DIVERGENCE-L Anterior/Oblique Lumbar Fusion System
K150135 · Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. · MAX · Jun 11, 2015 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K150135
Device Name
DIVERGENCE-L Anterior/Oblique Lumbar Fusion System
Applicant
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
Product Code
MAX · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Jun 11, 2015
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3080
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The DIVERGENCE-L™ Anterior/Oblique Lumbar Fusion System Interbody is indicated for interbody fusion in patients with DDD at one or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved levels. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These patients should be skeletally mature and have had six months of non-operative treatment. The DIVERGENCE-L™ Anterior/Oblique Lumbar Fusion Interbody cage is also required to be used with autogenous bone graft. These implants may be implanted via a variety of open or minimally invasive approaches. These approaches include anterior and oblique. These devices are intended to be used with supplemental fixation instrumentation, which has been cleared for use in the lumbar spine. Interbody cages with a lordosis of 18° or greater must be used with at least supplemental, anterior fixation. The DIVERGENCE-L™ Anterior/Oblique Lumbar Fusion plate and bone screw components are indicated as a supplemental fixation device for the lumbosacral level, anterior below the bifurcation (L5-S1) of the vascular structures or anterior oblique above the bifurcation (1-L5) of the vascular structures. The indications of spinal instrumentation systems should be well understood by the surgeon. The plate and bone screw components are indicated for use in the temporary stabilization of the anterior lumbar spine during the development of spinal fusions in patients with: 1) Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) defined by back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies; 2) trauma (including fractures); 3) tumors; 4) deformity defined as kyphosis, lordosis, or scoliosis; 5) pseudarthrosis; and/or 6) failed previous fusions. When used together, the DIVERGENCE-L™ Anterior/Oblique Lumbar Fusion System components can be used only to treat patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved levels.
Device Story
System comprises interbody cages, plates, and bone screws for lumbar spinal fusion. Cages are hollow, packed with autogenous bone graft, and implanted via anterior or oblique approaches to provide structural support and correction. Plates and screws provide supplemental anterior fixation. Used in OR by surgeons for patients with degenerative disc disease, trauma, tumors, or deformity. Implants stabilize the spine during the fusion process, potentially reducing pain and restoring spinal alignment. System is single-use; instruments are reusable.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. No clinical data provided. Mechanical verification included static/fatigue compression, static torsion, push-out, subsidence, and expulsion testing per ASTM standards.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: PEEK (ASTM F2026), Ti-6Al-4V ELI (ASTM F136), Tantalum (ASTM F560). Instruments: Stainless steel (ASTM A564/F899), Silicone. Sterilization: Gamma irradiation (implants). Form factor: Interbody cages, plates, bone screws. Connectivity: None.
Indications for Use
Indicated for skeletally mature patients with discogenic back pain due to DDD at 1-2 contiguous levels (L2-S1), with or without Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis/retrolisthesis, failing 6 months of non-operative treatment. Plate/screw components indicated for temporary stabilization in DDD, trauma, tumors, deformity, pseudarthrosis, or failed fusion.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An intervertebral body fusion device is an implanted single or multiple component spinal device made from a variety of materials, including titanium and polymers. The device is inserted into the intervertebral body space of the cervical or lumbosacral spine, and is intended for intervertebral body fusion.
Special Controls
*Classification.* (1) Class II (special controls) for intervertebral body fusion devices that contain bone grafting material. The special control is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device.” See § 888.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.(2) Class III (premarket approval) for intervertebral body fusion devices that include any therapeutic biologic (e.g., bone morphogenic protein). Intervertebral body fusion devices that contain any therapeutic biologic require premarket approval.
(c)
*Date premarket approval application (PMA) or notice of product development protocol (PDP) is required.* Devices described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.
DIVERGENCE™ Anterior Cervical Fusion System (K142450)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image is a black and white logo for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The logo features a stylized image of three faces in profile, stacked on top of each other. The faces are oriented to the right. The logo also includes the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA" arranged in a circular pattern around the image of the faces.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Incorporated Ms. Lila Joe Principal Regulatory Affairs Specialist 1800 Pyramid Place Memphis, Tennessee 38132
June 11, 2015
Re: K150135
Trade/Device Name: DIVERGENCE-L™ Anterior/Oblique Lumbar Fusion System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3080 Regulation Name: Intervertebral body fusion device Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: MAX, OVD, KWQ Dated: May 13, 2015 Received: May 14, 2015
Dear Ms. Joe:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set
{1}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Ms. Lila Joe
forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled. "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours.
