The HairMax LaserComb Advanced 7 is indicated to treat androgenetic alopecia and promote hair growth in females who have Ludwig (Savin) Scale I-4, II-1, II-2, or frontal and Fitzpatrick Skin Types I to IV. The HairMax LaserComb Professional 12 is indicated to treat androgenetic alopecia and promote hair growth in females who have Ludwig (Savin) Scale I-4, II-1, II-2, or frontal and Fitzpatrick Skin Types I to IV.
Device Story
Hand-held low-level laser device; emits laser light to scalp to promote hair growth. Comb teeth part hair to ensure light reaches scalp. Advanced 7 model uses 7 laser modules; Professional 12 model uses 12 laser modules. Operated by user at home. Includes audible timer for treatment duration. Output is distributed laser light. Benefits patient by stimulating hair growth in androgenetic alopecia. Adjustments in treatment time compensate for module quantity differences.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance testing confirmed compliance with design specifications and verified all functions operate as designed. No clinical data presented.
Technological Characteristics
Hand-held low-level laser device. Emits laser light. Features hair-parting teeth mechanism. Includes audible timer. Advanced 7 contains 7 laser modules; Professional 12 contains 12 laser modules. Same laser modules and materials as predicate K110233.
Indications for Use
Indicated for females with androgenetic alopecia (Ludwig-Savin Scale I-4, II-1, II-2, or frontal) and Fitzpatrick Skin Types I-IV to promote hair growth.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An infrared lamp is a device intended for medical purposes that emits energy at infrared frequencies (approximately 700 nanometers to 50,000 nanometers) to provide topical heating.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is an infrared therapeutic heating lamp, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 890.9.
{0}------------------------------------------------
SEP 2 6 2011
# 6. 510(k) Summary
The following information is provided as required by 21 CFR § 807.87 for Lexington International, LLC HairMax LaserComb Lux 9 510(k) premarket notification. In response to the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990, the following is a summary of the safety and effectiveness information upon which the substantial equivalence determination is based.
- Lexington International, LLC Sponsor: 777 Yamato Rd. Suite 105 Boca Raton, FL 33431 (561) 417-0200 research@hairmax.com Establishment Registration Number: 3006182775
- Olsson Frank Weeda Contact: C/O Casper E Uldriks Esq. 1400 Sixteenth Street, NW Washington DC 20036
August 30, 2011 Date:
Proprietary Name: HairMax LaserComb
Common or Usual Name: Lamp, nonheating, for promotion of hair growth.
Product Code: OAP
Classification Name: 21 CFR 890.5500 Infrared lamp
Predicate Device: HairMax Lux 9 K110233
## Device Description:
Similar to the HairMax Lux 9 K110233, the modified HairMax Advanced 7 and Pro 12 consist of a hand-held low level laser device that emits laser light with the intention to promote hair growth. The device provides distributed laser light to the scalp while the comb teeth simultaneously part the user's hair to ensure the laser light reaches the user's scalp.
### Intended Use / Indications for Use
The HairMax LaserComb Advanced 7 is indicated to treat Androgenetic Alopecia and promote hair growth in females who have Ludwig-Savin Scale I-4, II-1, II-2 or frontal and Fitzpatrick Skin Types I to IV.
{1}------------------------------------------------
The HairMax LaserComb Pro 12 is indicated to treat Androgenetic Alopecia and promote hair growth in females with who have Ludwig-Savin Scale 1-4, II-1, II-2 or frontal and Fitzpatrick Skin Types I to IV.
#### Technological Characteristics
The modifications to the HairMax Lux 9 since its previous clearance in K110233 do not alter the safety of the device. The predicate device contains 9 laser modules. The modified devices use the exact same laser modules and hair parting teeth mechanism. The difference in the predicate versus modified device is the quantity of the laser modules. The Advanced 7 contains 7 laser modules and the Pro 12 contains 12 laser modules. Adjustments in treatment time compensate for the different number of laser modules.
### Nonclinical Testing
Based on the Risk Analysis, the verification and validation tests that were performed and the acceptance criteria applied for each are listed in Section 10. The HairMax Advanced 7 and Pro 12 were subject to the same preclinical requirements as the predicate device. Performance testing was conducted to confirm compliance to design specifications; all functions were verified to operate as designed.
#### Substantial Equivalence
The Advanced 7 and Pro 12 are as safe and effective as the predicate device, HairMax Lux 9. The subject devices have the same intended use of affecting hair growth as the predicate device. The subject devices have indications, i.e., treating androgenetic alopecia, and the same specific indication of promoting hair growth in females, who have Ludwig-Savin Scale I-4, II-1, II-2 or frontal and Fitzpatrick Skin Types I to IV, as the predicate device.
The Advanced 7 and Pro 12 are identical in technological characteristics as the device cleared in K110233, including its laser power, wavelength, laser delivery method, its comb component, its instructions for use and its audible timer. The changes in the number of laser modules does not change the safety or effectiveness.
{2}------------------------------------------------
### Conclusion:
The Advanced 7 and Pro 12 have the following similarities to the HairMax Lux 9:
- has the same indicated use, ●
- same identical laser modules .
- . same hair parting teeth
- uses the same operating principle .
- incorporates the same basic device design and physical properties .
- incorporates the same materials .
Therefore the modification to the Lux 9 can be found substantially equivalent to the HairMax LaserComb cleared in K110233.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the seal of the Department of Health & Human Services USA. The seal is circular and contains the department's name around the perimeter. In the center of the seal is a stylized emblem featuring three abstract shapes, possibly representing human figures or elements of health and well-being. The emblem is simple and modern in design.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room -WO66-Ci609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Lexington International, LLC % Olsson Frank Weeda Casper E Uldriks, Esq. 1400 16th Street Northwest. Suite 400 Washington, District of Columbia 20036
SEP 26. 2011
Re: K112524
Trade/Device Name: HairMax Advanced 7, HairMax Professional 12 Regulation Number: 21 CFR 890.5500 Regulation Name: Infrared lamp Regulatory Class: Il Product Code: OAP Dated: September 16, 2011 Received: September 19, 2011
Dear Mr. Uldriks:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA), You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices. good manufacturing practice. labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21
{4}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Casper E Uldriks, Esq.
CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801). please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/Reportal?roblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
http://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
for
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Surgical. Orthopedic and Restorative Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
# 5. Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known): K (12524
Device Name: HairMax Advanced 7, HairMax Professional 12
Indications for Use:
The HairMax LaserComb Advanced 7 is indicated to treat androgenetic alopecia and promote hair growth in females who have Ludwig (Savin) Scale I-4, II-1, II-2, or frontal and Fitzpatrick Skin Types I to IV.
The HairMax LaserComb Professional 12 is indicated to treat androgenetic alopecia and promote hair growth in females who have Ludwig (Savin) Scale I-4, II-1, II-2, or frontal and Fitzpatrick Skin Types I to IV.
Prescription Use _ (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use __X_ (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE OF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Neil RP Ogle for nuxen
(Division Sign-C Division of Surgical, Orthopedic, and Restorative Devices
510(k) Number K112524
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.