VIVACIT-E VITAMIN E HIGHLY CROSSLINKED POLYETHYLENE LINERS
K120370 · Zimmer, Inc. · OQG · Jun 4, 2012 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K120370
Device Name
VIVACIT-E VITAMIN E HIGHLY CROSSLINKED POLYETHYLENE LINERS
Applicant
Zimmer, Inc.
Product Code
OQG · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Jun 4, 2012
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3358
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Vivacit-E Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners are neutral and elevated acetabular liners which are intended to mate with either the Continuum or Trilogy IT acetabular shells in total hip arthroplasty. The Vivacit-E Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners are indicated for primary or revision surgery in skeletally mature individuals for rehabilitating hips damaged as a result of noninflammatory degenerative joint disease (NIDJD) or its composite diagnoses of osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, protrusio acetabuli, traumatic arthritis, slipped capital epiphysis, fused hip, fracture of the pelvis, and diastrophic variant. The system is intended for use either with or without bone cement in total hip arthroplasty.
Device Story
Vivacit-E liners are acetabular components for total hip arthroplasty; manufactured from UHMWPE blended with d/l alpha-tocopherol (Vitamin E), compression molded, and crosslinked via electron beam irradiation. Vitamin E acts as an antioxidant to prevent oxidative degradation of the polyethylene. Liners are designed to mate with existing Continuum or Trilogy Integrated Taper (IT) acetabular shells. Used in clinical settings by orthopedic surgeons during primary or revision hip surgery; implanted with or without bone cement. Device provides a bearing surface intended to reduce wear and resist oxidation compared to conventional polyethylene. Clinical benefit derived from improved material longevity and stability in the joint environment.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided. Evidence consists of bench testing and animal studies. Bench testing included mechanical characterization, oxidation index (ASTM F2102), accelerated aging (ASTM F2003), and hip simulator wear testing (ISO 14242-1). Wear testing showed 96% reduction in wear compared to conventional polyethylene and comparable performance to Longevity HXPE. Animal studies (rabbits) evaluated local/systemic inflammatory response and systemic toxicity (ISO 10993) over 3, 6, 13, and 26-week intervals, confirming the material is a non-irritant with no evidence of systemic toxicity.
Technological Characteristics
Material: UHMWPE blended with d/l alpha-tocopherol, compression molded, electron beam crosslinked. Standards: ASTM D638 (tensile), ASTM F648 (Izod impact), ASTM F2003 (accelerated aging), ASTM F2102 (oxidation index), ISO 14242-1 (wear), ISO 10993 (biocompatibility). Form factor: Neutral and elevated acetabular liners. Connectivity: None (mechanical implant). Sterilization: Ethylene oxide.
Indications for Use
Indicated for primary or revision total hip arthroplasty in skeletally mature individuals with noninflammatory degenerative joint disease (NIDJD), including osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, protrusio acetabuli, traumatic arthritis, slipped capital epiphysis, fused hip, pelvic fracture, and diastrophic variant.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A hip joint metal/polymer/metal semi-constrained porous-coated uncemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a hip joint. The device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across the joint. This generic type of device has a femoral component made of a cobalt-chromium-molybdenum (Co-Cr-Mo) alloy or a titanium-aluminum-vanadium (Ti-6Al-4V) alloy and an acetabular component composed of an ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene articulating bearing surface fixed in a metal shell made of Co-Cr-Mo or Ti-6Al-4V. The femoral stem and acetabular shell have a porous coating made of, in the case of Co-Cr-Mo substrates, beads of the same alloy, and in the case of Ti-6Al-4V substrates, fibers of commercially pure titanium or Ti-6Al-4V alloy. The porous coating has a volume porosity between 30 and 70 percent, an average pore size between 100 and 1,000 microns, interconnecting porosity, and a porous coating thickness between 500 and 1,500 microns. The generic type of device has a design to achieve biological fixation to bone without the use of bone cement.
