K233661 · Sofradim Production · OWT · Feb 13, 2024 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K233661
Device Name
Transorb™ Self-Gripping Resorbable Mesh
Applicant
Sofradim Production
Product Code
OWT · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Feb 13, 2024
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.3300
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
Transorb™ Self-Gripping Resorbable Mesh is intended to be used for the reinforcement of abdominal wall soft tissues where weakness exists.
Device Story
Transorb™ Self-Gripping Resorbable Mesh is a macro-porous, fully resorbable surgical mesh designed for ventral hernia repair in open procedures. The device is placed in the extraperitoneal space to reinforce soft tissue. It consists of a PLLA/TMC monofilament textile with absorbable grips on one side to facilitate positioning and fixation. The mesh provides mechanical strength for abdominal wall reinforcement during the healing period; it integrates with host tissue via ingrowth. The material degrades via hydrolysis, with nearly complete resorption at 18-24 months and total resorption within 36-60 months, metabolizing into CO2 and H2O. The device is intended for use by surgeons in clinical settings. It is available in various rectangular and square sizes and can be trimmed by the practitioner.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided. Evidence consists of bench testing (pore size, density, thickness, burst/breaking/tear/suture pull-out strength), biocompatibility testing (ISO 10993 series), animal studies (porcine and rabbit models evaluating reinforcement, degradation, integration, and gripping performance), and human factors usability testing (IEC 62366-1).
Indicated for reinforcement of abdominal wall soft tissues where weakness exists in open procedures involving ventral hernia repair.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Surgical mesh is a metallic or polymeric screen intended to be implanted to reinforce soft tissue or bone where weakness exists. Examples of surgical mesh are metallic and polymeric mesh for hernia repair, and acetabular and cement restrictor mesh used during orthopedic surgery.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA logo on the right. The FDA logo features the letters "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue text.
February 13, 2024
Sofradim Production Mickaël Nicolas Principal Regulatory Affairs Specialist 116, Avenue du Formans Trévoux, 01600, France
Re: K233661
Trade/Device Name: Transorb™ Self-Gripping Resorbable Mesh Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.3300 Regulation Name: Surgical Mesh Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OWT, OOD, FTL Dated: November 14, 2023 Received: November 15, 2023
Dear Mickael Nicolas:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
{1}------------------------------------------------
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Digitally signed by Tek Tek N. N. Lamichhane -S Lamichhane -S Date: 2024.02.13 07:48:57 -05'00' Tek N. Lamichhane, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT4B: Division of Infection Control and Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Devices OHT4: Office of Surgical and Infection Control Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K233661
Device Name Transorb™ Self-Gripping Resorbable Mesh
Indications for Use (Describe)
Transort™ Self-Gripping Resorbable Mesh is intended to be used for the reinforcement of abdominal wall soft tissues where weakness exists in open procedures involving ventral hernia repair.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|-------------------------------------------------|
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary
| 510(k) Number | K233661 |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date Prepared: | January 11, 2024 |
| Submitter: | Sofradim Production (subsidiary of Covidien IIc) |
| | 116, avenue du Formans |
| | 01600 Trevoux, France |
| | Telephone: +33 (0)4 74 08 90 00 |
| | Fax: +33 (0) 4 74 08 90 02 |
| Contact: | Mickaël Nicolas |
| | Regulatory Affairs Principal Specialist |
| | 116, avenue du Formans |
| | 01600 Trevoux, France |
| | Phone: +33 (0)4 74 08 90 00 |
| | Email: mickael.nicolas@medtronic.com |
| Name of device: | |
| Trade/Proprietary name: | Transorb™ Self-Gripping Resorbable Mesh |
| Common name: | Surgical Mesh |
| Classification name: | General And Plastic Surgery Panel number |
| | Product code: OWT, FTL, OOD |
| | Regulation number: 21 CFR 878.3300 |
| Predicate Device: | |
| Trade/Proprietary name: | TIGR® Matrix Surgical Mesh |
| Common name: | Surgical Mesh |
| Classification name: | General And Plastic Surgery Panel number and product code: OWT, FTL,<br>OOD |
| | Regulation number: 21 CFR 878.3300 |
| 510(k) Number: | K191749 |
| Manufacturer: | Novus Scientific AB, Virdings Alle 2, Uppsala, SE Se-754 50 |
| Reference Device 1: | |
| Trade/Proprietary name: | ProGrip™ Self-Gripping Polyester Mesh |
| Common name: | Surgical Mesh |
| Classification name: | General And Plastic Surgery Panel number and product code: FTL |
| | Regulation number: 21 CFR 878.3300 |
| 510(k) Number: | K220586 |
| Manufacturer: | Sofradim Production (subsidiary of Covidien IIc) |
| | 116, avenue du Formans |
| | 01600 Trevoux, France |
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### Reference Device 2:
| Trade/Proprietary name: | Phasix™ Mesh |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Common name: | Surgical Mesh |
| Classification name: | General And Plastic Surgery Panel number and product code: OOD<br>Regulation number: 21 CFR 878.3300 |
| 510(k) Number: | K161424 |
| Manufacturer: | Davol Inc. |
| | 100 Crossings Boulevard |
| | Warwick, RI 02886 |
| Device Description: | Transorb™ Self-Gripping Resorbable Mesh is designed for ventral<br>hernia repair when placed in an extraperitoneal space by open surgical<br>approach. |
| | Transorb™ Self-Gripping Resorbable Mesh is made of a fully resorbable<br>bi-dimensional Poly-L-lactide, poly-trimethylene carbonate copolymer<br>(PLLA/TMC) monofilament textile with monofilament PLLA/TMC |
Transorb™ Self-Gripping Resorbable Mesh is available in different shapes and sizes.
