K230311 · Threadstone, LLC · GAT · Nov 24, 2023 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K230311
Device Name
HyperSuture
Applicant
Threadstone, LLC
Product Code
GAT · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Nov 24, 2023
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.5000
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
HyperSutures (both tape and cable) are indicated for use in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation. including use in cardiovascular procedures, and the use of allograft tissue for orthopedic procedures.
Device Story
HyperSuture consists of non-absorbable, sterile surgical sutures available as braided cables or tapes; composed of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) multifilament strands. Used by surgeons in clinical settings for soft tissue approximation, ligation, cardiovascular surgery, and orthopedic allograft fixation. Devices are provided in various USP sizes (cables) or equivalent tape sizes, with or without pre-attached AISI 302 stainless steel needles. Functionality relies on mechanical tissue approximation; sutures provide tensile strength to hold tissues together during healing. Benefits include high-strength, non-absorbable fixation for surgical procedures. Sterilized via ethylene oxide (EO).
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Compliance with USP performance requirements for diameter, tensile strength, and needle attachment. Biocompatibility evaluated per ISO 10993-1:2018. Endotoxin levels verified via Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) testing to be within FDA-recommended limits.
Technological Characteristics
Material: UHMWPE multifilament strands. Needle: AISI 302 stainless steel, 1/2 circle curvature, taper cutting. Sterilization: Ethylene Oxide (EO). Compliance: USP requirements for non-absorbable surgical sutures; ISO 10993-1:2018 for biocompatibility. Form factor: Braided cable or tape, 40 inches length.
Indications for Use
Indicated for general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, including cardiovascular procedures and allograft tissue use in orthopedic procedures. No specific age or gender restrictions.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Nonabsorbable poly(ethylene terephthalate) surgical suture is a multifilament, nonabsorbable, sterile, flexible thread prepared from fibers of high molecular weight, long-chain, linear polyesters having recurrent aromatic rings as an integral component and is indicated for use in soft tissue approximation. The poly(ethylene terephthalate) surgical suture meets U.S.P. requirements as described in the U.S.P. Monograph for Nonabsorbable Surgical Sutures; it may be provided uncoated or coated; and it may be undyed or dyed with an appropriate FDA listed color additive. Also, the suture may be provided with or without a standard needle attached.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control for this device is FDA's “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Surgical Sutures; Guidance for Industry and FDA.” See § 878.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.
Predicate Devices
Force Fiber Suture and Force Fiber OrthoTape Suture (K181774)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which consists of the letters "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue text.
November 24, 2023
Threadstone L.L.C. Jeremy Clark President 1035 Benfield Blvd. Suite H Millersville, Maryland 21108
Re: K230311
Trade/Device Name: HyperSuture Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.5000 Regulation Name: Nonabsorbable Poly(Ethylene Terephthalate) Surgical Suture Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: GAT Dated: October 25, 2023 Received: October 26, 2023
Dear Jeremy Clark:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device"
{1}------------------------------------------------
(https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30. Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90. Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review. the OS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
Digitally signed by Tek N. Tek N. Lamichhane -S Lamichhane -S Date: 2023.11.24 07:54:48
11.24 07:54:48 Tek N. Lamichhane, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT4B: Division of Infection Control and Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Devices OHT4: Office of Surgical and Infection Control Devices
{2}------------------------------------------------
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K230311
Device Name HyperSuture
Indications for Use (Describe)
HyperSutures (both tape and cable) are indicated for use in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation. including use in cardiovascular procedures, and the use of allograft tissue for orthopedic procedures.