Predicate Devices
Continuum and Trilogy Integrated Taper (IT) Acetabular Systems (K091508)
Longevity IT Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Elevated Liners (K093846)
Continuum and Trilogy Integrated Taper (IT) Acetabular Systems and Longevity IT Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Elevated Liners (K101229)
Continuum and Trilogy Integrated Taper (IT) Acetabular Systems and Longevity IT Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Elevated Liners (K103662)
Trilogy Acetabular System Longevity Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners (K990135)
{0}------------------------------------------------
K120370
Image /page/0/Picture/2 description: The image shows the logo for Zimmer Biomet. The logo consists of a stylized letter "Z" inside a circle, with the word "zimmer" written in lowercase letters below it. The logo is black and white and has a simple, modern design.
P.O. Box 708 Warsaw, IN 46581-0708 574 267-6131
## Summary of Safety and Effectiveness
Sponsor:
Contact Person:
Date:
Trade Name:
Common Name:
Classification Name and Reference:
Zimmer, Inc. P.O. Box 708 Warsaw, IN 46581-0708
Rebecca M. Brooks, Sr. Specialist, Regulatory Affairs Telephone: (574) 371-8033 Fax: (574) 372-4605
May 30, 2012
Vivacit-E® Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners
Total Hip Prosthesis
LPH - Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-constrained, metal/polymer, porous, uncemented; 21 CFR 888.3358
JDI - Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-constrained, metal/polymer, cemented; 21 CFR 888.3350
LZO - Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented; 21 CFR 888.3353
OQG - Hip Prosthesis, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer, + Additive, Porous, Uncemented; 21 CFR 888.3358
OOH - Hip. Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer + Additive, Cemented; 21 CFR 888.3350
OOI - Hip, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer + Additive, Porous Uncemented; 21 CFR 888.3353
{1}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 May 30, 2012
Predicate Device:
Device Description:
Intended Use:
Continuum and Trilogy Integrated Taper (IT) Acetabular Systems, manufactured by Zimmer, Inc. (K091508)
Longevity IT Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Elevated Liners, manufactured by Zimmer, Inc. (K093846)
Continuum and Trilogy Integrated Taper (IT) Acetabular Systems and Longevity IT Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Elevated Liners, manufactured by Zimmer, Inc. (K101229)
Continuum and Trilogy Integrated Taper (IT) Acetabular Systems and Longevity IT Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Elevated Liners, manufactured by Zimmer, Inc. (K103662)
Trilogy Acetabular System Longevity Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners manufactured by Zimmer, Inc. (K990135)
El Antioxidant Infused Technology, manufactured by Biomet Manufacturing Corp. (K100048)
The Vivacit-E Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners are neutral and elevated acetabular liners which are intended to mate with either the Continuum or Trilogy IT acetabular shells in total hip arthroplasty.
The Vivacit-E Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners are indicated for primary or revision surgery in skeletally mature individuals for rehabilitating hips damaged as a result of noninflammatory degenerative joint disease (NIDJD) or its composite diagnoses of osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, protrusio acetabuli, traumatic arthritis, slipped capital epiphysis, fused hip, fracture of the pelvis, and diastrophic variant.
The system is intended for use either with or without bone cement in total hip arthroplasty.
2 of 11
12
{2}------------------------------------------------
Page 3 May 30, 2012
## Comparison to Predicate Device:
The Vivacit-E Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners are packaged, manufactured, and sterilized using equivalent materials and processes as their predicates. The subject device also has the same intended use as the predicate device.
The subject devices are designed to have the same geometry as the predicate Longevity IT Neutral and Elevated liners.