Mesh composition:
absorbable grips on one side.
| Product codes | Shape | Dimensions<br>(length x width) |
|---------------|-------------|--------------------------------|
| TSB1510 | Rectangular | 10cm x 15cm |
| TSB2020 | Square | 20cm x 20cm |
| TSB3030 | Square | 30cm x 30cm |
| TSB4030 | Rectangular | 30cm x 40cm |
Poly-L-lactide, poly-trimethylene carbonate copolymer (PLLA/TMC) monofilament yarn (up to 21g).
The detailed composition refers to the estimated maximum amount of each material and substance to which a patient can be exposed when 1 unit of the largest size of Transorb™ Self-Gripping Resorbable Mesh is implanted (i.e 40 x 30 cm). These amounts will be less for smaller sizes or if the mesh is trimmed by the practitioner prior to implantation.
Transorb™ Self-Gripping Resorbable Mesh is a macro-porous mesh knitted from resorbable monofilament PLLA/TMC yarns. It has been designed to reinforce soft tissues where weakness exists by providing strength and tissue integration throughout the expected healing period. Transorb™ Self-Gripping Resorbable Mesh has absorbable PLLA/TMC grips on one side that facilitate positioning and contribute to fixation. The PLLA/TMC mesh and grips degrade and resorb in vivo by hydrolysis in 36 to 60 months and are metabolized by the body into CO2 and H₂O.
The macro-porous textile provides strength required to withstand biomechanical stresses throughout the healing period, while allowing
{5}------------------------------------------------
for tissue ingrowth. As the textile integrates, host tissue ingrowth is intended to provide strength to the repair.
Preclinical studies showed that the mesh maintains mechanical characteristics to reinforce the abdominal wall in vivo for at least 20 weeks and progressively resorbs.
Preclinical studies showed that the grips contribute to the fixation of the mesh to surrounding tissue in vivo for at least 4 weeks.
At 18 to 24 months, mesh degradation is nearly complete. The remaining mesh fibers are essentially resorbed in 36 to 60 months postimplantation. The total resorption period depends on numerous factors including unique patient physiology.
Intended Use:
Transorb™ Self-Gripping Resorbable Mesh is intended to be used for the reinforcement of abdominal wall soft tissues where weakness exists.
Indications for use:
Summary comparing the technological characteristics of the subject, predicate device and reference devices:
Transorb™ Self-Gripping Resorbable Mesh is intended to be used for the reinforcement of abdominal wall soft tissues where weakness exists in open procedures involving ventral hernia repair.
The subject device Transorb™ Self-Gripping Resorbable Mesh is substantially equivalent to the predicate device TIGR® Matrix Surgical Mesh (K191749) in terms of indications.
