K161424 · C.R. Bard, Inc. · OOD · Sep 29, 2016 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K161424
Device Name
Phasix Mesh
Applicant
C.R. Bard, Inc.
Product Code
OOD · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Sep 29, 2016
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.3300
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
Phasix™ Mesh is indicated to reinforce soft tissue where weakness exists in patients undergoing plastic and reconstructive surgery, or for use in procedures involving soft tissue repair of hernia or other fascial defects that require the addition of a reinforcing or bridging material to obtain the desired surgical result.
Device Story
Phasix Mesh is a sterile, resorbable surgical mesh composed of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) monofilament fiber. It is knitted into a mesh structure and provided in various shapes and sizes. The device is used by surgeons in clinical settings to reinforce soft tissue weaknesses or repair fascial defects. Upon implantation, it provides immediate short-term mechanical support and acts as a scaffold for tissue in-growth. The material predictably degrades via hydrolysis and enzymatic processes over 12 to 18 months, retaining approximately 70% strength at 12 weeks. It is a passive implantable device; it does not involve software, electronics, or active sensing.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data was required. Substantial equivalence is supported by bench testing (mesh thickness, pore size, density, tensile strength, stiffness, suture pullout, burst strength, tear resistance) and reliance on previously submitted biocompatibility and animal resorption studies for the predicate device.
Technological Characteristics
Material: Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) monofilament. Construction: Knitted mesh. Sterilization: Ethylene oxide. Packaging: Tyvek envelope and foil pouch. Biocompatibility: ISO 10993-1 compliant. No electrical, software, or electro-mechanical components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients undergoing plastic and reconstructive surgery or soft tissue repair (e.g., hernia, fascial defects) requiring reinforcement or bridging material.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Surgical mesh is a metallic or polymeric screen intended to be implanted to reinforce soft tissue or bone where weakness exists. Examples of surgical mesh are metallic and polymeric mesh for hernia repair, and acetabular and cement restrictor mesh used during orthopedic surgery.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image is a black and white logo for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The logo features a stylized caduceus symbol, which is a staff with two snakes coiled around it. The symbol is surrounded by the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" in a circular arrangement. The logo is simple and recognizable, and it is often used to represent the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
September 29, 2016
C.R. Bard, Inc. Ms. Janna Babson Regulatory Affairs Specialist 100 Crossings Boulevard Warwick, Rhode Island 02886
Re: K161424
Trade/Device Name: Phasix Mesh Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.3300 Regulation Name: Surgical mesh Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OOD Dated: August 30, 2016 Received: August 31, 2016
Dear Ms. Babson:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you; however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set
{1}------------------------------------------------
forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
# David Krause -S
Binita S. Ashar, M.D., M.B.A., F.A.C.S. for Director Division of Surgical Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K161424
Device Name Phasix™ Mesh
Indications for Use (Describe)
Phasix™ Mesh is indicated to reinforce soft tissue where weakness exists in patients undergoing plastic and reconstructive surgery, or for use in procedures involving soft tissue repair of hernia or other fascial defects that require the addition of a reinforcing or bridging material to obtain the desired surgical result.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
| Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
|----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the word "BARD" in a stylized, sans-serif font. The letters are a dark green color, and the overall design has a slightly retro or vintage feel. The letters are bold and closely spaced, creating a strong visual impact.
#### 510(k) Summary Section 5
#### I. SUBMITTER
Davol Inc. 100 Crossings Boulevard Warwick, RI 02886
| Contact Person: | Janna Babson<br>Regulatory Affairs Specialist |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------|
| Phone: | (401) 825-8454 |
| Fax: | (401) 825-8765 |
| E-mail: | Janna.Babson@crbard.com |
Date Prepared: May 16, 2016
#### II. DEVICE
| Trade Name: | Phasix™ Mesh |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------|
| Common or Usual Name: | Surgical Mesh |
| Classification Name: | Surgical Film (21 CFR § 878.3300) |
| Regulatory Class: | Class II |
| Product Code: | OOD |
#### III. PREDICATE DEVICE
Phasix™ Mesh cleared in K142818 on March 31, 2015.