The following non-clinical laboratory testing was performed to determine substantial equivalence: mechanical material characterization (tensile, small punch, Izod Impact, Crack Propagation), physical and chemical characterization (Oxidation Index, Compressive Modulus, Poisson's Ratio, Surface Roughness, Density, Onset Melting Temperature, Peak Melting Temperature, Degree of Crystallinity, Crosslink Density, Swell Ratio, Molecular Weight, Lamallae Thickness. Free Radical concentration. Vitamin E Consolidation, Vitamin E Elution and Extraction, Trans-vinylene Index), biocompatibility (cvtoxicity, systemic toxicity, bacterial reverse mutation, genotoxicity, peripheral blood micronucleus, intracutaneous reactivity, guinea pig maximization sensitization, muscle implantation, acute systemic toxicity, subchronic toxicity, chronic toxicity, and biological response to wear debris studies), wear testing under normal and abrasive conditions, liner push-out, lever-out, and torque-out resistance, fit condition assessment, compatibility in the MR Environment, locking mechanism durability assessment, pendulum frictional torque tests under normal and abrasive conditions, delamination assessment, anatomic fatigue, and subluxed loading fatigue.
Testing was conducted on the subject devices and compared to legally marketed devices. Additionally, evaluations of the device design and geometry were performed. The Vivacit-E Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners functioned as intended and met the performance requirements,
Performance Data (Nonclinical and/or Clinical):
್ನಿ
{3}------------------------------------------------
K120390
Page 4 May 30, 2012
> thus demonstrating that the Vivacit-E Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners are as safe and effective as the predicate device. These analyses and testing data forms the basis for the determination of substantial equivalence.
#### Claims:
## Claim 1:
Vivacit-E Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene is formulated with antioxidant protection that prevents oxidation degradation of polyethylene.
Vivacit-E Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene (UHMWPE resin blended with d/i alpha tocopherol, compression molded, crosslinked with electron beam irradiation) tensile (ASTM D638), izod impact (ASTM F648, Annex A1), and oxidation index (ASTM F2102) samples were tested in the non-aged condition as well as at various intervals up to 24 weeks of accelerated aging according to ASTM F2003. The Vivacit-E Vitamin E HXPE material showed no significant change in tensile or izod properties and no detectable oxidation (oxidation indices < 0.01) at any aging interval up to 24 weeks. The standard accelerated aging cycle per ASTM F2003 is an aggressive aging method. where samples are subjected to 100% oxygen, 73 psi, and 70℃ for two weeks in order to force oxygen into the material in an attempt to elicit an oxidative response. Vivacit-E Vitamin E HXPE samples showed no statistically significant difference in ultimate tensile strength (p=0.63), elongation (p=0.61), and izod impact (p=0.47) after aging for 12 times the standard accelerated aging method. Greater than 96% retention of mechanical properties was seen when comparing non-aged to 24-week aged samples, indicating no significant change in mechanical properties after aging.
Additionally, the Vivacit-E Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene (UHMWPE resin blended with d/l alpha tocopherol, compression molded, crosslinked with electron beam irradiation) material was subjected to cyclic loading in an oxidative environment. A 0.5 Hz, 10 MPa bending stress was applied at 80°C in an air atmosphere for 5 weeks The Vivacit-E material showed no evidence of cracking and negligible (~1.5Mc). oxidation (oxidation indices <0.05) in the loaded and unloaded samples when tested according to ASTM F2102. Bench testing is not necessarily indicative of clinical performance.
## Claim 2:
# Vivacit-E Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene showed no measurable oxidation during accelerated aging testing per ASTM F2003.
Vivacit-E Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene was manufactured by blending UHMWPE with d/1 alpha tocopherol, compression molding, and crosslinking with electron beam irradiation. Both non-aged samples that were accelerated aged according to ASTM F2003 at 70℃, 73 psi, and 100% oxygen at various aging intervals up to 24 weeks were tested for oxidation index (ASTM F2102) and oxidative
p 4 of 11
\$
{4}------------------------------------------------
K120370
Page 5 May 30, 2012
> induction time (ASTM D3895). Conventional GUR 1050 gamma sterilized samples were used as controls. The oxidative induction time is an assessment of how long it takes a material to oxidize at a high temperature. The standard accelerated aging cycle per ASTM F2003 lasts two weeks and is an aggressive aging method, where oxygen is forced into the material in an attempt to elicit an oxidative response. After aging 12 times the standard method, the Vivacit-E Vitamin E HXPE samples showed no detectable oxidation (oxidation indices <0.01) and oxidative induction times that were > 8.0 minutes. After 2 weeks of aging, the conventional GUR 1050 samples showed detectable oxidation with an OI greater than 0.5 and oxidative induction times that were less than 1.0 minute. After 4 weeks aging, the conventional GUR 1050 samples showed oxidation indices greater than 3 and oxidation induction time could not be measured due to the brittleness of the material. The oxidative induction times and oxidation indices after accelerated aging for 24 weeks indicate that the presence of Vitamin E in the Vivacit-E Vitamin E HXPE material actively and continuously prevents oxidation of the material after an extreme oxidative challenge. Bench testing is not necessarily indicative of clinical performance.
