K252094 · Epic Medical Pte. , Ltd. · KPE · Aug 1, 2025 · General Hospital
Device Facts
Record ID
K252094
Device Name
eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container
Applicant
Epic Medical Pte. , Ltd.
Product Code
KPE · General Hospital
Decision Date
Aug 1, 2025
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 880.5025
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The Empty Fluid Container is used to hold an admixture of compatible fluids for intravenous administration to a patient. Medication transfer in and out of the container is done using aseptic technique.
Device Story
eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container is a sterile, single-use, non-PVC flexible bag for IV fluid preparation and administration. Available in 100 mL, 250 mL, 500 mL, and new 1,000 mL capacities. Features two ports: an additive port for fluid introduction and a spiking port for administration. Two configurations: Needle-Free Valve (NFV) port for male Luer lock syringes or ProSeal™ Injection Site for closed-system injection. Used in clinical settings by healthcare professionals/pharmacists. Device maintains a sealed system post-removal. Benefits include secure medication addition and compatibility with standard IV spikes/tubing. No software or electronic components.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Substantial equivalence is supported by bench performance testing, including resistance to temperature/pressure/leakage (ISO 15747), hanger tensile strength, accelerated aging (ASTM F1980), microbial ingress, and biocompatibility testing (ISO 10993).
Technological Characteristics
Flexible non-PVC polyolefin film bag. Additive port materials: Polypropylene, Polycarbonate, Liquid Silicone Rubber (NFV model) or Polyisoprene Rubber (Injection Site model). Spiking port material: Thermoplastic elastomer. Sterilization: Ethylene Oxide (EO) to SAL 10-6. Shelf-life: 3 years. Single-use. No software or energy source.
Indications for Use
Indicated for holding compatible fluids for intravenous administration to patients in clinical settings. Used by trained healthcare professionals or pharmacists for parenteral drug delivery.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An I.V. container is a container made of plastic or glass used to hold a fluid mixture to be administered to a patient through an intravascular administration set.
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
August 1, 2025
Epic Medical Pte. Ltd.
Freddie Lee
CEO/MD, Chief Executive Officer/Managing Director
105 Cecil Street #20-04, The Octagon
Singapore, 069534
Singapore
Re: K252094
Trade/Device Name: eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 880.5025
Regulation Name: I.V. container
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: KPE, ONB
Dated: July 3, 2025
Received: July 3, 2025
Dear Freddie Lee:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device"
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K252094 - Freddie Lee
Page 2
(https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
{2}
K252094 - Freddie Lee
Page 3
Sincerely,
David Wolloscheck -S
David Wolloscheck, Ph.D.
Assistant Director
DHT3C: Division of Drug Delivery and
General Hospital Devices, and
Human Factors
OHT3: Office of Gastrorenal, ObGyn,
General Hospital, and Urology Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
FORM FDA 3881 (8/23)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740
EF
| DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration Indications for Use | Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 07/31/2026 See PRA Statement below. |
| --- | --- |
| 510(k) Number (if known) K252094 | |
| Device Name eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container | |
| Indications for Use (Describe) The Empty Fluid Container is used to hold an admixture of compatible fluids for intravenous administration to a patient. Medication transfer in and out of the container is done using aseptic technique. | |
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) ☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | |
| CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED. | |
| This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.* | |
| The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov | |
| "An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number." | |
{4}
EPIC
# K252094 – 510(k) Summary
## I. Submitter
Epic Medical Pte. Ltd.
