XABO Ventricular Catheter, XABO Peritoneal Catheter, XABO Catheter Set
K242003 · Aesculap, Inc. · JXG · Dec 16, 2024 · Neurology
Device Facts
Record ID
K242003
Device Name
XABO Ventricular Catheter, XABO Peritoneal Catheter, XABO Catheter Set
Applicant
Aesculap, Inc.
Product Code
JXG · Neurology
Decision Date
Dec 16, 2024
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 882.5550
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The XABO Catheters are used for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunting.
Device Story
XABO Catheters are implantable devices for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunting; manufactured from barium sulfate-filled silicone elastomer; impregnated with clindamycin hydrochloride and rifampicin for controlled release. Ventricular catheters feature 18 cm length, 1.2 mm ID/2.5 mm OD, 1 cm depth markers, and 16 flow holes; include pre-loaded stainless steel stylet and optional deflector. Peritoneal catheters measure 60 cm or 120 cm, 1.2 mm ID/2.5 mm OD, open-ended, trimmable. Used by neurosurgeons in clinical settings to manage hydrocephalus or related CSF disorders. Catheters articulate with existing Miethke Shunt Systems (e.g., M.blue, proGAV 2.0). Antibiotic impregnation aims to reduce colonization/infection risk. Deflector is MR Conditional (3-Tesla).
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. No clinical data provided. Performance testing included ISO 7197 compliance, zone of inhibition, drug release kinetics, and crush resistance. Biocompatibility testing per ISO 10993-1 included cytotoxicity, sensitization, genotoxicity, implantation, systemic toxicity, hemolysis, and pyrogenicity. Toxicological risk assessment performed for extractables/leachables. MRI safety testing conducted per ASTM F2213, F2182, F2119, and F2503.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: Barium sulfate-filled silicone elastomer impregnated with clindamycin hydrochloride and rifampicin. Dimensions: 1.2 mm ID, 2.5 mm OD; lengths 18 cm (ventricular), 60/120 cm (peritoneal). Connectivity: Mechanical articulation with Miethke Shunt Systems. Energy: None (passive). Sterilization: Not specified. Standards: ISO 7197 (performance), ISO 10993-1 (biocompatibility), ASTM F2213/F2182/F2119 (MRI safety).
Indications for Use
Indicated for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunting in patients requiring shunt systems.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A central nervous system fluid shunt is a device or combination of devices used to divert fluid from the brain or other part of the central nervous system to an internal delivery site or an external receptacle for the purpose of relieving elevated intracranial pressure or fluid volume (e.g., due to hydrocephalus). Components of a central nervous system shunt include catheters, valved catheters, valves, connectors, and other accessory components intended to facilitate use of the shunt or evaluation of a patient with a shunt.
Miethke Shunt System (DSV, connectors, and reservoirs) (K030698)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
December 16, 2024
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which consists of the letters "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue text.
Aesculap Inc. Kathy Racosky Technical Manager II 3773 Corporate Parkway Center Valley, Pennsylvania 18034
Re: K242003
Trade/Device Name: XABO Ventricular Catheter, XABO Peritoneal Catheter, XABO Catheter Set Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.5550 Regulation Name: Central Nervous System Fluid Shunt And Components Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: JXG Dated: November 15, 2024 Received: November 15, 2024
Dear Kathy Racosky:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
{1}------------------------------------------------
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review. the OS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advicecomprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
{2}------------------------------------------------
Sincerely,
Adam D. Digitally signed by Adam D. Pierce -S Pierce -> 10:37:07 -05'00'
Adam D. Pierce, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT5A: Division of Neurosurgical, Neurointerventional, and Neurodiagnostic Devices OHT5: Office of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
Submission Number (if known)
K242003
Device Name
XABO Ventricular Catheter, XABO Peritoneal Catheter, XABO Catheter Set
Indications for Use (Describe)
The XABO Catheters are used for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunting.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
× | Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}------------------------------------------------
| 510(k) #: K242003 | 510(k) Summary | Prepared on: 2024-11-15 |
|------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|
| Contact Details | | 21 CFR 807.92(a)(1) |
| Applicant Name | Aesculap Inc. | |
| Applicant Address | 3773 Corporate Parkway Center Valley PA 18034 United States | |
| Applicant Contact Telephone | 610-984-7402 | |
| Applicant Contact | Kathy Racosky | |
| Applicant Contact Email | kathy.racosky@bbraunusa.com | |
| Device Name | | 21 CFR 807.92(a)(2) |
| Device Trade Name | XABO Ventricular Catheter, XABO Peritoneal Catheter, XABO Catheter<br>Set | |
| Common Name | Central nervous system fluid shunt and components | |
| Classification Name | Shunt, Central Nervous System And Components | |
| Regulation Number | 882.5550 | |
| Product Code(s) | JXG | |
| Legally Marketed Predicate Devices | | 21 CFR 807.92(a)(3) |
| Predicate # | Predicate Trade Name (Primary Predicate is listed first) | Product Code |
| K110560 | Medtronic ARES Antibiotic- Impregnated Catheters | JXG |
| K011030/K020728/ K | Aesculap Miethke Shunt System | JXG |
| Device Description Summary | | 21 CFR 807.92(a)(4) |
{5}------------------------------------------------
The XABO Catheters are manufactured using barium sulfate fillcone elastomer and are impregnated with clindamycin hydrochloride and rifampicin designed to be released over time from the exterior and inner lumen surface once implanted.
