Stryker Resorbable Fixation System

K213777 · Stryker Leibinger Micro Implants · JEY · Feb 4, 2022 · Dental

Device Facts

Record IDK213777
Device NameStryker Resorbable Fixation System
ApplicantStryker Leibinger Micro Implants
Product CodeJEY · Dental
Decision DateFeb 4, 2022
DecisionSESE
Submission TypeSpecial
Regulation21 CFR 872.4760
Device ClassClass 2
AttributesTherapeutic, Pediatric

Intended Use

Dental: The Delta Resorbable Fixation System is intended for use in the fixation of bones of the maxillofacial and midfacial skeleton affected by trauma or for reconstruction. The system can be used in both adult and pediatric patients. Neuro: The Delta Resorbable Fixation System is intended for use in the fixation of bones of the cranial skeleton affected by trauma or for reconstruction. The system can be used in both adult and pediatric patients.

Device Story

Resorbable bone fixation system; includes plates, meshes, and screws; composed of poly lactide and poly glycolide copolymer. Used for fixation of craniofacial, midfacial, and cranial bones following trauma or reconstruction. Operated by surgeons in clinical settings. Implants provide structural stabilization during bone healing; material resorbs over time. System not for mandible or full load-bearing applications. Output is physical stabilization of bone segments. Device is provided sterile; packaging updated to double-pouch configuration with inner pouch as primary sterile barrier.

Clinical Evidence

No clinical data. Substantial equivalence supported by bench testing, including sterilization validation (ISO 11135:2014), EO residual testing (ISO 10993-7:2008), endotoxin testing (ISO 10993-1/ANSI/AAMI ST72:2019), and summative usability validation of packaging (n=19 users).

Technological Characteristics

Materials: Copolymer of poly lactide and poly glycolide. Fixation: Screws. Sterilization: Ethylene Oxide (EO) per ISO 11135:2014. Packaging: Double-pouch system with inner pouch as sterile barrier. No changes to implant design or material formulation.

Indications for Use

Indicated for fixation of maxillofacial, midfacial, and cranial skeletal bones affected by trauma or reconstruction in adult and pediatric patients. Not intended for use in the mandible or full load-bearing procedures.

Regulatory Classification

Identification

A bone plate is a metal device intended to stabilize fractured bone structures in the oral cavity. The bone segments are attached to the plate with screws to prevent movement of the segments.

Predicate Devices

Related Devices

Submission Summary (Full Text)