105 Cecil Street #20-04
The Octagon
Singapore 069534
Phone: +65 9635 2618 / +66 81 761 5292
Contact Person: Mr. Freddie LEE, Chief Executive Officer/ Managing Director
Date Prepared: August 1, 2025
Content and Format: Prepared in accordance with 21 CFR 807.92
Type of Submission: Special
## II. Subject Device
| 510(k) Number: | K252094 |
| --- | --- |
| Trade/ Device Name: | eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container |
| Common/ Usual Name: | Empty I.V. bag |
| Regulation Number: | I.V. container |
| Regulation Name: | 21 CFR 880.5025 |
| Regulatory Class: | Class: II |
| Product Code: | KPE, ONB |
## III. Predicate
| 510(k) Number: | K223674 | K241442 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Trade/ Device Name: | eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container (models 426030, 426040, 426110) | eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container with ProSeal™ Injection Site |
| Common/ Usual Name: | Empty I.V. bag | Empty I.V. bag |
| Regulation Number: | I.V. container | I.V. container |
| Regulation Name: | 21 CFR 880.5025 | 21 CFR 880.5025 |
| Regulatory Class: | Class: II | Class: II |
| Product Code: | KPE | KPE, ONB |
Page 1 of 8
{5}
EPIC
## IV. Purpose of Submission and Device Description
The eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container (EFC) is a sterile, nonpyrogenic, single-use intravenous (IV) bag constructed from flexible, non-PVC film. It is designed for the preparation and administration of IV fluids and is intended for disposal after a single use.
Two previously cleared subgroups include:
- eZSURE™ EFC with Needle-Free Valve (NFV) Additive Port (K223674)
- eZSURE™ EFC with ProSeal™ Injection Site Additive Port (K241442)
Both subgroups are currently available in 100 mL, 250 mL, and 500 mL capacities. This Submission introduces a new 1,000 mL capacity option for each subgroup.
Each EFC consists of a flexible plastic film bag with two (2) ports:
- Additive (filling) port – for introducing compatible fluids
- Spiking (administration/access) port – for accessing the infusate using a standard IV spike
The NFV model features a self-sealing needle-free valve additive port compatible with male Luer lock syringes. The Injection Site model incorporates a closed-system injection site with a double elastomeric membrane, compatible with the ProSeal™ Injector, which is also compatible with male Luer lock syringes. Both configurations support secure medication addition and maintain a sealed system after device removal.
## V. Indications for Use Statement
The Empty Fluid Container is used to hold an admixture of compatible fluids for intravenous administration to a patient. Medication transfer in and out of the container is done using aseptic technique.
## VI. Comparison of Intended Use & Technological Characteristics
The Subject devices and the Predicate devices share the following characteristics:
### Intended Use comparison
There was no difference that would alter the overall intended use of the Subject devices, compared to the Predicate devices, with respect to:
1) Indications for use statements
2) Intended user population/ intended use environment
3) Intended drug type
4) Prescription use or over-the-counter use
5) IV bag access components
### Technological Characteristics comparison
### Equivalencies – Technology & Design
The Subject and Predicate devices exhibit the same design characteristics, with their respective filling port types. No substantial differences were identified that would raise concerns regarding safety or performance. The shared characteristics are listed below:
1) Principles of operation
2) Technology and design of the empty container
3) Material of empty container body
4) Materials of additive (filling) port (per type vs. the respective Predicate device)
5) Intended filling device (per type vs. the respective Predicate device)
6) Material of spiking (administration) port
7) Biocompatibility
8) Primary package top & bottom webs
9) Sterilization process
10) Shelf-life validation
11) Single-use or reusable
12) Labeling specifications
Page 2 of 8
{6}
EPIC
There were no substantial differences compared to the Predicate devices listed in Table 1 and Table 2. The respective evaluations – summarized in the respective Submitter's Comment at the bottom row of each table – concluded that the identified difference does not pose any safety or performance concerns for either device
Table 1: Comparison of characteristics for eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container (with NFV filling port)
| Characteristics compared | Predicate Device (K223674) | Subject Device (K252094) | Comparative evaluation | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container (with NFV filling port) | | eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container (with NFV filling port) |
| Intended use and Indications for Use statement | | The Empty Fluid Container is used to hold an admixture of compatible fluids for intravenous administration to a patient. Medication transfer in and out of the container is done using aseptic technique. | | Same |
| Intended user population | | Adequately trained health care professionals or pharmacists | | Same |
| Intended use environment | | Clinical setting | | Same |
| Intended drug type | | Parenteral drugs | | Same |
| Prescription use or over-the-counter use | | R only | | Same |
| IV bag access components | | Device has 2 access points:
1. Additive port/filling port
2. Spiking/administration/access port, IV spike bag access for IV set/IV line | | Same |
| Principles of operation | NFV filling port | The empty bags are filled by connecting transfer devices, e.g., through standard male Luer lock syringes (without needle) or automated filling devices
The additive port is a self-sealing needle-free female luer lock connector, no different from standard needle-free filling port devices of market-cleared IV sets.
