The Nerve Capping Device is indicated to protect a peripheral nerve end and to separate the nerve from surrounding environment to reduce the development of a symptomatic neuroma.
Device Story
The Nerve Capping Device is a sterile, single-use, bioresorbable tubular implant composed of poly(DL-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone). It features one open end and one sealed end with a fixation hole. Used by surgeons in a clinical setting, the device is placed over a peripheral nerve stump to isolate it from the surrounding environment. The nerve end is pulled into the tube and sutured; the sealed end is then sutured to surrounding tissue. By providing a physical barrier for up to 10 weeks, the device prevents nerve stump dislocation and reduces the formation of symptomatic neuromas. The device is provided in various diameters to accommodate different nerve sizes.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Evidence includes biocompatibility testing (cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation, systemic toxicity, pyrogenicity, hemocompatibility, implantation/local tolerance, degradation, genotoxicity, carcinogenicity), in vitro degradation assessment, suture retention strength testing, tip dimensional verification, and usability testing with intended end users. Results demonstrate the device is non-pyrogenic, biocompatible, and maintains barrier function for up to 10 weeks, consistent with predicate performance.
Technological Characteristics
Material: poly(DL-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) (synthetic bioresorbable copolyester). Form factor: tubular device with one closed end, 3cm length, various diameters (1.5mm–8.0mm). Barrier function: non-permeable for up to 10 weeks. Sterilization: Ethylene oxide (SAL 10^-6). Mechanical: suture-fixable. Packaging: Polycarbonate tray and Tyvek pouch.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring protection of a peripheral nerve end to reduce the development of a symptomatic neuroma.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A nerve cuff is a tubular silicone rubber sheath used to encase a nerve for aid in repairing the nerve (e.g., to prevent ingrowth of scar tissue) and for capping the end of the nerve to prevent the formation of neuroma (tumors).
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized caduceus symbol, which is often associated with medicine and healthcare. The words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" are arranged in a circular pattern around the caduceus. The logo is black and white.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
January 13, 2016
Polyganics Innovations BV Ms. Betty IJmker Manager OA/RA Rozenburglaan 15A Groningen 9727 DL The Netherlands
Re: K152684
Trade/Device Name: Nerve Capping Device Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.5275 Regulation Name: Nerve Cuff Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: JXI Dated: December 11, 2015 Received: December 14, 2015
Dear Ms. IJmker:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration. listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you; however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in
{1}------------------------------------------------
the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Carlos L. Pena -S
Carlos L. Peña, PhD, MS Director Division of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K152684
Device Name Nerve Capping Device
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Nerve Capping Device is indicated to protect a peripheral nerve end and to separate the nerve from surrounding environment to reduce the development of a symptomatic neuroma.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for Polyganics. The logo features a cluster of teal and blue circles on the left side. To the right of the circles, the word "POLYGANICS" is written in blue, with the words "Bioresorbable Medical Devices" written in a smaller font size underneath.
Submitter:
Polyganics Innovations BV Rozenburglaan 15A 9727 DL Groningen The Netherlands www.polyganics.com
Date Prepared: 11 December 2015
Contact Person:
Betty IJmker Manager QA/RA Tel : +31 50 588 6598 : +31 50 588 6599 Fax E-mail : b.ijmker@polyganics.com
General Provisions:
Trade Name: Nerve Capping Device Common Name: Nerve capping device Classification Name: Nerve cuff 21 CFR 882.5275 Product Code: JXI Device Class: Class II Performance Standards: None
Predicate Devices:
K050573 NEUROLAC® Nerve Guide (Polyganics) K112267 NEUROLAC® Nerve Guide (Polyganics) K131541 Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff (Collagen Matrix, Inc)
## Device Description:
The Nerve Capping Device is a sterile biodegradable nerve cuff composed of the bioresorbable copolyester poly(DL-lactide-s-caprolactone). It is a tubular device with one open end and one sealed end which functions as a cap, isolating the nerve end. The capping device prevents dislocation of the stump by pulling the nerve end into the tube and suturing in the nerve within the cap. Consequently, the end of the cap will be sutured to surrounding tissue. One hole at the sealed end of the tube allows easy fixation with a suture to the surrounding tissue. The size of the product is 3cm in length, and is available in
{4}------------------------------------------------
different diameters for different sized nerves. The Nerve Capping Device is sterilized in a pouch package. The device is single-use, cannot be re-sterilized, and is a prescription product.
Indications for Use:
The Nerve Capping Device is indicated to protect a peripheral nerve end and to separate the nerve from surrounding environment to reduce the development of a symptomatic neuroma.
Summary / comparison of technical characteristics:
The Nerve Capping Device is similar in design and manufacturing, and identical in materials, packaging and sterilization method as its predicate NEUROLAC® (K050573 and K112267).