# Mark N. Melkerson -S
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: January 31, 2017 See PRA Statement below.
K150135
Page 1 of 2
510(k) Number (if known) K150135
Device Name
DIVERGENCE-L™ Anterior/Oblique Lumbar Fusion System
### Indications for Use (Describe)
The DIVERGENCE-L™ Anterior/Oblique Lumbar Fusion System Interbody is indicated for interbody fusion in patients with DDD at one or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved levels. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These patients should be skeletally mature and have had six months of non-operative treatment. The DIVERGENCE-L™ Anterior/Oblique Lumbar Fusion Interbody cage is also required to be used with autogenous bone graft. These implants may be implanted via a variety of open or minimally invasive approaches. These approaches include anterior and oblique. These devices are intended to be used with supplemental fixation instrumentation, which has been cleared for use in the lumbar spine. Interbody cages with a lordosis of 18° or greater must be used with at least supplemental, anterior fixation.
The DIVERGENCE-L™ Anterior/Oblique Lumbar Fusion plate and bone screw components are indicated as a supplemental fixation device for the lumbosacral level, anterior below the bifurcation (L5-S1) of the vascular structures or anterior oblique above the bifurcation (1-L5) of the vascular structures. The indications of spinal instrumentation systems should be well understood by the surgeon. The plate and bone screw components are indicated for use in the temporary stabilization of the anterior lumbar spine during the development of spinal fusions in patients with: 1) Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) defined by back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies; 2) trauma (including fractures); 3) tumors; 4) deformity defined as kyphosis, lordosis, or scoliosis; 5) pseudarthrosis; and/or 6) failed previous fusions.
When used together, the DIVERGENCE-L™ Anterior/Oblique Lumbar Fusion System components can be used only to treat patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved levels.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|-------------------------------------------------|--|
|-------------------------------------------------|--|
2 Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
### PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
### FOR FDA USE ONLY
Concurrence of Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) (Signature)
{3}------------------------------------------------
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
K150135
Page 2 of 2
*DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}------------------------------------------------
## DIVERGENCE-L™ Anterior/Oblique Lumbar Fusion System 510(k) SUMMARY June 09, 2015
- I. Submitter Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. 1800 Pyramid Place Memphis, TN 38132 (901)396-3133 Contact Lila Joe Principle Regulatory Affairs Specialist Date Prepared June 09, 2015 II. Device Name of Device DIVERGENCE-LTM Anterior/Oblique Lumbar Fusion System Classification Name Intervertebral Body Fusion Device (21 CFR 888.3080) Intervertebral Body Fusion Device (21 CFR 888.3080) Spinal Intervertebral Body Fixation Orthosis (21 CFR 888.3060) Class II Classification Product Codes KWQ (Plates and Screws) MAX, OVD (Interbody Cages) Predicates Primary Predicate PERIMETER® Interbody Fusion Device K131669 (S.E. 11/01/2013) Additional Predicates · CAPSTONE® Spinal System K133650 (S.E. 12/26/2013) • CLYDESDALE® Spinal System
- K132897 (S.E. 12/11/2013)
{5}------------------------------------------------
- · CAPSTONE CONTROL K120368 (S.E. 04/09/2012)
- LT CAGE® PEEK Lumbar Tapered Fusion Device (P970015/R022 - Approved 09/10/2003 -Downclassed)
- · SOVEREIGN® Spinal System K122037 ( S.E. 03/22/2013)
- · CoRoent® XLR Standalone System K100043 (S.E. 06/13/2010)
- · BRIGADE® Hyperlordotic System K123045 (S.E. 04/16/2013)
- PYRAMID® +4 Anterior Lumbar Plate System K071416 (S.E. 11/01/2007)
- · ZPLATE IITM Anterior Fixation System K991460 (S.E. 05/19/1999 ).
- · Reference Predicate DIVERGENCE™ Anterior Cervical Fusion System K142450 (S.E. 10/01/2014)
The predicates have not been subject to a design related recall.
