K243619 · Taewoong Medical Co., Ltd. · ESW · Oct 30, 2025 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K243619
Device Name
Niti-S Esophageal Stent; Esophageal TTS Stent
Applicant
Taewoong Medical Co., Ltd.
Product Code
ESW · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Oct 30, 2025
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.3610
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Niti-S Esophageal Stent is intended for use in esophageal strictures caused by intrinsic and/or extrinsic malignant tumors and occlusion of concurrent esophageal fistulas. The Esophageal TTS Stent is intended for use in esophageal strictures caused by intrinsic and/or extrinsic malignant tumors and occlusion of concurrent esophageal fistulas.
Device Story
Device consists of implantable Nitinol wire stent and disposable flexible introducer system. Stent restores esophageal structure/function by exerting outward radial force on luminal surface. Suture attached to one end allows for repositioning during placement. Used in clinical setting by physicians for management of malignant esophageal strictures and fistulas. Introducer system facilitates delivery and deployment. Stent remains in situ to maintain patency. Benefits include relief of obstruction and closure of fistulas. Subject device is identical to predicates except for change in suture material from Nylon to Polyester.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Biocompatibility testing performed per ISO 10993-1, including cytotoxicity, sensitization, intracutaneous reactivity, acute/subchronic systemic toxicity, pyrogenicity, genotoxicity, and subcutaneous implantation. Performance testing included shelf-life and tensile testing.
Technological Characteristics
Implantable Nitinol wire stent in diamond shape; lengths 60-150mm; midsection diameters 16-22mm; dumbbell diameters 24-28mm. Coverage: Silicone full covered or bare. Radiopaque markers: 8 platinum-iridium, 2 316L stainless steel. Suture: Polyester. Delivery system: Co-axial tube type (OTW or TTS). Sterilization: Ethylene Oxide (EO). No electrical components or software.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients with esophageal strictures caused by intrinsic and/or extrinsic malignant tumors and occlusion of concurrent esophageal fistulas.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An esophageal prosthesis is a rigid, flexible, or expandable tubular device made of a plastic, metal, or polymeric material that is intended to be implanted to restore the structure and/or function of the esophagus. The metal esophageal prosthesis may be uncovered or covered with a polymeric material. This device may also include a device delivery system.
Special Controls
The special control for this device is FDA's “Guidance for the Content of Premarket Notification Submissions for Esophageal and Tracheal Prostheses.”
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
October 30, 2025
Taewoong Medical Co., Ltd.
% Matthew Krueger
Principal Consultant
Biologics Consulting Group
100 Daingerfield Rd, Suite 400
Alexandria, Virginia 22314
Re: K243619
Trade/Device Name: Niti-S Esophageal Stent; Esophageal TTS Stent
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.3610
Regulation Name: Esophageal Prosthesis
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: ESW
Dated: September 29, 2025
Received: September 29, 2025
Dear Matthew Krueger:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K243619 - Matthew Krueger
Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-
{2}
K243619 - Matthew Krueger
Page 3
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
SIVAKAMI VENKATACHALAM -S
for
Shanil P. Haugen, Ph.D.
Assistant Director
DHT3A: Division of Renal, Gastrointestinal,
Obesity and Transplant Devices
OHT3: Office of Gastrorenal, ObGyn,
General Hospital and Urology Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
Niti-S Esophageal Stent
Page 9 of 46
| Indications for Use | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Please type in the marketing application/submission number, if it is known. This
textbox will be left blank for original applications/submissions. | K243619 | ? |
| Please provide the device trade name(s). | | ? |
| Niti-S Esophageal Stent;
Esophageal TTS Stent | | |
| Please provide your Indications for Use below. | | ? |
| The Niti-S Esophageal Stent is intended for use in esophageal strictures caused by intrinsic and/or extrinsic
malignant tumors and occlusion of concurrent esophageal fistulas.
The Esophageal TTS Stent is intended for use in esophageal strictures caused by intrinsic and/or extrinsic
malignant tumors and occlusion of concurrent esophageal fistulas. | | |
| Please select the types of uses (select one or both, as
applicable). | ☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | ? |
{4}
K243619
Page 1 of 7
Traditional 510(k) Summary
Taewoong Medical
Niti-S Esophageal Stent
Esophageal TTS Stent
1. SUBMITTER INFORMATION
Applicant: Taewoong Medical
Contact: Yongjin Jeff Kim
Phone: +82 70 4649 1543
Email: jinjeff@stent.net
Address: 14, Gojeong-ro, Wolgot-myeon, Gimpo-si, Gyeonggi-do, 10022, Republic of Korea
2. CORRESPONDENT INFORMATION
Contact: Matthew Krueger
Title: Principal Consultant
Firm: Biologics Consulting Group
3. DATE PREPARED: SEPTEMBER 25, 2024
4. DEVICE INFORMATION
Device Name: Esophageal TTS Stent
Niti-S Esophageal Stent
Common Name: Prosthesis, Esophageal
Regulation Number: 21 C.F.R. 878.3610
Regulation Name: Esophageal prosthesis
Product Code: ESW
Regulatory Class: Class II
5. PREDICATE DEVICE INFORMATION
Device Name: Esophageal TTS Stent, Niti-S Esophageal Stent
510(k) Number: K240522, K080782
Manufacturer: Taewoong Medical
The predicate devices have not been subject to a design related recall.
