K181896 · Jeisys Medical, Inc. · OHV · Oct 18, 2019 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K181896
Device Name
LIPOcel
Applicant
Jeisys Medical, Inc.
Product Code
OHV · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Oct 18, 2019
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.4590
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The LIPOcel delivers High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) energy that can disrupt the Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT) to provide a non-invasive approach to achieve a desired aesthetic effect. The LIPOcel is specifically indicated for non-invasive waist circumference reduction.
Device Story
LIPOcel is a High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) system for non-invasive waist circumference reduction. Device comprises control unit, touch LCD, power supply, and handpiece with cartridge. User sets irradiation parameters (energy, spacing, distance) via interface; system delivers 2 MHz ultrasound energy via linear scanning. Energy focuses at 13mm depth in subcutaneous adipose tissue, raising temperature above 55°C to induce thermal coagulation, collagen contraction, and adipose tissue destruction. Destroyed tissue is cleared via natural inflammatory response. Operated by clinicians in a clinical setting. Output is thermal energy delivered to target tissue; healthcare providers use device to achieve aesthetic body contouring. Benefits include non-invasive fat reduction without surgery.
Clinical Evidence
Single-center, prospective, randomized, three-armed clinical study. Sample size not explicitly stated. Primary endpoint: waist circumference reduction at 12 weeks. Results showed mean reduction of 3.05 ± 5.95cm (p<.0001). Adverse events included erythema, ecchymosis, and dysesthesia, all resolved without treatment. No serious adverse events or unanticipated adverse device effects reported. Mean pain score was 7.35.
Technological Characteristics
HIFU energy source; 2 MHz frequency; 60 J/cm² max power; 13mm focal length; 50% duty rate. Linear scanning delivery method. Standards: IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, IEC 60601-1-6, IEC 60601-2-62, IEC 6255. System includes control unit, touch LCD, and handpiece.
Indications for Use
Indicated for non-invasive waist circumference reduction in patients seeking aesthetic body contouring.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A Focused Ultrasound Stimulator System for Aesthetic Use is a device using focused ultrasound to produce localized, mechanical motion within tissues and cells for the purpose of producing either localized heating for tissue coagulation or for mechanical cellular membrane disruption intended for noninvasive aesthetic use.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control for this device is FDA's “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Focused Ultrasound Stimulator System for Aesthetic Use.” See § 878.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.
K100874 — LIPOSONIX SYSTEM, MODEL 1 P00XXXX · Medicis Technologies Corporation · Aug 19, 2011
K112626 — LIPSONIX(R) SYSTEM MODEL 2 · Medicis Technologies Corporation · Oct 20, 2011
K230100 — SCIZER (SC1-M410) · Classys, Inc. · Nov 3, 2023
K170370 — ULTRASHAPE POWER SYSTEM · Syneron Medical, Ltd. · May 15, 2017
K141708 — ULTRASHAPE SYSTEM · Syneron Medical, Ltd. · Oct 6, 2014
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, with the letters "FDA" in a blue square. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
October 18, 2019
Jeisys Medical, Inc. % Parul Chansoria Regulatory Consultant Elexes Medical Consulting 6494 Tralee Village Dr. Dublin, California 94568
Re: K181896
Trade/Device Name: LIPOcel Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4590 Regulation Name: Focused Ultrasound Stimulator System for Aesthetic Use Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OHV Dated: September 19, 2019 Received: September 19, 2019
Dear Parul Chansoria:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
Long Chen, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT4A: Division of General Surgery Devices OHT4: Office of Surgical and Infection Control Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K181896
Device Name LIPOcel
Indications for Use (Describe)
The LIPOcel delivers High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) energy that can disrupt the Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT) to provide a non-invasive approach to achieve a desired aesthetic effect. The LIPOcel is specifically indicated for non-invasive waist circumference reduction.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <span style="font-size:16px">☑</span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | <span style="font-size:16px">☐</span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
## 510(k) SUMMARY
## I. SUBMITTER
Jeisys Medical Inc., 307, Daeryung Techno Town 8th Gamasan-ro 96, Geumcheon-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Contact Person: Parul Chansoria Founder and CEO, Elexes Medical Consulting Telephone: 650-528-2445 E-mail: parul@elexes.com
Summary Prepared: July 10, 2018
FDA Establishment registration number: 3006985163
### II. DEVICE
Common/Usual Name: Focused Ultrasound Stimulator System for Aesthetic Use Trade Name: LIPOcel Regulation Name: Focused Ultrasound Stimulator System for Aesthetic Use Regulatory Class: Class II Classification Panel: General and Plastic Surgery Devices Product Code: OHV Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4590
### III. PREDICATE DEVICE
The LIPOcel is substantially equivalent to the following cleared device:
#### Table 1: Predicate Device
| Company | Product | 510(k) Number |
|--------------------|--------------------------|---------------|
| Solta Medical Inc. | LipoSonix System Model 2 | K112626 |
### IV. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
LIPOcel, the Subject Device, is a medical device indicated for non-invasive waist circumference reduction. It consists of a control unit, Touch LCD monitor, power supply unit, and driver unit for irradiation and for setting parameters after the main power and key switch is turned on. The ultrasound energy that is generated from the pulse generator operates the HIFU transducer, and is irradiated from the cartridge when the footswitch or the finger switch on the handpiece is pressed in the READY state and the energy is delivered into the target tissue. HIFU energy is irradiated
{4}------------------------------------------------
based on linear scanning method through the hand-piece depending on irradiation energy, irradiation spacing and irradiation distance, that are set in advance by the user. The Subject Device's L13 Cartridge uses the focused ultrasound energy to focus from the transducer onto the fat layer at a depth of 13mm from the surface of the skin. As a result, tissue temperature rises over 55°C and thermal coagulation occurs. Using thermal effects generated by the HIFU transducer, cellular disruption of the subcutaneous adipose tissue occurs. This thermal coagulation results in the contraction of the collagen and subsequently results in destruction of the adipose tissue. The destroyed adipose tissue is cleared via an inflammatory response.
