K163320 · W.O.M. World of Medicine GmbH · HET · Mar 21, 2017 · Obstetrics/Gynecology
Device Facts
Record ID
K163320
Device Name
LAP-Pump PP110
Applicant
W.O.M. World of Medicine GmbH
Product Code
HET · Obstetrics/Gynecology
Decision Date
Mar 21, 2017
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 884.1720
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The LAP-Pump PP110 is a suction and irrigation pump intended for use during diagnostic and/or therapeutic laparoscopic procedures to irrigate fluid into and remove fluid from the abdominal cavity.
Device Story
LAP-Pump PP110 is a microprocessor-controlled single-roller peristaltic pump for laparoscopic surgery; used to irrigate and remove fluids from the abdominal cavity. Device components include power supply, pump head, roller wheel, and suction/irrigation controls. Operated by clinical staff in a surgical setting; mounted on a pole or equipment rack. Uses sterile, single-use irrigation tube sets and non-sterile vacuum tube sets. Features RFID transponder technology to verify tube set position and prevent accidental reuse by invalidating sets after use. Output is controlled fluid flow; healthcare providers use the device to maintain clear surgical fields during laparoscopy, facilitating debris and fluid removal. Benefits include improved visualization and procedural efficiency.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. No clinical data provided. Performance demonstrated via electrical safety (AAMI ANSI ES60601-1), electromagnetic compatibility (IEC 60601-1-2), software verification (IEC 62304), ETO sterilization validation (ISO 11135-1, ISO 14937, ISO 10993-7), and biocompatibility (ISO 10993-1, -5, -10, -11). Flow rate performance (3 l/min) verified as equivalent to predicates.
Technological Characteristics
Microprocessor-controlled single-roller peristaltic pump. Features RFID transponder technology for tube set recognition. Connectivity: standalone, pole/rack-mounted. Sterilization: ETO for tube sets. Software: IEC 62304 compliant. Standards: AAMI ANSI ES60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, ISO 11135-1, ISO 14937, ISO 10993-7, ISO 11607-1, ASTM F-1980, ISO 10993-1/5/10/11.
Indications for Use
Indicated for use during diagnostic and/or therapeutic laparoscopic procedures for irrigation and suction of fluids in the abdominal cavity.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A gynecologic laparoscope is a device used to permit direct viewing of the organs within the peritoneum by a telescopic system introduced through the abdominal wall. It is used to perform diagnostic and surgical procedures on the female genital organs. This generic type of device may include: Trocar and cannula, instruments used through an operating channel, scope preheater, light source and cables, and component parts.
KSEA UNIVERSAL LAPAROMAT LAPAROSCOPIC SUCTION AND IRRIGATION PUMP (K010569)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized image of three human profiles facing to the right, with flowing lines connecting them.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
March 21, 2017
W.O.M. World of Medicine GmbH Dr. Soeren Markworth Head of Regulatory Affairs Salzufer 8 Berlin, 10587 Germany
Re: K163320
Trade/Device Name: LAP-Pump PP110 Regulation Number: 21 CFR 884.1720 Regulation Name: Gynecologic laparoscope and accessories Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: HET Dated: March 7, 2017 Received: March 8, 2017
Dear Dr. Markworth:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
{1}------------------------------------------------
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely,
# Jennifer R. Stevenson -S
For Binita S. Ashar, M.D., M.B.A., F.A.C.S. Director Division of Surgical Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
K163320
#### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
#### Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: January 31, 2017 See PRA Statement below.
510(k) Number (if known)
K163320
Device Name LAP-Pump PP110
Indications for Use (Describe)
The LAP-Pump PP110 is a suction and irrigation pump intended for use during diagnostic and or therapeutic laparoscopic procedures to irrigate fluid into and remove fluid from the abdominal cavity.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW .*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows a sequence of alphanumeric characters. The sequence starts with the letter 'K', followed by the numbers '163320'. The characters are displayed in a simple, sans-serif font and are evenly spaced.
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for WOM, which is a medical device company. Below the logo is the text "LAP-Pump PP110" and "510(k) Premarket Notification". The LAP-Pump PP110 is a medical device that is used for laparoscopic surgery and the 510(k) Premarket Notification is a submission to the FDA that is required for medical devices that are similar to devices already on the market.
