Yukon OCT Spinal System

K193129 · K2m, Inc. · NKG · Feb 7, 2020 · Orthopedic

Device Facts

Record IDK193129
Device NameYukon OCT Spinal System
ApplicantK2m, Inc.
Product CodeNKG · Orthopedic
Decision DateFeb 7, 2020
DecisionSESE
Submission TypeTraditional
Regulation21 CFR 888.3075
Device ClassClass 2
AttributesTherapeutic

Intended Use

The YUKON OCT Spinal System is intended to provide immobilization of spinal segments as an adjunct to fusion for the following acute and chronic instabilities of the craniocervical junction, the cervical spine (C1 to C7) and the thoracic spine (T1-T3); traumatic spinal fractures and/or traumatic dislocations; instability or deformity; failed previous fusion (e.g., pseudoarthrosis); tumors involving the cervical spine; and degenerative disease, including intractable radiculopathy and/or myelopathy, neck and/or arm pain of discogenic origin as confirmed by radiographic studies, and degenerative disease of the facets with instability. The YUKON OCT Spinal System is also intended to restore the integrity of the spinal column even in the absences of fusion for a limited time period in patients with advanced stage tumors involving the cervical spine in whom life expectancy is of insufficient duration to permit achievement of fusion. In order to achieve additional levels of fixation, the YUKON OCT Spinal System may be connected to EVEREST, MESA, and DENALI Spinal System components via the rod to rod connectors or transition rods.

Device Story

Top-loading, posterior (occipital-cervical-thoracic) spinal fixation system; components include screws, hooks, rods, rod connectors, and occipital components. Used by surgeons in clinical settings to provide spinal segment immobilization/stabilization as an adjunct to fusion. System connects to EVEREST, MESA, and DENALI systems via transition rods/connectors for extended fixation. Provides mechanical stabilization to the spinal column; benefits patients by addressing instability from trauma, tumors, or degenerative conditions.

Clinical Evidence

Bench testing only. Static compression, static torsion, and dynamic compression testing performed per ASTM F1717. Results demonstrate performance equivalent to or better than predicate devices.

Technological Characteristics

Top-loading posterior spinal fixation system. Components: screws, hooks, rods, rod connectors, occipital components. Mechanical testing performed per ASTM F1717. No software or electronic components.

Indications for Use

Indicated for patients requiring spinal immobilization/stabilization as an adjunct to fusion for craniocervical junction, cervical (C1-C7), and thoracic (T1-T3) instabilities, including traumatic fractures/dislocations, deformity, failed fusion, tumors, and degenerative disease (radiculopathy, myelopathy, discogenic pain, facet instability). Also indicated for temporary spinal column restoration in patients with advanced cervical tumors where fusion is not expected.

Regulatory Classification

Identification

Posterior cervical screw systems are comprised of multiple, interconnecting components, made from a variety of materials that allow an implant system to be built from the occiput to the upper thoracic spine to fit the patient's anatomical and physiological requirements, as determined by preoperative cross-sectional imaging. Such a spinal assembly consists of a combination of bone anchors via screws (i.e., occipital screws, cervical lateral mass screws, cervical pedicle screws, C2 pars screws, C2 translaminar screws, C2 transarticular screws), longitudinal members (e.g., plates, rods, including dual diameter rods, plate/rod combinations), transverse or cross connectors, interconnection mechanisms (e.g., rod-to-rod connectors, offset connectors), and closure mechanisms (e.g., set screws, nuts). Posterior cervical screw systems are rigidly fixed devices that do not contain dynamic features, including but not limited to: non-uniform longitudinal elements or features that allow more motion or flexibility compared to rigid systems.Posterior cervical screw systems are intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in patients as an adjunct to fusion for acute and chronic instabilities of the cervical spine and/or craniocervical junction and/or cervicothoracic junction such as: (1) Traumatic spinal fractures and/or traumatic dislocations; (2) deformities; (3) instabilities; (4) failed previous fusions (e.g., pseudarthrosis); (5) tumors; (6) inflammatory disorders; (7) spinal degeneration, including neck and/or arm pain of discogenic origin as confirmed by imaging studies (radiographs, CT, MRI); (8) degeneration of the facets with instability; and (9) reconstruction following decompression to treat radiculopathy and/or myelopathy. These systems are also intended to restore the integrity of the spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a limited time period in patients with advanced stage tumors involving the cervical spine in whom life expectancy is of insufficient duration to permit achievement of fusion.

Special Controls

*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for posterior cervical screw systems are:(1) The design characteristics of the device, including engineering schematics, must ensure that the geometry and material composition are consistent with the intended use. (2) Nonclinical performance testing must demonstrate the mechanical function and durability of the implant. (3) Device components must be demonstrated to be biocompatible. (4) Validation testing must demonstrate the cleanliness and sterility of, or the ability to clean and sterilize, the device components and device-specific instruments. (5) Labeling must include the following: (i) A clear description of the technological features of the device including identification of device materials and the principles of device operation; (ii) Intended use and indications for use including levels of fixation; (iii) Device specific warnings, precautions, and contraindications that include the following statements: (A) “Precaution: Preoperative planning prior to implantation of posterior cervical screw systems should include review of cross-sectional imaging studies ( *e.g.,* CT and/or MRI) to evaluate the patient's cervical anatomy including the transverse foramen, neurologic structures, and the course of the vertebral arteries. If any findings would compromise the placement of these screws, other surgical methods should be considered. In addition, use of intraoperative imaging should be considered to guide and/or verify device placement, as necessary.”(B) “Precaution: Use of posterior cervical pedicle screw fixation at the C3 through C6 spinal levels requires careful consideration and planning beyond that required for lateral mass screws placed at these spinal levels, given the proximity of the vertebral arteries and neurologic structures in relation to the cervical pedicles at these levels.” (iv) Identification of magnetic resonance (MR) compatibility status; (v) Cleaning and sterilization instructions for devices and instruments that are provided non-sterile to the end user, and; (vi) Detailed instructions of each surgical step, including device removal.

