VITROS Immunodiagnostic Products hs Troponin I Reagent Pack
K252393 · Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Inc. · MMI · Oct 29, 2025 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K252393
Device Name
VITROS Immunodiagnostic Products hs Troponin I Reagent Pack
Applicant
Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Inc.
Product Code
MMI · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Oct 29, 2025
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1215
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K252393 · Oct 29, 2025
VITROS Immunodiagnostic Products hs Troponin I Reagent Pack
Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Inc.
Multi-center prospective clinical study of patients presenting to Emergency Departments
The study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the VITROS hs Troponin I test in a real-world clinical population of 2,145 subjects presenting with symptoms consistent with acute coronary syndrome across 24 Emergency Departments.
Multi-center prospective study of VITROS hs Troponin I test; Multi-center prospective study; Follow-up/Duration: Serial blood samples drawn up to 11 hours after ED presentation
2145 subjects presenting with symptoms consistent with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) at 24 Emergency Departments; Sample Size: 2145; Number of Sites: 24
Independent adjudication committee (US board-certified cardiologists) using Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction
Diagnostic accuracy (AUC, Sensitivity, Specificity, NPV, PPV) relative to adjudicated MI diagnosis
Indications for Use
For in vitro diagnostic use only. For the quantitative measurement of cardiac troponin I (cTnl) in human plasma (heparin) using the VITROS 5600 Integrated System. Cardiac troponin I is used to aid in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI).
Device Story
VITROS Immunodiagnostic Products hs Troponin I Reagent Pack is an in vitro diagnostic immunoassay for quantitative measurement of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) in lithium heparin plasma. Performed on the VITROS 5600 Integrated System; device uses streptavidin-conjugated antibody and HRP-labeled antibody conjugate to bind cTnI in patient samples. Antigen-antibody complex is captured on biotin-BSA coated wells; unbound components are removed via washing. Bound HRP conjugate is measured via luminescent luminol reaction; light signal is proportional to cTnI concentration. Used in emergency departments by clinical laboratory personnel. Results aid physicians in diagnosing myocardial infarction. Benefits include rapid, quantitative assessment of cardiac injury to support clinical decision-making for patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome.
Clinical Evidence
Prospective, multicenter, blinded study of 2145 patients (≥22 years) presenting with acute coronary syndrome symptoms. Adjudicated diagnosis (MI vs. non-MI) based on Fourth Universal Definition of MI. Sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV calculated for 0-2h, 2-4h, 4-6h, and 6-11h intervals using sex-specific (9 ng/L female, 12 ng/L male) and overall (11 ng/L) cut-offs. Sensitivity ranged from 84.03% to 97.62% depending on interval and cut-off. False negative rates were 3.2% (female) and 8.0% (male) using sex-specific cut-offs.
Technological Characteristics
Quantitative immunoassay; biotin-BSA/streptavidin-mouse monoclonal anti-cTnI capture; HRP-mouse monoclonal anti-cTnI conjugate. Measuring range 2.25–30,000 ng/L. Instrument: VITROS 5600 Integrated System. Detection via luminescent luminol reaction. Traceable to internal standard. Complies with CLSI EP05-A3, EP17-A2, EP06, EP07, EP37, EP28-A3c, and ISO 17511:2021.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the quantitative measurement of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) in human heparin plasma to aid in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI) in patients presenting with symptoms consistent with acute coronary syndrome.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A creatine phosphokinase/creatine kinase or isoenzymes test system is a device intended to measure the activity of the enzyme creatine phosphokinase or its isoenzymes (a group of enzymes with similar biological activity) in plasma and serum. Measurements of creatine phosphokinase and its isoenzymes are used in the diagnosis and treatment of myocardial infarction and muscle diseases such as progressive, Duchenne-type muscular dystrophy.
{0}
FDA
U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY
## I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K252393
B Applicant
Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Inc.
C Proprietary and Established Names
VITROS Immunodiagnostic Products hs Troponin I Reagent Pack
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| MMI | Class II | 21 CFR 862.1215 - Creatine Phosphokinase/Creatine Kinase or Isoenzymes Test System | CH - Clinical Chemistry |
## II Submission/Device Overview:
A Purpose for Submission:
New device
B Measurand:
Cardiac Troponin I (cTnI)
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
{1}
C Type of Test:
Quantitative Immunoassay
III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
A Intended Use(s):
See Indications for Use below.
