Both systems can synchronize treatment delivery by automatic beam hold. Both devices can be used to import data |
Page 3 of 9
510(k) Summary
LUNA 3D
{7}
| Description/ Parameter | Subject Device: LUNA 3D | Predicate Device: Vision RT AlignRT Plus (K233622) | Reference Device: LUNA 3D (K232031) | Comment |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | The LUNA 3D system can be used for all patients, undergoing radiotherapy and radiosurgery treatments and CT simulation for radiation therapy planning. | treatment isocenter. • Withholding the beam automatically during radiation delivery, as well as gating the beam based on the patient's respiratory motion. • Performing quality assurance on MV, kV imagers, room lasers, and the treatment couch. • Visualizing the Cherenkov signal associated with the radiation beam on entry and exit from the patient. • Passing and receiving information to/from other systems associated with the radiotherapy treatment. | therapy planning. | from other systems to be used as a reference (e.g. DICOM). The already cleared version of LUNA 3D (reference device) has the same core functions as the subject and the predicate device. However, in its current version, the reference device has no interoperability with treatment or diagnostic devices. Compared to the reference device, LUNA 3D does not verify the patient identity and is not visualizing Cherenkov signals. |
| **Principle of operation** | 3D imaging of the patients surfaces and comparison with reference surfaces. | Video based imaging of 3D skin surface data using surface matching software. | 3D imaging of the patients surfaces and comparison with reference surfaces. | Similar to predicate device and identical to reference device |
| **Target population** | Any individual of any age undergoing radiotherapy. | Any individual (adult or child) undergoing radiotherapy. | Any individual of any age undergoing radiotherapy. | Similar to predicate device and identical to reference device |
| **Components** | PC workstation, cables, camera pods (video cameras and a projector unit). Calibration phantom, made of plastic. Depending on the interoperability, additional hardware such as cables and | PC workstation, cables, camera pods (video cameras and a projector unit). Calibration phantom, made of plastic. Depending on the interoperability, additional hardware such as cables and | PC workstation, cables, camera pods (video cameras and a projector unit). Calibration phantom, made of plastic. | Similar The components provided with the system are comparable. All three devices (the reference device as well) have the basic setup with cameras, cables and computer workstations. |
Page 4 of 9
510(k) Summary
LUNA 3D
{8}
| Description/ Parameter | Subject Device: LUNA 3D | Predicate Device: Vision RT AlignRT Plus (K233622) | Reference Device: LUNA 3D (K232031) | Comment |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | adapter devices can be provided. | adapter devices can be provided. | | To allow interoperability with treatment and diagnostic devices, the subject and the predicate device might be delivered with additional hardware. |
| **System performance and accuracy** | Shift accuracy* multi pod system: <0.5mm Rotation accuracy* multi pod system: <0.5mm | Positioning accuracy: Target registration errors (as measured using calibration phantom) < 1mm (0.5mm) for all couch angles. Respiratory tracking: Tracks respiratory signal from imaged surface data and sends to CT (4 D CT) or to Linac or imaging device (gating). Surface displacements can be tracked with RMS errors < 0.5mm over 10 or more breathing cycles. | Positioning accuracy: Target registration errors (as measured using calibration phantom) < 0.5mm for all couch angles. Respiratory tracking: Tracks respiratory signal from imaged surface data. Surface displacements can be tracked with RMS errors < 0.5mm over 10 or more breathing cycles. | Identical Both the predicate device and the subject device have a gating function; Similar The accuracy of the subject device is better than the predicate device's and identical to the reference device. |
| **Biocomp** | The LUNA 3D device does not come into contact with patients during its intended use. The User does come into contact with commercially available user interfaces such as keyboards or touchscreens of mobile devices. Furthermore, during calibration the user does come into contact with the calibration cube. | The AlignRT Plus product requires no direct contact with the patient. The only interactions between the user and the system are with: • the PC (in the control room) or remote workstation (in the vault), • the Remote Control (in the vault), • the Real Time Coach (RTC) (in the vault), or | The LUNA 3D device does not come into contact with patients during its intended use. The User does come into contact with commercially available user interfaces such as keyboards or touchscreens of mobile devices. Furthermore, during calibration the user does come into contact with the calibration cube. | Identical |