Table 1 contains a comparison of technological characteristics with the predicate devices:
{5}------------------------------------------------
| Parameter | Nerve Capping Device (New<br>Device) | NEUROLAC® (K050573) | NEUROLAC® (K112267) | Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff<br>(K131541) |
|-----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Indications for use | The Nerve Capping Device is<br>indicated to protect a peripheral<br>nerve end and to separate the nerve<br>from surrounding environment to<br>reduce the development of a<br>symptomatic neuroma. | The NEUROLAC® nerve guide is<br>indicated for the reconstruction of a<br>peripheral nerve discontinuity up to<br>20mm in patients who have<br>sustained a complete division of a<br>nerve. | The NEUROLAC® nerve guide is<br>indicated for the reconstruction of a<br>peripheral nerve discontinuity up to<br>20mm in patients who have<br>sustained a complete division of a<br>nerve. | Flexible Collagen Nerve Cuff is used for<br>the management of peripheral nerve<br>injuries in discontinuities where gap<br>closure can be achieved by flexion of<br>the extremity (e.g., to prevent ingrowth<br>of scar tissue) or at the end of the nerve<br>in the foot to reduce the formation of<br>symptomatic or painful neuroma. |
| Sterility | Sterile, SAL 10-6<br>Ethylene oxide sterilization | Sterile, SAL 10-6<br>Ethylene oxide sterilization | Sterile, SAL 10-6<br>Ethylene oxide sterilization | Sterile, SAL 10-6<br>Gamma Irradiation |
| Resorbable | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Material | poly(DL-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) | poly(DL-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) | poly(DL-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) | Type I Collagen |
| Source | Synthetic | Synthetic | Synthetic | Bovine tendon |
| Barrier function/<br>Permeability | Up to 10 weeks non permeable | Up to 10 weeks non permeable | Up to 10 weeks non permeable | Semi-permeable, permeable to<br>nutrients and macromolecules |
| Sizes | 1.5 mm ID x 3.0 cm length<br>2.0 mm ID x 3.0 cm length<br>2.5 mm ID x 3.0 cm length<br>3.0 mm ID x 3.0 cm length<br>4.0 mm ID x 3.0 cm length<br>5.0 mm ID x 3.0 cm length<br>6.0 mm ID x 3.0 cm length<br>7.0 mm ID x 3.0 cm length<br>8.0 mm ID x 3.0 cm length | 4.0 mm ID x 3.0 cm length<br>5.0 mm ID x 3.0 cm length<br>6.0 mm ID x 3.0 cm length<br>7.0 mm ID x 3.0 cm length<br>8.0 mm ID x 3.0 cm length<br>10.0 mm ID x 3.0 cm length | 1.5 mm ID x 3.0 cm length<br>2.0 mm ID x 3.0 cm length<br>2.5 mm ID x 3.0 cm length<br>3.0 mm ID x 3.0 cm length | 2.0 mm ID x 2.5 cm length<br>2.5 mm ID x 2.5 cm length<br>3.0 mm ID x 2.5 cm length<br>4.0 mm ID x 2.5 cm length<br>5.0 mm ID x 2.5 cm length<br>6.0 mm ID x 2.5 cm length |
| Shape | Cap (tube with one closed end)<br>Image: Drawing of a nerve capping device | Tube<br>Image: Drawing of a tube | Tube<br>Image: Drawing of a tube | Tube<br>Image: Drawing of a tube |
| Color | Transparent | Transparent | Transparent | White to Off white |
| Pyrogenicity | Non-pyrogenic<br>Endotoxin ≤ 0.6 EU/device | Non-pyrogenic<br>Endotoxin ≤ 0.18 EU/device | Non-pyrogenic<br>Endotoxin ≤ 0.18 EU/device | Non-pyrogenic<br>Endotoxin ≤ 0.5 EU/ml |
| Mechanical strength | Can be sutured | Can be sutured | Can be sutured | Can be sutured |
| Biocompatibility | Biocompatible | Biocompatible | Biocompatible | Biocompatible |
| Packaging | Polycarbonate tray and Tyvek pouch | Polycarbonate tray and Tyvek pouch | Polycarbonate tray and Tyvek pouch | Double peel package |
Table 1: Comparison of technological characteristics
{6}------------------------------------------------
### Performance Data:
The following performance data were provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination.
## Biocompatibility testing
The biocompatibility evaluation for the Nerve Capping Device was conducted in accordance with the FDA Blue Book Memorandum #G95-1 "Use of International Standard ISO-10993, "Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part 1: Evaluation and Testing," May 1, 1995, and International Standard ISO 10993-1 "Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices - Part 1: Evaluation and Testing Within a Risk Management Process," as recognized by FDA. The Nerve Capping Device is considered a permanent contact device: device contact exceeds 30 days.