#### V. INDICATIONS FOR USE
The LIPOcel delivers High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) energy that can disrupt the Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT) to provide a non-invasive approach to achieve a desired aesthetic effect. The LIPOcel is specifically indicated for non-invasive waist circumference reduction.
#### VI. TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE PREDICATE DEVICE
The key technological characteristics, such as the energy type and the operating principle of the Subject Device are equivalent to that of the Predicate Device. Also, the Subject and Predicate Device have similar indications for use. The only differences between them are the treatment area and the treatment line numbers.
| Parameter | Subject Device<br>LIPOcel | Predicate 1<br>LipoSonix<br>System Model 2 | Remark |
|----------------------------------------------|---------------------------|--------------------------------------------|---------------------------------|
| Energy Source | HIFU energy | HIFU energy | Same as the<br>Predicate Device |
| Frequency of<br>Ultrasound energy | 2 MHz | 2 MHz | Same as the<br>Predicate Device |
| Maximum power<br>delivered to the<br>patient | 60 J/cm² | 60 J/cm² | Same as the<br>Predicate Device |
| Cartridge Focal<br>length | 13 mm | 13 mm | Same as the<br>Predicate Device |
| Duty Rate | 50 % | 50% | Same as the<br>Predicate Device |
| Treatment line | 16 line | 24 line | Different. |
Table 2: Basic Technology Comparison
{5}------------------------------------------------
| | | | This difference<br>does not affect<br>the safety and<br>efficacy<br>of the device. |
|-------------------------------|--------------|--------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Treatment line/sec | 20.19 mm/sec | 20.19 mm/sec | Same as the<br>Predicate Device |
| Space between<br>each<br>line | 2 mm | 2 mm | Same as the<br>Predicate Device |
| Treatment area | 30 x 30 (mm) | 46 x 46 (mm) | Different.<br>This difference<br>does not affect<br>the safety and<br>efficacy<br>of the device. |
| Treatment Time | 60 min | 60 min | Same as the<br>Predicate Device |
# VII. NON-CLINICAL STUDY
Electrical, mechanical, and performance testing were performed in accordance with IEC 60601-1:2005 + AMD1:2012/ EN 60601-1:2006 + A1:2013, IEC 60601-1-2:2007/ EN 60601-1-2:2007, IEC 60601-1-6:2010 + AMD1:2013/ EN 6061-1-6:2010 + A1:2015, IEC 60601-2-62:2013/ EN 60601-2-62:2015, and IEC 6255:2013. All test results were satisfactory. Refer to EMC and ES test reports in Section 17 Electromagnetic Compatibility and Electrical Safety of this submission document.
Performance testing - Acoustic power, beam profile, thermal evaluation, and focal length testing were performed according to design requirement specifications and verification and validation plan. All test results were satisfactory with no deviations from the applicable standards or protocols. Refer to summary of performance in Section 18 Performance Testing - Bench for more details.
### VIII. SOFTWARE VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION TESTING
Software verification and validation testing was conducted and demonstrated as per FDA's Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, "Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices."
{6}------------------------------------------------
#### IX. CLINICAL STUDY
The study was a single-center, a prospective, randomized, three-armed clinical study at UltraLaser Center, Monterrey, Mexico in compliance with international guidelines for Good Clinical Practices. An average fluence of 85 J/cm 2 was set as the initial treatment setting and the energy dose was increased or decreased in increments of 5 J/cm 2 according to the patient's tolerance. A mean waist circumference reduction of 3.05 ± 5.95cm (p<.0001) from baseline was observed at 12 weeks follow up.
The subjects were evaluated initially, with follow-up after 4, 8 and 12 weeks. The adverse events reported were erythema, ecchymosis, and dysesthesia and were resolved during the course of the study without any treatment. There were no serious adverse events (SAEs) or unanticipated adverse device effects (UADEs) related to treatment with the investigational device. The mean pain score for the treated population was 7.35.
#### X. CONCLUSION
LIPOcel is substantially equivalent to the Predicate Device in terms of indications for use, handpiece size, aesthetic optimal temperature, patient contacting material, output waveform, maximum power output, and operating principle. Safety and performance testing was performed and Jeisys Medical Inc. has concluded that the device does not raise any significant questions of safety and efficacy and is substantially equivalent to the Predicate Device.
Panel 1
/
Sort by
Ready
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.