Page 5 of 9
510(k) Summary
LUNA 3D
{9}
| Description/ Parameter | Subject Device: LUNA 3D | Predicate Device: Vision RT AlignRT Plus (K233622) | Reference Device: LUNA 3D (K232031) | Comment |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | - the Head Adjuster (in the vault). - Calibration plate (in the vault) - Calibration cube (in the vault) - Calibration levelling plate (in the vault) The materials of the devices (which are commonly used in light-industrial, commercial and home use) and that the application only involves intermittent external contact with intact skin. | | |
| **Mechanical safety** | LUNA 3D camera pods are ceiling mounted. Display device is rigidly wall mounted. The breath hold device is clamped to the treatment couch in patient environment. | Cameras are ceiling mounted and do not contact patient or user. The InBore camera solution is fixed to the inside of the bore-based linac. Head adjuster is clamped to the treatment couch through universal base plate. | LAP LUNA 3D camera pods are ceiling mounted. Display device is rigidly wall mounted. The breath hold device is clamped to the treatment couch in patient environment. | Identical, except subject and reference device have no InBore camera |
| **Optical Pattern** | Optical visible blue pattern is projected on the patient's body surface. | Optical (near infra-red) pattern is projected to patient. | Optical visible blue pattern is projected on the patient's body surface. | Similar, only different wavelength Optical pattern is projected on the patient's body surface. |
| **Electrical Standard** | IEC 60601-1 compliant. | IEC 60601-1 compliant. | IEC 60601-1 compliant. | Identical |
| **EMC Standard** | IEC60601-1-2 compliant. | IEC 60601-1-2 compliant. | IEC 60601-1-2 compliant. | Identical |
| **Size and Weight** | The camera pods have the following dimensions: 540mm x 240mm x 95mm and a weight of 6.4 kg | The camera (key part of the system) has the following dimensions: HD Cameras (each) – 470 x 220 x 70 – 4.5kg | The camera pods have the following dimensions: 540mm x 240mm x 95mm and a weight of 6.4 kg | Similar LUNA 3D system cameras have similar dimensions and weight as the Align RT Horizon |
Page 6 of 9
510(k) Summary
LUNA 3D
{10}
| Description/ Parameter | Subject Device: LUNA 3D | Predicate Device: Vision RT AlignRT Plus (K233622) | Reference Device: LUNA 3D (K232031) | Comment |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Horizon cameras (each) – 480 x 140 x 127 – 2.75kg InBore optional camera accessory - Ring 499mm diameter (plus 1mm protrusions) x 177mm wide (max) – 3.2kg | | camera. |
| **Packaging** | System components will be packed separately and commissioned based on the customers order. All components could be send separately or shipped together. | The system is packaged in a variety of boxes and then packaged within palletized crate. | System components will be packed separately and commissioned based on the customers order. All components could be send separately or shipped together. | Similar Both devices are provided separately packed and commissioned according to request. |
| **Environmental range** | Operating Temp: +15 to +30°C Humidity: 25-80% Altitude: <= 2000m Storage Temp: -10 to +40°C | Operating Temp: +16°C to +30° Altitude: <= 3000m Storage - 20°C to +50°C | Operating Temp: +15 to +30°C Humidity: 25-80% Altitude: <= 2000m Storage Temp: -10 to +40°C | Similar: Both devices have almost identical operating conditions. However the Align RT device has a broader storage temperature range. |
| **Workstation Operating System** | Windows 10 IOT, Windows Server 2022 | Windows 10 | Windows 10 IOT, Windows Server 2022 | Similar: Both devices use Windows OS. |
| **Power requirements** | 110-240V 50/60Hz | 110-230V 50/60Hz | 110-240V 50/60Hz | Similar: The maximum voltage range of the LUNA 3D is slightly higher, but not relevant for the US market. |
| **Network requirements** | 100 Mbit/s connected to local hospital network | 10BaseT internet connection behind a local firewall. | 100 Mbit/s connected to local hospital network | Similar: LUNA 3D device has a secured 100 Mbit/s network connection whereas the subject device has 10BaseT. Thus the subject device does offer better transmissions speed. |
Page 7 of 9
510(k) Summary
LUNA 3D
{11}
## Summary of bench testing:
The new functions of the subject device, compared to the already cleared reference device in terms of synchronized treatment (gating function), synchronized image acquisition (4DCT) and couch control have been tested on a functional level, performance level and in terms of human factors. The tests have been carried out on production equivalent systems in laboratory and clinical environments.
