Cirq, Cirq Robotic Alignment System, Cirq Robotic Alignment Module Cranial, Cirq Robotic Alignment Module, Cirq Robotic Alignment Cranial And Spine, CIRQ Robotic Alignment Cranial and Spine System
K210989 · Brainlab AG · HAW · Nov 12, 2021 · Neurology
Device Facts
Record ID
K210989
Device Name
Cirq, Cirq Robotic Alignment System, Cirq Robotic Alignment Module Cranial, Cirq Robotic Alignment Module, Cirq Robotic Alignment Cranial And Spine, CIRQ Robotic Alignment Cranial and Spine System
Applicant
Brainlab AG
Product Code
HAW · Neurology
Decision Date
Nov 12, 2021
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 882.4560
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The Cirq Robotic Alignment Module is an intraoperative robotic positioning system and an accessory to compatible Brainlab IGS Cranial software applications. Using spatial information from an image guided navigation system, the Cirq Robotic Alignment Module enables the surgeon to align and hold surgical instruments according to pre-planned trajectories. The Cirq Robotic Alignment Module is indicated for stereotactic biopsies of intracranial lesions.
Device Story
Intraoperative robotic positioning system; accessory to Brainlab IGS Cranial software. Inputs: spatial data from infrared-based image-guided navigation system (tracking reflective markers on tools). Operation: surgeon manually pre-aligns instrument to region of interest; robotic arm (attached to operating table side rail) automatically fine-tunes alignment to pre-planned trajectory via kinematic unit. Output: stable, held surgical instrument at planned trajectory. Used in OR by neurosurgeons. Benefits: precise, stable instrument positioning for intracranial biopsies; reduces manual alignment errors. Healthcare providers use visual feedback from IGS software to monitor movement and verify trajectory.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. System accuracy verified via simulation and physical test setups. Positional accuracy (mean error ≤ 2.0 mm) and trajectory angle accuracy (mean error ≤ 2.0 degrees) met acceptance criteria. Biocompatibility evaluated per ISO 10993-1 for limited contact duration (≤ 24 hours). Mechanical testing confirmed stability of instrument holder interface, locking mechanisms, and biopsy drill kit performance (cutting efficiency, axial holding force).
Technological Characteristics
Robotic positioning system; includes motor unit, mechatronic holding arm, and surgical instruments. Infrared tracking (IR LEDs in cameras, reflective markers on tools). Connectivity: integrates with Brainlab IGS Cranial software. Sterilization: reprocessable instruments. Materials: biocompatible per ISO 10993-1. Accuracy: ≤ 2.0 mm positional, ≤ 2.0 degrees angular.
Indications for Use
Indicated for stereotactic biopsies of intracranial lesions in patients requiring neurosurgical intervention.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A stereotaxic instrument is a device consisting of a rigid frame with a calibrated guide mechanism for precisely positioning probes or other devices within a patient's brain, spinal cord, or other part of the nervous system.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the seal of the Department of Health & Human Services. To the right of that is the FDA logo in blue, with the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG" stacked on top of the word "ADMINISTRATION".
November 12, 2021
Brainlab AG Chiara Cunico Manager Regulatory Affairs Olof-Palme-Str. 9 Munich, Germany 81829
Re: K210989
Trade/Device Name: Cirq, Cirg Robotic Alignment System, Cirq Robotic Alignment Module Cranial, Cirg Robotic Alignment Module, Cirg Robotic Alignment Cranial And Spine, CIRQ Robotic Alignment Cranial And Spine System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.4560 Regulation Name: Stereotaxic Instrument Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: HAW Dated: October 12, 2021 Received: October 15, 2021
Dear Chiara Cunico:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's
{1}------------------------------------------------
requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Adam D. Pierce, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT5A: Division of Neurosurgical, Neurointerventional and Neurodiagnostic Devices OHT5: Office of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K210989
#### Device Name
Cirq, Cirq Robotic Alignment System, Cirq Robotic Alignment Module Cranial, Cirq Robotic Alignment Cranial And Spine CIRQ Robotic alignment cranial and spine system
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
The Cirq Robotic Alignment Module is an intraoperative robotic positioning system and an accessory to compatible Brainlab IGS Cranial software applications. Using spatial information from an image guided navigation system, the Cirq Robotic Alignment Module enables the surgeon to align and hold surgical instruments according to pre-planned trajectories.
The Cirq Robotic Alignment Module is indicated for stereotactic biopsies of intracranial lesions.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
| <span style="text-decoration: overline;">X</span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
## CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
## *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary
### November 12, 2021
| General Information | |
|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Manufacturer | Brainlab AG, Olof-Palme Str.9, 81829, Munich, Germany |
| Applicant Details | Chiara Cunico<br>Manager, Regulatory Affairs<br>+49899915680 |
| Establishment Registration | 8043933 |
| Trade Name | Cirq, Cirq Robotic Alignment System, Cirq Robotic Alignment Module<br>Cranial, Cirq Robotic Alignment Cranial And Spine, CIRQ Robotic<br>alignment cranial and spine system |
| Classification Name | Neurological Stereotaxic Instrument |
| Product Code | HAW |
| Regulation Number | 882.4560 |
| Regulatory Class | II |
| Panel | Neurology |
| Predicate Device | Medtronic Stealth Autoguide™ System (K191597) by Medtronic |
| Reference Device | Cirq Robotic Alignment System (K202320) by Brainlab |
## 1. Indications for Use
The Cirq Robotic Alignment Module is an intraoperative robotic positioning system and an accessory to compatible Brainlab IGS Cranial software applications. Using spatial information from an image guided navigation system, the Cirq Robotic Alignment Module enables the surgeon to align and hold surgical instruments according to pre-planned trajectories.