Silicone valve of the additive port self-seals/re-seals when mating component devices are disconnected from one another. | | Same |
| | Spiking (administration/access) port | IV set or IV line is attached through the spiking (administration) port to dispense IV therapy using a standard spike and tubing | | Same |
{7}
EPIC
Table 1: Comparison of characteristics for eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container (with NFV filling port)
| Characteristics compared | Predicate Device (K223674) | Subject Device (K252094) | Comparative evaluation |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container (with NFV filling port) | eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container (with NFV filling port) | |
| Technology and design of the empty container | The bag is manufactured by welding a plastic attachment to the bag body and assembling the bottom with entry and exit connectors/ports | | Same |
| Material of empty fluid container body | Sealed Air Corp's Medical Packaging Film, Nexcel® Film, Grade M315, Polyolefin | | Same |
| Materials of additive (filling) port | Polypropylene, Polycarbonate, Liquid Silicone Rubber | | Same |
| Intended filling device | Syringe or transfer device with Male Luer lock tip | | Same |
| Material of spiking (administration) port | Thermoplastic elastomer | | Same |
| Maximum volumes | 100 mL, 200 mL, 500 mL | 1,000 mL | Different see Comment #1 |
| Biocompatibility | Acceptable biological risks established by demonstrating that the device meets ISO 10993-1 | | Same |
| Primary package top & bottom webs | Medical grade paper and medical plastic film, heat sealed | | Same |
| Sterilization process | Ethylene Oxide (EO), SAL 10-6 | | Same |
| Shelf-life validation | 3 years (36 months) | | Same |
| Single use or reusable | Single use only | | Same |
| Labeling specifications | Met the requirements specified in 21 CFR 801 | | Same |
Submitter's Comment (Table 1)
Comment #1
Subject device is different from the Predicate device in its maximum volume capacity. The difference between the Subject device and Predicate device did not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness as functional testing have been conducted and their data are summarized in section VII.A. The difference was determined to be insignificant as performance results were determined to have met the intended use. The biocompatibility testing and chemical characterization as well as risk analysis data on cleared device were evaluated for the Subject device and are summarized in section VII.B. The difference was determined to be insignificant as results were determined to have met the device's biological safety specifications
Page 4 of 8
{8}
EPIC
Table 2: Comparison of characteristic for eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container (with ProSeal™ Injection Site)
| Characteristics compared | Predicate Device (K241442) | Subject Device (K252094) | Comparative evaluation | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container (with ProSeal™ Injection Site) | | eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container (with ProSeal™ Injection Site) |
| Intended use and Indications for Use statement | | The Empty Fluid Container is used to hold an admixture of compatible fluids for intravenous administration to a patient. Medication transfer in and out of the container is done using aseptic technique. | | Same |
| Intended user population | | Adequately trained health care professionals or pharmacists | | Same |
| Intended use environment | | Clinical setting | | Same |
| Intended drug type | | Parenteral drugs | | Same |
| Prescription use or over-the-counter use | | R only | | Same |
| IV bag access components | | Device has 2 access points: 1. Additive port/filling port 2. Spiking/administration/access port, IV spike bag access for IV set/IV line | | Same |
| Principles of operation | Injection site filling port | The empty bags are filled by connecting transfer devices, e.g., through standard male Luer lock syringes (without needle) or automated filling devices, attached to the ProSeal™ Injector. The additive port is a self-sealing closed system ProSeal™ Injection Site. Membrane of the additive port self-seals/re-seals when mating component devices are disconnected from one another. | | Same |
| | Spiking (administration/access) port | IV set or IV line is attached through the spiking (administration) port to dispense IV therapy using a standard spike and tubing | | Same |