LUNA 3D has undergone formal hardware and software verification and validation testing. The testing was performed in accordance with LAPs development SOP, that is part of the company wide quality management system compliant to the FDA Quality System Regulation (21 CFR §820), ISO 13485 Quality Management System Standard and the ISO 14971 Risk Management Standard. The Test results demonstrate the device performance as intended.
For latency measurement it was evaluated if the specified mean latency between patient movement and an update to the displayed values can be achieved. A representative setup was used on-site to measure latency values under expected clinical conditions. To determine system latency, the time difference between triggering the capture of camera images in the pod and the display of the results on the screen, or the transmission of the signal to the third-party interface, is measured. The latency tests confirmed the specified latency.
In the accuracy tests, the 3D sensors should be capable of achieving the specified displacement detection accuracy and the specified rotation detection accuracy in a system with multiple camera pods during positioning and monitoring operations. To determine this, a representative setup was used on-site to measure accuracy values under expected clinical conditions. A phantom was placed on a motion platform with six degrees of freedom in the isocenter and moved in a defined manner. Camera pod data was acquired and accuracy determined. The tests demonstrated a tracking accuracy within the specified accuracy in a multi-camera pod system during positioning and monitoring.
Essential performance was tested in a functional safety lab test under the supervision of a certified testing organization. The purpose of this test was to verify that the essential performance characteristics were maintained even under single fault conditions. Latency and accuracy measurement in connection with the display of values and the gating function was carried out and specified single-fault conditions were induced. It was determined that the defined essential performance parameters were maintained under single fault conditions.
Validation in a clinical setting included acceptance testing of the gating function and the reliable display of values, a verified full workflow simulation, object tolerance tests, and thus the functional validation of LUNA 3D in a clinically equivalent environment. The complete clinical workflow with the gating function was simulated in a clinical setting. Among other things, an object was moved into and out of the tolerance range. The response of the beam signal is measured and should fall within the specified tolerance limits. The signal was measured as expected at the third party interface. In addition, the 4DCT functionality and automated table control were validated in a clinical
Page 8 of 9
510(k) Summary
LUNA 3D
{12}
environment to ensure that the table moves according to the data provided by the system. The complete clinical workflow was simulated. A breathing phantom was used to generate baseline data, which was then synchronized with the CT scanner as respiratory motion data. The respiratory data was recorded during the CT scan. The data were acquired as expected. To verify the functionality of the table control, the table was moved automatically based on the data provided by LUNA 3D. For this purpose calculated correction values were sent from LUNA 3D and the table was supposed to move to the respective position accordingly. The table moved to the intended positions. This confirmed the LUNA 3D functionalities of gating, 4DCT, and couch control in a clinical setting and in accordance with the intended workflows.
To verify that the intended users can operate the LUNA 3D user interface correctly, usability tests were conducted in accordance with FDA guidelines on human factors. This served to evaluate the ergonomic aspects of new workflows and functions, as well as to identify potential user errors. A representative group of users was trained in the clinically relevant workflows. Subsequently, these steps were performed by the user in a clinical setting under observation, and the implementation was documented. No safety-related user errors were observed.
#### **Comparison of electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility:**
The subject device is electrically and electromagnetically safe and in accordance with internationally recognized standards of the IEC 60601 standard family. Both predicate as well as the proposed device follow identical standards, whereas the proposed device follows the current version that is included in the list of recognized consensus standards.
#### **FDA recognized consensus standards used:**
- ANSI AAMI ES ES60601-1:2005/(R)2012 & A1:2012 C1:2009/(R)2012 & A2:2010/(R)2012 (Cons. Text) [Incl. AMD2:2021] 19-46
- IEC 60601-1-2 Edition 4.1 2020-09 Consolidated Version 19-36
- IEC TR 60601-4-2 Edition 1.0 2016-05 19-19
- IEC 62304 Edition 1.1 2015-06 CONSOLIDATED VERSION 13-79
- ANSI AAMI ISO 14971:2019 5-125
#### **Conclusion:**
LAP GmbH Laser Applikationen believes that the LUNA 3D is substantially equivalent to the currently legally marketed device.
Carried out tests in laboratory and clinical environment, show the same or better performance and accuracy values compared to the predicate device. The safety tests were conducted and passed in accordance with the same standards that were applied to the predicate device. The subject device does not introduce new indications for use, compared to the predicate device. It has the same technological characteristics and does not introduce new potential hazards or safety risks.
Therefor the subject device is considered to be as safe and as effective, and it performs as well as or better than the legally marketed device.
Page 9 of 9
510(k) Summary
LUNA 3D
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.