{5}
K243619
Page 2 of 7
Traditional 510(k) Summary
Taewoong Medical
Niti-S Esophageal Stent
Esophageal TTS Stent
# 6. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The Esophageal TTS Stents and Niti-S Esophageal Stents that are the subject of this 510(k) are identical to the devices cleared in K240522 and K080782, respectively, with the exception of the change in suture material for both stents. The indications for use for the Niti-S Esophageal Stent have also been updated to align with those of the Esophageal TTS Stents.
The Esophageal TTS Stents and Niti-S Esophageal Stents consist of an implantable metallic stent and a disposable, flexible introducer system for placement of the stent. The stent is a flexible and expandable tubular device made of Nitinol wire that is intended to be implanted to restore the structure and/or function of the esophagus. The introducer is a disposable system for delivery and deployment of the stent at the target position. Upon deployment, the stent imparts an outward radial force on the luminal surface of the esophagus to establish patency. A length of suture is attached to one end of the stent and can be used for stent repositioning during initial placement, in accordance with the instructions for use.
# 7. INDICATIONS FOR USE
The Esophageal TTS Stent is intended for use in esophageal strictures caused by intrinsic and/or extrinsic malignant tumors and occlusion of concurrent esophageal fistulas.
The Niti-S Esophageal Stent is intended for use in esophageal strictures caused by intrinsic and/or extrinsic malignant tumors and occlusion of concurrent esophageal fistulas.
# 8. COMPARISON OF INTENDED USE AND TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE PREDICATE DEVICE
The table below compares the intended use and the technological characteristics of the subject device and predicate device.
Table 1: Comparator Table for Subject and Predicate Devices
| | Subject Device | Predicate Device K080782, K240522 | Comments |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Device Name | Niti-S Esophageal Stent, Esophageal TTS Stent | Niti-S Esophageal Stent (K080782), Esophageal TTS Stent (K240522) | Identical |
| Common Name | Esophageal Stent | Esophageal Stent | Identical |
| Manufacturer | Taewoong Medical Co., Ltd | Taewoong Medical Co., Ltd | Identical |
| Product Code | ESW | ESW | Identical |
| Regulation | 21 CFR 878.3610 Esophageal prosthesis | 21 CFR 878.3610 Esophageal prosthesis | Identical |
{6}
K243619
Page 3 of 7
Traditional 510(k) Summary
Taewoong Medical
Niti-S Esophageal Stent
Esophageal TTS Stent
| | Subject Device | Predicate Device K080782, K240522 | Comments |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Indications for use | Niti-S Esophageal Stent is intended for use in esophageal strictures caused by intrinsic and/or extrinsic malignant tumors and occlusion of concurrent esophageal fistulas.
Esophageal TTS Stent is intended for use in esophageal strictures caused by intrinsic and/or extrinsic malignant tumors and occlusion of concurrent esophageal fistulas. | (K080782) Niti-S Esophageal Stent is intended for use in esophageal strictures caused by intrinsic and/or extrinsic malignant tumors.
(K240522) Esophageal TTS Stent is intended for use in esophageal strictures caused by intrinsic and/or extrinsic malignant tumors and occlusion of concurrent esophageal fistulas. | **Substantially Equivalent:**
• Original use of K080782: esophageal strictures from malignant tumors
• Now includes: “occlusion of concurrent esophageal fistulas”. This indication was previously cleared for the identical stent implant as cleared in K240522.