B Indication(s) for Use:
For in vitro diagnostic use only.
For the quantitative measurement of cardiac troponin I (cTnl) in human plasma (heparin) using the VITROS 5600 Integrated System.
Cardiac troponin I is used to aid in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI).
C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
Rx - For Prescription Use Only
D Special Instrument Requirements:
VITROS 5600 Integrated System
IV Device/System Characteristics:
A Device Description:
The VITROS Immunodiagnostic Products hs Troponin I Reagent Pack is performed on the VITROS 5600 Integrated System. Each reagent pack contains:
- 100 coated wells (biotin-BSA; streptavidin-mouse monoclonal anti-cTnI, 4 µg/mL).
- 8.2 mL assay reagent (buffer with horse serum, bovine gamma globulin, bovine serum albumin, and antimicrobial agent).
- 7.0 mL conjugate reagent (HRP-mouse monoclonal anti-cTnI, 5 µg/mL, in buffer with bovine serum albumin and antimicrobial agent).
The reagent pack includes the VITROS hs Troponin I Calibrators for calibration of the VITROS 5600 Integrated System.
The VITROS 5600 Integrated System reports cTnI results in units of ng/L or pg/mL.
Additional materials required but not provided with the product:
- VITROS Immunodiagnostic Products Signal Reagent
- VITROS Immunodiagnostic Products Universal Wash Reagent
- VITROS Immunodiagnostic Products Reagent Pack Storage Box with desiccant
- Quality control materials
K252393 - Page 2 of 15
{2}
K252393 - Page 3 of 15
B Principle of Operation:
An immunoassay is performed using the components of the reagent pack in which cTnI present in the sample binds with a streptavidin-conjugated antibody and a horseradish peroxidase-labeled antibody conjugate. The antigen-antibody complex is captured to the surface of a well by biotin-BSA. A free-bound separation is effected to remove unbound antibodies by washing. The bound HRP conjugate is measured by a luminescent luminol reaction. The light signal is read by the instrument and is proportional to the concentration of cTnI.
V Substantial Equivalence Information:
A Predicate Device Name(s):
Vitros Troponin I ES Reagent Pack
B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):
K062838
C Comparison with Predicate(s):
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K252393 | K062838 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | VITROS
Immunodiagnostic
Products hs Troponin I
Reagent Pack | VITROS
Immunodiagnostic
Products Troponin I ES
Reagent Pack |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | To aid in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. | Same |
| | | |
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
| Sample Type | Lithium heparin plasma | Serum and plasma (EDTA and lithium heparin) |
| Instrument(s) | VITROS 5600
Integrated System | VITROS
Immunodiagnostic
System ECi and ECiQ model analyzers |
| Measuring range | 2.25 - 30,000 ng/L | 12-80,000 ng/L |
| Biotin interference | No interference at up to 0.351 mg/dL | No interference at up to 0.00025 mg/dL |
{3}
VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
CLSI EP05-A3. Evaluation of Precision of Quantitative Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline—Third Edition.
CLSI EP17-A2. Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline – Second Edition.
CLSI EP06 2nd Edition. Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedure.
CLSI EP07. Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry. 3rd ed.
CLSI EP37. Supplemental Tables for Interferent Testing in Clinical Chemistry – First Edition.
CLSI EP28-A3c. Defining Establishing and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory; Approved Guideline - Third Edition
ISO 17511:2021. In vitro diagnostic medical devices - Requirements for establishing metrological traceability of values assigned to calibrators, trueness control materials and human samples.
VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
A Analytical Performance:
1. Precision/Reproducibility:
Precision was evaluated consistent with the CLSI document EP05-A3. In the study, each of four patient plasma pools and two controls were tested in replicates of two per run, two runs per day over each of 20 days for a total of 80 measurements. The study was performed using each of three reagent lots on one VITROS 5600 Integrated System across a single calibration interval. The data were analyzed for within-run precision (repeatability) and within-device (with variance components of within-run, between-run, and between-day). Representative performance data is shown below.
| Sample type | Mean conc. (ng/L) | Within-run | | Within-device | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Pooled patient samples | 5.5 | 0.14 | 2.7 | 0.25 | 4.9 |
| | 11.7 | 0.31 | 2.7 | 0.57 | 4.9 |
| | 65.3 | 1.14 | 1.8 | 1.91 | 3.0 |
| | 309.2 | 3.42 | 1.1 | 9.15 | 3.0 |
| Controls | 14,090 | 262.7 | 1.9 | 415.8 | 3.0 |
| | 18,460 | 236.3 | 1.3 | 565.0 | 3.1 |
K252393 - Page 4 of 15
{4}
K252393 - Page 5 of 15
2. Linearity:
Linearity studies were performed in line with CLSI document EP06 2nd edition. For cTnI, the measurement procedure shows linearity for the interval from 2.25 to 30,000 ng/L, with deviations from linearity within +/- 10%.
Two studies were conducted. The first study used contrived samples (commercially available buffered human plasma that has been spiked with cTnI) that spanned the entire measuring interval using 11 levels with a minimum of 3 replicates for each level, the maximum observed % deviation from linearity was 4.2%. The second study used lithium heparin plasma patient samples and spanned the low end up to 4799 ng/L with 12 levels and a minimum of 5 replicates for each level, the maximum observed % deviation from linearity was 9.0%.
Hook Effect
A commercially available buffered human plasma that has been stripped of troponin, and contains no measurable cTnI was spiked with cTnI (measured gravimetrically) to produce a fluid with a concentration of approximately 100,000 ng/L. This fluid was diluted with the human base matrix to produce a set of 10 samples covering the assay range from 0 ng/L up to approximately 100,000 ng/L. Samples were tested in triplicate and quality control samples were tested in singleton using one VITROS hs Troponin I assay lot in combination with one VITROS 5600 Integrated System. The sponsor demonstrated that there is no hook effect with the assay up to cTnI concentration of 100,000 ng/L.
3. Analytical Specificity/Interference:
The analytical specificity performance of the VITROS® Immunodiagnostic Products hs Troponin I Reagent Pack run on the VITROS 5600 Integrated System was established by conducting a cross-reactivity study and interference testing for endogenous and exogenous substances, consistent with CLSI EP07 and EP37.
Endogenous substances
Interference from endogenous substances was assessed using two lithium heparin plasma samples with cTnI concentrations of approximately 10 ng/L and 350 ng/L. Each of the two samples was further divided into two aliquots for a control sample (with no added interferent) and test sample (with added interferent). The native concentrations of the substances were taken into account when calculations were made for spiking the substance. For screening, each sample was assayed in replicates of five using three lots of reagent packs on one instrument. For those substances that on initial screening were found to interfere, dose response testing was conducted to establish the concentration limit below which no significant interference is expected. The results are given in the table below: No significant interference, defined by the sponsor as within ±10% difference in the mean for the test sample versus the mean of the control sample, was observed at the following concentrations.
{5}
K252393 - Page 6 of 15
| Substance | Highest concentration tested at which no significant interference is observed |
| --- | --- |
| Bilirubin, conjugated | 40 mg/dL |
| Bilirubin, unconjugated | 40 mg/dL |
| Cholesterol | 400 mg/dL |
| Fibrinogen | 500 mg/dL |
| HAMA (human anti-mouse antibodies) | 800 μg/L |
| Hemoglobin | 750 mg/dL |
| Rheumatoid Factor | 900 IU/mL |
| Total protein* | 10.1 g/dL |
| Triglyceride | 1500 mg/dL |
*Test results compared to a control sample with total protein concentration of 7.3 g/dL.
