K170656 · Collagen Matrix, Inc. · JXI · Jun 1, 2017 · Neurology
Device Facts
Record ID
K170656
Device Name
Reinforced Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff
Applicant
Collagen Matrix, Inc.
Product Code
JXI · Neurology
Decision Date
Jun 1, 2017
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 882.5275
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
Reinforced Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff is used for the management of peripheral nerve injuries where gap closure can be achieved by flexion of the extremity (e.g., to prevent ingrowth of scar tissue).
Device Story
Resorbable, flexible type I collagen tubular matrix; circumferentially supported by resorbable synthetic polymer filament. Provides encasement for peripheral nerve injuries; protects neural environment; prevents scar tissue ingrowth. Synthetic filament enhances biomechanical stability and kink-resistance. Implanted at severed peripheral nerve gap; provides guidance for axonal growth. Used in clinical settings; operated by surgeons. Output is physical conduit; facilitates nerve regeneration. Benefits patient by supporting nerve repair.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing and animal study provided. Bench testing: physical characterization (suture pullout, compression/kink resistance, permeability, hydrothermal transition) and biocompatibility (ISO 10993 series: cytotoxicity, sensitization, systemic toxicity, genotoxicity, pyrogenicity, implantation, haemocompatibility). Animal study: 48 rats with sciatic nerve excision; 16 subject device, 16 predicate, 16 autograft control. Sacrificed at 12 and 24 weeks. Evaluation via gross observation, histology, and histomorphometry showed robust nerve regeneration comparable to predicate and autograft.
Technological Characteristics
Type I bovine tendon collagen tubular matrix; resorbable synthetic polymer filament reinforcement. Dimensions: 2-6 mm ID, 2.5-3.0 cm length. Biocompatible; resorbable; crosslinked. Sterilization: ETO (SAL 10^-6). Non-pyrogenic (endotoxin ≤ 0.5 EU/ml). Mechanical properties: sutureable, compression-resistant, kink-resistant. Complies with ISO 10993-1, ISO 10993-3, ISO 10993-5, ISO 10993-6, ISO 10993-10, ISO 10993-11, and ASTM F756-13.
Indications for Use
Indicated for management of peripheral nerve injuries in discontinuities where gap closure can be achieved by flexion of the extremity.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A nerve cuff is a tubular silicone rubber sheath used to encase a nerve for aid in repairing the nerve (e.g., to prevent ingrowth of scar tissue) and for capping the end of the nerve to prevent the formation of neuroma (tumors).
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/2 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized image of three human profiles facing to the right, stacked on top of each other.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
June 1 ,2017
Collagen Matrix, Inc. Peggy Hansen Senior Vice President 15 Thornton Road Oakland, New Jersey 07436
Re: K170656
Trade/Device Name: Reinforced Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.5275 Regulation Name: Nerve Cuff Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: JXI Dated: March 2, 2017 Received: March 3, 2017
Dear Ms. Hansen:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device
{1}------------------------------------------------
related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely,
# Michael J. Hoffmann -S
for
Carlos L. Peña, PhD, MS Director Division of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K170656
Device Name Reinforced Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff
Indications for Use (Describe)
Reinforced Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff is used for the management of peripheral nerve injuries where gap closure can be achieved by flexion of the extremity (e.g., to prevent ingrowth of scar tissue).
