K231208 · Stryker Leibinger GmbH & Co KG · HBW · Aug 14, 2023 · Neurology
Device Facts
Record ID
K231208
Device Name
Stryker Resorbable Fixation System
Applicant
Stryker Leibinger GmbH & Co KG
Product Code
HBW · Neurology
Decision Date
Aug 14, 2023
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 882.5360
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic, Pediatric
Indications for Use
The Delta Resorbable Fixation System is intended for use in the fixation of bones of the cranial skeleton affected by trauma or for reconstruction. The system can be used in both adult and pediatric patients. The self-tapping screws and low profile emergency screws are intended for use in the fixation of bones of the cranial skeleton affected by trauma or for reconstruction, and can be used in pediatric patients older than 29 days and up to two (2) years of age (infants).
Device Story
System consists of resorbable bone fixation plates, meshes, and screws (copolymer of poly lactide and poly glycolide) for cranial skeleton fixation. Subject devices add self-tapping screws (STS) and low-profile emergency screws (LPES). STS modification removes pre-tapping step from pilot hole preparation; LPES maintains existing operational principles. Used in clinical settings for trauma or reconstruction. Surgeons operate system to stabilize bone segments. Output is mechanical fixation of cranial bones. Benefits include rigid fixation using resorbable materials, reducing need for secondary removal procedures. Validation confirmed user comprehension of modified pilot hole workflow and restricted pediatric patient population.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Bench testing only. Verification testing included insertion and pull-out tests per ASTM F2502 and inherent viscosity testing. Usability validation study confirmed user comprehension of modified pilot hole preparation and patient population restrictions, with passing results for task performance and knowledge tasks.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: Copolymer of poly lactide and poly glycolide. Principle: Resorbable bone fixation (plates, meshes, screws). Modifications: Self-tapping thread geometry and screw head dimensions. Standards: ASTM F2502 for mechanical testing. Sterilization: Unchanged from reference device. Connectivity: None (mechanical).
Indications for Use
Indicated for fixation of cranial skeleton bones affected by trauma or reconstruction in adults and pediatric patients. Self-tapping and low-profile emergency screws are indicated for pediatric patients >29 days to 2 years of age.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A cranioplasty plate fastener is a screw, wire, or other article made of tantalum, vitallium, or stainless steel used to secure a plate to the patient's skull to repair a skull defect.
Predicate Devices
Stryker Universal Neuro III System AXS Screw (K171152)
{0}------------------------------------------------
August 14, 2023
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the FDA logo is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
Stryker Leibinger GmbH & Co. KG Gregory Gohl Senior Regulatory Affairs Specislist Boetzinger Strasse 41 D-79111 Freiburg, Germany
Re: K231208
Trade/Device Name: Stryker Resorbable Fixation System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.5360 Regulation Name: Cranioplasty Plate Fastener Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: HBW Dated: May 19, 2023 Received: July 14, 2023
### Dear Gregory Gohl:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for
{1}------------------------------------------------
devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
Image /page/1/Picture/5 description: The image shows a digital signature of Adam D. Pierce -S. The signature indicates that the document was digitally signed by Adam D. Pierce -S on August 14, 2023. The timestamp of the signature is 10:22:50 with a time zone offset of -04'00'.
Adam D. Pierce, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT5A: Division of Neurosurgical, Neurointerventional and Neurodiagnostic Devices OHT5: Office of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K231208
Device Name Stryker Resorbable Fixation System
### Indications for Use (Describe)
The Delta Resorbable Fixation System is intended for use in the fixation of bones of the cranial skeleton affected by trauma or for reconstruction. The system can be used in both adult and pediatric patients.
The self-tapping screws and low profile emergency screws are intended for use in the fixation of bones of the cranial skeleton affected by trauma or for reconstruction, and can be used in pediatric patients older than 29 two (2) years of age (infants).
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <span style="font-family: Arial;"> </span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | <span style="font-family: Arial;"> </span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# Section 5. 510(k) Summary
This section provides a summary of 510(k) information in accordance with the requirements of 21 CFR 807.92.
- SUBMITTER [§807.92(a)(1)] I.
| 510(k) Owner: | Stryker Leibinger GmbH& Co. KG<br>Boetzinger Strasse 41<br>D-79111 Freiburg, Germany |
|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Submitter / Contact<br>Person: | Gregory Gohl<br>Sr. Regulatory Affairs Specialist<br>Stryker Craniomaxillofacial (CMF)<br>1941 Stryker Way<br>Portage, MI 49002 |