## Exogenous substances
Interference from 64 exogenous substances (common prescription drugs, OTC medications and sample additives) was assessed using two lithium heparin plasma samples with cTnI concentrations of approximately 10 ng/L and 350 ng/L, as described above. No significant interference, defined by the sponsor as within ±10% difference in the mean for the test sample versus the mean of the control sample was observed at the following concentrations.
| Substance | Highest concentration tested at which no significant interference is observed |
| --- | --- |
| Acetaminophen | 15.6 mg/dL |
| Acetylcysteine | 15.0 mg/dL |
| Adrenaline (epinephrine) | 20 μg/dL |
| Allopurinol | 6.0 mg/dL |
| Alprazolam | 0.0258 mg/dL |
| Ambroxol | 63 μg/dL |
| Amlodipine besylate | 0.0104 mg/dL |
| Amoxicillin | 5.40 mg/dL |
| Ascorbic acid | 5.25 mg/dL |
| Atorvastatin calcium | 0.162 mg/dL |
| Benazepril HCl | 0.044 mg/dL |
| Biotin | 0.351 mg/dL |
| Bivalirudin | 2.18 mg/dL |
| Caffeine | 10.8 mg/dL |
| Carvedilol | 43.2 μg/dL |
| Cefoxitin sodium | 523 mg/dL |
| Ceftriaxone disodium hemi (heptahydrate) | 100 mg/dL |
| Cephalexin sodium | 13.4 mg/dL |
| Cinnarizine | 108 μg/dL |
| Clopidogrel | 2.4 μg/dL |
| Cocaine | 0.6 mg/dL |
| Cotinine | 0.24 mg/dL |
| Cyclosporine | 0.18 mg/dL |
| Dextran | 600 mg/dL |
{6}
K252393 - Page 7 of 15
| Substance | Highest concentration tested at which no significant interference is observed |
| --- | --- |
| Digoxin | 0.0039 mg/dL |
| Diphenhydramine | 0.0774 mg/dL |
| Dopamine | 0.0621 mg/dL |
| Enalaprilat | 0.0819 mg/dL |
| Enoxaparin (LMWH) | 360 U/dL |
| Eptifibatide | 1.44 mg/dL |
| Erythromycin | 13.8 mg/dL |
| Ethanol | 600 mg/dL |
| Fibrinogen | 500 mg/dL |
| Fondaparinux | 0.39 mg/dL |
| Furosemide | 1.59 mg/dL |
| Heparin (Sodium), UFH | 330 U/dL |
| Ibuprofen | 21.9 mg/dL |
| Insulin | 3.12 µg/dL |
| L-dopa (Levodopa) | 0.75 mg/dL |
| Levothyroxine | 0.0429 mg/dL |
| Lidocaine | 1.5 mg/dL |
| Methylprednisolone | 0.783 mg/dL |
| Metronidazole | 12.3 mg/dL |
| Naproxen sodium | 39.3 mg/dL |
| Nifedipine | 0.0588 mg/dL |
| Nitrofurantoin | 0.213 mg/dL |
| Nitroglycerin (Nitrostat) | 1.2 µg/dL |
| Omeprazole | 0.84 mg/dL |
| Oxycodone | 0.0324 mg/dL |
| Oxytetracycline | 1.2 mg/dL |
| Phenytoin | 6.0 mg/dL |
| Propranolol HCl | 0.115 mg/dL |
| Pseudoephedrine | 0.330 mg/dL |
| Quinidine | 1.5 mg/dL |
| Rifampicin (Rifampin) | 4.8 mg/dL |
| Rivaroxaban | 0.270 mg/dL |
| Salicylic acid | 2.86 mg/dL |
| Sodium azide | 17.5 mg/dL |
| Spironolactone | 0.0555 mg/dL |
| Theophylline | 6.0 mg/dL |
| tPA (alteplase) at 11.8 ng/L cTnI | 0.6 mg/dL |
| tPA (alteplase) at 386 ng/L cTnI | 0.3 mg/dL |
| Vancomycin hydrochloride | 12.3 mg/dL |
| Verapamil | 0.16 mg/dL |
| Vorapaxar | 36 µg/dL |
| Warfarin sodium | 8.0 mg/dL |
{7}
Interference was observed in the presence of streptokinase (not commercially available in the United States):
| Substance | Interferent concentration | cTnI conc. | Effect when above the concentration limit | %Interference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Streptokinase | 37,500 U/dL | 12.0 ng/L | Decreased cTnI results | -79% |
| | 37,500 U/dL | 390 ng/L | Decreased cTnI results | -65% |
The following limitations are included in the labeling:
Dextran at therapeutic doses significantly interferes with this test. This test should not be used on patients taking Dextran. An alternate method not subject to Dextran interference should be used.