The battery of testing included the following tests which were conducted for the predicate NEUROLAC® and leveraged for the Nerve Capping Device, except for cytotoxicity, pyrogenicity and EO residues which were conducted for the Nerve Capping Device.
The predicate test data was leveraged to support the substantial equivalence of the subject device as the device material is exactly the same for the subject and predicate device NEUROLAC® (bioresorbable copolyester poly(DL-lactide-s-caprolactone), and the shape is tubular as the predicate device NEUROLAC® but with one closed end. The Nerve Capping Device is manufactured with an identical production process (with the only difference being the sealing step of the tip), packaging and sterilization method, and the body contact is identical.
| BIOCOMPATIBILITY TEST | RESULTS | CONCLUSION | | |
|----------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|--|--|
| Cytotoxicity | No biological reactivity (Grade 0)<br>was observed | No cytotoxic potential | | |
| Sensitization | No significant evidence of causing<br>delayed dermal contact<br>sensitization in the guinea pig | Non-sensitizing | | |
| Irritation | No erythema or edema was<br>observed | Non-irritating | | |
| Acute systemic toxicity | Test article did not induce a<br>significantly greater biological<br>reaction than the control | Not considered systemically toxic | | |
| Pyrogenicity | Endotoxins were not detected | Non-pyrogenic | | |
| Hemocompatibility: Hemolysis | 0.0% hemolysis was observed | Non-hemolytic | | |
| Hemocompatibility: Prothrombin<br>Time Assay | No adverse effect on prothrombin<br>coaqulation time | Compatible with blood | | |
| Implantation/local tolerance | Relatively mild foreign body<br>response | Relatively mild foreign body response | | |
| (Bio)degradation | After 16 months very small<br>fragments of material were found | Biodegradable | | |
| (Sub)acute/subchronic toxicity | No toxic responses were<br>observed | No subchronic toxicity | | |
| Genotoxicity | No statistical increase was found<br>in the mutation frequency | Non-mutagenic | | |
| Carcinogenicity | No significant carcinogenic<br>potential | No significant carcinogenic potential | | |
{7}------------------------------------------------
| EO and ECH residues | EO: ≤0.0016 mg/device<br>ECH: ≤0.00045 mg/device | Residual levels acceptable |
|---------------------|--------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|
|---------------------|--------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|
The Nerve Capping Device complies with the biocompatibility requirements for its intended use.
| Other performance testing conducted for the Nerve Capping Device: | | | |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|
| | | | |
| Test | Test Method Summary | Results |
|---------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <i>In vitro</i> degradation | Assessment of physical, chemical and<br>thermal properties of the Nerve<br>Capping Device:<br>pH testing Dimensional testing Weight (dry and wet state) Tensile testing Intrinsic viscosity Glass temperature Degradation products Blue dye leak tests Visual inspections | The <i>in vitro</i> degradation at 37 °C<br>behavior for Nerve Capping Device is<br>comparable to the predicate<br>NEUROLAC®, and the shape integrity<br>will be intact for up 10 weeks to form a<br>barrier and separate the nerve stump<br>from the surrounding environment. The<br>degradation pattern is comparable to<br>that of NEUROLAC®. |
| Usability testing | Usability and specifications of the<br>Nerve Capping Device were assessed<br>by providing samples to the intended<br>end users. Their opinion and<br>experience on the usage of the product<br>was used to evaluate the device as<br>design verification and validation<br>activity to determine whether or not it<br>meets the requirements | The overall result is that the device can<br>be used to cover a nerve end in a fast<br>and easy manner and that the<br>procedure is less invasive then current<br>used techniques. The range of<br>dimensions from 1.5 up to 8.0 mm is<br>sufficient and the flat tube end with<br>fixation hole was found to be<br>convenient to fixate the device into the<br>tissue. |
| Suture retention<br>strength | To determine the force necessary to<br>pull a suture from the device or cause<br>the wall of the device to fail | All samples passed the acceptance<br>criteria and are comparable to<br>NEUROLAC® regarding retention<br>forces. The suture retention of a suture<br>placed in the tip section is higher<br>compared to a suture placed in the<br>tube section. |
| Tip dimensional<br>verification | To verify that the specified dimensions<br>of the tip are met | All samples passed the acceptance<br>criteria. The dimensions of the tip of the<br>device (closed part) are within the<br>tolerances as specified. |
## Conclusion:
The non-clinical data and the device verification and validation demonstrate that the Nerve Capping Device should perform as intended in the specified use conditions. The non-clinical data demonstrate that the Nerve Capping Device is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.