## Claim 3:
# Vivacit-E Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene retains mechanical strength after accelerated aging.
Vivacit-E Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene (UHMWPE resin blended with d/l alpha tocopherol, compression molded, crosslinked with electron beam irradiation) tensile (ASTM D638) and izod impact (ASTM F648, Annex Al) specimens were tested in the non-aged condition and at various aging intervals up to 24 weeks. Accelerated aging was performed according to ASTM F2003 in 100% oxygen at 73 psi and 70°C. The accelerated aging interval according to ASTM F2003 is two weeks and is an aggressive aging mechanism that attempts to force oxygen into the material to elicit an oxidative response. Once the oxidation process reaches a critical level, it can lead to a decline in mechanical properties. Vitamin E HXPE material showed no statistically significant difference in ultimate tensile strength (p=0.63), elongation (p=0.61), and izod impact (p=0.47) after aging for 12 times the standard accelerated aging method. Greater than 96% retention of mechanical properties was seen when comparing non-aged to 24-week aged Vivacit-E Vitamin E HXPE samples, indicating no significant change in properties after aging. Bench testing is not necessarily indicative of clinical performance.
## Claim 4:
# Vitamin E does not elute from Vivacit-E Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene.
Several exhaustive solvent extractions for up to 3 days were conducted on Vivacit-E Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene (UHMWPE resin blended with d/1 alpha tocopherol, compression molded, crosslinked with electron beam irradiation). Solvents included boiling hexane for three days, and isopropanol at room temperature for three
5 of 12
{5}------------------------------------------------
K120370
Page 6 May 30, 2012
> days. Fourier transform infrared with detection limits of 100 ppm, gas chromatographymass spectroscopy (GC-MS) with detection limits of 10 ppm and liquid chromatographymass spectroscopy (LC-MS) analysis with detection limits of 10 ppm were used to quantify and identify the extraction residues. The various techniques showed that residue quantities removed from the Vivacit-E material were comparable to a non-Vitamin E predicate material. The FTIR spectral analysis of the residues indicated a strong correlation to aliphatic hydrocarbons and any trace amounts of Vitamin E related peaks were within the noise of the instrument.
> The Vitamin E blended into UHMWPE material does not elute from the Vivacit-E Vitamin E HXPE material after a 24 week exposure to an aqueous environment. The Vivacit-E Vitamin E HXPE material was machined into acetabular liners. The Vivacit-E Vitamin E HXPE liners were immersed in 40°C de-ionized water for up to a 24 week exposure time. The liners were removed after immersion for 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks. A sample of the de-ionized water solution was taken at every time interval and measured by UV-Vis for Vitamin E. The Vitamin E levels in the aqueous solution were below detectable limits of UV-Vis. Vitamin E Index and Oxidation Index (ASTM F 2102) were also measured on the liners at each time interval. All results showed no change in Vitamin E Index or Oxidation Index after a 24 week exposure.