#### IV. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The proposed Phasix™ Mesh utilizes a fully resorbable poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) polymer material. The P4HB is produced from a naturally occurring monomer, processed into monofilament fiber, and then knitted into a surgical mesh. Phasix™ Mesh is packaged individually as a sterile, single, flat mesh available in a wide range of shapes and sizes. Phasix™ Mesh provides immediate short-term support, and a scaffold that enables tissue in-growth over time while the mesh predictably and gradually degrades via hydrolysis and a hydrolytic enzymatic digestive process. Preclinical implantation studies indicate that Phasix™ Mesh retains approximately 70% of its strength at 12 weeks. Absorption of the mesh material is essentially complete within 12 to 18 months.
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### V. INDICATIONS FOR USE
Phasix™ Mesh is indicated to reinforce soft tissue where weakness exists in patients undergoing plastic and reconstructive surgery, or for use in procedures involving soft tissue repair, such as the repair of hernia or other fascial defects that require the addition of a reinforcing or bridging material to obtain the desired surgical result.
#### VI. SUMMARY COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE PREDICATE DEVICE
The proposed Phasix™ Mesh has the same intended use as the predicate device. The following technological characteristics of Phasix™ Mesh are the same as the predicate device: device material, design, chemical composition, biocompatibility, packaging materials, and sterilization. The difference between the predicate and proposed devices arises in size availability. The proposed Phasix™ Mesh will be offered in 25 sizes in comparison to the 5 sizes currently marketed for the predicate Phasix™ Mesh (K142818).
The proposed Phasix™ Mesh has the same materials and design as the predicate Phasix™ Mesh. The proposed and predicate devices are constructed of the same P4HB monofilament knitted to create a mesh with the same weave characteristics. Both devices have the same indications for use, and are intended for use in the reconstruction and repair of soft tissue deficiencies where weakness exists such as hernia repair. In addition, the proposed device and the predicate device are packaged in the same materials including a DuPont™ Tyvek envelope and foil pouch that undergo the same ethylene oxide sterilization method.
{5}------------------------------------------------
| Device<br>Features | Phasix™ Mesh<br>(Proposed Device) | Phasix™ Mesh<br>(Predicate device)<br>K142818 | Equivalency |
|----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|
| Intended<br>Use | Soft tissue reinforcement | Soft tissue reinforcement | Identical |
| Indication<br>for Use | Phasix™ Mesh is indicated<br>to reinforce soft tissue<br>where weakness exists in<br>patients undergoing plastic<br>and reconstructive surgery,<br>or for use in procedures<br>involving soft tissue repair,<br>such as the repair of hernia<br>or other fascial defects that<br>require the addition of a<br>reinforcing or bridging<br>material to obtain the<br>desired surgical result. | Phasix™ Mesh is indicated<br>to reinforce soft tissue<br>where weakness exists in<br>patients undergoing plastic<br>and reconstructive surgery,<br>or for use in procedures<br>involving soft tissue repair,<br>such as the repair of hernia<br>or other fascial defects that<br>require the addition of a<br>reinforcing or bridging<br>material to obtain the<br>desired surgical result. | Identical |
| Sterilization | Ethylene Oxide | Ethylene Oxide | Identical |
| Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate<br>Material<br>(P4HB) | | Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate<br>(P4HB) | Identical |
| Structure | Knitted P4HB monofilament | Knitted P4HB monofilament | Identical |
{6}------------------------------------------------