# 510(k) SUMMARY OF SAFETY & EFFECTIVENESS
# (Content in accordance with 21 CFR §807.92)
### 1. General Information
| Submitter: | W.O.M. WORLD OF MEDICINE GmbH |
|----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | Salufer 8 |
| | 10587 Berlin |
| | Germany |
| Registration Number: | 3001556604 |
| Contact Person: | Dr. Soeren Markworth<br>Head of Regulatory Affairs |
| | Phone: +4930-399 81-594<br>Fax: +4930-399 81-593<br>E-mail: soeren.markworth@womcorp.com |
| Date prepared: | 7th of March, 2017 |
# 2. Proposed Device
| Trade Name: | LAP-Pump PP110 |
|----------------------|---------------------------------------------|
| Common Name: | Suction and Irrigation pump for Laparoscopy |
| Classification Name: | Gynecologic laparoscope and accessories |
| Regulation Number: | 21 C.F.R. § 884.1720 |
| Regulatory Class: | II |
| Product Code: | HET |
{4}------------------------------------------------
# LAP-Pump PP110 510(k) Premarket Notification
#### 3. Predicate Devices
#### Primary Predicate Device
| Trade Name: | LAP-Wave 3000 (P07) |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------|
| 510(k) Number: | K990732 |
| Classification Name | Gynecologic laparoscope and accessories |
| Regulation Numer | 21 C.F.R. § 884.1720 |
| Regulatory Class | II |
| Product Code | HET |
#### Secondary Predicate Device
| Trade Name: | KSEA UNIVERSAL LAPAROMAT LAPAROSCOPIC<br>SUCTION AND IRRIGATION PUMP |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 510(k) Number: | K010569 |
| Classification Name | Laparoscope, General & Plastic Surgery |
| Regulation Numer | 21 C.F.R. § 876.1500 |
| Regulatory Class | II |
| Product Code (Classification) | GCJ |
| Product Code (Subsequent) | BTA |
#### 4. Device Description
The LAP-Pump PP110 is a suction and irrigation pump for use during laparoscopic procedures. The irrigation and suction functions are used to facilitate the removal of debris and fluids during laparoscopy. The pump consists of the following main components: : (1) a power supply, (2) a power switch, (3), a START/STOP button for the irrigation function, (4), a START/STOP button for the suction function, (5) a roller wheel, (6) a pump head, (7) suction pump and (8) a casing. The pump is a microprocessor controlled single roller pump that functions according to the peristaltic principle and is to be used with specially designed sterile, single use irrigation tube sets with or without hand piece, a sterile outflow tube set
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for WOM, which is a circle with a stylized figure-8 shape inside and a small red triangle at the bottom. Below the logo, the text "WOM" is printed in a sans-serif font. Below that, the text "LAP-Pump PP110 510(k) Premarket Notification" is printed in a smaller font.
and a vacuum tube set. The pump is designed to be mounted on a pole/tripod, or can be placed in an equipment rack.
#### 5. Intended Use
The LAP-Pump PP110 is a suction and irrigation pump intended for use during diagnostic and/or therapeutic laparoscopic procedures to irrigate fluid into and remove fluid from the abdominal cavity.
#### 6. Comparison of Technological Characteristics
#### Primary Predicate Device
The predecessor product of the proposed device LAP-Pump PP110 is the LAP Wave 3000 (P07). The LAP-Wave 3000 (P07) was originally cleared under K990732 and is the primary predicate device for the LAP-Pump PP110. Both pumps are designed, developed and manufactured by W.O.M. WORLD of MEDICINE GmbH. They incorporate the same basic design. Specifically, both the LAP-Pump PP110 and the LAP-Wave 3000 (P07) are pump systems for use during laparoscopic procedures. They are microprocessor controlled single roller pumps that function according to the peristaltic principle and are to be used with specially designed tube sets.
The differences in the technological characteristics of both the proposed device LAP-Pump PP110 and the primary predicate device LAP-Wave 3000 (P07) are minor and do not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness. The main differences between the LAP-Pump PP110 and the LAP-Wave 3000 (P07) are the following:
- The LAP-Pump PP110 incorporates a suction pump that is to be used with a nonsterile vacuum tube set. The LAP-Wave 3000 (P07) does not have a vacuum pump, which means a separate vacuum pump or the central vacuum connection of the hospital had to be used when needed.
- The LAP-Pump PP110 is designed with a radio frequency identification (RFID) transponder technology tube set recognition function that controls the proper
{6}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/6/Picture/1 description: The image shows the WOM logo, which is a circle with a stylized "W" inside. Below the logo, the text "LAP-Pump PP110" is displayed, followed by "510(k) Premarket Notification". The text indicates that the image is related to a medical device, specifically a LAP-Pump PP110, and its premarket notification under section 510(k) of the Food and Drug Administration regulations.
position of the Inflow Tube Set and eliminates accidental reuse of an Inflow Tube Set by invalidating the tube set after the irrigation process has been started.
- . The LAP-Pump PP110 includes a greater variety of tube sets. For the LAP-Pump PP110 the following tube sets are available as accessories: standard irrigation tube set, high-flow suction-irrigation tube set with hand piece, suction tube set and vacuum tube set. The LAP-Wave 3000 (P07) featured only a standard irrigation tube set which can be connected to a standard hand piece.
#### Secondary Predicate Device
The KSEA UNIVERSAL LAPAROMAT LAPAROSCOPIC SUCTION AND IRRIGATION PUMP (hereafter referred to as "Laparomat") was originally cleared under K010569 and is the secondary predicate device for the LAP-Pump PP110. Both pumps incorporate a similar basic design. Specifically, both the LAP-Pump PP110 and the Laparomat are pump systems for use during laparoscopic procedures. They are microprocessor controlled pumps that provide irrigation and suction functions and are to be used with specially designed tube sets.