> The Vitamin E blended into UHMWPE material does not elute from the Vitamin E HXPE material under compressive loading conditions. The pressure induced leaching study was based on the work presented by Okubo et al. "Confirmation of Pressure-Induced Leaching of Vitamin E from inside of Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene" J. Biomech. Sci. and Eng., 5, 154 (2010). Thin films (100 micron thick) were cut from Vivacit-E Vitamin E HXPE molded blocks. A vertical compressive load was applied to the film with a metal cylindrical rod. The load conditions were set at two different loads of 150 N and 1500 N for one minute which results in 3 MPa and 30 MPa of contact stress. The transfer film was removed with ethanol and analyzed by fluorescence spectroscopy. The Vitamin E levels under the pressure-induced leaching conditions were below the detection limits of fluorescence spectroscopy. Bench testing is not necessarily indicative of clinical performance.
#### Claim 5:
.
# Vivacit-E Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene resists cracking and oxidation when subjected to environmental stress cracking.
The Vivacit-E Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene (UHMWPE resin blended with d/1 alpha tocopherol, compression molded, crosslinked with electron beam irradiation) material was subjected to cyclic loading in an oxidative environment. A 0.5 Hz, 10 MPa bending stress was applied at 80℃ in an air atmosphere for 5 weeks The Vivacit-E material showed no evidence of cracking and negligible (~1.5Mc). oxidation (oxidation indices <0.05) in the loaded and unloaded samples when tested according to ASTM F2102. Bench testing is not necessarily indicative of clinical performance.
p. 6 of 11
发
{6}------------------------------------------------
K120370
Page 7 May 30, 2012
## Claim 6:
# Vivacit-E Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene retains wear properties after extended aging.
A test of Vivacit-E Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene was conducted comparing in-vitro wear of the material after 2 weeks of accelerated aging in an aging bomb at 70°C, 73 psi, and 100% oxygen according to ASTM F2003. Vivacit-E Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene was prepared by blending UHMWPE flake with d/l alpha-tocopherol, compression molded, crosslinked with e-beam irradiation and Wear testing was carried out in a 12-station AMTI sterilized with ethylene oxide. (Watertown, MA) hip simulator in accordance with ISO-14242-1 for 5 million cycles at a frequency of 1.0±0.1 Hz. A 32 mm CoCr femoral head mated with a 48mm x 32mm Vivacit-E neutral liner (4.7mm thickness) and a 48mm x 32mm Trilogy conventional neutral liner (4.9mm thickness) was utilized for the testing. All samples were submersed in bovine calf serum diluted with deionized water to a protein content of 30 g/l. 3 g/l sodium azide and 7.9 g/l disodium EDTA was also added to deter al growth and to prevent precipitation of naturally occurring compounds. The average weight loss (mg) was determined gravimetrically and load soak controls (samples that were submersed in the lubricant and placed under the same loading profile, but no articular motions) were used to correct for the fluid absorption properties of the polyethylene components. After 5 million cycles, the volumetric wear rates (weight loss rate divided by the material density, mm3/Mc) of the 2 week aged (1.96+0.34 mm3/Mc) and 6 week aged (1.50±0.32 mm /Mc) Vivacit-E Vitamin E HXPE liners were not statistically different from each other (p=0.064); thus indicating that Vivacit-E Vitamin E HXPE retains wear properties after extended aging. The results of in-vitro hip wear simulator tests have not been shown to quantitatively predict clinical wear performance.
## Claim 7:
# Vivacit-E Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene has wear properties which are comparable to Longevity Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene.