{0}------------------------------------------------ Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. Underneath the square are the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue. 2/4/2022 Stryker Leibinger Micro Implants Gregory Gohl Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist 750 Trade Centre Way -Suite 200 Portage, Michigan 49002 Re: K213777 Trade/Device Name: Stryker Resorbable Fixation System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.4760 Regulation Name: Bone Plate Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: JEY, GXR, HBW Dated: January 21, 2022 Received: January 26, 2022 Dear Gregory Gohl: We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading. If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for {1}------------------------------------------------ devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems. For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100). Sincerely, for Andrew Steen Assistant Director DHT1B: Division of Dental and ENT Devices OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT and Dental Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health Enclosure {2}------------------------------------------------ # Indications for Use 510(k) Number (if known) ### K213777 Device Name Stryker Delta Resorbable Fixation System ### Indications for Use (Describe) Dental: The Delta Resorbable Fixation System is intended for use in the fixation of bones of the maxillofacial and midfacial skeleton affected by trauma or for reconstruction. The system can be used in both adult and pediatric patients. Neuro: The Delta Resorbable Fixation System is intended for use in the fixation of bones of the cranial skeleton affected by trauma or for reconstruction. The system can be used in both adult and pediatric patients. | Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | | |---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | <div> <span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) </span> </div> | <div> <span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) </span> </div> | ### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED. This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. ### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.* The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: > Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov "An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number." {3}------------------------------------------------ # 510(k) Summary This section provides a summary of 510(k) information in accordance with the requirements of 21 CFR 807.92. - SUBMITTER [§807.92(a)(1)] I. | 510(k) Owner: | Stryker Leibinger GmbH& Co. KG<br>Boetzinger Strasse 41<br>D-79111 Freiburg, Germany | |------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Submitter/ Contact<br>Person: | Gregory Gohl<br>Sr. Regulatory Affairs Specialist<br>Stryker Craniomaxillofacial (CMF)<br>1941 Stryker Way<br>Portage, MI 49002 | | Phone: 269-370-1476<br>Fax: 877-648-7114 | | | Date prepared: | February 4, 2022 | - DEVICE [§807.92(a)(2)] K213777 II. | Trade Name: | Stryker Resorbable Fixation System | |-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Abbreviated Name: | Delta System / Delta Resorbable Fixation System | | Common or Usual Name: | Resorbable Bone Plating System | | Device: | Stryker Resorbable Fixation System | | Classification Name &<br>Regulation Description: | Plate, Fixation, Bone; per 21 CFR §888.3030 | | Regulation Medical<br>Specialty & Review Panel: | Dental (OHT1/DHT1B – Office of Ophthalmic,<br>Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT, & Dental); Neurology<br>(OHT5/DHT5A – Office of Neurological and Physical<br>Medicine Devices) | | Primary Product Code: | JEY | | Subsequent Prod. Codes: | GXR, HBW | | Regulatory Device Class: | Class II | | *Note the company Stryker or legacy name Stryker Leibinger precedes the<br>product/trade name and predicate device in some documentation. | | {4}------------------------------------------------ ### III. PREDICATE DEVICE [§807.92(a)(3)] - A. Submission Branch of Predicate Device: Division of Surgical, Orthopedic, and Restorative Devices; Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health - B. Predicate Device: Stryker Resorbable Fixation System K113109 # IV. DEVICE DESCRIPTION [§807.92(a)(4)] - A. Submission Branch of Subject Device: Dental (OHT1/DHT1B-Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT, & Dental); Neurology (OHT5/DHT5A - Office of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices) - B. Subject Device: Stryker Resorbable Fixation System (also referred to as Stryker Delta Resorbable Fixation System or Delta System The Stryker Resorbable Fixation System is a cranio-maxillofacial plating system intended for use in the fixation of bones of the craniofacial and midfacial skeleton affected by trauma or for reconstruction. The system can be used in both adult and pediatric patients but is not intended for use in the mandible and/or full load bearing procedures. It consists of resorbable bone fixation plates, meshes, and screws made of a copolymer of poly lactide and poly glycolide. - V. INDICATIONS FOR USE [§807.92(a)(5)] | | Predicate Device - K113109 | Subject Device | |------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Indications for<br>Use | The Delta Resorbable Fixation System is<br>intended for use in the fixation of bones<br>of the craniofacial and midfacial<br>skeleton affected by trauma or for<br>reconstruction. The system can be used<br>in both adult and pediatric patients but is<br>not intended for use in the mandible<br>and/or full load bearing procedures. | Dental: The Delta Resorbable Fixation<br>System is intended for use in the fixation<br>of bones of the maxillofacial and<br>midfacial skeleton affected by trauma or<br>for reconstruction. The system can be<br>used in both adult and pediatric patients.