The XABO Ventricular Catheters will be offered in 18 cm in length with an inner diameter of 1.2 mm and an outer diameter of 2.5 mm. Lengths are marked in 1 cm intervals starting from the catheter tip, thus enabling the surgeon to qauge the depth of penetration of the catheter into the lateral ventricle. The proximal end of the catheter has 16 flow holes around the catheter circumference.
Components supplied with the XABO Ventricular Catheter include a pre-loaded stainless steel stylet and depending on the confiquration may contain a deflector.
The XABO Peritoneal Catheters measure 60 cm or 120 cm in length, 1.2 mm in inner diameter, and 2.5 mm in outer diameter. There are no length markers or wall slits on the tip is open ended. The catheter may be trimmed to the proper length.
The XABO Catheters are designed to articulate with existing Miethke Shunt Systems, such as the M.blue Adjustable Shunt System. Miethke Shunt System GAV 2.0 and SA 2.0 Valves, proGAV 2.0 Adjustable Shunt System miniNAV valve, and the Miethke Shunt System (DSV, connectors, and reservoirs) cleared by FDA (K192266/K190174/K161853/K141687/K110206/K030698/K011030).
# Intended Use/Indications for Use
The XABO Catheters are used for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunting.
## Indications for Use Comparison
The indications for use is the same as the reference device.
## Technological Comparison
As established in this submission, the XABO Catheters are antibiotic-impregnated catheters offered in similar dimensions, lengths, marker lengths and tip configurations that are substantially equivalent to the predicate and reference device is shown to be substantially equivalent and has the same technological characteristics to its predicate devices through comparison in design, function, principles of operation, intended use, material composition, and range of sizes.
#### Non-Clinical and/or Clinical Tests Summary & Conclusions 21 CFR 807.92(b)
21 CFR 807.92(a)(5)
21 CFR 807.92(a)(5)
21 CFR 807.92(a)(6)
{6}------------------------------------------------
Performance bench testing:
Testing was conducted in accordance with ISO 7197 (2006). Testing results confirm that the XABO Catheters meet performance specifications.
Zone of Inhibition, Druq Content, Druq Release Kinetic and Crush Resistance Comparison testing of the XABO Catheters and the predicate device show that they have the same characteristics.
MRI Safety Testing according to ASTM F2213, ASTM F2182 and ASTM FF2119 demonstrated that the deflector is MR Conditional in 3-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging systems per ASTM F2503.
All testing was performed on the worst-case final finished device.
Biocompatibility testing:
A biocompatibility evaluation was condance with ISO 1099-1 and "Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices – Part 1: Evaluation and Testing within a Risk Management Process", as recognized by FDA. Biocompatibility testing included Cytotoxicity, Sensitization/Reactivity, Genotoxicity, Implantation, Acute Systemic Toxicity, Sub- Chronic, Hemolysis, and Pyrogenicity. Chronic systemic toxicity and carcinogenicity endpoints have been addressed by a chemical characterization (extractable and leachable studies).
A toxicological risk assessment evaluated the risk of chronic toxicity, and developmental and reproductive toxicity to patients associated with exposure to the extractable compounds to adult, pediatric an dneonatal patients.
The XABO Catheters and deflector are considered an implant device of permanent duration (>30 days). While the stylet is classified as indirect contact in the area of tissue/bone intended for less than 1 hour duration.
#### Conclusion:
Results of all testing confirm that the XABO Catheters as a component of a sceptance criteria for the specified shelf life, conform to applicable standard ISO 7179, and are equivalent in function to the predicate device, the Medtronic ARES Antibiotic-Impregnated Catheters.
Results of the conducted comparative performance testing confirm that the performance characteristics for both devices, the XABO Catheters and Medtronic ARES Antibiotic-Impregnated Catheters, are substantial equivalent.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.