In-vitro wear testing was undertaken to evaluate the wear performance of Vivacit-E Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene liners in comparison to Longevity IT liners. Vivacit-E Vitamin E HXPE was prepared by blending UHMWPE flake with d/1 alphatocopherol, compression molding, crosslinking with e-beam irradiation and sterilizing with ethylene oxide. The largest articulation size (56mm x 40mm acetabular liner (4.7mm thickness) mated with a 40mm CoCr femoral head and 56mm uni-hole Continuum acetabular shell) of the Vivacit-E Vitamin E and Longevity IT HXPE liners was chosen as it constitutes the worst case size for wear. Both Vivacit-E and Longevity were accelerated aged for 2 weeks prior to evaluation at 70℃, 73 psi, and 100% oxygen according to ASTM F2003. All liners were tested in a 12-station AMTI (Watertown, MA) hip simulator in accordance with ISO-14242-1 for 5 million cycles at a frequency of 1.0±0.1Hz. All samples were submersed in bovine calf serum diluted with deionized water to a protein content of 30 g/l. 3 g/l sodium azide and 7.9 g/l disodium EDTA was also added to deter bacterial growth and to prevent precipitation of naturally occurring
દિક
{7}------------------------------------------------
# Page 8 May 30, 2012
compounds. The average weight loss (mg) was determined gravimetrically and load-soak controls (samples that were submersed in the lubricant and placed under the same loading profile, but no articular motions) were used to correct for the fluid absorption properties of the polyethylene components. The wear rates (weight loss rate divided by the material density based off a linear best fit line to the data, mm3/Mc) exhibited by the Vivacit-E and Longevity material, 1.02±0.39 mm²/Mc and 1.56±0.33 mm²/Mc respectively, were not statistically different from each other (p=0.165). The results of in-vitro hip wear simulator tests have not been shown to quantitatively predict clinical wear performance.
## Claim 8:
# Vivacit-E Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene showed a 96% reduction in wear over Conventional Polyethylene.
In-vitro wear testing was undertaken to evaluate the reduction in wear of Vivacit-E Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene over Conventional Polyethylene. Vivacit-E Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene was prepared by blending UHMWPE flake with d/l alpha-tocopherol, compression molding, crosslinking with e-beam irradiation and sterilizing with ethylene oxide. The Conventional Polyethylene material tested was compression molded, gamma sterilized UHMWPE. 40mm articulation size Vivacit-E Vitamin E HXPE (average of best and worst case formulation) liners (56mm x 40mm neutral liners (4.7mm thickness) mated with a 40mm CoCr femoral heads) and 32mm articulation sized Conventional Polyethylene liners (48mm x 32mm conventional neutral liners (4.9mm thickness) mated with 32mm CoCr femoral heads) were tested in a 12station AMTI (Watertown, MA) hip simulator in accordance with ISO-14242-1 for 5 million cycles (Mc) at a frequency of 1.0±0.1Hz. All samples were submersed in bovine calf serum diluted with deionized water to a protein content of 30 g/l sodium azide and 7.9 g/l disodium EDTA was also added to deter bacterial growth and to prevent precipitation of naturally occurring compounds. The average weight loss (mg) was determined gravimetrically and load soak controls (samples that were submersed in the lubricant and placed under the same loading profile, but no articular motions) were used to correct for the fluid absorption properties of the polyethylene components. Both materials were accelerated aged for 2 weeks in an aging bomb at 70°C, 73 psi, and 100% oxygen according to ASTM F2003 prior to testing. The average volumetric wear rates (mm /Mc) calculated after 5 million cycles showed that the 40mm Vivacit-E Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene liners displayed a 96% reduction in wear compared to the 32mm Conventional Polyethylene components. The results of in-vitro hip wear simulator tests have not been shown to quantitatively predict clinical wear performance.
{8}------------------------------------------------
K120370
Page 9 May 30, 2012
## Claim 9:
Vivacit-E Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene and Longevity Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene wear particles elicited comparable local and systemic inflammatory responses in rabbits.