#### III. Product Description
The DIVERGENCE-L™ Anterior/Oblique Lumbar Fusion System consists of plates, bone screws, and interbody cages.
The DIVERGENCE-L™ Anterior/Oblique Lumbar interbody cages are available in various widths, heights, and lordosis inserted between two lumbar vertebral bodies to give support and correction during lumbar interbody fusion surgeries. The hollow geometry of the implants allows them to be packed with autogenous bone graft and must be used with supplemental fixation. The cages are manufactured from medical grade Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and titanium alloy with tantalum markers and are provided sterile.
The DIVERGENCE-L™ Anterior/Oblique Lumbar plates and bone screws are available in a broad range of size offerings intended for anterior screw fixation and stabilization during the normal healing process following surgical correction of disorders of the spine. Fixation is provided by bone screws inserted into the vertebral body of the lumbar spine using an anterior or oblique approach. The DIVERGENCE-
{6}------------------------------------------------
LTM Anterior/Oblique Lumbar plate and bone screws are made from titanium alloy and are provided sterile.
The subject devices are manufactured from ASTM F2026 - Standard Specification for Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Polymers for Surgical Implant Applications, ASTM F136 - Standard Specification for Wrought Titanium-6 Aluminum-4 Vanadium ELI Alloy for Surgical Implant Applications, and ASTM F560 - Standard Specification for Unalloyed Tantalum for Surgical Implant Applications.
The subject interbody cages, plates, and bone screws are implants that are single use only. The subject implants are provided sterile by gamma irradiation.
The subject instruments are reusable and provided non-sterile. The subject instruments must be cleaned and sterilized by the hospital.
#### IV. Indications for Use:
The DIVERGENCE-L Anterior/Oblique Lumbar Fusion System Interbody is indicated for interbody fusion in patients with DDD at one or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved levels. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These patients should be skeletally mature and have had six months of non-operative treatment. The DIVERGENCE-L™ cage is also required to be used with autogenous bone graft. These implants may be implanted via a variety of open or minimally invasive approaches. These approaches include anterior and oblique. These devices are intended to be used with supplemental fixation instrumentation, which has been cleared for use in the lumbar spine. Interbody cages with a lordosis of 18° or greater must be used with at least supplemental, anterior fixation.
The DIVERGENCE-L™ Anterior/Oblique Lumbar Fusion plate and bone screws components are indicated as a supplemental fixation device for the lumbosacral level, anterior below the bifurcation (L5-S1) of the vascular structures or anterior oblique above the bifurcation (L1-L5) of the vascular structures. The indications and contraindications of spinal instrumentation systems should be well understood by the surgeon. The plate and bone screw components are indicated for use in the temporary stabilization of the anterior lumbar spine during the development of spinal fusions in patients with: 1) Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) defined by back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and
{7}------------------------------------------------
radiographic studies; 2) trauma (including fractures); 3) tumors; 4) deformity defined as kyphosis, lordosis, or scoliosis; 5) pseudarthrosis; and/or 6) failed previous fusions.
When used together, the DIVERGENCE-LTM Anterior/Oblique Lumbar Fusion System components can be used only to treat patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved levels.
#### V. Comparison of Technological Characteristics
The primary predicate for the DIVERGENCE-L™ Anterior/Oblique Fusion Lumbar System is the PERIMETER® Interbody Fusion Device (K131669, S.E. 11/01/2013)
The subject DIVERGENCE-L™ Anterior/Oblique Fusion Lumbar interbody cages have the same or similar indications, intended use, fundamental scientific technology, and similar materials as the following FDA cleared predicates K131669 (S.E. 11/01/2013), K133650 (S.E. 12/26/2013), K132897 (S.E. 12/11/2013), K120368 (S.E. 04/09/2012), P970015/R022 (Approved 09/10/2003 - Downclassed), K122037 (S.E. 03/22/2013), K100043 (S.E. 06/13/2010), and K123045 (S.E. 04/16/2013).
The subject DIVERGENCE-L™ Anterior/Oblique Fusion Lumbar plates and bone screws have the same intended use, fundamental scientific technology, material, and similar indications as the following FDA cleared predicates K071416 (S.E. 11/01/2007) and K991460 (S.E. 05/19/1999 ).
