ORTHOLOC 3DI MIDFOOT/FLATFOOT SYSTEM

K121651 · Wrightmedicaltechnologyinc · HRS · Oct 12, 2012 · Orthopedic

Device Facts

Record IDK121651
Device NameORTHOLOC 3DI MIDFOOT/FLATFOOT SYSTEM
ApplicantWrightmedicaltechnologyinc
Product CodeHRS · Orthopedic
Decision DateOct 12, 2012
DecisionSESE
Submission TypeTraditional
Regulation21 CFR 888.3030
Device ClassClass 2
AttributesTherapeutic

Intended Use

The ORTHOLOC™ 3Di Midfoot/Flatfoot System is intended for use in stabilization of fresh fractures, revision procedures, joint fusion and reconstruction of small bones of the feet. Specific examples include: Flatfoot Osteotomies - Lateral column Lengthening (Evans Osteotomy) - Plantar Flexion Opening Wedge Osteotomy of the Medial Cuneiform (Cotton Osteotomy) - Medial Displacement Calcaneal Osteotomy (MDCO) Mid / Hindfoot Fusions - LisFranc Arthrodesis and/or Stabilization - 1st (Lapidus), 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th Tarsometatarsal (TMT) Fusions - Intercuneiform Fusions - Navicular-Cuneiform (NC) Fusion - Talo-Navicular (TN) Fusion - Calcaneo-Cuboid (CC) Fusion - Medial Column Fusion

Device Story

System comprises 23 titanium alloy bone plates in 8 styles; designed for stabilization of fresh fractures, revision procedures, joint fusion, and reconstruction of small foot bones. Plates feature polyaxial locking screw holes (up to 15° off-axis) and optional non-locking compression slots/k-wire holes. Used by orthopedic surgeons in clinical settings. Plates accept 2.7 mm and 3.5 mm ORTHOLOC 3Di locking and non-locking screws. Device provides mechanical stabilization of bone segments to facilitate healing and reconstruction. No software or algorithmic components.

Clinical Evidence

No clinical data provided. Substantial equivalence supported by bench testing, specifically mechanically validated Finite Element Analysis (FEA) and dimensional engineering analysis to compare bending performance against predicate systems.

Technological Characteristics

Titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) per ASTM F136/ISO 5832-3. Polyaxial locking mechanism (up to 15° off-axis). 23 plate variants across 8 styles. Compatible with 2.7 mm and 3.5 mm locking/non-locking screws. Mechanical fixation device.

Indications for Use

Indicated for stabilization of fresh fractures, revision procedures, joint fusion, and reconstruction of small bones of the feet, including specific flatfoot osteotomies and mid/hindfoot fusions.

Regulatory Classification

Identification

Single/multiple component metallic bone fixation appliances and accessories are devices intended to be implanted consisting of one or more metallic components and their metallic fasteners. The devices contain a plate, a nail/plate combination, or a blade/plate combination that are made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, stainless steel, and titanium, that are intended to be held in position with fasteners, such as screws and nails, or bolts, nuts, and washers. These devices are used for fixation of fractures of the proximal or distal end of long bones, such as intracapsular, intertrochanteric, intercervical, supracondylar, or condylar fractures of the femur; for fusion of a joint; or for surgical procedures that involve cutting a bone. The devices may be implanted or attached through the skin so that a pulling force (traction) may be applied to the skeletal system.

Predicate Devices

Reference Devices

Related Devices

Submission Summary (Full Text)

