Clinical study of patients undergoing routine surgical excision and device implantation; Clinical literature review and meta-analysis of published studies
The sponsor provided a clinical study of 50 patients to evaluate pain reduction following the use of the Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff for foot neuromas. A literature review and meta-analysis were used to compare these results against the Silastic Nerve Cuff predicate and excision-only control groups to support substantial equivalence for the expanded indication.
Neuroma; Foot surgery; Pain reduction; Clinical literature review; Meta-analysis
Clinical Evidence
Study Design
Population
Comparator
Key Endpoints
Clinical study of Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff for painful neuromas of the foot; Retrospective clinical cohort study; Follow-up/Duration: Mean follow-up 36 months (range 6-55 months)
Patients with painful single or multiple neuromas of the foot; Sample Size: 50 patients (60 nerves)
Not applicable for this study
Reduction of pain (1-10 scale)
Clinical literature review and meta-analysis; Literature review and meta-analysis
Patients treated for nerve ends of the foot
Silastic Nerve Cuff and nerve excision alone
Post-operative pain reduction
Indications for Use
Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff is used for the management of peripheral nerve injuries in discontinuities where gap closure can be achieved by flexion of the extremity (e.g., to prevent ingrowth of scar tissue) or at the end of the nerve in the foot to reduce the formation of symptomatic or painful neuroma.
Device Story
Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff is a resorbable, flexible type I collagen tubular matrix; provides encasement for peripheral nerve injuries; protects neural environment; acts as interface between nerve and surrounding tissue to prevent scar tissue ingrowth. When placed at terminal nerve ends, prevents neuroma formation. Features crimped walls for kink-resistance. Supplied sterile, non-pyrogenic, single-use. Used by clinicians in surgical settings. Device provides physical barrier; output is the physical protection of the nerve site. Benefits include reduced scar tissue ingrowth and reduced formation of symptomatic or painful neuromas.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical study of 50 patients (ages 16-77, mean 54) undergoing excision of painful neuromas in the foot. 60 nerves treated with Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff. Mean follow-up 36 months. Primary endpoint: pain reduction (1-10 scale). Results: 93% success rate in reducing pain. Meta-analysis compared subject device to Silastic Nerve Cuff and excision-only control; subject device performed substantially equivalent to predicate and showed clinically significant improvement over excision-only.
Technological Characteristics
Resorbable, flexible type I collagen tubular matrix derived from bovine tendon. Semi-permeable to nutrients and macromolecules. Features crimped walls for kink-resistance. Can be sutured. Sterilized via gamma irradiation (SAL 10-6). Non-pyrogenic (endotoxin ≤ 0.5 EU/ml). Biocompatible per ISO 10993-1 and FDA Blue Book G95-1.
Indications for Use
Indicated for management of peripheral nerve injuries in discontinuities where gap closure is achievable via extremity flexion, or for capping nerve ends in the foot to reduce symptomatic/painful neuroma formation.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A nerve cuff is a tubular silicone rubber sheath used to encase a nerve for aid in repairing the nerve (e.g., to prevent ingrowth of scar tissue) and for capping the end of the nerve to prevent the formation of neuroma (tumors).
{0}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) SUMMARY
K131541
# 1. Applicant Information
| Applicant Name: | Collagen Matrix, Inc. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------|
| Address: | 15 Thornton Road |
| | Oakland, New Jersey 07436 |
| Telephone: | (201) 405-1477 |
| Fax: | (201) 405-1355 |
| Contact Person: | Peggy Hansen, RAC |
| | VP, Clinical, Regulatory, QA, and Marketing |
| Date Prepared: | March 31, 2014 |
# 2. Name of the Device
Device Common Name: Device Trade Name: Device Classification Name: Nerve Cuff Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff Nerve cuff 882.5275 JXI · Class II
#### 3. Legally Marketed Devices to Which Substantial Equivalence is Claimed
Predicate Device(s):
Collagen Nerve Cuff K012814
Silastic® Nerve Cuff Pre-amendment Device
#### Description of the Device 4.
Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff is a resorbable, flexible type I collagen tubular matrix that provides both an encasement for peripheral nerve injuries as well as protection of the neural environment. Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff is designed to be an interface between the nerve and the surrounding tissue (e.g., to prevent ingrowth of scar tissue). When placed at the terminal end of a nerve, the Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff is designed to prevent formation of neuroma. When hydrated, Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff is a flexible collagen conduit where the crimped walls provide a kink-resistant property to the tube. It is supplied sterile, non-pyrogenic, in various sizes and for single use only.
# 5. Indications for Use / Intended Use
Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff is used for the management of peripheral nerve injuries in discontinuities where gap closure can be achieved by flexion of the extremity (e.g., to prevent ingrowth of scar tissue) or at the end of the nerve in the foot to reduce the formation of symptomatic or painful neuroma.