Heterophile as well as human anti-animal antibodies (most common human anti-mouse antibodies or HAMA) in serum or plasma of certain individuals are known to cause interference with immunoassays.1 The anti-animal antibodies may be present in blood samples from individuals regularly exposed to animals or who have received preparations of mouse monoclonal antibodies for diagnosis or therapy. Results inconsistent with clinical observations indicate the need for additional testing.
Troponin autoantibodies have been reported to be present in approximately 10% to 20% of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) and may lead to falsely low troponin assay results and delay in treatment of acute coronary syndrome.2,3Therefore, a test result that is inconsistent with the clinical picture and patient history should be interpreted with caution.
## Cross-Reactivity
A study was conducted to quantify the level of cross-reactivity with the assay from certain structural similar substances. In the study, two test samples were prepared from plasma, containing no cTnI (i.e. immeasurable) and containing endogenous cTnI at approximately 10 ng/L. The cross-reactivity of the assay was evaluated by adding a potentially cross-reactive substance to each of the test samples. These samples were paired with two reference samples that were not spiked with cross-reactant and with the same cTnI concentration. Each sample was assayed in replicates of five using three lots and one instrument. The difference in results between test and reference sample was calculated for each of the two cTnI samples and analyzed for % cross-reactivity using the below equation. The results of the study found that there was no significant cross-reactivity of the substances at the concentrations tested.
$$
\% \text{Cross-reactivity} = \frac{(\text{Mean cTnI with cross-reactant} - \text{Mean cTnI with control})}{\text{Concentration of cross-reactant}} \times 100\%
$$
K252393 - Page 8 of 15
{8}
| Cross-Reactant | Concentration of Cross-Reactant, ng/L | % Cross-Reactivity |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Actin (from Rabbit Muscle) | 1,000,000 | 0.0% |
| Cardiac Troponin C (Recombinant) | 1,000,000 | 0.0% |
| Cardiac Troponin T (Recombinant) | 1,000,000 | 0.0% |
| CK-MB (Recombinant) | 1,000,000 | 0.0% |
| Myoglobin (Recombinant) | 1,000,000 | 0.0% |
| Myosin (Recombinant) | 1,000,000 | 0.0% |
| Skeletal Troponin I | 1,000,000 | 0.0% |
| Tropomyosin (from porcine muscle) | 1,000,000 | 0.0% |
The percent differences from this study are summarized below:
| Substance | Mean Control (ng/L) | Mean with Interferent (ng/L) | Difference (ng/L) | Difference (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Actin (from Rabbit Muscle) | 11.45 | 11.31 | -0.14 | -1.2% |
| Cardiac Troponin C (Recombinant) | 11.45 | 25.34 | 13.89 | 121.4% |
| Cardiac Troponin T (Recombinant) | 11.45 | 11.24 | -0.21 | -1.8% |
| CK-MB (Recombinant) | 11.82 | 13.91 | 2.09 | 17.7% |
| Myoglobin (Recombinant) | 11.82 | 11.46 | -0.36 | -3.1% |
| Myosin (Recombinant) | 11.82 | 10.87 | -0.95 | -8.0% |
| Skeletal Troponin I | 11.45 | 14.99 | 3.55 | 31.0% |
| Tropomyosin (from porcine muscle) | 11.75 | 12.56 | 0.81 | 6.9% |
An additional study was conducted to evaluate the interference from Cardiac Troponin C and the results are summarized below:
| Cardiac Troponin C (ng/L) | Mean Control (ng/L) | Mean with Interferent (ng/L) | % Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 20,000 | 10.37 | 10.69 | 3.1 |
| 40,000 | 10.37 | 11.73 | 13.1 |
| 60,000 | 10.37 | 12.27 | 18.3 |
| 80,000 | 10.37 | 11.87 | 14.5 |
| 1,000,000 | 11.45 | 25.34 | 121.4 |
K252393 - Page 9 of 15
{9}
K252393 - Page 10 of 15
4. Assay Reportable Range:
2.25 ng/L to 30,000 ng/L
5. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
The sponsor provided data to support that plasma samples may be stored for up to 8 hours at room temperature 15–30°C (59–86°F), and up to 11 months at ≤ -20°C with up to two freeze-thaw cycles.