| | Phone: 269-370-1476 |
| Date prepared: | August 14, 2023 |
#### DEVICE [§807.92(a)(2)] II.
| Trade Name: | Stryker Resorbable Fixation System |
|--------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Abbreviated Name: | Delta System / Delta Resorbable Fixation System |
| Common or Usual Name: | Resorbable Bone Plating System |
| Device: | Stryker Resorbable Fixation System |
| Classification Name &<br>Regulation Description: | Fastener, Plate, Cranioplasty; per 21 CFR §882.5360 |
| Regulation Medical<br>Specialty & Review Panel: | Neurology (OHT5/DHT5A – Office of Neurological,<br>Neurointerventional, and Neurodiagnostic Devices) |
| Primary Product Code: | HBW |
| Regulatory Device Class: | Class II |
{4}------------------------------------------------
### III. PREDICATE DEVICE [§807.92(a)(3)]
A. Predicate Device: Stryker Universal Neuro III System AXS Screw - K171152
### B. Reference Device: Stryker Resorbable Fixation System - K213777
### IV. DEVICE DESCRIPTION [§807.92(a)(4)]
- A. Submission Branch of Subject Device: Neurology (OHT5/DHT5A Office of Neurological, Neurointerventional, and Neurodiagnostic Devices)
- B. Subject Device: Stryker Resorbable Fixation System (also referred to as Delta System or Stryker Delta Resorbable Fixation System; marketed as DualStart)
The predicate Stryker Universal Neuro III System is intended for reconstruction, stabilization, and/or rigid fixation of non-load-bearing bony areas subsequent to craniotomy, craniectomy, and cranial features in adults and adolescents (age 12 and higher). The reference device Stryker Resorbable Fixation System is a cranio-maxillofacial plating system intended for use in the fixation of bones of the craniofacial and midfacial skeleton affected by trauma or for reconstruction. The reference device can be used in both adult and pediatric patients but is not intended for use in the mandible and/or full load bearing procedures. It consists of resorbable bone fixation plates, meshes, and screws made of a copolymer of poly lactide and poly glycolide.
Through this submission there is no change to the existing articles within the Delta System. The scope of this submission covers the addition of screws to the Delta System, which are shown as a modification of screws of the reference device to create the addition of self-tapping screws (STS) and low profile emergency screws (LPES). The subject STS and LPES, only, have a limited patient population of pediatric patients older than 29 days and up to two (2) years of age (infants).
{5}------------------------------------------------
#### INDICATIONS FOR USE [§807.92(a)(5)] V.
The Delta Resorbable Fixation System is intended for use in the fixation of bones of the cranial skeleton affected by trauma or for reconstruction. The system can be used in both adult and pediatric patients.
The self-tapping screws and low profile emergency screws are intended for use in the fixation of bones of the cranial skeleton affected by trauma or for reconstruction, and can be used in pediatric patients older than 29 days and up to two (2) years of age (infants).
| Feature | Predicate Device | Subject Devices (only) | Explanation of Differences |
|---------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|
| Indications for Use | The Stryker Universal Neuro III System is intended for reconstruction, stabilization, and/or rigid fixation of non-load-bearing bony areas subsequent to craniotomy, craniectomy, and cranial fractures in adults and adolescents (age 12 and higher). | Neuro<br>The Delta Resorbable Fixation System is intended for use in the fixation of bones of the cranial skeleton affected by trauma or for reconstruction. The system can be used in both adult and pediatric patients. | Similar |
### TABLE 5-1: COMPARISON OF INDICATIONS FOR USE (PREDICATE)
### TABLE 5-2: COMPARISON OF INDICATIONS FOR USE AND RELATED REFERENCE DEVICE)
| Feature | Reference Device | Subject Devices (only) | Explanation of<br>Differences |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Indications for Use<br>(overall Delta System) | Neuro<br>The Delta Resorbable Fixation<br>System is intended for use in the<br>fixation of bones of the cranial<br>skeleton affected by trauma or<br>for reconstruction. The system<br>can be used in both adult and<br>pediatric patients. | Neuro<br>The Delta Resorbable Fixation<br>System is intended for use in the<br>fixation of bones of the cranial<br>skeleton affected by trauma or for<br>reconstruction. The system can be<br>used in both adult and pediatric<br>patients. | Identical |
| Indications for Use<br>(subject devices only) | Neuro | Neuro<br>The self-tapping screws and low<br>profile emergency screws are<br>intended for use in the fixation of<br>bones of the cranial skeleton<br>affected by trauma or for<br>reconstruction, and can be used in<br>pediatric patients older than 29<br>days and up to two (2) years of<br>age (infants). | For subject device<br>STS and LPES<br>screws, only,<br>restriction of<br>patient population<br>to pediatric<br>patients older than<br>29 days and up to<br>two (2) years of<br>age (infants). |
| Area of Application | Craniofacial and midface | Craniofacial and midface | Identical |
| Patient Contact,<br>Duration of<br>Implantation within<br>Body | Tissue/Bone, Permanent | Tissue/Bone, Permanent | Identical |
{6}------------------------------------------------
#### VI. COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE PREDICATE DEVICE [§807.92(a)(6)]
The subject device is compared to its predicate and reference device system for substantial equivalence of technological characteristics based on the criteria of pilot hole preparation process flow, geometrical modifications, and patient population.
The technological characteristics of the subject device that remain the same as the reference device include material of construction, manufacturing process, sterilization process, packaging materials, and anatomical area indication.
