K142818 · C. R. Bard · OOD · Mar 31, 2015 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K142818
Device Name
Phasix Mesh
Applicant
C. R. Bard
Product Code
OOD · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Mar 31, 2015
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.3300
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Phasix™ Mesh is indicated to reinforce soft tissue where weakness exists in patients undergoing plastic and reconstructive surgery. or for use in procedures involving soft tissue repair of hernia or other fascial defects that require the addition of a reinforcing or bridging material to obtain the desired surgical result.
Device Story
Phasix™ Mesh is a fully resorbable surgical mesh composed of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) monofilament fiber. Used by surgeons in clinical settings for soft tissue reinforcement in hernia repair or reconstructive procedures. The mesh provides immediate short-term mechanical support while acting as a scaffold for tissue in-growth. Over 12 to 18 months, the material predictably degrades via hydrolysis and enzymatic digestion. It is supplied as a sterile, single-use flat mesh in various sizes. By reinforcing weakened tissue, the device facilitates surgical repair and improves patient outcomes in fascial defect management.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical study was required. Evidence consists of bench testing (mesh weave, pore size, density, thickness, stiffness, burst strength, tear resistance, suture pullout) and leveraged biocompatibility/animal resorption data from the predicate device.
Technological Characteristics
Material: Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) monofilament. Form: Knitted surgical mesh. Sterilization: Ethylene oxide. Packaging: Tyvek® envelope and foil pouch. No electrical or metal components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients undergoing plastic and reconstructive surgery or soft tissue repair (e.g., hernia, fascial defects) requiring reinforcement or bridging material.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Surgical mesh is a metallic or polymeric screen intended to be implanted to reinforce soft tissue or bone where weakness exists. Examples of surgical mesh are metallic and polymeric mesh for hernia repair, and acetabular and cement restrictor mesh used during orthopedic surgery.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image contains a circular logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features the department's emblem, which consists of a stylized representation of three human profiles facing right, arranged in a way that they appear interconnected. The emblem is positioned to the right of the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA", which is arranged in a circular fashion around the emblem.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
March 31, 2015
Davol Incorporated, Subsidiary of C. R. Bard Incorporated Mr. Steve Keenan Regulatory Affairs Engineer 100 Crossings Boulevard Warwick, Rhode Island 02886
Re: K142818
Trade/Device Name: Phasix" Mesh Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.3300 Regulation Name: Surgical Mesh Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OOD Dated: February 18, 2015 Received: February 19, 2015
Dear Mr. Keenan:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you; however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical
{1}------------------------------------------------
device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
for
Sincerely yours,
# David Krause -S
Binita S. Ashar, M.D., M.B.A., F.A.C.S. Director Division of Surgical Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K142818
Device Name Phasix™ Mesh
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Phasix™ Mesh is indicated to reinforce soft tissue where weakness exists in patients undergoing plastic and reconstructive surgery. or for use in procedures involving soft tissue repair of hernia or other fascial defects that require the addition of a reinforcing or bridging material to obtain the desired surgical result.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <span style="text-decoration: overline;">X</span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | <span style=""></span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW .*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
### 510(K) SUMMARY
This 510(k) Summary is provided per the requirements of section 21 CFR 807.92
#### I. Submitter
| Company Name: | Davol, Inc., Subsidiary of C. R. Bard, Inc |
|----------------------|----------------------------------------------|
| Company Address: | 100 Crossings Boulevard<br>Warwick, RI 02886 |
| Telephone: | (401) 825-8499 |
| Fax: | (401) 825-8765 |
| Submitter's Name: | Steve Keenan<br>Regulatory Affairs Engineer |
| Email: | steve.keenan@crbard.com |
| Date Prepared: | September 26, 2014 |
| II. | |
| Device | |
| Trade Name: | Phasix™ Mesh |
| Common/Usual Name: | Surgical Mesh |
| Classification Name: | Surgical Film (21 CFR § 878.3300) |
Regulatory Class: Product Code:
III. Predicate Device
- TephaFLEX® Mesh ●
- K113723 (Tepha, Inc.), FDA cleared on February 15, 2012 o
Class II
OOD
- K111946 (Tepha Inc.), FDA cleared on September 26, 2011 O
- K070894 (Tepha Inc.), FDA cleared on April 13, 2007 O
PREMARKET NOTIFICATION FOR PHASIX™ MESH
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### Device Description IV.