| | Transorb™ Self-<br>Gripping<br>Resorbable Mesh<br>(K233661) | TIGR® (K191749)<br>Predicate device | Comparison |
|----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
| Intended<br>Use | Reinforcement of<br>abdominal wall soft<br>tissue where<br>weakness exists. | Reinforcement of<br>soft tissue where<br>weakness exists. | Similar |
| Indications<br>for use | Transorb™ self-<br>gripping resorbable<br>mesh is intended to<br>be used for the<br>reinforcement of<br>abdominal wall soft<br>tissues where<br>weakness exists in<br>open procedures<br>involving ventral<br>hernia repair. | Procedures involving<br>soft tissue repair,<br>such as for the repair<br>of hernias or other<br>fascial defects that<br>require the addition<br>of a reinforcing<br>material to obtain<br>the desired surgical<br>result | Similar |
| Method of<br>Insertion | Open | Open and<br>laparoscopic | Similar |
| Location of<br>Mesh<br>placement | Extraperitoneal | Extraperitoneal | Same |
| Defect<br>Closure | Recommended | Recommended | Same |
| Classification | OWT, OOD, FTL per<br>21 CFR 878.3300 | OWT, OOD, FTL per<br>21 CFR 878.3300 | Same |
{6}------------------------------------------------
| Materials | Fully resorbable<br>textile (polymeric)<br>made of copolymer<br>of polylactide acid<br>and trimethylene<br>carbonate yarns<br>(PLLA/TMC) | Fully resorbable<br>textile (polymeric)<br>made of<br>(i) copolymer of<br>glycolide, lactide and<br>trimethylene<br>carbonate<br>(PGA/PLA/TMC) and<br>(ii) copolymer of<br>lactide and<br>trimethylene<br>carbonate<br>(PLLA/TMC) | Similar |
|---------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|
| Shape | Flat Sheet<br>Square, rectangular,<br>with round corners | Flat Sheet<br>Rectangular | Similar |
| Sizes | 10x15cm, 20x20cm,<br>30x30cm and<br>30x40cm<br>The mesh may be<br>recut as needed | 10x15cm, 15x20cm<br>and 20x30cm<br>The mesh may be<br>recut as needed | Different |
| Texture | Two-dimensional<br>monofilament<br>textile with<br>monofilament<br>absorbable grips on<br>one side of the<br>mesh<br>Porosity: pore size<br>of 1.4mm x 1.4mm<br>at the time of<br>implantation | Two-dimensional<br>multifilament textile<br>Porosity: pore size of<br>1.0 mm x 1.0 mm at<br>the time of<br>implantation | Different |
| Sterilization | Ethylene Oxide | Ethylene Oxide | Same |
Both predicate and subject devices are resorbable flat sheet meshes. Differences in terms of material, sizes, and texture (pore size and presence of grips) have been evaluated and do not raise new questions of safety or effectiveness. Performance testing has demonstrated substantial equivalence for biocompatibility, mechanical properties such as strength, human factors evaluation, sterilization, packaging, and transport.
The device ProGrip™ Self-Gripping Polyester Mesh previously cleared under K220586 is introduced as a reference device for its gripping design feature to support the design of the subject device. Both reference and subject devices have resorbable grips on one side and are equivalent in terms of intended use.
The device Phasix™ Mesh previously cleared under K161424 is introduced as a reference device because it includes large sizes (up to 50*50cm) and it is a fully resorbable mesh. Both reference and subject devices are resorbable meshes with large mesh sizes.
{7}------------------------------------------------
Transorb™ Self-Gripping Resorbable Mesh has been evaluated and Materials: found compliant with ISO Standard 10993-1.
Performance data: The performance of Transorb™ Self-Gripping Resorbable Mesh has been evaluated through bench tests, in vitro and in vivo studies. These studies demonstrate that the subject device and predicate device TIGR® Matrix Surgical Mesh (K191749) have substantially equivalent performance characteristics. The following performance data is provided:
#### a. Biocompatibility Testing
Biocompatibility testing and classification has been selected and performed in accordance with ISO 10993, Biological evaluation of Medical Devices, Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process. Transorb™ Self-Gripping Resorbable Mesh is classified as an implant with permanent contact.
A complete chemical characterization was performed in accordance with ISO 10993-18. No risk of chronic toxicity, carcinogenicity or reproductive and developmental toxicity has been identified so nor through literature review and material characterization, nor in Toxicological Risk Assessment performed on finished product extractables profile. Available biological safety data on the Transorb™ Self-Gripping Resorbable Mesh are listed hereafter. Testing was performed on sterilized finished devices.
| Studies | Standards | Conclusion |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------------|------------|
| Cytotoxicity | ISO10993-5 | Pass |
| Sensitization | ISO 10993-10 | Pass |
| Intracutaneous irritation | ISO10993-10 | Pass |
| Acute systemic toxicity | ISO10993-11 | Pass |
| Material mediated pyrogenicity | ISO10993-11 | Pass |
| Hemolysis | ISO 10993-4 | Pass |
| Genotoxicity: bacterial reverse mutation -Ames | ISO10993-3 | Pass |
| Genotoxicity: mouse lymphoma | ISO10993-3 | Pass |
| Subacute systemic toxicity | ISO 10993-11 | Pass |
| Subchronic systemic toxicity | ISO 10993-11 | Pass |
| Local tissue effects (28D - 10W -26W - 52W - 78W) | ISO 10993-6 | Pass |
| In vivo degradation | ISO 10993-9 | Pass |
Applicable ISO 10993-1 Biocompatibility evaluation was conducted and demonstrates that the subject device is biocompatible for its intended body contact and duration.