| Technology and design of the empty container | | The bag is manufactured by welding a plastic attachment to the bag body and assembling the bottom with entry and exit connectors/ ports | | Same |
Page 5 of 8
{9}
EPIC
Table 2: Comparison of characteristic for eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container (with ProSeal™ Injection Site)
| Characteristics compared | Predicate Device (K241442) | Subject Device (K252094) | Comparative evaluation |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container (with ProSeal™ Injection Site) | eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container (with ProSeal™ Injection Site) | |
| Material of empty fluid container body | Sealed Air Corp's Medical Packaging Film, Nexcel® Film, Grade M315, Polyolefin | | Same |
| Materials of additive (filling) port | Polypropylene, Polyisoprene Rubber (IR) | | Same |
| Intended filling device | ProSeal™ Injector or ProSeal™ Injector Plus (cleared K241071) Male Luer Lock tip | | Same |
| Material of spiking (administration) port | Thermoplastic elastomer | | Same |
| Maximum volumes | 100 mL, 200 mL, 500 mL | 1,000 mL | Different see Comment #1 |
| Biocompatibility | Acceptable biological risks established by demonstrating that the device meets ISO 10993-1 | | Same |
| Primary package top & bottom webs | Medical grade paper and medical plastic film, heat sealed | | Same |
| Sterilization process | Ethylene Oxide (EO), SAL 10-6 | | Same |
| Shelf-life validation | 3 years (36 months) | | Same |
| Single use or reusable | Single use only | | Same |
| Labeling specifications | Met the requirements specified in 21 CFR 801 | | Same |
## Submitter's Comment (Table 2)
## Comment #1
Subject device is different from the Predicate device in its maximum volume capacity. The difference between the Subject device and Predicate device did not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness as functional testing have been conducted and their data are summarized in section VII.A. The difference was determined to be insignificant as performance results were determined to have met the intended use. The biocompatibility testing and chemical characterization as well as risk analysis data on cleared device were evaluated for the Subject device and are summarized in section VII.B. The difference was determined to be insignificant as results were determined to have met the device's biological safety specifications
Page 6 of 8
{10}
EPIC
## VII. Performance Data Supporting Substantial Equivalence
## A. Functional Performance
The Subject device was evaluated to be in conformance with the following ANSI/AAMI and ISO standards, and the product code-applicable FDA guidance document:
- ANSI/AAMI CN27:2021, General requirements for Luer activated valves (LAVs) incorporated into medical devices for intravascular applications
- ISO 80369-7:2021, Small-bore connectors for liquids and gases in healthcare applications - Part 7: Connectors for intravascular or hypodermic applications
- ISO 80369-20:2015, Small-bore connectors for liquids and gases in healthcare applications (Part 20: Common test methods)
- ISO 8536-4:2019, Infusion equipment for medical use - Part 4: Infusion sets for single use, gravity feed
- ISO 15747:2018, Plastic containers for intravenous injections
- ISO 22413:2021, Transfer sets for pharmaceutical preparations — Requirements and test methods
- Intravascular-Administration-Sets-Premarket-Notification-Submissions-[510(k)]---Guidance-for-Industry-and-FDA-Staff
Bench performance verifications and validations were performed on the Subject device and leveraged from the relevant testing data from the Predicate devices and the existing device: K223674/S001, K241442 and K230343/S001:
### On Subject device
- Resistance to temperature, pressure and fluid leakage tests per ISO 15747:2018, Annex A.3
- Accelerated aging tests per ASTM F1980-21 of above tests
- Resistance to dropping test per ISO 15747:2018, Annex A.4
- Accelerated aging test per ASTM F1980-21 of above test
- Hanger tensile strength test per ISO 15747:2018, Annex A.11
- Accelerated aging tests per ASTM F1980-21 of above tests
### Under K223674 – NFV filling port version
- Infusion container transparency test to ISO 15747:2018
- Water vapor impermeability test to ISO 15747:2018
- Access port cover test to ISO 15747:2018
- Access port penetration ability of insertion point test to ISO 15747:2018
- Access port adhesion strength of infusion device and impermeability of the insertion point test to ISO 15747:2018