{0}------------------------------------------------ K121651 1/3 # 510(K) SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS OCT 1 2 2012 In accordance with the Food and Drug Administration Rule to implement provisions of the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990 and in conformance with 21 CFR 807.92, this information serves as a Summary of Safety and Effectiveness for the URTHOLOCTM 3Di Midfoot/Flatfoot System. (a)(1). Submitted By: Date: Contact Person: (a)(2). Proprietary Name: Common Name: Classification Name and Reference: Device Product Code, Device Panel: (a)(3). Predicate Device: Wright Medical Technology, Inc. 5677 Airline Road Arlington, TN 38002 June 1, 2012 Leslie Fitch Regulatory Affairs Specialist (901) 867-4120 ORTHOLOC™ 3Di Midfoot/Flatfoot System Bone Plate System 21 CFR 888.3030 - Class II HRS: Orthopedic K061808 - DARCO Locking Bone Plate System K113014 - CLAW II Polyaxial Compression System K100618 - Orthohelix Variable Angle Plates K 100502 - Ascension Plating System K11663 - DePuy A.L.P.S. Total Foot System #### (a)(4). Device Description Wright Medical's ORTHOLOC™ 3Di Midfoot/Flatfoot System is intended for use in stabilization of fresh fractures, revision procedures, joint fusion and reconstruction of bones of the feet and toes. The subject plates are modified from the DARCO Locking Bone Plate System (K061808) or the CLAW II Polyaxial Compression System (K113014). The system contains 23 plates belonging to 1 of 8 plate styles with various sizes and options, each contoured for specific anatomy and designed for specific procedures. All plates feature polyaxial locking screw holes, and some plates have non-locking compression slots and kwire holes. The plates are made from titanium alloy conforming to ASTM F136 or ISO 5832-3 and accept 2.7 mm and 3.5 mm ORTHOLOC™ 3Di locking and ORTHOLOC™ non-locking screws. # (a)(5). Intended Use The ORTHOLOC™ 3Di Midfoot/Flatfoot System is intended for use in stabilization of fresh fractures, revision procedures, joint fusion and reconstruction of small bones of the feet. Specific examples include: {1}------------------------------------------------ K121651\$\frac{2}{3}\$ Flatfoot Osteotomies - · Lateral column Lengthening (Evans Osteotomy) - · Plantar Flexion Opening Wedge Osteotomy of the Medial Cuneiform (Cotton Osteotomy) - · Medial Displacement Calcaneal Osteotomy (MDCO) Mid / Hindfoot Fusions - · LisFranc Arthrodesis and/or Stabilization - · 1ª(Lapidus), 2nd, 3d, 4th, and 5th Tarsometatarsal (TMT) Fusions - · Intercuneiform Fusions - · Navicular-Cuneiform (NC) Fusion - · Talo-Navicular (TN) Fusion - · Calcaneo-Cuboid (CC) Fusion - · Medial Column Fusion The indications statement is similar to the DARCO predicate system's indications for use statement and has been tailored to the intended use of the subject device, which has fewer plates than the DARCO system. The bones of the hand, wrist, ankles, and fingers, and toes included in the predicate indications statement are omitted from the indications for this system, because this system includes only plates designed for midfoot and flatfoot procedures. The indications statement has also been modified to include specific procedures for which the system is designed. The addition of these specific examples of osteotomies and arthrodeses does not alter the intended therapeutic effect of the subject device. Some of these procedures are part of a predicate indications statement, and the others are supported by technologically similar predicates designed and marketed for these procedures. # (a)(6). Technological Characteristics Comparison While many of the technological characteristics are the same for the subject device system and the DARCO predicate system, some design changes have been made. The subject plates have a new polyaxial locking feature that offers locking up to 15° off-axis. The subject's locking feature is similar to the locking feature of the predicate CLAW II and identical to the locking feature for ORTHOLOC™ 3Di Hallux (K120359). The subject plates are made from titanium alloy (Ti6AlaV), while some of the corresponding predicate plates are commercially pure titanium or stainless steel. #### (b)(1). Substantial Equivalence - Non-Clinical Evidence Performance testing shows that no new worst-case plates (in bending) are introduced in this system. Through mechanically validated FEA analysis, the worst-case subject ORTHOLOC™ 3Di Midfoot/Flatfoot plates were found not to represent a new worst-case in bending for any of the eight plate styles evaluated when compared to the most similar DARCO or CLAW II plates. A dimensional engineering analysis was also provided in order to help establish mechanical equivalence. ## (b)(2). Substantial Equivalence - Clinical Evidence N/A #### (b)(3). Substantial Equivalence - Conclusions {2}------------------------------------------------ Image /page/2/Picture/0 description: The image contains a series of alphanumeric characters. The characters 'K121651' are written in a clear, legible font. To the right of these characters, there is a fraction '3/3' written in a smaller font size. The new design characteristics of the subject system do not raise any new types of questions of safety or effectiveness. Performance testing shows that no new worst-case plates (in bending) are introduced in this system. From the evidence submitted in this 510(k) the subject device system can be expected to perform at least as well as the predicate systems. . • {3}------------------------------------------------ Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized caduceus, which is a symbol often associated with medicine and healthcare. The words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA" are arranged in a circular pattern around the caduceus. Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Mail Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002 OCT 12 2012 Wright Medical Technology, Inc. % Ms. Leslie H. Fitch 5677 Airline Road Arlington, TN 38002 . Re: K121651 Trade/Device Name: ORTHOLOC 3Di Midfoot/Flatfoot System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3030 Regulation Name: Single/multiple component metallic bone fixation appliances and accessories Regulatory Class: II Product Code: HRS Dated: September 19, 2012 Received: September 20, 2012 Dear Ms. Fitch: We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading. If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may . publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical {4}------------------------------------------------ Page 2 - Ms. Leslie H. Fitch device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050. If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportalProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance. You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm. Sincerely yours, Sincerely yours, Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Surgical. Orthopedic and Restorative Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health Enclosure {5}------------------------------------------------ # Indications for Use Statement 510(k) Number (if known): Not yet assigned. Device Name: ORTHOLOC™ 3Di Midfoot/Flatfoot System Indications for Use: The ORTHOLOC™ 3Di Midfoot/Flatfoot System is intended for use in stabilization of fresh fractures, revision procedures, joint fusion and reconstruction of small bones of the feet. Specific examples include: Flatfoot Osteotomies - Lateral column Lengthening (Evans Osteotomy) ● - Plantar Flexion Opening Wedge Osteotomy of the Medial Cuneiform (Cotton ● Osteotomy) - Medial Displacement Calcaneal Osteotomy (MDCO) ● Mid / Hindfoot Fusions - LisFranc Arthrodesis and/or Stabilization . - 15(Lapidus), 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th Tarsometatarsal (TMT) Fusions ● - Intercuneiform Fusions . ● - . Navicular-Cuneiform (NC) Fusion - Talo-Navicular (TN) Fusion . - Calcaneo-Cuboid (CC) Fusion ● - Medial Column Fusion Asundi (Division Sign-Off) ﻟﻠﻘ Division of Surgical, Orthopedic, and Restorative Devices K121651 510(k) Number Prescription Use __ X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) AND/OR Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) (PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED) Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Innolitics
510(k) Summary
Decision Summary
Classification Order
Enter a record ID and click Load to view the document.
100%