The MotoCLIP™HiMAX™ Implant System is indicated for hand and foot bone fragment osteotomy fixation and joint arthrodesis.
Device Story
The MotoCLIP/HiMAX Implant System is a metallic bone staple system used by orthopedic surgeons for fixation of bone fractures, fusions, and osteotomies in the hand and foot. The system consists of Nitinol implants and associated surgical instrumentation. It functions as a line extension of the previously cleared CrossCLIP system, featuring modified implant and instrument geometry. The device provides mechanical stabilization of bone fragments to facilitate healing. Surgeons select and implant the staples during reconstructive or fracture surgery. Performance is verified through engineering analysis and mechanical pull-out testing to ensure strength characteristics meet or exceed those of the predicate device.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Evidence consists of bench testing, including theoretical Finite Element Analysis (FEA) to predict compression force and maximum strain, and mechanical pull-out testing comparing the subject device to the predicate.
Technological Characteristics
Metallic bone staple system; material: Nitinol (ASTM F2063); includes implants and surgical instrumentation; mechanical fixation principle; non-software device.
Indications for Use
Indicated for hand and foot bone fragment osteotomy fixation and joint arthrodesis in patients requiring bone fixation for fractures, fusions, or osteotomies.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Single/multiple component metallic bone fixation appliances and accessories are devices intended to be implanted consisting of one or more metallic components and their metallic fasteners. The devices contain a plate, a nail/plate combination, or a blade/plate combination that are made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, stainless steel, and titanium, that are intended to be held in position with fasteners, such as screws and nails, or bolts, nuts, and washers. These devices are used for fixation of fractures of the proximal or distal end of long bones, such as intracapsular, intertrochanteric, intercervical, supracondylar, or condylar fractures of the femur; for fusion of a joint; or for surgical procedures that involve cutting a bone. The devices may be implanted or attached through the skin so that a pulling force (traction) may be applied to the skeletal system.
K181866 — MotoCLIP/HiMAX Step Staple Implant System · Crossroads Extremity Systems, LLC · Aug 9, 2018
K142148 — ORTHOHELIX STAPLE SYSTEM · Orthohelix Surgical Designs, Inc. · Aug 21, 2014
K231885 — Medline UNITE® REFLEX® Nitinol Staple System · Medline Industries, LP · Aug 9, 2023
K142727 — CrossCLIP Implant System · Orthodiscovery Group, LLC(D.B.A. Crossroads Extremity Systems · Oct 24, 2014
K130832 — ORTHOHELIX STAPLE SYSTEM · Orthohelix Surgical Designs, Inc. · Aug 15, 2013
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
CrossRoads Extremity Systems, LLC % Christine Seifert Executive Vice President MRC/X, LLC 6075 Poplar Avenue Memphis, Tennessee 38119
June 29, 2018
Re: K181410
Trade/Device Name: MotoCLIP/HiMAX Implant System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3030 Regulation Name: Single/Multiple Component Metallic Bone Fixation Appliances And Accessories Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: JDR Dated: May 25, 2018 Received: May 30, 2018
Dear Christine Seifert:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good
{1}------------------------------------------------
manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803). please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
# Mark N. Melkerson -S
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K181410
Device Name MotoCLIP/HiMAX™ Implant System
Indications for Use (Describe)
The MotoCLIP™HiMAX™ Implant System is indicated for hand and foot bone fragment osteotomy fixation and joint arthrodesis.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
### 510(k) Summary
MotoCLIP™/HiMAX™ Implant System June 24, 2018
| Company: | CrossRoads Extremity Systems, LLC<br>6055 Primacy Parkway, Suite 140<br>Memphis, TN 38119 |
|--------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Establishment<br>Registration: | 3011421599 |
| Primary Contact: | Christine Scifert<br>Phone: 901-831-8053 |
| Company Contact: | Chad Hollis<br>Phone: 901-221-8406 |
| Trade Name: | MotoCLIP™/HiMAX™ Implant System |
| Common Name: | Staple, Fixation, Bone |
| Classification: | Class II |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 888.3030 (Single/multiple component metallic bone fixation<br>appliances and accessories) |
| Panel: | 87- Orthopedic |
| Product Code: | JDR |
| Predicate Devices: | CrossRoads Extremity Systems, LLC CrossCLIP™ Implants (K142727) |
## Device Description:
MotoCLIP™/HiMAX™ Implant System is a staple system which gives the surgeon a means of bone fixation in the management of bone fractures and reconstruction surgery. The MotoCLIP™/HiMAXIM Implant System is a line extension of the previously cleared CrossCLIP™ System K142727. After clearance, CrossRoads re-branded the CrossCLIP™ System to the MotoCLIPTMTM Implant System.
The MotoCLIP™/HiMAX™ Implant System gives the surgeon a means for fixation of fractures, fusions, and osteotomies of the foot, ankle, and hand. The MotoCLIP™/HiMAX™ Implant System includes implants and the related instrumentation needed for implantation. The implants are made from implant grade Nitinol per ASTM F2063.
{4}------------------------------------------------
The only modifications being made in this submission are changes in the geometry of the implants and associated instruments.
## Indications for Use:
The MotoCLIP™HiMAX™ Implant System is indicated for hand and foot bone fragment osteotomy fixation and joint arthrodesis.
## Substantial Equivalence:
The subject MotoCLIP™/HiMAX™ Implant Sytem is substantially equivalent to CrossRoads Extremities Systems, LLC's previously cleared CrossCLIP™ Implant (K142727).
There are no substantial differences between the MotoCLIP™HiMAX™ Implant System and the predicate CrossCLIP™ Implants (now branded MotoCLIP™/HiMAX™ Implant System) with respect to intended use and technological characteristics. including basic design, materials of manufacture, mechanical properties, and intended effect.
The minor modification that is the subject of this submission is that the geometry of the subject implants vary from the predicate implants. Engineering analysis shows that the performance of the implants meets or exceeds the strength of the worst-case implant in the previously cleared system (K142727).
Therefore, the MotoCLIP™HiMAX™ Implant System can be found substantially equivalent to the cited predicate, as it does not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness.
# Performance Testing:
Theoretical analysis (FEA) of the worst case MotoCLIP™/HiMAX™ Implant System was performed to predict compression force as well as maximum strain for the subject and predicate devices. In addition, pull-out testing was performed to compare the predicate to the subject device. The results of the theoretical analysis and pull-out testing demonstrate the predicted performance of the subject MotoCLIP™/HiMAX™ Implant System does not introduce a new worst case and therefore is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
# Conclusion:
There are no substantial differences between the MotoCLIP™/HiMAX™ Implant System and the predicate CrossCLIP™ Implants (now branded MotoCLIP™/HiMAX™ Implant System) with respect to intended use and technological characteristics, including basic design, materials of manufacture, mechanical properties, and intended effect.
Therefore, the MotoCLIP™/HiMAX™ Implant System can be found substantially equivalent to the cited predicate, as it does not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness.
Panel 1
/
Sort by
Ready
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.