K211960 · Boston Scientific Corporation · ESW · Nov 22, 2021 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K211960
Device Name
Agile Esophageal OTW Stent System
Applicant
Boston Scientific Corporation
Product Code
ESW · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Nov 22, 2021
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.3610
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Agile Esophageal Partially Covered and Fully Covered OTW Stent System is intended for maintaining esophageal luminal patency in esophageal strictures caused by intrinsic and/or extrinsic malignant tumors, and occlusion of concurrent esophageal fistulas.
Device Story
The Agile Esophageal OTW Stent System is a self-expanding, braided Nitinol wire stent with silicone covering, designed to maintain esophageal patency and occlude fistulas. The stent features flared ends to prevent migration and integrated sutures for repositioning or removal. It is delivered via a co-axial, over-the-wire (OTW) delivery system featuring a clear distal section for visualization and radiopaque markers for accurate placement. The device is used by clinicians in a clinical setting to treat malignant esophageal obstructions. The clinician navigates the delivery system to the target site, deploys the stent, and may use the delivery system to reconstrain the stent if initial placement is suboptimal. The stent provides mechanical support to the esophageal wall, improving patient quality of life by facilitating swallowing and managing fistula-related complications.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance testing included delivery system withdrawal, deployment force, reconstrainment force, stent hoop expansion/compression force, flexibility, and fatigue resistance. Biocompatibility testing was conducted per ISO 10993-1, including cytotoxicity, irritation, and sensitization. All tests met acceptance criteria.
Indicated for patients with esophageal strictures caused by intrinsic or extrinsic malignant tumors and those requiring occlusion of concurrent esophageal fistulas.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An esophageal prosthesis is a rigid, flexible, or expandable tubular device made of a plastic, metal, or polymeric material that is intended to be implanted to restore the structure and/or function of the esophagus. The metal esophageal prosthesis may be uncovered or covered with a polymeric material. This device may also include a device delivery system.
Special Controls
The special control for this device is FDA's “Guidance for the Content of Premarket Notification Submissions for Esophageal and Tracheal Prostheses.”
Wallflex Esophageal Fully & Partially Covered Stent System (K091510/K073266)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the symbol of the Department of Health & Human Services on the left and the FDA acronym along with the full name of the agency on the right. The FDA part of the logo is in blue, with the acronym in a square and the full name written out next to it.
November 22, 2021
Boston Scientific Corporation Inderdeep Tiwana Sr. Regulatory Affairs Specialist 100 Boston Scientific Way Marlborough, Massachusetts 01752
Re: K211960
Trade/Device Name: Agile Esophageal OTW Stent System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.3610 Regulation Name: Esophageal prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: ESW Dated: October 19, 2021 Received: October 20, 2021
### Dear Inderdeep Tiwana:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part
{1}------------------------------------------------
801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4. Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
for
Shanil Haugen Assistant Director DHT3A: Division of Renal, Gastrointestinal, Obesity and Transplant Devices OHT3: Office of GastroRenal, ObGyn, General Hospital and Urology Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K211960
Device Name Agile Esophageal OTW Stent System
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Agile Esophageal Partially Covered OTW Stent System is intended for maintaining esophageal luminal patency in esophageal strictures caused by intrinsic malignant tumors, and occlusion of concurrent esophageal fistulas.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <span style="font-size:16px">☒</span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | <span style="font-size:16px">☐</span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Boston Scientific. The words "Boston Scientific" are written in a serif font and are colored in blue. The word "Boston" is on the top line and the word "Scientific" is on the bottom line.
Boston Scientific Corporation 300 Boston Scientific Way Marlborough, MA 01752-1234 (508) 683-4000
www.bostonscientific.com
### 510(k) Summary for Agile Esophageal OTW Stent System
## 1. Submitter
Boston Scientific Corporation Endoscopy Division 100 Boston Scientific Way Marlborough, MA 01752
### Contact:
| Primary Contact: | Inderdeep Tiwana |
|------------------|-----------------------------------|
| | Sr. Regulatory Specialist |
| | Phone: (508) 683-4005 |
| | E-mail: Inderdeep.tiwana@bsci.com |
- Secondary Contact: Ashley Santos Director, Regulatory Affairs-Endoscopy Phone: (508) 382-0284 Email: Ashley.santos@bsci.com
Date Prepared: June 23, 2021
### 2. Device
| Trade Name: | Agile Esophageal OTW Stent System |
|----------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| Classification Name: | Prosthesis, Esophageal |
| Product Code: | ESW |
| Device Class and Panel: | Class II |
| Classification Regulation: | 21 CFR 878.3610 |
{4}------------------------------------------------
### 3. Predicate Devices
### Stent
| Trade Name: | Agile Esophageal Stent System |
|----------------------------|-------------------------------|
| Manufacturer: | Boston Scientific Corp. |
| 510(k) Clearance Number: | K180144 |
| Classification Name: | Prosthesis, Esophageal |
| Product Code: | ESW |
| Device Class and Panel: | Class II |
| Classification Regulation: | 21 CFR 878.3610 |
### Delivery System:
| Trade Name: | Wallflex Esophageal Fully & Partially Covered Stent System |
|----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|
| Manufacturer: | Boston Scientific Corp. |
| 510(k) Clearance Number: | K091510/K073266 |
| Classification Name: | Prosthesis, Esophageal |
| Product Code: | ESW |
| Device Class and Panel: | Class II |
| Classification Regulation: | 21 CFR 878.3610 |
### 4. Device Description
The Agile Esophageal 23mm Partially Covered and Fully Covered Over the Wire (OTW) Stent System is comprised of a metallic implantable stent pre-loaded inside of a flexible delivery system. The stent is made from braided Nitinol wires which form a self-expanding. radiopaque (RO) cylindrical mesh. The stent has flares at each end to aid in minimizing migration after the stent is placed in the esophagus. The flares are a wider diameter than the stent body. The wire ends are looped at the end of the stent. The proximal and distal stent ends each have a continuous suture threaded around their circumferences. The suture is intended to aid in removal or repositioning during the initial stent placement procedure, to be used in the event of incorrect placement. The stent is available in either partially covered or fully covered configurations. The stent is covered with a silicone polymer to restrict turnor in-growth through the wire mesh and to occlude concurrent esophageal fistulas. The proposed stent is nearly identical in design to its predicate Agile Esophageal Stent System (K180144). The main difference between the proposed and the predicate stent is the type of delivery system used with the stent. The proposed Agile Esophageal OTW Stent is intended to be used with an over-the-wire delivery svstem. whereas the predicate Agile Esophageal Stent used a through-the-scope delivery system.
