ATRICLIP LAA EXCLUSION SYSTEM WITH PRELOADED GILLINOV-COSGROVE CLIP, GILLINOV-COSGROVE SECTION GUIDE MODEL VARIOUS LAA0
K093679 · AtriCure, Inc. · FZP · Jun 10, 2010 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K093679
Device Name
ATRICLIP LAA EXCLUSION SYSTEM WITH PRELOADED GILLINOV-COSGROVE CLIP, GILLINOV-COSGROVE SECTION GUIDE MODEL VARIOUS LAA0
Applicant
AtriCure, Inc.
Product Code
FZP · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Jun 10, 2010
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.4300
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The AtriClip LAA Exclusion System is indicated for the occlusion of the left atrial appendage, under direct visualization, in conjunction with other open cardiac surgical procedures.
Device Story
AtriClip LAA Exclusion System is a sterile, single-use, implantable device designed for permanent occlusion of the left atrial appendage (LAA). The system comprises a self-closing clip preloaded on a disposable applier and a selection guide. The clip features a frame assembly of two springs connecting opposing tubes covered with pressure pads and a knit fabric. During open cardiac surgery, a physician uses the applier to position the clip over the LAA; pulling a thumb lever opens the clip, while releasing it allows the clip to close, applying uniform pressure to ensure secure occlusion. The device is used in an OR setting by cardiac surgeons. By providing consistent, reproducible LAA closure, the device aims to reduce the risk of thromboembolic events associated with the LAA. Clinical performance is verified intra-operatively and via follow-up imaging.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical study of 70 subjects evaluated safety and efficacy. Primary safety endpoint event rate was 0%. Efficacy demonstrated via LAA exclusion rates: 95.1% composite (intra-operative and 3-month) and 98% at 3-month follow-up. No events linked to device or procedure per independent physician adjudication. Non-clinical testing included acute and chronic animal models (7 to 90 days) confirming complete appendage exclusion with no adverse events.
Technological Characteristics
Implantable clip with frame assembly (two springs, opposing tubes, pressure pads, knit fabric). Available in 35mm, 40mm, 45mm, and 50mm lengths. Biocompatibility tested per ISO 10993-1. Mechanical actuation via thumb lever on disposable applier. Sterile, single-use.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients undergoing open cardiac surgical procedures requiring occlusion of the left atrial appendage (LAA) under direct visualization.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An implantable clip is a clip-like device intended to connect internal tissues to aid healing. It is not absorbable.
Predicate Devices
Weck Hem-O-Lok® Ligating Clip and Clip Applier (K030311)
Power Medical SurgASSIST® Straight Linear 4 Row No Knife DLUs with Reloads (K040398)
Demetech Braided Nonabsorbable Polyester Suture and needle driver (K023030)
Gore SEAMGUARD® Bioabsorbable Staple Line Reinforcement Material (K043056)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the word "AtriCure" in a stylized font. The letters "A," "t," "r," and "i" are in a bold, sans-serif font, while the "Cure" portion of the word is outlined. There is a solid black circle inside the "C" of "Cure." The "e" in "Cure" has a small trademark symbol next to it.
KC093679
ﯿﻨﮧ ﮨ
## 510(k) Summary
# JUN 1 0 2010
#### General Information
| Classification | Class 2 |
|---------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Trade name | AtriClip LAA Exclusion System with preloaded Gillinov-Cosgrove Clip |
| Common name | Implantable Clip |
| Classification Name | Clip, Implantable (21 CFR 878.4300, Product Code FZP) |
| Manufacturer | AtriCure, Inc.<br>6217 Centre Park Dr.<br>West Chester, OH 45069<br>P: 513-755-4100<br>F: 513-755-4108 |
| Contact | James Lucky, RAC<br>Vice President Quality Assurance and Regulatory Affairs |
| Date of Submission | November 27, 2009 |
#### Intended Use
The AtriClip LAA Exclusion System is indicated for the left atrial appendage, under direct visualization, in conjunction with other open cardiac surgical procedures.
#### Predicate Devices
The predicate devices for the AtriClip LAA Exclusion System are the Weck Hem-O-Lok® Ligating Clip and Clip Applier (K030311), Medtronic VNUS U-Clip and Applier (K031623), Tyco AutoSuture TA and GIA Staplers (K032696), Power Medical SurgASSIST® Straight Linear 4 Row No Knife DLUs with Reloads (K040398), Demetech Braided Nonabsorbable Polyester Suture and needle driver (K023030) and Gore SEAMGUARD® Bioabsorbable Staple Line Reinforcement Material (K043056).