The DIVERGENCE™ Anterior Cervical Fusion System (K142450 - S.E. 10/01/2014) is a cage and plate system. The DIVERGENCE™ Anterior Cervical Fusion System is not a part of this submission and is only mentioned to show that the subject DIVERGENCE-L™ Anterior/Oblique Fusion System is not the first cage and plate system to be legally marketed.
#### VI. Performance Data
The following performance data are provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination.
## Biocompatibility
The biocompatibility evaluation for the subject DIVERGENCE-L™ Anterior/Oblique Fusion System interbody cages, plates, and bone screws was conducted in accordance with the FDA's Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, Use of International Standard ISO-10993, Biological Evaluation Method Devices Part 1: Evaluation and Testing, issued April 23, 2013.
{8}------------------------------------------------
The subject devices are manufactured from ASTM F2026: Standard Specification for Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Polymers for Surgical Implant Applications, ASTM F136: Standard Specification for Wrought Titanium-6 Aluminum-4 Vanadium ELI Alloy for Surgical Implant Applications, and ASTM F560: Standard Specification for Unalloyed Tantalum for Surgical Implant Applications.
The subject plates, bone screws, and interbody cages are permanent implants and will be classified as "Implant Devices - Tissue/bone - C Permanent (>30 days)" according to FDA's Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, Use of International Standard ISO-10993, Biological Evaluation Method Devices Part 1: Evaluation and Testing, issued April 23, 2013.
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK), titanium alloy, and tantalum have a long history of safe and effective use in predicate spinal implants. Therefore, biocompatibility testing is not required.
The subject trials, inserters, and interbody remover are manufactured from:
- Silicone (Elastosil® liquid silicone rubber) ●
- medical grade stainless steel per ●
- ASTM A564, Standard Specification for Hot-Rolled and Cold-Finished Age-Hardening Stainless Steel Bars and Shapes, or
- ASTM F899, Standard Specification for Wrought Stainless Steel for । Surgical Instruments
The subject instruments are classified as limited, up to 24 hours of body contact according to FDA's Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff: Use of International Standard ISO-10993, Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part 1: Evaluation and Testing, issued April 23, 2013.
The silicone rubber is used to manufacture instrument handles, which are non-patient contacting. Therefore, biocompatibility testing is not required according to FDA's Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff: Use of International Standard ISO-10993, Biological Evaluation Method Devices Part 1: Evaluation and Testing, issued April 23, 2013.
Medical grade stainless steel has a long history of safe and effective use in spinal surgery and biocompatibility testing is not required.
{9}------------------------------------------------
### Mechanical Testing
In accordance with the Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff - Spinal System 510(k)'s, Medtronic has evaluated the subject devices to demonstrate substantial equivalence to the predicate devices.
Design verification testing was completed in accordance with
- ASTM F1717, Standard Test Methods for Spinal Implant Constructs in a Vertebrectomy Model,
- ASTM F2077, Test Methods for Intervertebral Body Fusion Devices -
- ASTM F2267. Standard Test Method for Measuring Load Induced Subsidence – of Intervertebral Body Fusion Device Under Static Axial Compression
- ASTM F-04.25.02.02, Static Push-out Test Method for Intervertebral Body Fusion Devices
The tests completed were:
- Construct Static Compression -
- -Construct Compression Fatigue
- -Construct Static Torsion
- Static Push-Out -
- Static Compression -
- -Static Compression Shear
- Compression-Shear Fatigue -
- -Subsidence
- Expulsion -
The subject devices with pre-determined acceptance criteria met the acceptance criteria for all tests. Expulsion testing for the PERIMETER® Interbody Fusion Device and the DIVERGENCE-L™ Anterior/Oblique Lumbar Fusion 24º lordosis interbody cage were performed as a characterization test and did not include predetermined acceptance criteria.
#### VII. Conclusions
Design verification testing was completed in accordance with ASTM F1717, ASTM F2077, ASTM F2267, and ASTM F-04.25.02.02. Based on the test results and additional supporting information provided in this pre-market notification, Medtronic believes the subject devices demonstrated substantial equivalence to the legally marketed predicate devices.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.