The differences in the technological characteristics of both the proposed device LAP-Pump PP110 and the secondary predicate device Laparomat are minor and do not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness. The main differences between the LAP-Pump PP110 and the Laparomat are the following:
- · The LAP-Pump PP110 is designed with a radio frequency identification (RFID) transponder technology tube set recognition function that controls the proper position of the Inflow Tube Set and eliminates accidental reuse of an Inflow Tube Set by invalidating the tube set after the irrigation process has been started.
- . The LAP-Pump PP110 transports the irrigation fluid via the peristaltic principle using a roller wheel, while the Laparomat uses an impeller for irrigation fluid transportation.
- . The irrigation tube sets of both devices have a different design with respect to the fluid transportation mechanism. The irrigation tube sets of the LAP-Pump PP110 feature a segment which is intended to be inserted around the roller wheel of the
{7}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/7/Picture/1 description: The image shows the WOM logo, which is a circle with a stylized "W" inside. Below the logo is the text "WOM LAP-Pump PP110 510(k) Premarket Notification". The text is centered below the logo and is in a simple, sans-serif font. The logo is in black and white, with a small red triangle at the bottom of the "W".
pump, while the irrigation tube sets of the Laparomat feature an impeller segment which is intended to be connected to the connection site of the pump.
## 7. Performance Data
Electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility testing was performed by independent laboratories in accordance with the following standards:
- AAMI ANSI ES60601-1: 2005/(R)2012 and A1:2012, C1:2009/(R)2012 and A2:2010/(R)2012, Medical electrical equipment - Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance;
- IEC60601-1-2:2007 Medical Electrical Equipment Part 1-2: General Requirements . for Basic Safety and Essential Performance - Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic Compatibility - Requirements and Tests.
Test results demonstrate that the proposed device conforms to the above standards.
The software was developed, tested, and verified in accordance with the FDA guidance document, "Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices" and in accordance with the following standard:
- . IEC 62304:2006 - Medical Device Software - Software Life Cycle Processes.
Design verification testing of the LAP-Pump PP10 demonstrates that the device performs as intended and that the performance does not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness.
ETO sterilization validation on the tube sets was performed in accordance with the below standard:
- ISO 11135-1:2007 Sterilization of health care products Ethylene oxide Part 1: Requirements for the development, validation and routine control of a sterilization process for medical devices;
{8}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/8/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for WOM, which is a circle with a design inside and a small red triangle at the bottom. Below the logo, the text "WOM" is written in a bold, sans-serif font. The text "LAP-Pump PP110 510(k) Premarket Notification" is written below the logo and the WOM text.
- ISO 14937:2009 Sterilization of health care products General criteria for . characterization of a sterilizing agent and the development, validation and routine control of a sterilization process for medical devices; and
- . ISO 10993-7:2008 - Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 7: Ethylene oxide sterilization residuals.
Residual ethylene oxide (EO) and ethylene chlorohydrin (ECH) data shows that the limit of EO < 4 mg and ECH < 5 mg after 10 days of aeration (gas release) that remain on the tube set will not be exceeded. The sterility assurance level (SAL) was ≤ 10˚. Package and product integrity of the tube sets were tested in accordance with ISO 11607-1 - Packaging for terminally sterilized medical devices and ASTM-F-1980:2002 - Standard for accelerated aging of sterile medical device packages.
Biocompatibility testing was performed on the tube sets in accordance with:
- . ISO 10993-1 - Biological evaluation of medical devices- Evaluation and testing within a risk management system;
- . ISO 10993-5 - Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity;
- . ISO 10993-10 - Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 10: Tests for irritation and skin sensitization; and
- . ISO 10993-11 - Biological evaluation of medical devices -- Part 11: Tests for systemic toxicity.
Finally, complete testing was performed to demonstrate safety and effectiveness of the proposed device LAP-Pump PP110. As the flow rate of 3 l/min as the main function of the predicate and the proposed device is the same, no comparative testing was performed. Instead, the performance and safety features of the proposed device are demonstrated.
{9}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/9/Picture/0 description: The image shows a sequence of alphanumeric characters, specifically 'K163320'. The characters are presented in a clear, sans-serif font, making them easily readable. The arrangement is linear, with each character distinctly separated from the others.
Image /page/9/Picture/1 description: The image shows the WOM logo, which is a circle with a stylized heart shape inside. Below the logo, the text "WOM" is written in bold letters. The text "LAP-Pump PP110" and "510(k) Premarket Notification" are written below the WOM text.
## 8. Conclusion
Based on the similar intended use compared to the primary predicate device as well as the same intended use compared to the secondary predicate device, the same or similar basic technological characteristics and performance testing, the LAP-Pump PP110 is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices LAP-Wave 3000 (P07) (K990732) and Laparomat (K010569). The differences between the proposed device and the predicate devices do not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.