The Cirq Robotic Alignment Module is indicated for stereotactic biopsies of intracranial lesions.
#### 2. Device Description
The subject device is intended to serve as a positing and holding device for Brainlab instruments such as drill kits, during surgical procedures.
The device consists of:
- Medical Electrical Equipment Hardware
- I Medical Software
- . Reprocessable Surgical Instruments, and
{4}------------------------------------------------
- Disposable Instruments
The CIRQ Robotic Alignment Module is an adapter containing a motor unit, which is attached to a user-controlled mechatronic holding arm named CIRQ Arm System. The arm is attached to the side rail of an operating table. Together they form a structure capable of holding and positioning instruments.
By using position information acquired by a compatible IGS platform via infrared tracking method, an instrument can be manually pre-aligned roughly to the region of interest by opening the brakes of the CIRQ Arm System. Following this, the tracking information is used to automatically (via the Kinematic Unit attached to the motor unit) fine align the instrument to achieve a pre-planned trajectory controlled by the CIRQ Robotic Alignment Software. After finishing the alignment, the arm with the instrument attached remains in this position and the surgeon can perform the surgical steps intended without losing the trajectory.
The position of the instruments relatively to the patient is visualized via the Cirq Robotic Alignment Software, which is running in a compatible IGS platform (see Figure 2). This software also controls and monitors the movement of the Cirq Robotic Alignment Module.
There are no variants of the device. There is only one configuration for the cranial use case.
## 3. Substantial Equivalence
| Parameters | Subject Device | Primary Predicate | Reference Device |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | Cirq | Medtronic Stealth | Cirq Robotic Alignment |
| | | Autoguide™ System | System (K202320) |
| | | (K191597) | |
| Indications for | The Cirq Robotic | The Stealth Autoguide™ | For spinal use, the Cirq |
| Use/ Intended | Alignment Module is an | System is a positioning | Robotic Alignment |
| use | intraoperative robotic | and guidance system | Module is an accessory to |
| | positioning system and an | intended for the spatial | the compatible Brainlab |
| | accessory to compatible | positioning and | IGS Spinal software |
| | Brainlab IGS Cranial | orientation of instrument | applications and is |
| | software applications. | holders or tool guides to | intended to be an |
| | Using spatial information | be used by | intraoperative image |
| | from an image guided | neurosurgeons to guide | guided localization |
| | navigation system, the | standard neurosurgical | system to support the |
| | Cirq Robotic Alignment | instruments, based on a | surgeon to achieve pre- |
| | Module enables the | pre-operative plan and | planned trajectories with |
| | surgeon to align and hold | feedback from an image- | surgical instruments. |
| | surgical instruments | guided navigation system | |
| | according to pre-planned | with three-dimensional | |
| | trajectories. | imaging software. | |
| Indications for | The Cirq Robotic | The Stealth Autoguide™ | The medical indications |
| use | Alignment Module is | System is a remotely- | for use of the Cirq |
| | indicated for stereotactic | operated positioning and | Robotic Alignment |
| | biopsies of intracranial | guidance system, | Module for spinal use is |
| | lesions. | indicated for any | the treatment of diseases |
| | | neurological condition in | |
| Parameters | Subject Device | Primary Predicate | Reference Device |
| | Cirq | Medtronic Stealth<br>Autoguide™ System<br>(K191597) | Cirq Robotic Alignment<br>System (K202320) |
| | | which the use of<br>stereotactic surgery may<br>be appropriate (for<br>example, stereotactic<br>biopsy, stereotactic EEG,<br>laser tissue ablation,<br>etc.). | where the placement of<br>spinal screws is indicated. |
| Operating<br>principle | Preoperative images<br>(Cranial IGS)<br>Surgical planning (Cranial<br>IGS)<br>Patient registration<br>(Cranial IGS)<br>Guidance of instruments | Preoperative images<br>(StealthStation)<br>Surgical planning<br>(StealthStation)<br>Patient registration<br>Guidance of instruments | Preoperative images<br>(Spine IGS)<br>Surgical planning<br>Patient registration<br>(Spine IGS)<br>Guidance of instruments |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| Localization<br>means | The infrared light is<br>emitted by IR LEDs<br>located in the cameras.<br>This light is reflected by<br>the highly reflecting<br>markers mounted on the<br>several tools. The camera<br>receives the reflected<br>light for further<br>processing | Optical markers on tool<br>holder | The infrared light is<br>emitted by IR LEDs<br>located in the cameras.<br>This light is reflected by<br>the highly reflecting<br>markers mounted on the<br>several tools. The camera<br>receives the reflected<br>light for further<br>processing |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| Image-Guided | Yes | Yes (on StealthStation) | Yes |