The VITROS Immunodiagnostic Products hs Troponin I Reagent Pack is traceable to an internal standard.
6. Detection Limit:
Limit of Blank (LoB)
Testing was performed using four zero-analyte lithium heparin plasma samples tested with 10 replicates on two runs for five days. Testing was performed using three reagent lots and one instrument. 100 determinations were obtained for each sample. LoB was calculated non-parametrically. The largest estimate across all reagent lot-instrument combinations tested was 0.26 ng/L.
Limit of Detection (LoD)
Testing was performed using five lithium heparin plasma samples ranging from one to five times the estimated LoB tested with ten replicates on two runs for five days. Testing was performed using three reagent lots and one instrument. 100 determinations were obtained for each sample. The parametric approach described in EP17-A2 was followed to determine the LoD. The largest estimate across all reagent lot-instrument combinations tested was 0.43 ng/L.
Limit of Quantitation (LoQ)
Testing was performed using five lithium heparin plasma samples near and above the LOD tested with five replicates on one run for three days. Testing was performed using three reagent lots and one instrument. 75 determinations were obtained for each sample using each reagent lot. For each reagent lot-instrument combination, the within-laboratory precision for each sample, expressed as %CV, was plotted against the mean concentration obtained for each sample. LoQ was determined by the concentration where a power function model fit to the data equaled 20% CV. The largest estimate across all reagent lot-instrument combinations tested was 0.56 ng/L.
The sponsor claims a LoB of 0.26 ng/L, and LoD of 0.59 ng/L, and an LoQ of 2.25 ng/L.
7. Assay Cut-Off:
See clinical cut-off.
{10}
K252393 - Page 11 of 15
8. Carry-Over
A study was conducted to measure the risk of carryover. In the study, no increase in cTnI concentration was seen in low cTnI samples measured after samples spiked with 1,250,000 ng/L cTnI.
B Comparison Studies:
1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device:
Not applicable.
2. Matrix Comparison:
Not applicable.
C Clinical Studies:
1. Clinical Sensitivity:
A prospective, multicenter, blinded, non-interventional study was conducted to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the VITROS® Immunodiagnostic Products hs Troponin I Reagent Pack. The clinical study included 2145 patients 22 years and older (999 females and 1146 males) presenting with symptoms consistent with acute coronary syndrome across 24 emergency departments (ED) in the United States. For each patient enrolled into the study, lithium heparin plasma samples were collected by serial sampling multiple times over the course of their ED stay for determination of cTnI by the candidate device. These samples were stored frozen (-20°C) and sent to a laboratory for later testing. The sponsor provided evidence to support the sample handling and storage conditions of the clinical samples. All subjects were adjudicated by a panel of board-certified cardiologists who reviewed the subject’s clinical presentation, medical history, relevant clinical data, and locally measured standard of care (SOC) troponin test. The adjudication outcome (MI or non-MI) was based on the Fourth Universal Definition of MI. The cTnI results were interpreted as positive for MI if plasma cTnI concentration were above the cut-off, and negative if less than or equal to the following cut-offs:
| | Overall cut-off | Sex-specific cut-off |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Male | 11 ng/L | 12 ng/L |
| Female | | 9 ng/L |