• Stent Justification:
o Same materials
o Same design
o Same purposes
o Same target site
o Same manufacturing process
• Therefore, the Niti-S Esophageal Stent with the modified Indications for Use is Substantially Equivalent to the previously cleared Esophageal TTS Stent (K240522). |
Page 3 of 7
{7}
K243619
Page 4 of 7
Traditional 510(k) Summary
Taewoong Medical
Niti-S Esophageal Stent
Esophageal TTS Stent
| | Subject Device | Predicate Device K080782, K240522 | Comments |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Design (Stents) | | | **Substantially Equivalent:**
- Dimensionally the same
- General design is the same
- Only the suture material has changed from Nylon to Polyester
- Performance testing, biocompatibility testing, and shelf life testing demonstrate that the change in suture material does not affect safety or effectiveness of the device. Thus, the stent with the modified suture material is substantially equivalent to the predicate device. |
| | - Nitinol wire in diamond shape
- Lengths: 60 mm, 80 mm, 100 mm, 120 mm, 140 mm, 150 mm
- Midsection Diameters: 16 mm, 18 mm, 20 mm, 22 mm
- Dumbbell Diameters: 24 mm, 26 mm, 28 mm
- Coverage: Silicone Full Covered, Silicone Both Bare
- Radiopaque Markers: 8 platinum-iridium markers and 2 316L stainless steel markers
- Suture material: Polyester | - Nitinol wire in diamond shape
- Lengths: 60 mm, 80 mm, 100 mm, 120 mm, 140 mm, 150 mm
- Midsection Diameters: 16 mm, 18 mm, 20 mm, 22 mm
- Dumbbell Diameters: 24 mm, 26 mm, 28 mm
- Coverage: Silicone Full Covered, Silicone Both Bare
- Radiopaque Markers: 8 platinum-iridium markers and 2 316L stainless steel markers
- Suture material: Nylon | |
Page 4 of 7
{8}
K243619
Page 5 of 7
Traditional 510(k) Summary
Taewoong Medical
Niti-S Esophageal Stent
Esophageal TTS Stent
| | Subject Device | Predicate Device K080782, K240522 | Comments |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Design (Introducer) | **Niti-S Esophageal Stent**
OTW (Over-The-Wire) type
Stent Delivery System
Co-axial tube type
Usable Length: 70cm
Diameter: 16 Fr (5.3mm), 20 Fr (6.7mm)
**Esophageal TTS Stent**
TTS (Through-The-Scope) type
Stent Delivery System
Co-axial tube type
Usable Length: 180 and 220cm
Diameter: 10.5 Fr (3.5mm) | **Niti-S Esophageal Stent**
(K080782) OTW (Over-The-Wire) type Stent Delivery System
Co-axial tube type
Usable Length: 70cm
Diameter: 16 Fr (5.3mm), 20 Fr (6.7mm)
**Esophageal TTS Stent**
(K240522) TTS (Through-The-Scope) type Stent Delivery System | Identical |
| Single Use | Yes | Yes | Identical |
| Sterile | EO Sterilization | EO Sterilization | Identical |
| Method of Placement | OTW (Over-The-Wire),
TTS (Through-The-Scope) | OTW (Over-The-Wire),
TTS (Through-The-Scope) | Identical |
| Method of Deployment | Release by pulling outer sheath | Release by pulling outer sheath | Identical |
| Packaging | PET tray with Tyvek lid placed in
a Tyvek pouch and then placed
inside of a Manila paper box | PET tray with Tyvek lid placed in
a Tyvek pouch and then placed
inside of a Manila paper box | Identical |
## 9. SUMMARY OF NON-CLINICAL PERFORMANCE TESTING
### Biocompatibility Testing
Biocompatibility testing per ISO 10993-1 and FDA Guidance was performed to demonstrate the biological safety of the subject stents with the new polyester suture material.
Page 5 of 7
{9}
K243619
Page 6 of 7
Traditional 510(k) Summary
Taewoong Medical
Niti-S Esophageal Stent
Esophageal TTS Stent
Stent materials are considered implants in contact with tissue for > 30 days.
Table 2 outlines the testing conducted.
Table 2: Biocompatibility Testing Conducted
| Test | Standard |
| --- | --- |
| Cytotoxicity
MEM Extract | ISO 10993-5:2009 |
| Sensitization
Guinea pig maximization test | ISO 10993-10:2021 |
| Intracutaneous Reactivity
New Zealand rabbit | ISO 10993-23:2021 |
| Acute Systemic Toxicity
ICR mice | ISO 10993-11:2017 |
| Pyrogen Test
New Zealand rabbit | ISO 10993-11:2017
USP <151> |
| 90-Day Subchronic Systemic Toxicity
Rats | ISO 10993-11: 2017 |
| In Vitro Mammalian Chromosomal Aberration (Genotoxicity)
Chinese hamster lung cell line (CHL) | ISO 10993-3: 2015
ISO/TR 10993-33: 2015 |
| Bacterial Reverse Mutation
(Genotoxicity) | ISO 10993-3: 2015
ISO/TR 10993-33: 2015 |
| 4-Week Subcutaneous Implantation Testing
Rats | ISO 10993-6: 2018 |
| 13-Week Subcutaneous Implantation Testing
Rats | ISO 10993-6: 2018 |
| Chemical Characterization
Exhaustive extraction | ISO 10993-18:2020 |
## Electrical Safety
Not applicable. The subject device contains no electric components, generates no electrical emissions, and uses no electrical energy of any type.
## Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)
Not applicable. The subject device contains no electric components, generates no electrical emissions, and uses no electrical energy of any type.
## Software
Not applicable. The subject device contains no software.
Page 6 of 7
{10}
K243619
Page 7 of 7
Traditional 510(k) Summary
Taewoong Medical
Niti-S Esophageal Stent
Esophageal TTS Stent
## Performance Testing
Other performance testing was conducted to show that the device meets its design requirements and performs as intended. The performance tests include:
- Shelf-life testing
- Tensile testing
## 10. CONCLUSION
Based on the non-clinical performance and biocompatibility testing, the Esophageal TTS Stents and Niti-S Esophageal Stents are as safe and effective as the predicate devices and support a determination of substantial equivalence.
Page 7 of 7
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.