| Planning<br>software | Compatible with:<br>Cranial 3.1<br>Trajectory 2.5 | Compatible with:<br>S8 Cranial v1.1<br>Synergy Cranial v.3.1 | --- |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| System accuracy<br>requirement | Under representative<br>worstcase configuration,<br>the Cirq Robotic<br>Alignment with Cranial<br>IGS Software, has<br>demonstrated<br>performance in 3D<br>positional accuracy with a<br>mean error ≤ 2.0 mm and<br>in trajectory angle<br>accuracy with a mean<br>error ≤ 2.0 degrees. | Under representative<br>worstcase configuration,<br>the StealthStation®<br>System with Cranial<br>Software used with<br>Stealth Autoguide™<br>System, has<br>demonstrated<br>performance in 3D<br>positional accuracy with a<br>mean error ≤ 2.0 mm and<br>in trajectory angle<br>accuracy with a mean<br>error ≤ 2.0 degrees | --- |
| Parameters | Subject Device | Primary Predicate | Reference Device |
| | Cirq | Medtronic Stealth | Cirq Robotic Alignment |
| | | Autoguide™ System<br>(K191597) | System (K202320) |
| Guide position<br>adjustment | Robotic movement | Robotic movement | Robotic movement |
| Accessories | Sterile Drape<br>Stabilization Brace<br>Cable Sets (part of<br>Surgical Base System)<br>Instrument Calibration<br>Matrix<br>Screwdriver for Cranial<br>Depth Stop<br>Sterilization Tray Robotic<br>Cranial for Cirq<br>Disposable reflective<br>marker sphere | Sterile Drapes<br>Head Frame Adapter<br>Cable Sets | Sterile Drape<br>Stabilization Brace<br>Cable Sets (part of<br>Surgical Base System)<br>Instrument Calibration<br>Matrix<br>Sterilization Tray Robotic<br>Spinal Drilling for Cirq<br>Disposable reflective<br>marker sphere<br>Bone Drill Bits for spinal<br>use cases |
| Real-time<br>instrument<br>position | Yes | Yes (on StealthStation) | Yes |
| Patient<br>registration | Optical patient<br>registration used from<br>Cranial 3.1 | Optical Registration<br>Device (via<br>StealthStation) | Patient registration used<br>from Spine IGS |
| Surgeon<br>performs final<br>instrument<br>delivery through<br>instrument<br>guide | Yes | Yes | Yes |
{5}------------------------------------------------
{6}------------------------------------------------
# 4. Performance Data
The following performance data were provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination.
## Performance Testing - Bench:
Performance testing as bench testing was performed for the instrument set as part of the subject device. The specified accuracy of the instrument sets is verified using tolerance analysis and simulation tools, as well as physical test setups (Instrument and System Accuracy Test). The outcome of the system accuracy test showed that the set acceptance criteria (positional accuracy with a mean error ≤ 2.0 mm and a trajectory angle accuracy with a mean error ≤ 2.0 degrees) are met and the system is equivalent to the predicate device in its worst-case configuration. Additionally, possible impacts on the accuracy performance due to repeated sterilization of the Instrument Set were considered.
The stability of the Instrument Holder Interface was tested to ensure safe and effective connection between the Cirq Robotic Alignment Module and the Instrument Set. The locking
{7}------------------------------------------------
mechanisms of the Tracking Arrays were tested for their performance over the complete expected service life of 5 years.
Additional verification activities were focused on the Biopsy Drill Kit which consists of Guide Tube, Bone Anchor, Drill Bit and Depth Stop. It has been verified that the Bone Anchor ensures a sufficient fixation to the skull to enable a safe connection to the patients anatomy during a biopsy procedure. Furthermore, it was verified that the Bone Anchor withstands foreseeable forces which could occur during a biopsy procedure. The cutting efficiency of the Drill Bit was verified in a comparing bench test. The axial holding force of the Depth Stop was verified to ensure a safe performance during the drilling process.
#### Biocompatibility Evaluation
The biocompatibility evaluation for the Subject Device was conducted in accordance with the FDA Blue Book Memorandum #G95-1 "Use of International Standard ISO-10993, 'Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part 1: Evaluation and Testing," May 1, 1995, and International Standard ISO 10993-1 "Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices – Part 1: Evaluation and Testing Within a Risk Management Process," as recognized by FDA.
Based on the biological toxicological evaluation of existing data and test results, the device is considered to meet the requirements of ISO 10993-1 and ISO 14971 for a device with limited contact duration (≤ 24 hours) and can be considered safe and suitable for its intended use.
#### 5. Conclusion
The comparison of the Subject Device with the predicate device shows that the device has similar functionality, intended use, technological characteristics, and typical users as the predicate device. Verification and validation activities ensured that the design specifications are met and that the differences does not introduce new issues concerning safety and effectiveness. Hence, the Subject Device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.