<br>Neuro: The Delta Resorbable Fixation<br>System is intended for use in the fixation<br>of bones of the cranial skeleton affected<br>by trauma or for reconstruction. The<br>system can be used in both adult and<br>pediatric patients. | ### TABLE 5-1: COMPARISON OF INDICATIONS FOR USE {5}------------------------------------------------ #### COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE VI. PREDICATE DEVICE [§807.92(a)(6)] The subject device is compared to its predicate device for substantial equivalence of technological characteristics based on the following criteria: - A. Principles of Operation - B. Technological Characteristics # C. Principles of Operation / Operating Principle The basic operational principle of the Stryker Resorbable Fixation System remains the same as for the predicate: The Delta Resorbable Fixation System is intended for use in the fixation of bones of the craniofacial and midfacial skeleton affected by trauma or for reconstruction. The system can be used in both adult and pediatric patients but is not intended for use in the mandible and/or full load bearing procedures. This submission does not propose a change in the operating principle as there is no change to the implant design. interface with accessories or implant materials. # D. Technological Characteristics The technological characteristics remain the same as the predicate: - -Same Intended Use: The Delta Resorbable Fixation System is intended for use in the fixation of bones of the craniofacial and midfacial skeleton affected by trauma or for reconstruction. The system can be used in both adult and pediatric patients but is not intended for use in the mandible and/or full load bearing procedures. - -Same Mode of Fixation: fixated to the native bone with Stryker Delta Resorbable screws. - Same Materials of Construction: Implants are made of a copolymer of poly lactide and poly glycolide. No change to the formulation of the polymer. - -Same Design: The change of the sterilization supplier and location does not change the implant design by any means. # VII. PERFORMANCE DATA [§807.92(b)(7)] The modifications described in this submission are the change to a new Ethylene Oxide (EO) sterilization supplier and location and a modification to the packaging. The new EO sterilization cycle is equivalent to the predicate device sterilization cycle operating at lower EO gas concentrations. There is no change to the sterilization method regarding the final end-product. The new supplier location and cycle were proven to be as substantially equivalent for sterilization as the predicate location. Packaging components, design, and materials remain the same. Labeling requirements also remain unchanged. The modification of the packaging is an update of the sterile barrier layout of the double pouch packaging system (i.e., only the inner pouch is the sterile barrier instead of the outer and inner pouch as for the predicate devices). This change is {6}------------------------------------------------ communicated to the customer through an inclusion of a warning sticker in regard. Useability validation confirms the warning sticker label mitigates the risk associated with the change in the sterile barrier packaging. A risk analysis was performed, and sterilization testing was performed in support of the substantial equivalence determination. There is no change in the design, material, manufacturing process, or duration/location of contact. The tests necessary to evaluate the change regarding the new sterilization location and supplier are listed below. The following tests were performed to adopt the Stryker Resorbable Fixation System plates and meshes into the existing EO Cycle. | Characteristic | Test | Result | Standards | |-------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------| | Sterilization<br>Validation | Product Adoption and<br>Sterility | Passed | ISO 11135:2014<br>+AMD1:2018 | | Sterilization /<br>Biocompatibility | EO Residual | Passed | ISO 10993-7:2008<br>+AMD1:2019 | | Sterilization /<br>Biocompatibility | Endotoxin Testing | Passed | ISO 10993-1<br>+ANSI/AAMI ST72:2019 | TABLE 5-2: STERILIZATION AND BIOCOMPATIBILITY TESTING The aseptic transfer (i.e., the transfer of the devices from the non-sterile field into the sterile field during surgery) is modified by the change in the sterile barrier declaration. The aseptic transfer has been identified as the only critical task to be subjected to a summative usability validation of packaging. The human factors testing/study was designed to evaluate in particular possible adverse effects caused by negative transfer. The study was conducted with a sample size of 19 representative users including experienced as well as new users. The full packaging configuration was subjected to test. All test participants were able to perform the aseptic transfer correctly. No use errors or use difficulties were observed. The packaging change was evaluated to be non-critical. TABLE 5-3: SUMMATIVE USABILITY VALIDATION OF PACKAGING | Characteristic | Test | Result | |----------------------|---------------------------------|--------| | Summative Validation | Aseptic transfer<br>performance | Passed | # Performance Bench Testing Performance bench testing was not required as a basis for substantial equivalence. {7}------------------------------------------------ ### Animal Testing Animal testing was not required as a basis for substantial equivalence. ### Clinical Testing [§807.92(b)(2)] Clinical testing was not required as a basis for substantial equivalence. ### VIII. CONCLUSION [§807.92(b)(3)] In summary, the Stryker Resorbable Fixation System is substantially equivalent to its predicate device. The design of implants has not changed, nor has the manufacturing of them changed. There is no change to the sterilization method, and the sterilization cycles of the subject and predicate device are evaluated to be equivalent throughout this submission. The fundamental scientific technology has not changed from the predicate device since the design of the implants or subcomponents has not changed. The intended use, principle of operation, mechanism of action, technological characteristics, and materials of construction also have not changed. In reference to packaging and labeling, specifically, the packaging components, design, and materials remain the same. The moisture barrier change in packaging of the subject devices led to change in labeling. Human factors data supports that the modified packaging, including the change in labeling, is substantially equivalent to the predicate. Overall, the modifications do not raise new questions of safety or effectiveness. According to the comparison based on the requirements of 21 CFR 807.87 and the information provided herein. it is concluded that the information included in this submission supports substantial equivalence to the predicate device.
Innolitics
510(k) Summary
Decision Summary
Classification Order
Enter a record ID and click Load to view the document.
100%