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
| Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | <div> </div> |
|----------------------------------------------|--------------|
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | <div> </div> |
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
### 510(k) SUMMARY
#### 1. Applicant Information
| Applicant Name: | Collagen Matrix, Inc. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------|
| Address: | 15 Thornton Road |
| | Oakland, New Jersey 07436 |
| Telephone: | (201) 405-1477 |
| Fax: | (201) 405-1355 |
| Contact Person: | Peggy Hansen, RAC |
| | SVP, Quality and Regulatory Affairs |
| Date Prepared: | April 28, 2017 |
#### 2. Name of the Device
| Device Common Name: | Nerve Cuff |
|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
| Device Trade Name: | Reinforced Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff |
| Device Classification Name: | Nerve cuff |
| | 882.5275 |
| | JXI |
| | Class II |
| Device Classification Panel: | Neurology |
| | |
#### 3. Legally Marketed Devices to Which Substantial Equivalence is Claimed
Predicate Device(s):
Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff K131541
#### 4. Description of the Device
Reinforced Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff is a resorbable, flexible type I collagen tubular matrix circumferentially supported with a resorbable synthetic polymer filament. The device provides both an encasement for peripheral nerve injuries as well as protection of the neural environment. The synthetic polymer filament provides enhanced support for biomechanical stability and kink-resistance of the collagen conduit. The Reinforced Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff is an interface between the nerve and the surrounding tissue to prevent ingrowth of scar tissue. When implanted at a severed peripheral nerve gap, the Reinforced Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff provides guidance for axonal growth across the gap. Upon hydration, the Reinforced Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff is a soft, flexible collagen conduit with compression-resistant and kink-resistant properties. It is supplied sterile, nonpyrogenic, in various sizes and for single use only.
#### 5. Indications for Use
Reinforced Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff is used for the management of peripheral nerve injuries in discontinuities where gap closure can be achieved by flexion of the extremity (e.g., to prevent ingrowth of scar tissue).
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### 6. Summary/Comparison of Technical Characteristics
| Parameter | Reinforced Flexible Collagen Nerve<br>Cuff<br>(This submission) | Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff<br>K131541 |
|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Indications for<br>Use | Intended for use in the management<br>of peripheral nerve injuries in<br>discontinuities where gap closure can<br>be achieved by flexion of the extremity<br>(e.g., to prevent ingrowth of scar<br>tissue). | Intended for use in the management of<br>peripheral nerve injuries in<br>discontinuities where gap closure can<br>be achieved by flexion of the extremity<br>(e.g., to prevent ingrowth of scar<br>tissue) or at the end of the nerve in the<br>foot to prevent the formation of<br>symptomatic or painful neuroma. |
| Material | Type I collagen with absorbable<br>polymeric suture filament | Type I collagen |
| Source of<br>collagen | Bovine tendon | Bovine tendon |
| Form | Tubular matrix | Tubular matrix |
| Color | White to off-white | White to off-white |
| Sizes | 2 mm ID x 2.5 cm length<br>2.5 mm ID x 2.5 cm length<br>3 mm ID x 2.5 cm length<br>4 mm ID x 2.5 cm length<br>5 mm ID x 2.5 cm length<br>6 mm ID x 2.5 cm length<br>Addition of a 3.0 cm length size for all<br>diameters. | 2 mm ID x 2.5 cm length<br>2.5 mm ID x 2.5 cm length<br>3 mm ID x 2.5 cm length<br>4 mm ID x 2.5 cm length<br>5 mm ID x 2.5 cm length<br>6 mm ID x 2.5 cm length |
| Mechanical<br>Strength | Can be sutured | Can be sutured |
| pH | 6 - 9 | 6 - 9 |
| Resorbable | Yes | Yes |
| Crosslinked | Yes | Yes |
| Biocompatibility | Biocompatible | Biocompatible |
| Sterility | Sterile, SAL 10-6<br>ETO sterilization | Sterile, SAL 10-6<br>Gamma irradiation |
| Pyrogenicity | Non-pyrogenic<br>Endotoxin ≤ 0.5 EU/ml | Non-pyrogenic<br>Endotoxin ≤ 0.5 EU/ml |
| Single<br>Use/Reuse | Single use only | Single use only |
| Packaging | Double peel package | Double peel package |
#### Nonclinical Tests Submitted
The substantial equivalence of the Reinforced Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff to its predicate device was demonstrated based on an evaluation of the product safety, product characteristics, and performance in an animal model.
In vitro characterization studies included evaluation of physical properties such as suture pullout strength, compression resistance, kink resistance, and an evaluation of physicochemical properties such as product permeability and hydrothermal
{5}------------------------------------------------
transition temperature. The characterization test results of the subject device were equivalent to those of the predicate device.
