VENTRIO LIGHT HERNIA PATCH WITH TRM ANTIMICROBIAL COATING
K113229 · C.R. Bard, Inc. · FTL · Jul 20, 2012 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K113229
Device Name
VENTRIO LIGHT HERNIA PATCH WITH TRM ANTIMICROBIAL COATING
Applicant
C.R. Bard, Inc.
Product Code
FTL · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Jul 20, 2012
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.3300
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Ventrio™ Light Hernia Patch is indicated for use in the reconstruction of soft tissue in procedures involving soft tissue repair where weakness exists, such as for the repair of hernias. TRM Antimicrobial Coating has been shown to reduce or inhibit microbial colonization on the device.
Device Story
Self-expanding, nonabsorbable sterile surgical mesh; used for soft tissue/hernia repair. Composed of two layers of knitted polypropylene monofilament mesh forming a positioning pocket; stitched with PTFE thread to an ePTFE sheet. Includes SorbaFlex™ Memory Technology (polydioxanone monofilament in a polypropylene sleeve) for stability and insertion ease. Surfaces coated with TRM Antimicrobial Coating (bioresorbable L-tyrosine succinate polymer, rifampin, and minocycline) to inhibit microbial colonization for up to 7 days. Implanted by surgeons in clinical settings. Polypropylene side facilitates tissue in-growth; ePTFE side minimizes visceral tissue attachment. PDO component degrades via hydrolysis in 6-8 months. Device provides mechanical support for tissue defects.
Clinical Evidence
No human clinical trials. Evidence includes ISO 10993 biocompatibility testing, bench testing of physical/functional characteristics, and in vivo studies. Porcine study (4 weeks post-implantation) evaluated tissue attachment, mesh contracture, in-growth, and inflammatory response. Two in vivo dorsal rabbit infection models assessed microbial colonization and abscess formation. Analytical/in vitro testing confirmed drug content, impurity profiles, kinetic drug release, and polymer degradation.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: knitted polypropylene monofilament, ePTFE, PTFE thread, polydioxanone (PDO) monofilament (dyed with D&C Violet No. 2). Coating: L-tyrosine succinate polymer with rifampin and minocycline (115 ug/cm²). Sterilization: Ethylene oxide (EtO). Form factor: self-expanding patch with positioning pocket. Connectivity: N/A.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring soft tissue reconstruction or hernia repair. No specific age or gender contraindications stated.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Surgical mesh is a metallic or polymeric screen intended to be implanted to reinforce soft tissue or bone where weakness exists. Examples of surgical mesh are metallic and polymeric mesh for hernia repair, and acetabular and cement restrictor mesh used during orthopedic surgery.
{0}------------------------------------------------
K 113229
1/5
### 510(K) SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS
This 510(k) Summary is provided per the requirements of section 807.92(c).
### Submitter Information:
JUL 20 2012
| Submitter's Name: | Stephanie Baker, BS, MBA<br>Regulatory Affairs Project Manager |
|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
| Address: | Davol Inc., Subsidiary of C. R. Bard, Inc. |
| | 100 Crossings Boulevard |
| | Warwick, RI 02886 |
| Telephone: | (401) 825-8588 |
| Fax: | (401) 825-8765 |
| Device Name: | |
| Trade Name: | VentrioTM Light Hernia Patch with TRM<br>Antimicrobial Coating |
| Antimicrobial Coating | |
| Common/Usual Name: | Surgical Mesh<br>Polymeric Surgical Mesh |
| Classification Name: | Mesh, Surgical, Polymeric<br>Antimicrobial Agent |
| Classification Code: | Class II, § 878.3300, Product Code FTL |
#### Predicate Device Names:
- Bard Ventrio Hernia Patch, K081777 (Davol Inc.), FDA cleared on September . 29,2008; K100229 – Special (Davol Inc.), FDA cleared on April 21,2010
- Pivit AB Antimicrobial Mesh, K053656 (TyRx Pharma, Inc.), FDA cleared on ● July 14, 2006
- Pivit AB-ST Antimicrobial Mesh, K093524 (TyRx Pharma, Inc), FDA cleared . on March 26,2010
## PREMARKET NOTIFICATION FOR VENTRIO™ LIGHT HERNIA PATCH WITH TRM ANTIMICROBIAL COATING
{1}------------------------------------------------
K 115229
2/5
#### Device Description:
The proposed Ventrio Light Hernia Patch with TRM Antimicrobial Coating is a selfexpanding, nonabsorbable, sterile prosthesis. It contains two primary layers of monofilament polypropylene mesh to form a positioning pocket. This pocket is stitched with a polytetrafluroethylene (PTFE) monofilament thread to an expanded polyfluoroethylene (ePTFE) sheet. The two primary layers of polypropylene mesh are constructed of a lighter weight, "larger-pore" (as defined below), knitted polypropylene monofilament approximately 0.0043" in diameter. The polypropylene mesh used in the proposed device weighs approximately 51% less per unit area than the polypropylene mesh used in the posterior layer of the predicate Ventrio Hernia Patch (0.024 g/in' versus 0.049 g/in2). The pore size of the mesh used in the proposed product is 0.082 in2 as compared to 0.019 in for the mesh used in the posterior layer of the predicate Ventrio Hernia Patch. The device contains SorbaFlex™ Memory Technology, which provides memory and stability to the device, facilitating ease of initial insertion, proper placement, The SorbaFlex Memory Technology is comprised of an extruded and fixation. polydioxanone (PDO) monofilament that is contained within a knitted polypropylene mesh sleeve. The PDO monofilament is dyed violet with D&C Violet No. 2 and fully degrades in vivo by means of hydrolysis with absorption essentially complete in 6-8 months.