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary of Threadstone HyperSuture (K230311)
## 1. Submitter Information
| Submitter's Name: | Threadstone L.L.C. |
|----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
| Address: | 1035 Benfield Blvd,<br>Suite H, Millersville,<br>MD 21163, USA |
| Phone Number: | (410) 544-2833 |
| Fax Number: | N/A |
| Registration Number: | 3017499940 |
| Contact Person: | Jeremy Clark,<br>Office@Threadstoneusa.com |
| Date of Preparation: | 11/22/2023 |
### 2. Device Name
| Trade Name: | HyperSuture™ |
|------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|
| Common or Usual Names: | Polyblend Suture, Non-absorbable Surgica <i>l</i> |
| Sutures Classification Name: | Nonabsorbable Poly(Ethylene Terephthalate) Surgical Suture |
## 3. Device Classification
| FDA Class: | II |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| Product Classification: | 21CFR §878.5000: Suture, nonabsorbable, synthetic, polyethylene |
| Classification Code: | GAT |
| Review Panel: | General & Plastic Surgery |
| Classification Code: | GAT |
|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Review Panel: | General & Plastic Surgery |
| Premarket Review: | Office of Device Evaluation<br>Division of Surgical Devices, Plastic and<br>Reconstructive General Surgery Devices Branch |
## 4. Predicate Device
K181774 – Force Fiber Suture and Force Fiber OrthoTape Suture
{5}------------------------------------------------
#### 5. Device Description
HyperSuture cables are non-absorbable, sterile, surgical sutures composed of multiple multifilament strands of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) braided together to form the implant. HyperSuture cables are available in USP 2-0, USP 2, and USP 5 and meet all surqical suture requirements established by the USP for class II non- absorbable surgical sutures.
HyperSuture tapes are non-absorbable, sterile, braid for surgery composed of multiple multifilament strands of ultra-high molecular weight polvethylene (UHMWPE) braided together to form the implant. HyperSuture tape sizes do not conform to USP diameter requirements; however, HyperSuture tapes meet USP tensile strength and needle attachment strength requirements for equivalent USP size sutures. HyperSuture tape sizes are available in Threadstone tape size 0.5 (USP 2-0 equivalent), tape 1.5 (USP 2 equivalent), and tape 2.5 (USP 5 equivalent).
Both HyperSuture cables and tapes are available in white/black, 40 inches in length, and with or without pre-attached needles.
### 6. Intended Use / Indication for Use
HyperSuture sutures (both cables and tapes) are indicated for use in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, including use in cardiovascular surgery, and the use of allograft tissues for orthopedic procedures.
### 7. Substantial Equivalence and Comparison of Technical Characteristics
HyperSuture product family is substantially equivalent to the previously cleared Force Fiber Suture and Force Fiber OrthoTape. The HyperSuture product family has the same intended use and indications for use, the same principles of operation, and similar technical characteristics as the predicate device, Force Fiber Suture and Force Fiber OrthoTape cleared per K181774. Both the HyperSuture and the predicate device are sterilized using the same processes (EO Sterilization), are composed of the same material (UHMWPE), and are tested per USP performance requirements for length, tensile strength and needle attachment. The minor differences in technical characteristics are limited to the needle material, needle shapes and needle tips. The HyperSuture product family utilizes AISI 302 stainless steel needle with 1/2 circle curvature and taper cutting which is a subset of needle shape and tips provided by the predicate sutures. These differences do not raise new questions of safety or effectiveness as it will be discussed in the performance data; therefore, the HyperSuture suture product family is substantially equivalent to the currently marketed predicate device.
{6}------------------------------------------------
### 8. Performance Data
HyperSuture sutures (both cables and tapes) meet requirements established by the United States Pharmacopeia. HyperSuture cables are tested per USP performance requirements for diameter, needle attachment and tensile strength. HyperSuture tapes are tested per USP performance requirements for tensile strength and needle attachment strength and Threadstone specifications for the tape width. FDA Guidance "Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Surgical Sutures; Guidance for Industry and FDA" was followed during the preparation of this submission. Materials used were evaluated per ISO 10993-1:2018 - Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices. Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) endotoxin quantification assessments, both process validation and routine testing, demonstrate endotoxin quantities below the recommended limits outlined in FDA Guidance "Pyrogens and Endotoxins Testing: Questions and Answers."
#### 9. Conclusion
The information provided in this 510(k) demonstrates that HyperSuture™ (K230311) is substantially equivalent to the predicate sutures cleared under K181774.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.