K192471 · Aerin Medical, Inc. · GEI · Dec 20, 2019 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K192471
Device Name
RHIN1 Stylus
Applicant
Aerin Medical, Inc.
Product Code
GEI · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Dec 20, 2019
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.4400
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The RHIN1 Stylus is indicated for use in otorhinolaryngology (ENT) surgery for the destruction of soft tissue in the nasal airway, including in posterior nasal nerve regions in patients with chronic rhinitis.
Device Story
Handheld bipolar radiofrequency (RF) probe; used in ENT surgery. Input: electrical energy from Aerin Console. Transformation: probe delivers low-power RF energy to target nasal tissue; integrated temperature sensor monitors tissue heat (50-70°C) to ensure controlled destruction. Output: thermal ablation of soft tissue. Operated by clinicians in clinical settings. Malleable shaft allows access to posterior nasal nerve regions. Device includes authentication features for console compatibility. Benefits: provides less invasive alternative to traditional chronic rhinitis surgeries; improves patient symptoms and quality of life.
Clinical Evidence
Prospective study of 50 subjects across 5 sites. Primary endpoint: >1-point improvement in 12-hour reflective 4-item Total Nasal Symptom Scale (rTNSS) at 12 weeks. Results: Mean rTNSS improved from 8.5 (baseline) to 3.4 (12 weeks), a 5.1-point decrease (59.2% improvement, p<0.0001). Responder rate (≥1-point improvement) was 94%. Two serious adverse events reported, neither related to device or procedure. Study supports safety and efficacy for chronic rhinitis treatment.
Technological Characteristics
Bipolar RF probe; handle, malleable shaft, treatment tip with electrode array and thermocouple. Energy source: Aerin Console (3-5 W). Sterilization: Ethylene Oxide (EtO) to SAL 10^-6. Packaging: thermoformed polyethylene-Tyvek tray. Connectivity: cable-connected to console with authentication feature. Temperature-controlled delivery (50-70 °C).
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients with chronic rhinitis requiring destruction of soft tissue in the nasal airway, including posterior nasal nerve regions, during ENT surgery.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An electrosurgical cutting and coagulation device and accessories is a device intended to remove tissue and control bleeding by use of high-frequency electrical current.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA logo on the right. The FDA logo is in blue and includes the agency's name, "U.S. Food & Drug Administration."
December 20, 2019
Aerin Medical Inc. Matthew Hull Director, US Regulatory Affairs 232 E Caribbean Dr. Sunnyvale, California 94089
Re: K192471
Trade/Device Name: RHIN1 Stylus Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4400 Regulation Name: Electrosurgical Cutting And Coagulation Device And Accessories Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: GEI Dated: September 9, 2019 Received: September 10, 2019
Dear Matthew Hull:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS)
regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
for Michael Ryan Director DHT1C: Division of ENT, Sleep Disordered Breathing, Respiratory and Anesthesia Devices OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT and Dental Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
Device Name RHIN1 Stylus
Indications for Use (Describe)
The RHIN I Stylus is indicated for use in otothing of the destruction of soft tissue in the nasal airway, including in posterior nasal nerve regions in patients with chronic rhinitis.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Aerin Medical. The word "Aerin" is written in a large, blue, sans-serif font. Below the word "Aerin" is the word "MEDICAL" written in a smaller, red, sans-serif font. To the right of the word "Aerin" are several green circles of varying sizes.
# 510(k) Summary
This 510(k) Summary is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of 21 CFR 807.92.
# General Information
| Submitter Information | | |
|--------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
| Company: | Aerin Medical Inc. | |
| Submitter's Address: | 232 E. Caribbean Drive<br>Sunnyvale, CA 94089 | |
| Contact Person: | Matthew M Hull<br>Director, Regulatory Affairs<br>Phone: 916-642-3554 | |
| Establishment Registration<br>Number | 3011625895 | |
| Date Prepared: | 09/09/2019 | |
| Name of the Device | | |
| Proprietary Name: | RHIN1 Stylus, Model FG815 | |
| Common Name: | Radiofrequency probe | |
| Classification Name: | Electrosurgical cutting and coagulation device and<br>accessories | |
| Classification Panel: | General and Plastic Surgery | |
| Device Class: | Class II | |
| Product Code: | GEI | |
| CFR Section: | 21 CFR 878.4400 | |
| Predicate Device: | InSeca ARC Stylus (K162810) | |
## Device Description
The RHIN1 Stylus is a handheld bipolar radiofrequency (RF) probe designed for use in otorhinolaryngology (ENT) surgery. The Stylus comprises a handle, shaft, and treatment tip. The treatment tip consists of an array of bipolar electric es and a temperature sensor that allows for monitoring of tissue temperature during RF energy delivery. The shaft is malleable to allow the user to bend the shaft in order to more easily access the desired treatment area(s). The Stylus is designed for use with the Aerin Console. It includes features to allow compatibility with and
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Aerin Medical. The word "Aerin" is written in a large, stylized font, with the "A" in a darker blue and the rest of the letters in a lighter blue. Below "Aerin" is the word "MEDICAL" in smaller, gray letters. To the right of "Aerin" are some small, light blue circles.
authentication by the Aerin Console. The Stylus connects to the Aerin Console via a flexible cable.
The RHIN1 Stylus is used to treat patients experiencing chronic rhinitis. During a treatment procedure, the clinician inserts the shaft of the RHIN1 Stylus into a patient's nostril to position the treatment tip and deliver low power RF energy to the target tissue of the nasal airway. The low-power radiofrequency energy generates heat within the tissue, causing destruction of the unwanted soft tissue. The shaft of the RHIN1 Stylus is then removed from the nostril.