The proposed Ventrio Light Hernia Patch surfaces are coated with TRM Antimicrobial Coating, which is comprised of a bioresorbable L-tyrosine succinate polymer (T) and antimicrobial agents rifampin (R) and minocycline (M). The coating is shaded orange in color due to the color of the antimicrobial agents. The TRM Antimicrobial Coating has been shown to reduce or inhibit microbial colonization on the device during the initial healing process for up to 7 days following surgery. The bioresorbable L-Tyrosine succinate polymer is essentially absorbed in 6 - 8 months based on in vitro studies.
The fascial side of the Ventrio Light Hernia Patch (polypropylene) allows a prompt fibroblastic response through the interstices of the mesh, allowing for tissue in-growth into the device. The visceral side of the device (ePTFE) has a submicronic porosity to minimize tissue attachment to the device.
#### Intended Use:
The Ventrio Light Hernia Patch is indicated for use in the reconstruction of soft tissue in procedures involving soft tissue repair where weakness exists, such as for the repair of hernias. The TRM Antimicrobial Coating has been shown to reduce or inhibit microbial colonization on the device.
### PREMARKET NOTIFICATION FOR VENTRIO™ LIGHT HERNIA PATCH WITH TRM ANTIMICROBIAL COATING
{2}------------------------------------------------
K113229
3/5
### Summary of Similarities and Differences in Technological Characteristics, Performance and Intended Use:
The proposed Ventrio Light Hernia Patch with TRM Antimicrobial Coating is similar in intended use and in technological characteristics and performance when compared to the predicate devices Ventrio Hernia Patch, Pivit AB and Pivit AB-ST. All devices are intended for use in the reconstruction and repair of soft tissue deficiencies where weakness exists such as hernia repair. In addition, all devices are similar in technological characteristics with regard to materials, design, sterilization, packaging and labeling, Where minor technological differences exist between the proposed device and the predicate devices, performance testing demonstrates that these differences do not adversely affect the safety and effectiveness of the proposed device.
The proposed device, Ventrio Light Hernia Patch with TRM Antimicrobial Coating and the predicate devices Ventrio Hernia Patch, Pivit AB and Pivit AB-ST are all composed of knitted polypropylene monofilament mesh. Both the proposed device and the predicate device, Ventrio Hernia Patch, contain two primary layers of monofilament polypropylene mesh to form a positioning pocket stitched with PTFE monofilament to an ePTFE sheet. The proposed device has the same mesh configuration as the predicate, Ventrio Hernia Patch, except for four modifications, three of which are considered minor modifications.
The first minor modification involves the polypropylene monofilament mesh layer of the device. The proposed device is constructed of two primary layers of lighter weight, larger pore knitted polypropylene monofilament while the predicate Ventrio Hernia Patch contains only one layer of lighter weight, larger pore knitted polypropylene monofilament.
The second minor modification involves the polypropylene mesh surrounding the PDO monofilament recoil ring. In both the proposed and predicate devices, the PDO monofilament recoil ring is contained within polypropylene mesh. However, in the predicate device (small circle, large circle, small oval, medium oval and large oval sizes only) the PDO monofilament is contained by two layers of knitted mesh stitched with PTFE monofilament thread while in the proposed device the PDO monofilament is contained within a knitted polypropylene mesh sleeve is also used to contain the PDO monofilament in the extra large sizes of the predicate device.
The last minor modification involves the sizes of the devices. The predicate Ventrio Hernia Patch is marketed in 9 sizes, while the proposed device will be marketed in 5 sizes only (small circle, large circle, small oval, medium oval and large oval). In addition to the three minor modifications described above, one other modification includes the addition of the TRM antimicrobial coating containing the antimicrobial agents rifampin and minocycline to the proposed device as discussed below. Both the proposed device and the
### PREMARKET NOTIFICATION FOR VENTRIO™ LIGHT HERNIA PATCH WITH TRM ANTIMICROBIAL COATING
{3}------------------------------------------------
K113229
4/15
predicate Ventrio Hernia Patch are packaged in the same materials. Tyyek and foil, and undergo ethylene oxide (EtO) sterilization.