The observed prevalence of MI in the study was 8.16% (6.21% female and 9.86% male). MI results were stratified by sex and analyzed for sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) for each of the following intervals from time since presentation to the ED: 0-2 hours, ≥2-4 hours, ≥4-6 hours, and ≥6-11 hours. The results are summarized as follows:
{11}
| Female using overall 11 ng/L cut-off | | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Hours since presentation to ED | N | Sensitivity | | Specificity | | NPV | | PPV | |
| | | % | 95% CI | % | 95% CI | % | 95% CI | % | 95% CI |
| 0–2 h | 1042 | 87.10 (54/62) | 76.55-93.31 | 91.63 (898/980) | 89.73-93.21 | 99.12 (898/906) | 98.27-99.55 | 39.71 (54/136) | 31.87-48.10 |
| ≥2–4 h | 858 | 91.80 (56/61) | 82.21-96.45 | 90.21 (719/797) | 87.95-92.09 | 99.31 (719/724) | 98.39-99.70 | 41.79 (56/134) | 33.78-50.26 |
| ≥4–6 h | 508 | 95.24 (40/42) | 84.21-98.68 | 86.48 (403/466) | 83.08-89.29 | 99.51 (403/405) | 98.22-99.86 | 38.83 (40/103) | 29.99-48.49 |
| ≥6–11 h | 541 | 93.55 (58/62) | 84.55-97.46 | 86.01 (412/479) | 82.62-88.83 | 99.04 (412/416) | 97.55-99.63 | 46.40 (58/125) | 37.90-55.12 |
| Male using overall 11 ng/L cut-off | | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Hours since presentation to ED | N | Sensitivity | | Specificity | | NPV | | PPV | |
| | | % | 95% CI | % | 95% CI | % | 95% CI | % | 95% CI |
| 0–2 h | 1214 | 84.87 (101/119) | 77.35-90.21 | 82.10 (899/1095) | 79.72-84.26 | 98.04 (899/917) | 96.92-98.75 | 34.01 (101/297) | 28.85-39.57 |
| ≥2–4 h | 979 | 88.89 (88/99) | 81.19-93.68 | 81.14 (714/880) | 78.42-83.58 | 98.48 (714/725) | 97.30-99.15 | 34.65 (88/254) | 29.06-40.69 |
| ≥4–6 h | 648 | 90.36 (75/83) | 82.12-95.03 | 77.52 (438/565) | 73.90-80.77 | 98.21 (438/446) | 96.50-99.09 | 37.13 (75/202) | 30.76-43.97 |
| ≥6–11 h | 799 | 93.16 (109/117) | 87.09-96.49 | 73.31 (500/682) | 69.87-76.50 | 98.43 (500/508) | 96.92-99.20 | 37.46 (109/291) | 32.09-43.15 |
K252393 - Page 12 of 15
{12}
| Female using sex-specific 9 ng/L cut-off | | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Hours since presentation to ED | N | Sensitivity | | Specificity | | NPV | | PPV | |
| | | % | 95% CI | % | 95% CI | % | 95% CI | % | 95% CI |
| 0–2 h | 1042 | 88.71 (55/62) | 78.48-94.42 | 90.31 (885/980) | 88.29-92.00 | 99.22 (885/892) | 98.39-99.62 | 36.67 (55/150) | 29.38-44.62 |
| ≥2–4 h | 858 | 95.08 (58/61) | 86.51-98.31 | 88.58 (706/797) | 86.19-90.61 | 99.58 (706/709) | 98.76-99.86 | 38.93 (58/149) | 31.47-46.94 |
| ≥4–6 h | 508 | 97.62 (41/42) | 87.68-99.58 | 84.98 (396/466) | 81.45-87.94 | 99.75 (396/397) | 98.59-99.96 | 36.94 (41/111) | 28.54-46.21 |
| ≥6–11 h | 541 | 96.77 (60/62) | 88.98-99.11 | 84.76 (406/479) | 81.27-87.70 | 99.51 (406/408) | 98.23-99.87 | 45.11 (60/133) | 36.91-53.59 |
| Male using sex-specific 12 ng/L cut-off | | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Hours since presentation to ED | N | Sensitivity | | Specificity | | NPV | | PPV | |
| | | % | 95% CI | % | 95% CI | % | 95% CI | % | 95% CI |
| 0–2 h | 1214 | 84.03 (100/119) | 76.40-89.53 | 83.11 (910/1095) | 80.77-85.21 | 97.95 (910/929) | 96.83-98.69 | 35.09 (100/285) | 29.78-40.79 |
| ≥2–4 h | 979 | 88.89 (88/99) | 81.19-93.68 | 81.48 (717/880) | 78.78-83.91 | 98.49 (717/728) | 97.31-99.15 | 35.06 (88/251) | 29.42-41.15 |
| ≥4–6 h | 648 | 89.16 (74/83) | 80.66-94.19 | 78.41 (443/565) | 74.83-81.60 | 98.01 (443/452) | 96.26-98.95 | 37.76 (74/196) | 31.27-44.72 |
| ≥6–11 h | 799 | 93.16 (109/117) | 87.09-96.49 | 75.07 (512/682) | 71.69-78.17 | 98.46 (512/520) | 96.99-99.22 | 39.07 (109/279) | 33.53-44.90 |
K252393 - Page 13 of 15
{13}
The results were also stratified by sex and analyzed for the false negative rate per subject; where MI negative by the device is when the cTnI result was below the cutoff in each of the time intervals.