#### Indications for Use
The RHIN1Stylus is indicated for use in otorhinolaryngology (ENT) surgery for the destruction of soft tissue in the nasal airway, including in posterior nasal nerve regions in patients with chronic rhinitis.
Summary of the technological characteristics of the device compared to the predicate device
The RHIN1 Stylus was found to be equivalent to the predicate device in design and intended use to generate and deliver bipolar RF energy to treat tissue in ENT procedures.
| Characteristic | RHIN1 Stylus<br>(Model FG815)<br>Subject Device | InSeca ARC Stylus<br>(Model FG256)<br>Predicate Device K162810 |
|-------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
| Design configuration | Same | Integrated cable, handle and<br>electrode |
| Energy type | Same | Bipolar radiofrequency |
| Tissue temperature | Same | 50 - 70 °C<br>(temperature controlled) |
| Power | Same | 3-5 W |
| RF generator<br>compatibility | Same | Aerin Console,<br>Model FG226 |
| Sterilization | Same | EtO |
| Packaging System | Tray | Pouch |
| Use limit feature | Yes | Yes |
| Stylus validation feature | Yes | Yes |
| Summary of non-clinical tests | | |
Device performance testing included ex-vivo functional testing and usability testing. Force load testing was conducted to verify adequate shaft strength. The efficacy of
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Aerin Medical. The word "Aerin" is in a blue serif font, with the "A" being larger than the other letters. Below "Aerin" is the word "MEDICAL" in a smaller, sans-serif font. To the right of "Aerin" is a small circle with the "®" symbol inside. Above and to the right of "Aerin" are several small green circles of varying sizes.
the subject device is supported by thermocouple accuracy and response time testing. The subject devices met all the performance testing requirements.
The usability of the RHIN1 Stylus and System, the Instructions for Use, and the Physician Training Materials were all evaluated to validate and confirm that there were no new use errors that could cause serious harm to the user or patient, that no further improvement to the device and its user interface is necessary, and the device is safe to use. All study objectives were met.
After reviewing the differences between the RHIN1 and InSeca Styluses (change in shaft component and change in functional use to enable shaft bending for rhinitis), it was determined that the InSeca design verification testing is applicable to the RHIN1 device for biocompatibility, transit, and aging testing.
A packaging system change from pouch to lidded tray was previously documented through internal change control. The change from the originally cleared InSeca ARC Stylus packaging (polyethylene/nylon mix-Tyvek pouch) to a thermoformed polyethylene-Tyvek tray was fully validated for sterilization and evaluated for shelflife (accelerated aging), usability, and biocompatibility risk. The results and conclusions from sterilization testing demonstrated the ability of Ethylene Oxide (EO) gas sterilization to effectively sterilize the ARC Stylus family of products to a Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) of 10-6 using the overkill half-cycle method approach and establishing the sterilization process parameters for routine sterilization. The packaging and devices passed all aging and transit testing acceptance criteria, thereby allowing all styluses to be labeled with a two-year shelf life. A tray usability study was conducted; user ratings and comments received were positive, demonstrating the overall satisfaction of polled users with the tray packaging configuration. All packaging biocompatibility test acceptance criteria were met.
## Summary of clinical tests
The primary efficacy endpoint was defined as a statistically significantly greater than 1-point improvement in the mean 12-hour reflective 4-item Total Nasal Symptom Scale (rTNSS) from baseline to 12 weeks. The secondary efficacy endpoint was defined as a treatment responder rate of 55% or greater, where a responder is defined as achieving a 1 point or greater improvement (decrease) from baseline to 12 weeks. Safety was assessed by characterizing the type and frequency of adverse events reported throughout the study. Additional evaluations included physical and endoscopic nasal assessment and Patient Satisfaction Survev.
Fifty (50) subjects from 5 study sites were treated in the study. The subjects received bilateral treatment of the nasal airway in the area of the posterior nasal nerve with the RHIN1 Stylus. Twelve (12) week rTNSS scores were obtained from
{6}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/6/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Aerin Medical. The word "Aerin" is in a blue sans-serif font, with the "A" being larger than the other letters. Below "Aerin" is the word "MEDICAL" in a smaller, gray sans-serif font. To the right of "Aerin" are several green circles of varying sizes.
49 subjects with one patient's score failed to be taken at their 12-week visit. The primary and secondary efficacy endpoints of the study were met and demor. Trreted significant and clinically meaningful improvement in the rhinitis symptoms as reported in the rTNSS at 12 weeks of follow up.
Significant clinical improvement in symptoms was demonstrate by marked improvement in the Total Nasal Symptom Scale (rTNSS) in nearly all subjects and across all centers. The mean rTNSS at baseline was 8.5 (SD 1.8), which improved to 3.4 (SD 2.3) at the 12-week primary endpoint with a mean decrease of 5.1 points (SD 2.6) from baseline (59.2% improvement) (paired t-test, p<0.0001, lower 95% confidence bound=50). Responses to all four items of the rTNSS demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the mean question score. The responder rate, defined as at least a 1-point improvement in the rTNSS Score, was 94%.
Patient-reported satisfaction with the procedure and quality of life improvement were high. Physical and endoscopic nasal status assessments showed a favorable recovery process following the procedure. Two serious adverse events were reported from 2 subjects, neither was related to the device or the rrocedure. The reported adverse events were relatively mild, transient, and not unexpected for this type of procedure.
The study results support the conclusion that the treatment has a lasting effect on symptoms of chronic rhinitis and provides a less invasive alternative to traditional chronic rhinitis surgeries. The results from this study support the safety and efficacy of the proposed indication expansion to include destruction of tissue for patients with chronic rhinitis.
#### Conclusion
Testing demonstrates that the RHIN1 Stylus is substantially equivalent to the predicate in terms of both intended use and delivered RF treatment and is safe and effective for its intended use.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.