# A. Pilot Hole Preparation Process Flow
The operational principle of the Stryker Resorbable Fixation System is a cranio-maxillofacial plating system intended for use in the fixation of bones of the craniofacial and midfacial skeleton affected by trauma or for reconstruction. The method of pilot hole preparation has been modified for the self-tapping screw (STS) subject device. The reference device system requires pre-drilling and pre-tapping of the pilot hole prior to insertion. The STS subject screws require only pre-drilling of the pilot hole prior to screw insertion, thus removing the pre-tapping step. No modifications of principles of operation are made to the low profile emergency screw (LPES) subject device.
# B. Geometry Modifications
The subject devices incorporate a modification to the geometry to support the mechanical functionality of a self-tapping screw. Modifications to the subject devices include the thread geometry and screw head dimensions. The interfaces for the subject screws have been reviewed, confirming there is no impact to the intended product interfaces of the subject screws as compared to the reference device screws.
## C. Patient Population
The subject devices have a limited patient population of pediatric patients older than 29 days and up to two (2) years of age (infants), compared to the reference device Delta System, which has a patient population of adults and pediatric patients.
# VII. PERFORMANCE DATA [§807.92(b)(7)]
The modifications for the subject devices in this submission include a limited patient population of pediatric patients older than 29 days and up to two (2) years of age (infants), removal of the tapping step from pilot hole preparation (self-tapping screw [STS] only), and screw geometry. The limited patient population was determined based on a business decision, focusing new product introduction on our primary customer and patient base, of pediatric patients older than 29 days and up to two (2) years of age (infants). Verification and validation testing protocols were constructed to ensure testing captured this specific limited patient population, in accordance with the FDA 2014 guidance Premarket Assessment of Pediatric Medical Devices.
{7}------------------------------------------------
The material of construction, manufacturing process, sterilization process, and packaging materials remain unchanged compared to the reference device, therefore biocompatibility testing, shelf life testing, and sterilization testing are out of scope of this submission, and adopted from the reference device system. Bioburden tests were performed to further affirm no new worst-case is introduced with the modified screw geometries, which concluded a passing result.
Verification test criteria and methods were identified to evaluate the performance of the subject screws according to the proposed limited patient population of pediatric patients older than 29 days and up to two (2) years of age (infants). Modification of the operating principle, pilot hole preparation, for the STS was additionally evaluated through performance testing. The impact of screw geometry modification on material properties during real-time degradation was evaluated. The following performance tests were performed to support the substantial equivalence determination of the subject screws to the predicate and reference device system based on the modifications described:
| Characteristic | Test | Result | Standards |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------|--------|------------|
| Verification test | Insertion test | Passed | ASTM F2502 |
| Verification test after<br>real-time degradation | Pull-out test | Passed | ASTM F2502 |
| Verification test after<br>real-time degradation | Inherent viscosity | Passed | ASTM F2502 |
| | TABLE 5-2: PERFORMANCE BENCH TESTING |
|--|--------------------------------------|
| | |
A risk analysis was performed, and user validation testing, which also included human factors and usability engineering, in accordance with the FDA 2016 guidance Applying Human Factors and Usability Engineering to Medical Devices, was performed in support of the substantial equivalence determination. The validation study was constructed to confirm use error is under control, a comprehension of the Instructions for Use (IFU) is understood, and user needs are met. With respect to the modifications made to the subject devices, the validation evaluated the usability of the workflow steps, functionality of the devices, compatibility of related products or processes, and knowledge comprehension of labeling and IFU. Specifically, the knowledge comprehension addressed the ability to comprehend the modification to the pilot hole preparation and the limitation to the patient population. The validation testing concluded a passing result based on the data collected and reviewed in the study.
{8}------------------------------------------------
#### K231208 Page 6 of 6
| Characteristic | Test | Result |
|----------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| Usability validation | Task performance (evaluated for use error) | Passed |
| Usability validation | Knowledge tasks | Passed |
| Usability validation | Rating questions after task performance | Passed |
### TABLE 5-3: USABILITY VALIDATION TESTING
### Performance Bench Testing
Performance bench testing was performed in the form of verification testing to confirm substantial equivalence. See Table 5-2.
### Animal Testing
Animal testing was not required as a basis for substantial equivalence.
# Clinical Testing [§807.92(b)(2)]
Clinical testing was not required as a basis for substantial equivalence.
## VIII. CONCLUSION [§807.92(b)(3)]
In summary, the Stryker Resorbable Fixation System is substantially equivalent to the predicate and to the reference device system. The modifications proposed for the subject devices include the removal of a pilot hole preparation step (STS only), screw geometry modification, and restriction of the patient population. The material of construction, sterilization process, manufacturing process, packaging components, and anatomical area intended use / indication remain unchanged and identical to the reference device system. The scope of modifications concludes no impact to biocompatibility, sterilization, and shelf life. The performance verification testing supports that the performance of the subject screws is substantially equivalent to the reference device. The user validation study, which also considered human factors and usability engineering, confirmed use error is under control, a comprehension of the IFU is understood, and user needs are met, all of which supports the determination of substantial equivalence to the predicate and reference device system. Overall, the modifications do not raise new questions of safety or effectiveness. According to the comparison based on the requirements of 21 CFR 807.87 and the information provided herein, it is concluded that the information included in this submission supports substantial equivalence to the predicate and reference device system.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.