A study was conducted to evaluate the effects of Vivacit-E Vitamin E HXPE wear debris in the knee following percutaneous injection at 3 and 6 month time intervals. The testing was performed on healthy white rabbits. Particles of crosslinked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) material suspended in 67% Buffered Blood Bank Saline (BBBS) and 33% ethanol were used as the control article to compare to a high and low dose particle count of Vivacit-E Vitamin E HXPE suspended in BBBS. The Vivacit-E Vitamin E HXPE particles were generated using both wear simulators and mechanical grinders from UHMWPE resin blended with d/l alpha tocopherol, compression molded, and crosslinked with electron beam irradiation. Sterile, injection ready suspensions of particles from each test material were prepared. Physiologically relevant, in both size and quantity, particle suspensions were prepared based on published in-vivo clinical retrieval studies and normalized for rabbit body weight and joint size. On the day of dosing, approximately 150 uL of each of the four article suspensions (UHMWPE control, vehicle control (33.3% ethanol+BBBS), high dose Vivacit-E HXPE, and low dose Vivacit-E HXPE were injected into the lateral-anterior aspect of the right and left hind knee joint of rabbits. Blood samples were taken just prior to euthanizing the animals at both time interval endpoints of 3 and 6 months. The knee joint was dissected free and removed in toto as well as the popliteal lymph nodes, inguinal lymph nodes, spleen and liver. Under the conditions of this study, local and systemic inflammatory response was similar for both the Vivacit-E HXPE and UHMWPE control following intraarticular iniection in rabbits for 3 and 6 months duration. Additionally, the Vivacit-E HXPE did not cause systemic toxicity in this study. Microscopically, the test articles were classified as a nonirritant as compared to the vehicle and the UHMWPE control article at the 3 and 6 month termination intervals. Animal testing is not necessarily indicative of clinical performance.
#### Claim 10:
## Vivacit-E Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene is classified as a non-irritant as compared to the control under the conditions of a muscle implantation study.
Intramuscular implant testing was performed per ISO 10993 on healthy white rabbits at both 2 week and 12 week time periods. Four Vivacit-E Vitamin E HXPE sites and four HDPE sites were implanted for each rabbit at each time interval. The surgical sites were closed and the animals were observed daily for either 2 weeks or 12 weeks. A veterinary pathologist microscopically evaluated the H&E stained tissue sections of each implant site and concluded the macroscopic reaction was not significant as compared to the negative control article at both time intervals. The average irritant scores for HDPE and Vivacit-E Vitamin E HXPE were 7.0 and 7.0 respectively at 2 weeks and 3.7 and 3.0 respectively at 12 weeks. The Irritant Ranking Score is defined as: Test Group Average
\$\beta_r\$ q. \$\sigma\$ LI
48
{9}------------------------------------------------
K120370
Page 10 May 30, 2012
> - Control Group Average. For the two week interval, 7.0 - 7.0 = 0 and for the twelve week interval, 3.0 - 3.7 = 0 (-. 7). According to the interpretation of the Irritant Ranking Score, a non-irritant is classified as having a range of 0.0 - 2.9. Therefore, with Irritant Ranking Scores of 0.0 and -0.7, Vivacit-E Vitamin E HXPE is classified as a non-irritant. Animal testing is not necessarily indicative of clinical performance.
## Claim 11:
# Vivacit-E Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene did not elicit systemic toxicity in the mammalian animal model as compared to the control.
#### Acute systemic toxicity testing was performed per ISO 10993 on healthy adult mice.
The Vivacit-E Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene (UHMWPE resin blended with d/l alpha tocopherol and compression molded) material was extracted in both a polar and non-polar solvent. The study used a control blank of extraction vehicle without the test article. A single dose of either test article extract or control blank was injected into each animal. Animals were observed for any adverse clinical reactions immediately after injection and then again at 4, 24, 48, and 72 hours after injection. The animals were weighed daily after dosing. There was no mortality or evidence of systemic toxicity from the extracts and the Vivacit-E Vitamin E HXPE extracts met the requirements of the study.
# Subchronic systemic toxicity testing was performed per ISO 10993 on healthy adult male and female rats.
A USP high density polyethylene (HDPE) reference standard material was used as the control article to compare to Vivacit-E Vitamin E HXPE. The Vivacit-E Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene (UHMWPE resin blended with d/l alpha tocopherol and compression molded) material and HDPE reference material were surgically implanted in the subcutaneous tissue of the rat. Detailed examinations for clinical signs of disease or abnormality were conducted at pretreatment and weekly thereafter. Body weights of the test subjects were recorded at pretreatment, weekly, and the day prior to termination (prefasted weight) and the day of termination (fasted weight). At 13 weeks, blood samples were taken from each rat for hematology and clinical chemistry analyses. The animals were then euthanized, each implant was excised, and tissue samples were collected, weighed, and preserved. There was no evidence of systemic toxicity from the Vivacit-E Vitamin E HXPE following subcutaneous implantation in the rat for 13 weeks. The local macroscopic tissue reaction was not significant compared to the control article. Macroscopically, the Vivacit-E Vitamin E HXPE was classified as a non-irritant as compared to the control article.