The proposed and predicate devices Pivit AB and Pivit AB-ST are composed of knitted polypropylene mesh. The predicate devices Pivit AB and Pivit AB-ST are composed a single layer of knitted polypropylene mesh while the proposed device contains two primary layers of knitted polypropylene mesh stitched to an ePTFE sheet with PTFE monofilament thread. In addition, the proposed device contains an absorbable PDO recoil ring while the predicate devices Pivit AB and Pivit AB-ST do not contain any recoil mechanism. Both the proposed and predicate devices are coated with a bioresorbable Ltyrosine succinate polymer coating containing the antimicrobial agents rifampin and minocycline. The proposed device has the antimicrobial agents rifampin and minocycline (minocycline hydrochloride) in equal concentrations of approximately 115 ug/cm² while the predicate devices Pivit AB and Pivit AB-ST have the antimicrobial agents in equal concentrations of 86.11 ug/cm². Both the proposed device and the predicate devices Pivit AB and Pivit AB-ST are packaged in the same materials. Tyvek and foil. The predicate devices Pivit AB and Pivit AB-ST are gamma sterilized while the proposed device is sterilized with EtQ.
#### Performance Data:
Biocompatibility testing in accordance to the ISO 10993 series was conducted on the proposed finished device and the results indicate that the device is biocompatible per these standards.
Laboratory bench testing was performed to compare both physical and functional characteristics of the proposed device to those of the predicate device Ventrio Hernia Patch. In addition, an in vivo porcine study was performed to evaluate peritoneal tissue attachment, mesh contracture, mechanical tissue in-growth, and host inflammatory response associated with the proposed device at 4 weeks post-implantation. Two in vivo dorsal rabbit infection model studies were also performed to determine the amount of microbial colonization and macroscopic abscess formation associated with the proposed device after implantation and direct inoculation with bacteria. Analytical and in vitro testing was also performed on the proposed and predicate devices and include speed to kill, kinetic drug release (KDR), drug content and impurity, and polymer degradation testing.
#### Conclusion:
Results of the testing performed in support of this submission demonstrate that the Ventrio Light Hernia Patch with TRM Antimicrobial Coating is substantially equivalent to currently marketed predicate devices, Ventrio Hernia Patch, Pivit AB and Pivit AB-ST and is safe and effective for its intended use. In addition, the results of the testing show
### PREMARKET NOTIFICATION FOR VENTRIO™ LIGHT HERNIA PATCH WITH TRM ANTIMICROBIAL COATING
{4}------------------------------------------------
K113229
515
that the components in the proposed device, specifically ePTFE and PDO, have no interaction with the TRM antimicrobial coating and do not affect the release profile of the antimicrobial agents rifampin and minocycline.
# PREMARKET NOTIFICATION FOR VENTRIO™ LIGHT HERNIA PATCH WITH TRM ANTIMICROBIAL COATING
{5}------------------------------------------------
### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/5/Picture/1 description: The image shows the seal of the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) of the United States. The seal is circular and contains the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is an abstract emblem that resembles an eagle or bird-like figure with stylized wings.
#### Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room -WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
C.R. BARD, Incorporated % Ms. Stephanie Baker, BS, MBA Regulatory Affairs Project Manager 100 Crossings Boulevard Warwick, Rhode Island 02886
Re: K113229
Trade/Device Name: Ventrio™ Light Hernia Patch with TRM Antimicrobial Coating Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.3300 Regulation Name: Surgical mesh Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: FTL Dated: July 18, 2012 Received: July 19, 2012
Dear Ms. Baker:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set
JUL 20 2012
{6}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Ms. Stephanie Baker, BS, MBA .
forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Office of Compliance at (240) 276-0115. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (240) 276-3150 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html.
Sincerely yours,
Mark N. Melkerson
Director
Director Division of General, Restorative and Neurological Devices Office of Device Evaluation
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{7}------------------------------------------------
K 113229
#### INDICATION FOR USE STATEMENT
#### To be determined 510(k) Number (if known):
Device Name:
Ventrio™ Light Hernia Patch with TRM Antimicrobial Coating
The Ventrio™ Light Hernia Patch is indicated for use in the reconstruction of soft tissue in procedures involving soft tissue repair where weakness exists, such as for the repair of hernias. TRM Antimicrobial Coating has been shown to reduce or inhibit microbial colonization on the device.

(Division Sign ):T) Division of Sugical, Orthopedic, and Restorative Devices
510(k) Number: K113225
Prescription Use X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.