#### Device Description
The AtriClip LAA Exclusion System consists of a single use, sterile, self-closing, implantable Clip preloaded on a Single Use Clip Applier, and a Selection Guide to aid in appropriate Clip size selection. The frame assembly of the implantable Clip consists of two springs connecting two opposing tubes which are covered with pressure pads. This assembly is covered with a knit fabric. When closed, the Clip applies uniform pressure over the length of the Clip to ensure consistent, reproducible, and secure occlusion of the left atrial appendage (LAA).
{1}------------------------------------------------
The Clip is available in the following lengths to accommodate different sizes of LAA: 35 mm, 40 mm, 45 mm, and 50 mm.
The Clip Applier is a disposable device with a handle, shaft, and an end effector which contains the Clip. Both sides of the Clip are free to move within the end effector when activated. Pulling the thumb lever proximally opens the Clip. The bias of the Clip allows both the clip and the lever to return to the closed position when the lever is released.
#### Materials
All materials in the AtriClip LAA Exclusion System are suitable for their intended use and have been used in previously cleared products. Testing was conducted in accordance with ISO 10993-1 to ensure appropriate biocompatibility of all materials.
#### Predicate Comparison
The technological characteristics of the device are the same as the predicate devices. The same materials are used in the AtriClip and predicate devices. The sizes of the devices are equivalent and are provided in similar ranges. The method of LAA closure, permanent approximation of the sides of the LAA, is the same for the AtriClip and the predicates. All of the devices may be repositioned on the LAA prior to deployment and once deployed exert similar pressures on the tissue.
#### Non-Clinical Testing
The AtriClip was tested on in both acute and chronic models ranging from 7 days to 90 days Testing presented in the 510(k) document demonstrated complete appendage duration. exclusion both acutely and long-term in all animals with no adverse events attributed to the Clip device. Post-implant verification of efficacy confirmed there was no communication between the LAA and left atrium in all animals.
#### Clinical Testing
The AtriClip has been evaluated for safety and efficacy in a controlled clinical study of seventy subjects. The results of the study demonstrate the excellent performance of the product in its ability to exclude the LAA in a safe and efficient manner. Efficacy has been demonstrated at a very high rate intra-procedurally and this rate has been shown to improve as further healing was achieved. The observed exclusion rate of 95.1% composite (both intra-operative and 3 month) and 98% at 3 month follow-up support that this procedure can achieve excellent efficacy results.
The safety of the device and procedure has been well established through a careful scrutiny of all events reported in the study. Independent physician adjudication has demonstrated that there were no events that were in any way linked to the device or the procedure. The primary safety endpoint event rate in this trial is 0%. These results confirm the safety of the product and the procedure. The results further support the technical comparability of the product to other currently marketed options for LAA exclusion and therefore provides the clinical support to demonstrate a substantial equivalence of the AtriClip to the identified predicate devices.
{2}------------------------------------------------
# AtriCure®
#### Summary of Substantial Equivalence
As demonstrated by the predicate comparison of technological characteristics, data provided in the non-clinical studies and clinical testing, the AtriClip LAA Exclusion System is equivalent to the predicate products. The data presented in K093679 demonstrate that the device is as safe, as effective and performs as well as or better than the predicate device.
.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized eagle-like bird with its wings spread, positioned to the right of a circular inscription. The inscription reads "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA" in a circular arrangement around the bird. The logo is presented in black and white.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room W-O66-0609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
JUN 1 0 2010
AtriCure, Inc. c/o Mr. James Lucky Vice President of Quality Assurance and Regulatory Affairs 6217 Centre Park Drive West Chester, OH 45069
Re: K093679
AtriClip™ LAA Exclusion System w/Pre-loaded Gillnov-Cosgrove™ Clip Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4300 Regulation Name: Implantable Clip Regulatory Class: II Product Code: FZP Dated: June 1, 2010 Received: June 2, 2010
Dear Mr. Lucky:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Mr. James Lucky
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Bram D. Zuckerman, M.D. Director Division of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
# STATEMENT: INDICATION FOR USE
K093679 510 (k) Number:
Device Name: AtriClip LAA Exclusion System
### Indications for Use:
The AtriClip LAA Exclusion System is indicated for the occlusion of the left atrial appendage, under direct visualization, in conjunction with other open cardiac surgical procedures.
Prescription Use X Over the Counter Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) and/or (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGES IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
W.W.A.
ardiovascular Devices
510(k) Number K093679
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.