# Chronic systemic toxicity testing was performed per ISO 10993 on healthy adult male and female rats.
A USP high density polyethylene (HDPE) reference standard material was used as the control article to compare to Vivacit-E Vitamin E HXPE. The Vivacit-E Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene (UHMWPE resin blended with d/l alpha tocopherol and compression molded) material and HDPE reference material were surgically implanted in
p. 10 of 11
{10}------------------------------------------------
K120370
Page 11 May 30, 2012
> the subcutaneous tissue of the rat. Detailed examinations for clinical signs of disease or abnormality were conducted at pretreatment and weekly thereafter. Body weights of the test subjects were recorded at pretreatment, weekly, and the day prior to termination (prefasted weight) and the day of termination (fasted weight). At 26 weeks, blood samples were taken from each rat for hematology and clinical chemistry analyses. The animals were then euthanized, each implant was excised, and tissue samples were collected, weighed, and preserved. Macroscopic and microscopic findings showed no evidence of systemic toxicity from the Vivacit-E Vitamin E HXPE following subcutaneous implantation in the rat for 26 weeks. Macroscopic evaluation of the implantation sites showed no irritation in both the Vivacit-E Vitamin E HXPE and control materials. The local macroscopic tissue reaction was not significant compared to the control article. Microscopic evaluation of the subcutaneous tissue from the implantation site was found that the tissue response to Vivacit-E Vitamin E HXPE was comparable to that of the control material. The study classified Vivacit-E Vitamin E HXPE as a non-irritant as compared to the control article. Animal testing is not necessarily indicative of clinical performance.
{11}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/11/Picture/0 description: The image shows the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES" in all caps. The text is in a bold, sans-serif font. The text is black and the background is white.
Public Health Service
JUN - 4 2012
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room -WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Zimmer, Inc. c/o Rebecca Brook Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist 1800 West Center Street Warsaw, Indiana 46580
Re: K120370
Trade/Device Name: Vivacit-E Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Liners Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3358 Regulation Name: Hip Joint metal/polymer/metal semi-constrained porous-coated uncemented prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OQG, OQH, OQI, LPH, JDI, LZO Dated: May 8, 2012 Received: May 9, 2012
Dear Ms. Brook:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical
Image /page/11/Picture/11 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized depiction of an eagle or bird-like figure with outstretched wings. The bird is positioned to the right of the text, which is arranged in a circular pattern around the logo. The text reads "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA".
{12}------------------------------------------------
device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.goy/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Sincerely yours,
Mark N. Melkerson
Director Division of Surgical, Orthopedic and Restorative Device Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{13}------------------------------------------------
K120370
# Indications for Use
# 510(k) Number (if known): ├ (20370
Device Name:
Vivacit-E™ Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners
Indications for Use:
The system is indicated for primary or revision surgery in skeletally mature individuals for rehabilitating hips damaged as a result of noninflammatory degenerative joint disease (NIDJD) or its composite diagnoses of osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, protrusio acetabuli, traumatic arthritis, slipped capital epiphysis, fused hip, fracture of the pelvis, and diastrophic variant.
The system is intended for use either with or without bone cement in total hip arthroplasty.
Prescription Use _X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
(Please do not write below this line - Continue on another page if needed)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
B.P. Pinder Jr.
(Division Sign-Oft) Division of Surgical, Orthopedic, and Restorative Devices
Page 1 of 1
510(k) Number K120370
ﻟﻠﻤﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.