{1}------------------------------------------------
# 6. Summary/Comparison of Technical Characteristics
Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff is the identical product to the Company's currently marketed Neuroflex™ Collagen Nerve Cuff. The 510(k) premarket notification was submitted for expanded indications.
| Parameter | Flexible Collagen Nerve<br>Cuff<br>(This submission) | Collagen Nerve Cuff<br>K012814 | Silastic® Nerve Cuff |
|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Indications for Use | Intended for use in the<br>management of<br>peripheral nerve injuries<br>in discontinuities where<br>gap closure can be<br>achieved by flexion of<br>the extremity (e.g., to<br>prevent ingrowth of scar<br>tissue) or at the end of<br>the nerve in the foot to<br>reduce the formation of<br>symptomatic or painful<br>neuroma. | Intended for use in the<br>repair of peripheral nerve<br>discontinuities where gap<br>closure can be achieved<br>by flexion of the<br>extremity. | Intended to be used to<br>encase a nerve for aid in<br>repairing the nerve (e.g., to<br>prevent ingrowth of scar<br>tissue) and for capping the<br>end of the nerve to prevent<br>the formation of neuroma<br>(tumors). |
| Material | Type I collagen | Type I collagen | Silicone |
| Source | Bovine tendon | Bovine tendon | Synthetic |
| Form | Tubular matrix | Tubular matrix | Tubular matrix |
| Color | White to off-white | White to off-white | Opaque |
| Sizes | 2 mm ID x 2.5 cm length<br>2.5 mm ID x 2.5 cm length<br>3 mm ID x 2.5 cm length<br>4 mm ID x 2.5 cm length<br>5 mm ID x 2.5 cm length<br>6 mm ID x 2.5 cm length | 2 mm ID x 2.5 cm length<br>2.5 mm ID x 2.5 cm length<br>3 mm ID x 2.5 cm length<br>4 mm ID x 2.5 cm length<br>5 mm ID x 2.5 cm length<br>6 mm ID x 2.5 cm length | 3.3 mm ID x 1.0 cm length<br>4.1 mm ID x 1.0 cm length<br>4.8 mm ID x 1.0 cm length<br>5.3 mm ID x 1.3 cm length<br>6.1 mm ID x 1.3 cm length<br>7.1 mm ID x 1.3 cm length<br>7.9 mm ID x 1.5 cm length<br>8.6 mm ID x 1.5 cm length<br>9.9 mm ID x 1.5 cm length<br>10.7 mm ID x 1.5 cm length<br>11.7 mm ID x 1.8 cm length<br>13.7 mm ID x 1.8 cm length |
| Mechanical<br>Strength | Can be sutured | Can be sutured | Can be sutured |
| Resorbable | Yes | Yes | No |
| Crosslinked | Yes | Yes | No |
| Porosity/<br>Permeability | Semi-permeable.<br>Permeable to nutrients<br>and macromolecules | Semi-permeable<br>Permeable to nutrients<br>and macromolecules | Non-permeable |
| Biocompatibility | Biocompatible | Biocompatible | Biocompatible |
| Sterility | Sterile, SAL 10-6<br>Gamma irradiation | Sterile, SAL 10-6<br>Gamma irradiation | Sterile |
| Pyrogenicity | Non-pyrogenic<br>Endotoxin ≤ 0.5 EU/ml | Non-pyrogenic<br>Endotoxin ≤ 0.5 EU/ml | Unknown |
| Single Use/Reuse | Single use only | Single use only | Single use only |
| Parameter | Flexible Collagen Nerve<br>Cuff<br>(This submission) | Collagen Nerve Cuff<br>K012814 | Silastic® Nerve Cuff |
| Packaging | Double peel package | Double peel package | Sterile vials of distilled<br>water |
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Nonclinical Tests Submitted
The substantial equivalence of the Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff and its predicate device was demonstrated based on an evaluation of the expanded indications.
In vitro characterization studies included evaluation of physical properties such as suture strength, kink resistance, and an evaluation of physicochemical properties such as product permeability and hydrothermal transition temperature. The characterization test results of the subject device were equivalent to those of the predicate device, given that there has been no change to the device itself.
The Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff material was evaluated in a number of in vitro and in vivo tests to assess its safety/biocompatibility. The representative product passed all applicable FDA Blue Book Memorandum G95-1and ISO 10993-1 testing for the biological evaluation of medical devices.