The Reinforced Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff subject device was evaluated in a number of in vitro and in vivo tests to assess its safety/biocompatibility. The subject device passed all applicable tests in accordance with ISO 10993-1 and FDA Guidance on Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1 for the biological evaluation of medical devices within a risk management process.
| Test | Test Method/Model | Results |
|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Physical<br>Characterization | Suture pullout,<br>compression resistance,<br>kink resistance,<br>permeability,<br>hydrothermal transition<br>temperature | Test results of the finished subject device are<br>comparable to the predicate device. |
| Animal<br>Performance | Rat sciatic nerve study | Test results of the finished subject device are<br>comparable to the predicate device. |
| Cytotoxicity | Agarose Overlay, ISO<br>10993-5 | Non-cytotoxic; No evidence of causing any<br>cell lysis or toxicity. |
| | MEM Elution Using L-<br>929 Mouse Fibroblast<br>Cells, ISO 10993-5 | The test article scored '0' at 24, 48, and 72 ± 4<br>hours and is considered non-cytotoxic under<br>the conditions of the test. |
| Sensitization | Guinea Pig<br>Maximization, ISO<br>10993-10 | No evidence of causing delayed dermal<br>contact sensitization in the guinea pig. The<br>test article was not considered a sensitizer in<br>the guinea pig test. |
| Intracutaneous<br>Reactivity | Intracutaneous Study in<br>Rabbits, ISO 10993-10 | Under the conditions of the study, there was<br>no irritation or toxicity from the extract injected<br>intracutaneously into rabbits. |
| Acute Systemic<br>Toxicity | Acute Systemic Toxicity<br>in Mice, ISO 10993-11 | No mortality or evidence of systemic toxicity<br>up to 72 hours. |
| Subchronic<br>(Systemic) Toxicity | Systemic Toxicity in<br>Rabbits, ISO 10993-11 | No evidence of systemic toxicity or adverse<br>findings specifically attributed to the test article<br>up to 13 weeks. |
| Genotoxicity | Bacterial Reverse<br>Mutation Study, ISO<br>10993-3 | Non-mutagenic to Salmonella typhimurium<br>(strains TA97a, TA98, TA100, TA1535) and to<br>Escherichia coli (strain WP2-uvra) |
| | Mouse Lymphoma<br>Assay, ISO 10993-3 | Based on the criteria and conditions of the<br>study protocol, the test article is considered<br>non-mutagenic (non-genotoxic and non-<br>clastogenic) |
| Test | Test Method/Model | Results |
| Material-Mediated<br>Pyrogenicity | Rabbit Pyrogen study-<br>USP <151> | Non-pyrogenic. None of the rabbits<br>administered with the test article extract had a<br>temperature rise ≥0.5°C at the observation<br>time points. |
| Implantation | Local Tissue Reaction in<br>a Subcutaneous Implant<br>in Rabbits, ISO 10993-6 | The test article result was considered<br>acceptable at 2 weeks and 13 weeks when<br>compared to the control article. |
| Haemocompatibility | Hemolysis Assay –<br>Extract Method, ASTM<br>F756-13 | The test article was considered non-hemolytic<br>under the test conditions employed. |
| Chronic Toxicity<br>Degradation | Local Tissue Reaction<br>and Resorption in a<br>Subcutaneous Implant<br>in Rabbits, ISO 10993-6 | The test article result was considered<br>acceptable at 26 weeks when compared to the<br>control article. Resorption of test article and<br>incorporation into new host collagen was<br>advanced at 26 weeks. |
Viral inactivation studies were performed to ensure the viral safety of the product.
{6}------------------------------------------------
## Animal Study
In the animal study conducted, 48 rats underwent excision of a segment of the sciatic nerve. In 16 of 48 rats, the nerve injuries were treated with the subject device, in another 16 rats the nerve injuries were treated with the predicate device, and in the remaining 16 rats, the nerve injuries were treated with an autograft control. There were no procedure related complications or premature deaths in the study.
Animals were sacrificed at 12 weeks and 24 weeks. The nerve repair segments were evaluated by gross observation, histological, and histomorphometrical methods. The study demonstrated that nerve regeneration was robust for both the subject and predicate devices.
#### Conclusions Drawn from Non-clinical Studies
Subject and predicate device performance data were compared to support the safety of the subject device and demonstrate that the Reinforced Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff should perform as intended in the specified use conditions.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.