- Access port liquid tightness of the insertion point test to ISO 15747:2018
- Identification test to ISO 15747:2018
- Requirements for the raw container and test fluids test to ISO 15747:2018
- Impermeability to microorganism and migration test to ISO 15747:2018
- 7-day microbial ingress test per FDA guidance and AAMI CN27:2021
### Under K241442 - Injection Site filling port version
- Additive port air and liquid tightness test to ISO 15747:2018
- Impermeability to microorganism test to ISO 15747:2018
### Under K240433 - Injection Site filling port version
- Additive port positive pressure fluid leakage test to ISO 80369-7:2021
- Sub-atmospheric pressure air leakage test to ISO 80369-7:2021
- Stress cracking test to ISO 80369-7:2021
- Resistance to separation from axial load test to ISO 80369-7:2021
- Resistance to separation from unscrewing test to ISO 80369-7:2021
- Resistance to overriding to ISO 80369-7:2021
- Device leakage integrity test to ISO 8536-4:2019
- Vapor containment test per NIOSH 2016 draft protocol
- Microbial ingress test per FDA guidance and AAMI CN27:2021
Page 7 of 8
{11}
EPIC
## B. Biocompatibility
In accordance with ISO 10993-1:2018, the Subject device is classified as: *Externally Communicating Device, Blood Path Indirect, Prolonged Contact* (>24hr to 30d). The following testing were conducted under the Predicate devices and the existing device: K223674/S001, K241442, K240433; and the Subject device:
- Cytotoxicity per ISO 10993-5:2009
- Sensitization per ISO 10993-10:2010
- Intracutaneous reactivity per ISO 10993-23:2021
- Acute systemic toxicity per ISO 10993-11:2017
- Subacute/subchronic systemic toxicity per ISO 10993-11:2017
- In-vitro hemolysis per ISO 10993-4:2017
- Material mediated pyrogenicity per ISO 10993-11:2017
- Chemical characterization and toxicological risk assessment per ISO 10993-18:2020 & ISO 10993-17:2002
- Particulate matter testing per ISO 15747:2018, Plastic containers for intravenous injections and USP <788> Particulate Matter in Injections, on the Predicate devices and on the Subject device
- EO residues limits per ISO 10993-7:2008, Biological evaluation of medical devices — Part 7: Ethylene oxide sterilization residuals/Technical Corrigendum 1:2009/Amd.1:2019 for neonates and infants special patient population, as defined by the amended standard's patient population categories on the Subject device
## C. Sterility, Shipping, and Shelf-Life
The Subject device complies with sterilization requirements of ISO 11135:2014, Sterilization of Health Care Products – Ethylene Oxide – Part 1: Requirements for Development, Validation and Routine Control of a Sterilization Process for Medical Devices and the following testing/evaluations:
- Simulated shipping testing per ASTM D 4169-16, Standard Practice for Performance Testing of Shipping Containers and Systems under K151650/S004 and K223674/S001
- Package integrity tests per ASTM F1980-21, Standard guide for accelerated aging of sterile barrier systems for medical devices and Sterile Barrier Packaging Testing performed on the proposed device: Seal strength – ASTM F88/F88M-21, Standard test method for seal strength of flexible barrier materials; Dye Penetration – ASTM F1929-23, Standard test method for detecting seal leaks in porous medical device packaging by dye penetration; EN 868-5:2009, Packaging materials and systems for medical devices which are to be sterilized – Part 5: Heat and self-sealable pouches and reels of paper and plastic film construction – Requirements and test methods under K151650
- Pyrogen tests per ANSI/AAMI ST72/2019, Bacterial endotoxins – Test methods, routing monitoring, and alternatives to batch testing, USP 42-NF 37 <151>, Pyrogen test (USP rabbit test), USP 42-NF 37 <161>, Medical Devices-Bacterial Endotoxin and Pyrogen Tests, USP 42-NF 37 <85>, Bacterial Endotoxins Test under K151650 and testing will be conducted on every lot
- Shelf-life of 3 years has been validated using the FDA recognized standard, ASTM 1980-21, Standard Guide for Accelerated Aging of Sterile Barrier Systems for Medical Devices on the Subject device
## VIII. Clinical Tests
Not applicable
## IX. Conclusion
The difference between the Predicate and the Subject device does not raise any new or different questions of safety or effectiveness. The eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container (EFC) is substantially equivalent to the Predicate devices (K223674 & K241442) in all aspects
Page 8 of 8
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.