The sponsor provides the following information about the study in the labeling:
### False negative rate
Using the sex-specific cut-off of 9 ng/L, the false negative rate for females was 3.2% (2/62). When using the overall cut-off of 11 ng/L, the false negative rate for females was 6.5% (4/62).
Using the sex-specific cut-off of 12 ng/L, the false negative rate for males was 8.0% (9/113). When using the overall cut-off of 11 ng/L, the false negative rate for males was 7.1% (8/113).
Serial blood samples for subjects in the VITROS hs Troponin I study were drawn no more than 11 hours after ED presentation; however, clinical information of the study subjects, including standard of care (SOC) troponin test results, were collected for the subjects' entire hospital stay. The standard of care (SOC) troponin tests were the tests used by each clinical study site and were reviewed by the adjudicators for the adjudicated diagnosis.
For 2 of the male false negative subjects, the earliest SOC troponin test results that exceeded the SOC troponin cutoff were from samples drawn more than 26 hours after the final VITROS hs Troponin I sample was collected. For 2 of the female false negative subjects, the earliest SOC troponin test results that exceeded the SOC cutoff were from samples drawn more than 17 hours after the final VITROS hs Troponin I sample was collected.
The sponsor provided the following information about the false positive rate observed in the study:
### False positive rate
There are conditions other than MI that are known to cause acute or chronic myocardial injury and lead to elevated troponin values. The VITROS hs Troponin I clinical trial enrolled all subjects presenting to the emergency department with symptoms consistent with acute coronary syndrome. Some of these subjects had an acute or chronic condition other than MI. In the clinical trial, 15.79% (311/1970) of subjects without an MI diagnosis had at least one VITROS hs Troponin I test result above the overall 99th percentile cutoff on one or more serial draws. 91.96% (286/311) of these subjects were found to have decreased kidney function (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73m², Stage 3 chronic kidney disease, or renal failure) or one or more of the following cardiac conditions: angina, atrial fibrillation, cardiomyopathy, coronary artery disease, heart failure or tachycardia (heart rate >100 BPM).
### 2. Clinical Specificity:
See Clinical Sensitivity section above.
K252393 - Page 14 of 15
{14}
3. Other Clinical Supportive Data (When 1. and 2. Are Not Applicable): Not applicable.
## D Clinical Cut-Off:
The cut-offs for this assay were determined based on the 99th percentile upper reference limit (URL) in apparently healthy adults. See Expected Values/Reference Range below (Section VII. E.) for the determination of the clinical cut-offs.
## E Expected Values/Reference Range:
The VITROS Immunodiagnostic Products hs Troponin I Reagent Pack 99th percentile URLs were established from lithium heparin plasma of 952 apparently healthy adults, including 486 female and 466 male subjects. The subjects ranged in age from 22 to 91 years old, with 59% of the subjects ≥50 years of age. Subjects were excluded if they met any of the following criteria:
- History of kidney disease, diabetes, heart disease, cancer, lung disease, thyroid disease, or stroke
- High blood pressure, cholesterol, or triglycerides
- Muscle or skeletal injury or surgery in the last three months
- Current smoker
- Pregnant
- Additional exclusion criteria:
- Hemoglobin A1c ≥ 6.5%
- NT-proBNP >125 pg/mL for subjects <75 years of age or >450 pg/mL for subjects ≥75 years of age.
- eGFR < 60 mL/min
The 99th percentile URL values and respective 90% confidence intervals (CI), determined for females, males, and overall using the non-parametric statistical method, are shown in the table below.
| Gender | Number of Subjects | 99th Percentile URL, ng/L (90%CI) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Female | 486 | 9 (3.9 - 17.5) |
| Male | 466 | 12 (8.8 - 20.9) |
| Overall | 952 | 11 (8.2 - 14.3) |
## VIII Proposed Labeling:
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
## IX Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
K252393 - Page 15 of 15
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.