Predicate Devices

Reference Devices

Related Devices

Submission Summary (Full Text)

{0}------------------------------------------------ Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue. February 7, 2020 K2M, Inc. % Ali Khan Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist Stryker 59 Route 17 Allendale, New Jersey 07401 Re: K193129 Trade/Device Name: Yukon OCT Spinal System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3075 Regulation Name: Posterior Cervical Screw System Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: NKG, KWP Dated: November 11, 2019 Received: November 12, 2019 ## Dear Ali Khan: We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading. If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part {1}------------------------------------------------ 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4. Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems. For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100). Sincerely, for Ronald P. Jean, Ph.D. Director (Acting) DHT6B: Division of Spinal Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health Enclosure {2}------------------------------------------------ # Indications for Use 510(k) Number (if known) K193129 Device Name YUKON OCT Spinal System #### Indications for Use (Describe) The YUKON OCT Spinal System is intended to provide immobilization of spinal segments as an adjunct to fusion for the following acute and chronic instabilities of the craniocervical junction, the cervical spine (C1 to C7) and the thoracic spine (T1-T3); traumatic spinal fractures and/or traumatic dislocations; instability or deformity; failed previous fusion (e.g., pseudoarthrosis); tumors involving the cervical spine; and degenerative disease, including intractable radiculopathy and/or myelopathy, neck and/or arm pain of discogenic origin as confirmed by radiographic studies, and degenerative disease of the facets with instability. The YUKON OCT Spinal System is also intended to restore the integrity of the spinal column even in the absences of fusion for a limited time period in patients with advanced stage tumors involving the cervical spine in whom life expectancy is of insufficient duration to permit achievement of fusion. In order to achieve additional levels of fixation, the YUKON OCT Spinal System may be connected to EVEREST, MESA, and DENALI Spinal System components via the rod to rod connectors or transition rods. | Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |-------------------------------------------------| |-------------------------------------------------| | <span style="font-size:10pt;"> <span style="font-family:Wingdings;">☑</span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) </span> | |---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | <span style="font-size:10pt;"> <span style="font-family:Wingdings;">☐</span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) </span> | ## CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED. This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. ### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.* The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: > Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov "An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number." {3}------------------------------------------------ | 510(k) Summary: YUKON OCT Spinal System | | |-------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Submitter: | Stryker | | Contact Person : | Name: Ali Khan<br>Phone: (512)590-5298<br>Email: ali.khan@stryker.com | | Date Prepared: | 11/11/2019 | | Trade Name: | YUKON OCT Spinal System | | Common Name: | Spinal Fixation System | | Proposed Class: | Class II | | Classification Name: | Posterior Cervical Screw System | | Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 888.3075 | | Product Code: | NKG, KWP | | Predicate Device: | Primary Predicate:<br>K2M Yukon OCT Spinal System (K182182 & K171444)<br><br>Additional Predicates:<br>Stryker OASYS (K080143 & K032394)<br>DePuy Mountaineer (K042508)<br><br>Reference Devices:<br>K2M Everest Spinal System (K161369) | | Device Description: | The YUKON OCT Spinal System is a top-loading, multiple component, posterior (occipital-cervical-thoracic) spinal fixation system consisting of screws, hooks, rods, rod connectors, and occipital components. The system functions as an adjunct to fusion to provide stablilization of the posterior cervical and thoracic spine. | | Indications for use: | The YUKON OCT Spinal System is intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments as an adjunct to fusion for the following acute and chronic instabilities of the craniocervical junction, the cervical spine (C1 to C7) and the thoracic spine (T1-T3): traumatic spinal fractures and/or traumatic dislocations; instability or deformity; failed previous fusions (e.g., pseudoarthrosis); tumors involving the cervical spine; and degenerative disease, including intractable radiculopathy and/or myelopathy, neck and/or arm pain of discogenic origin as confirmed by radiographic studies, and degenerative disease of the facets with instability.<br><br>The YUKON OCT Spinal System is also intended to restore the integrity of the spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a limited time period in patients with advanced stage tumors involving the cervical spine in whom life expectancy is of insufficient duration to permit achievement of fusion.<br><br>In order to achieve additional levels of fixation, the YUKON OCT Spinal System may be connected to EVEREST, MESA and DENALI Spinal System components via the rod to rod connectors or transition rods. | | Summary of the Technological<br>Characteristics | The subject implants were compared to predicate devices and the design<br>features, materials and indications were the same or similar to the<br>previously cleared devices. | | Non-clinical Performance<br>Evaluation | The subject implants were compared to the predicates using engineering<br>rationales in addition to static compression, static torsion and dynamic<br>compression testing (ASTM F1717) and performed equivalent to or better than<br>the predicates. | | Conclusion | There are no significant differences between the YUKON OCT Spinal System<br>and other legally marketed systems. It is substantially equivalent to these<br>other devices in design, function, material and intended use. | {4}------------------------------------------------
Innolitics
510(k) Summary
Decision Summary
Classification Order
Enter a record ID and click Load to view the document.
100%