The proposed Phasix™ Mesh utilizes a fully resorbable poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) polymer material. The P4HB is produced from a naturally occurring monomer and is processed into monofilament fiber then knitted into a surgical mesh. The Phasix™ Mesh is packaged individually as a sterile, single flat mesh available in several rectangular sizes and one small circle. Phasix™ Mesh provides immediate short term support and provides a scaffold that enables tissue in-growth over time while the mesh predictably and gradually degrades via hydrolysis and a hydrolytic enzymatic digestive process. Preclinical implantation studies indicate that Phasix™ Mesh retains approximately 70% of its strength at 12 weeks. Absorption of the mesh material will be essentially complete within 12 to 18 months.
#### Indications for Use v.
Phasix™ Mesh is indicated to reinforce soft tissue where weakness exists in patients undergoing plastic and reconstructive surgery, or for use in procedures involving soft tissue repair, such as the repair of hernia or other fascial defects that require the addition of a reinforcing or bridging material to obtain the desired surgical result.
#### Comparison of Technological Characteristics with the Predicate Device VI.
The proposed Phasix™ Mesh has the same materials and design as the predicate TephaFLEX® Mesh. The proposed and predicate devices are constructed of the same P4HB monofilament knitted to create a mesh with the same weave characteristics. Both devices have the same indications for use statement and are intended for use in the reconstruction and repair of soft tissue deficiencies where weakness exists such as hernia repair. In addition, the proposed device and the predicate device are packaged in the same materials including a DuPont™ Tyvek® envelop and foil pouch that undergo the same ethylene oxide sterilization method. Where minor process technology differences
### PREMARKET NOTIFICATION FOR PHASIX™ MESH
{5}------------------------------------------------
exist, or manufacturing facilities have been changed between the proposed device and the predicate device, performance testing demonstrates that these differences do not adversely affect the safety and effectiveness of the proposed device.
#### Performance Data: VII.
The following performance data are provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination.
# Biocompatibility Testing
The proposed Phasix™ Mesh uses the same P4HB monofilament as the predicate TephaFLEX® Mesh. Therefore, biocompatibility testing previously conducted for the predicate TephaFLEX® Mesh was leveraged in support of the proposed device. Additional cytotoxicity testing was performed on the proposed device to confirm that the manufacturing facility changes and minor process modifications had no impact on the device. The cytotoxicity results met acceptance criteria with passing results. The biocompatibility evaluation for the TephaFLEX® Mesh was conducted in accordance with the FDA Blue Book Memorandum #G95-1 "Use of International Standard ISO-10993, 'Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part 1: Evaluation and Testing'" May 1, 1995, and International Standard ISO 10993-1 "Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part 1: Evaluation and Testing Within a Risk Management Process" as recognized by FDA. The proposed Phasix™ Mesh and predicate TephaFLEX® Mesh are considered tissue/bone contacting permanent implants. Therefore, the following tests were leveraged from the predicate device in support of this premarket notification:
- Cytotoxicity .
- Sensitization ●
- Intracutaneous Reactivity ●
- Systemic Toxicity .
- Genotoxicity .
### PREMARKET NOTIFICATION FOR PHASIX™ MESH
{6}------------------------------------------------
- Chronic Toxicity .
- Implantation ●
- Haemocompatibility o
All biocompatibility data leveraged from the predicate TephaFLEX® Mesh and the additional cytotoxicity testing on proposed Phasix™ Mesh met acceptance criteria.
# Electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)
There are no electrical or metal components in the Phasix™ Mesh; therefore the proposed device does not require EMC and Electrical Safety evaluation.
# Software Verification and Validation Testing
The proposed Phasix™ Mesh does not contain software.
# Bench Testing
Bench testing was performed to compare the proposed Phasix™ Mesh to the predicate TephaFLEX® Mesh. In accordance with FDA's "Guidance for the Preparation of a Premarket Notification Application for a Surgical Mesh" published March 2, 1999, the following physical and performance characteristics were evaluated:
- Mesh weave characteristics ●
- Mesh pore size o
- Mesh density
- Mesh thickness ●
- Device stiffness ●
- Burst strength ●
### PREMARKET NOTIFICATION FOR PHASIX™ MESH
{7}------------------------------------------------
- Tear resistance .
- Suture pullout strength. ●
# Animal Studies
In vivo studies were performed to characterize the mechanical strength and resorption profile of the P4HB monofilament mesh and were originally provided in support of the predicate TephaFLEX® Mesh via K113723. Since the proposed Phasix™ Mesh is constructed of the same P4HB monofilament knitted into a mesh with the same weave characteristics as the predicate TephaFLEX® Mesh, these resorption studies were adopted and provided in support of the Phasix™ Mesh.
# Clinical Study
No clinical study was required in support of the Phasix™ Mesh.
#### Conclusion: VIII.
All test results provided in this submission support and demonstrate that the proposed Phasix™ Mesh is substantially equivalent to the cited TephaFLEX® Mesh predicate.
## PREMARKET NOTIFICATION FOR PHASIX™ MESH
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.