The over-the-wire delivery system is a co-axial tube design. The exterior tube is used to constrain the stent before deployment and to reconstrain the stent after partial deployment. The exterior tube has clear distal section so that the constrained stent is visible. A yellow transition zone on the inner tube of the delivery system is visible between the stent and the blue outer sheath. The system has RO and visual markers to aid in accurate stent placement.
{5}------------------------------------------------
The proposed delivery system is nearly identical to its predicate, WallFlex Esophageal Stent System (K091510/ K073266).
## 5. Indications for Use
The Agile Esophageal Partially Covered and Fully Covered OTW Stent System is intended for maintaining esophageal luminal patency in esophageal strictures caused by intrinsic and/or extrinsic malignant tumors, and occlusion of concurrent esophageal fistulas.
## 6. Technological Characteristics
The technological characteristics of the proposed Agile Esophageal OTW Stent system are nearly identical to its predicates. The stent component of the proposed system is nearly identical to Agile Esophageal Stent System (K180144). The key difference between the proposed Agile Esophageal OTW Stent system and the predicate device Agile Esophageal Stent System (K180144) is the delivery system, as the proposed Agile Esophageal OTW Stent system will be offered with an Over-the-Wire delivery system. Except for few minor design updates to the delivery system, the delivery system of the proposed device is nearly identical to the delivery system offered with WallFlex Esophageal Fully & Partially Covered Stent Systems (K091510 & K073266).
## 7. Substantial Equivalence
The proposed Agile Esophageal OTW stent has nearly identical design to its predicate device, Agile Esophageal Stent (K180144). The main difference between the two devices is the type of delivery system used for stent delivery. The proposed Agile Esophageal OTW Stent will utilize over-the-wire delivery system, whereas the predicate stent uses a throughthe-scope delivery system.
The proposed Agile Esophageal over-the-wire delivery system is nearly identical to the delivery device used with WallFlex Esophageal Fully & Partially Covered Stent Systems (K091510 & K073266). Few minor design updates have been made to delivery device to accommodate its use with the proposed Agile Esophageal OTW Stent. These changes are to the reconstrainment band design, update to the exterior tube clear section and proximal inner section to accommodate different constrained stent length, and addition of additional laser marker bands to address user need requirement.
Overall, the design requirements are not impacted by these minor design and process differences, the proposed device is deemed substantially equivalent to the predicate devices and continues to meet the pre-defined device specification.
## 8. Performance Data
The product specifications of the proposed Agile Esophageal 23 mm OTW Stent are nearly identical to its predicate, Agile Esophageal 23mm Stent (K180144) and the product specifications of the proposed Agile Esophageal 23 mm OTW Delivery System are identical to WallFlex Esophageal Fully & Partially Covered Stent Systems (K091510 & K073266). The following bench testing was conducted to evaluate the changes on the proposed device. All Performance testing (bench) was successfully completed. The results of performance
{6}------------------------------------------------
(bench) testing demonstrate that the proposed Agile Esophageal OTW Stent System is considered substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
| Component | Product Specification | Result (Pass/Fail) |
|---------------------------|-------------------------------------------|--------------------|
| Delivery System | Visual Transition Zone Length | PASS |
| Delivery System | Reconstrainment Band to Distal Inner Bond | PASS |
| Delivery System and Stent | Delivery System Withdrawal / Removal | PASS |
| Delivery System and Stent | Deployment Force | PASS |
| Delivery System and Stent | Reconstrainment Force | PASS |
| Stent | Stent Hoop Expansion Force | PASS |
| Stent | Stent Hoop Compression Force | PASS |
| Stent | Stent Flexibility | PASS |
| Stent | Stent Fatigue Resistance | PASS |
| Stent | Cover Fatigue Resistance | PASS |
Biocompatibility of the proposed Agile Esophageal OTW Stent System was evaluated in accordance with ISO 10993-1. A subset of tests was performed on the stent component, which included: Cytotoxicity, Irritation, Sensitization Testing. A complete set of biocompatibility testing was performed on over-the-wire delivery system, which included: Cytotoxicity, Irritation, Sensitization Testing. All acceptance criteria were met.
## 9. Conclusion
Boston Scientific has demonstrated that the proposed Agile Esophageal OTW Stent System is substantially equivalent to the currently marketed predicate devices.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.