| Test | Results | Conclusions |
|----------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
| Cytotoxicity -<br>Agarose<br>Overlay | No evidence of causing any cell lysis or toxicity. | Non-cytotoxic |
| Sensitization -<br>Guinea Pig<br>Maximization | No evidence of causing delayed dermal contact<br>sensitization in the guinea pig. The test article<br>was not considered a sensitizer in the guinea<br>pig test. | Non-sensitizer |
| Intracutaneous<br>Reactivity | Under the conditions of the study, there was no<br>irritation or toxicity from the extract injected<br>intracutaneously into rabbits. | Non-irritant, non-toxic |
| Acute Systemic<br>Toxicity | No mortality or evidence of systemic toxicity | Non-toxic<br>(acute systemic) |
| Genotoxicity -<br>Bacterial<br>Reverse<br>Mutation | Non-mutagenic to Salmonella typhimurium and<br>to Escherichia coli strain WP2uvra | Non-mutagenic |
| Mouse<br>Lymphoma<br>Assay | None of the test article treatments induced<br>substantial increases in the number of revertant<br>colonies. | Non-mutagenic |
| In Vivo Mouse<br>Micronucleus<br>Assay | None of the mice treated with the test article<br>preparations exhibited overt signs of toxicity<br>either immediately post-treatment or during the<br>induction period. The levels of micronucleated<br>cells were within normal negative ranges. | Non-mutagenic |
{3}------------------------------------------------
Collagen Matrix, Inc. 510(k) Summary Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff Page 4 of 4
| Test | Results | Conclusions |
|----------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
| Pyrogenicity -<br>Rabbit Pyrogen | Non-pyrogenic | Non-pyrogenic |
| Muscle<br>Implantation | The macroscopic reaction was not significant<br>compared with the USP negative control<br>implant material. Microscopically, the test<br>article was classified as a nonirritant as<br>compared to the USP negative control article. | Non-irritant |
| Subacute/<br>Subchronic/<br>Chronic Toxicity | Minimum tissue reaction up to 24 weeks of<br>implantation and no adverse tissue reaction to<br>the host. | Non toxic<br>(subacute, subchronic,<br>chronic) |
Viral inactivation studies were performed to ensure the viral safety of the product.
# Clinical Test Submitted
A clinical study was submitted that evaluated the use of the Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff in the management of painful neuromas of the foot. A total of 50 patients underwent excision of painful single or multiple neuromas with the end of the resected nerve sutured into the Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff subject device. Each patient preoperatively was asked to describe the amount of pain he or she was experiencing on a scale from 1 to 10, with 10 indicating the most severe pain. In the telephone interview conducted during this study, the same question was asked of each patient following revision. Patient ages ranged from 16 to 77 years, with a mean of 54 years. In all, 30 right and 20 left sides were operated, and 1 patient had bilateral involvement. Mean follow-up was 36 months (6-55 months). There were a total of 60 nerves that underwent conduit procedures in the foot. The results showed a 93% success rate of reducing pain for the treatment of neuroma in the foot.
A clinical literature review and meta-analysis was further conducted to compare the results of the clinical study of the Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff subject device with published studies of the Silastic Nerve Cuff predicate device and nerve excision alone, specifically for treatment of nerve ends of the foot. The analysis showed that the Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff performs substantially equivalent to its predicate device (Silastic Nerve Cuff) with respect to reduction of pain post-operatively. In addition, both devices show clinically significant improvement in pain reduction over the excision-only control group.
#### Conclusions Drawn from Non-clinical and Clinical Studies
The results of the material evaluation, in vitro product characterization studies, biocompatibility studies, animal and clinical studies show that the Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff is safe and substantially equivalent to the predicate device. The expanded indication for use does not affect the safety and performance of the device.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/0 description: The image shows the seal of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The seal features a stylized caduceus, a symbol often associated with medicine and healthcare, with three parallel lines forming the staff and a snake winding around it. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA" is arranged in a circular pattern around the caduceus.
# DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
April 3, 2014
Collagen Matrix, Inc. Ms. Peggy Hansen, Vice President Clinical Regulatory, QA & Marketing 15 Thornton Road Oakland, NJ 07436
Re: K131541 .
Trade/Device Name: Neuroflex TM Collagen Nerve Cuff Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.5275 Regulation Name: Nerve Cuff Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: JXI Dated: March 6, 2014 Received: March 7, 2014
Dear Ms. Hansen:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please notc: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21
{5}------------------------------------------------
# Page 2 - Ms. Peggy Hansen
CFR Part 807): labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Small Manufacturers. International and Consumer Assistance at its tollfree number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled. "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm.for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers. International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
# Joyce M. Whang -S
fox Carlos L. Peña, PhD, MS Director Division of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{6}------------------------------------------------
#### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
# Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: January 31, 2017 See PRA Statement on last page.
# 510(k) Number (if known) K131541
#### Device Name Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff
# Indications for Use (Describe)
Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff is used for the management of peripheral nerve injuries in discontinuities where gap be achieved by flexion of the extremity (e.g., to prevent ingrowth of scar tissue) or at the nerve in the foot to reduce the formation of symptomatic or painful neuroma.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
[ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
# PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
### FOR FDA USE ONLY
Concurrence of Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) (Signalure)
**Joyce M. Whang -S**
FORM FDA 3881 (1/14)
PSC Publishing Services (30) ) 443-6740 FF
{7}------------------------------------------------
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
# *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.