### b. Bench Testing
Bench tests have been performed in accordance with the FDA Guidance "Guidance for the Preparation of a Premarket Notification Application of a Surgical Mesh" issued March 2, 1999 to evaluate the performance characteristics of the subject device Transorb™ Self-Gripping
{8}------------------------------------------------
Resorbable Mesh in comparison with the predicate TIGR Matrix Surgical Mesh (K191749). The following finished product physical and mechanical performances were assessed:
| Test method | Applicable standard / Test method | Conclusion |
|----------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Pore size | Internal test method.<br>Mesh pore size is measured on a<br>profile projector. Biggest pores<br>extreme height and width are<br>measured, the sample being free of<br>any stresses. | Regarding physical aspect,<br>the proposed device<br>(Transorb™ Self-Gripping<br>Resorbable Mesh) is<br>substantially equivalent to<br>TIGR® Matrix Surgical Mesh<br>(K191749). |
| Surface<br>density | ISO 3801: 1977 | |
| Thickness | ISO 9073-2: 1997 | |
| Bursting<br>strength and<br>deflection | ASTM 06797-15 | |
| Breaking<br>strength and<br>elongation at<br>break | ISO 13934-1: 2013 | Regarding mechanical<br>aspect in case of 510(k)<br>registration, the proposed<br>device (Transorb™ Self-<br>Gripping Resorbable Mesh) is substantially equivalent<br>to TIGR® Matrix Surgical<br>Mesh (K191749). |
| Tear strength | ISO 4674:1977 - method A2 | |
| Suture pull-<br>out strength | Internal test method.<br>Suture pull-out strength is<br>measured on a traction testing<br>machine using dedicated specimens<br>and test conditions | |
#### c. Animal Testing
#### Porcine study - Reinforcement performance
In vivo pre-clinical tests on large animal model were conducted in comparison with the predicate TIGR Matrix Surgical Mesh (K191749) to evaluate Transorb™ Self-Gripping Resorbable Mesh reinforcement performance during healing period (up to 20 weeks following implantation):
- o Mechanical performance (breaking strength – ball burst) of the repaired abdominal wall defects sites using a ball burst testing method.
- o Quality of tissue repair and of mesh tissue integration was also assessed by histologic examination.
#### Rabbit study – Degradation/Integration
In vivo testing has been performed in comparison with predicate TIGR Matrix Surgical Mesh (K191749) to evaluate:
- o Local tissue effects per requirements of ISO 10993-6 (2016) and FDA Guidance Use on International Standard ISO 10993-1, "Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process"
- Tissue integration and tissue ingrowth; O
- Degradation profile O
#### Porcine study – Gripping performance
{9}------------------------------------------------
In vivo testing has been performed in comparison with predicate TIGR Matrix Surgical Mesh (K191749) to evaluate:
- Contribution of the grips to the fixation of the mesh to the o surrounding tissue in early stages after implantation
- Quality of tissue repair and mesh tissue integration by o histologic examination.
These tests demonstrate the safety and performance of the subject device for its intended use and substantial equivalence to the primary predicate device.
#### d. Human Factors Testing
Usability tests were conducted in accordance with IEC 62366-1 and demonstrate that the subject device Transorb™ Self-Gripping Resorbable Mesh is substantial equivalent for the intended users, uses and use environments.
#### e. Shelf-life
The shelf-life of the subject Transorb™ Self-Gripping Resorbable Mesh was demonstrated by the results of the real time studies performed on Transorb™ Self-Gripping Resorbable Mesh (representative of final sterile product), that includes testing of the product mechanical performances and the ability of packaging to maintain sterile barrier. Based on these results, a shelf life of 36 months was assigned for the subject Transorb™ Self-Gripping Resorbable Mesh.
#### f. Clinical data
This premarket submission did not rely on the assessment of clinical performance data to demonstrate substantial equivalence.
#### Conclusion:
All testing demonstrates that the subject device Transorb™ Self-Gripping Resorbable Mesh is substantially equivalent to the predicate device, TIGR Matrix Surgical Mesh (K191749).
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.