| Device<br>Features | Phasix™ Mesh<br>(Proposed Device) | | Phasix™ Mesh<br>(Predicate device)<br>K142818 | | Equivalency |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|
| Size and<br>Shape | Size | Shape | Size | Shape | Similar |
| | 3"<br>4" x 6"<br>6" x 8"<br>8" x 10"<br>10" x 12"<br>4.5"<br>2.4" x 6.3"<br>3" x 3"<br>3" x 6.3"<br>3" x 8"<br>4" x 4"<br>4" x 8"<br>4" x 10"<br>6" x 10"<br>6" x 12"<br>8" x 8"<br>8" x 12"<br>8" x 16"<br>10" x 16"<br>12" x 12"<br>12" x 18"<br>14" x 14"<br>16" x 16"<br>18" x 18"<br>19.5" x 19.5" | Circle<br>Rectangle<br>Rectangle<br>Rectangle<br>Rectangle<br>Circle<br>Rectangle<br>Square<br>Rectangle<br>Rectangle<br>Square<br>Rectangle<br>Rectangle<br>Rectangle<br>Rectangle<br>Square<br>Rectangle<br>Rectangle<br>Rectangle<br>Square<br>Rectangle<br>Square<br>Square<br>Square<br>Square | 3"<br>4" x 6"<br>6" x 8"<br>8" x 10"<br>10" x 12" | Circle<br>Rectangle<br>Rectangle<br>Rectangle<br>Rectangle | |
| Packaging<br>Type | Tyvek | | Tyvek | | Identical |
#### VII. PERFORMANCE DATA
#### Performance Testing
Bench testing has been conducted in accordance with FDA's Guidance for the Preparation of a Premarket Notification for Surgical Mesh issued March 2, 1999 to evaluate the performance characteristics of proposed devices.
The following non-clinical tests were completed for the proposed and predicate device. The proposed Phasix™ Mesh demonstrated equivalent performance in comparison to the predicate device.
{7}------------------------------------------------
- Mesh thickness ●
- Mesh knit construction
- Mesh pore size
- Mesh density
- Tensile strength
- Device stiffness
- Suture pullout strength
- Burst strength
- Tear resistance
#### Biocompatibility testing
The proposed Phasix™ Mesh uses the same P4HB monofilament and the same processing aids as the predicate Phasix™ Mesh. Therefore, biocompatibility testing previously conducted on the predicate device (as presented via K142818) is also applicable to the proposed device, and thus is adopted in support of the proposed Phasix™ Mesh device. All testing conducted to date per the requirements of ISO 10993-1 indicates the device is biocompatible for its intended use as a permanent, tissue-contacting, implant device. Additional confirmatory LAL and cytotoxicity testing was performed.
#### Electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)
The Phasix™ Mesh is not an electro-mechanical medical device nor is it a medical system, therefore this section does not apply.
#### Software Verification and Validation Testing
The Phasix™ Mesh does not contain software; therefore this section does not apply.
#### Simulated Distribution Testing
Testing is to be performed in accordance with ASTM-D4169, Standard Practice for Performance Testing of Shipping Containers and Systems, in which the distribution environment that Phasix™ Mesh is routinely shipped in is simulated to demonstrate that the packaging system is able to maintain sterile package integrity.
#### Animal Study
In vivo studies were performed to characterize the mechanical strength and resorption profile of the P4HB monofilament mesh, and were originally provided in support of the predicate device (K142818). Since the proposed Phasix™ Mesh is constructed of the same P4HB monofilament knitted into a mesh with the same knit characteristics as the predicate device, these resorption studies are adopted in support of the proposed Phasix™ Mesh device, and were therefore not repeated.
{8}------------------------------------------------
#### Clinical Studies
No clinical study was required in support of the proposed Phasix™ Mesh.
#### VIII. CONCLUSIONS
The comparative analysis as well as the bench and preclinical testing results demonstrated that the Phasix™ Mesh has equivalent safety and performance as the predicate device that is currently marketed for the same intended use. Therefore, it is concluded that the proposed Phasix™ Mesh and the predicate device are substantially equivalent.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.