K982791 · Radiation Oncology Computer Systems · MUJ · Dec 30, 1998 · Radiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K982791
Device Name
ROCS TPS
Applicant
Radiation Oncology Computer Systems
Product Code
MUJ · Radiology
Decision Date
Dec 30, 1998
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 892.5050
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Software as a Medical Device
Indications for Use
ROCS TPS (Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning System) is intended to be used for the computation, display, evaluation and output documentation of radiation dose estimations to be submitted for independent clinical review and judgment prior to use. The goal of this system is to provide a tool that will provide consistent results using well documented algorithms. This system does not provide direct control over any treatment delivery device or system in any form. The device only provides output data in the form of displays, hardcopy prints and/or plots to guide a physician in selecting the optimum patient treatment plan. It is intended to provide a report to be used by a competent health professional such as a radiation oncologist, medical physicist, radiation therapist or dosimetrist.
Device Story
ROCS TPS is a software-based radiation therapy treatment planning system. It processes user-controlled input data via table look-up formats and documented algorithms to estimate radiation dose. The system operates on a PC platform using the Microsoft Windows NT operating system. It produces graphical displays, hardcopy prints, and plots. Used in clinical settings by radiation oncologists, medical physicists, therapists, or dosimetrists, the system serves as a decision-support tool. It does not control treatment delivery devices. Output reports guide clinicians in selecting optimal patient treatment plans, facilitating consistent dose estimation and independent clinical review.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided; bench testing only.
Technological Characteristics
Software-based treatment planning system; runs on PC hardware with Microsoft Windows NT OS; utilizes graphical user interface; employs table look-up formats and documented algorithms for dose calculation; supports modular software/hardware upgrades; Y2K compliant.
Indications for Use
Indicated for use by radiation oncologists, medical physicists, radiation therapists, or dosimetrists to compute, display, evaluate, and document radiation dose estimations for patient treatment planning. No specific patient population age or disease state contraindications provided.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A medical charged-particle radiation therapy system is a device that produces by acceleration high energy charged particles (e.g., electrons and protons) intended for use in radiation therapy. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, treatment planning computer programs, component parts, and accessories.
Predicate Devices
Radiation Oncology Computer Systems Treatment Planning System (K862643)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
DEC 30 1998
K982291/
#### 510(k) SUMMARY
| Submitter: | Radiation Oncology Computer Systems, Inc.<br>6190 Corte Del Cedro<br>Carlsbad, CA 92009<br>(760) 929-1811 |
|---------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contact: | Charlene Neblett, Manager, Quality Assurance |
| Date Prepared: | July 31, 1998 |
| Device Name: | ROCS TPS |
| Common Name: | Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning System |
| Classification Name:<br>Number: | Accelerator, Linear, Medical, Accessory<br>90 IYE (892.5050) |
| Predicate Device: | Radiation Oncology Computer Systems Treatment<br>Planning System<br>510(k) notification K862643 |
Device Description:
ROCS treatment planning system is a collection of software modules that execute well known and documented algorithms to produce radiation dose estimations. All data is user controlled and is in a table look-up format. Information is presented graphically on CRT screens and in hardcopy reports. Various models are available based upon the specific features desired by the customer (e.g., asymmetric jaws, electron pencil beam calculations, etc.) to best meet their clinical needs. The software is designed to run on a PC platform utilizing the Microsoft® Windows NT® operating system. ROCS treatment planning system has been designed to be upgradable in both software features and hardware. All dates are four digit numbers so the system is able to handle the year 2000.
### Intended Use:
ROCS TPS (Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning System) is intended to be used for the computation, display, evaluation and output documentation of radiation dose estimations to be submitted for independent clinical review and judgment prior to use. The goal of this system is to provide a tool that will provide consistent results using well documented algorithms. This system does not provide direct control over any treatment delivery device or system in any form. The device only provides output data in the form of displays, hardcopy prints and/or plots to guide a physician in selecting the optimum patient treatment plan. It is intended to provide a report to be used by a competent health professional such as a radiation oncologist, medical physicist, radiation therapist or dosimetrist.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Technological Characteristics:
The ROCS Treatment Planning System is designed to run on the Microsoft® Windows The House Tradition Panning Offech 18 ablighter to for the Microsoft Windows graphical user interface providing ease of use for anyone familiar with windows products. This differs from the predicate device in that the operating system is now Microsoft® Windows NT®; whereas, the predicate device utilized the DOS operating system.
{2}------------------------------------------------
## DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
DEC 30 1998
Charlene Neblett Manager Quality Assurance Radiation Oncology Computer System, Inc. 6190 Corte Del Cedro Carsbad, CA 92009
Re:
K982791 ROCS TPS Dated: November 2, 1998 Received: November 3, 1998 Regulatory class: II 21 CFR 892.5050/Procode: 90 MUJ
Dear Ms. Neblett:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class III (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4613. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification"(21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597, or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
Capt. Daniel G. Schultz, M.D. Acting Director, Division of Reproductive, Abdominal, Ear, Nose and Throat. and Radiological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
Image /page/2/Picture/15 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo is circular and contains the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is an abstract image of an eagle or other bird with its wings spread.
{3}------------------------------------------------
# INDICATIONS FOR USE
## ROCS TPS
ROCS TPS (Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning System) is intended to be used for the computation, display, evaluation and output documentation of radiation dose estimations to be submitted for independent clinical review and judgment prior to use. The device provides output data in the form of displays, hardcopy prints and/or plots to guide a physician in selecting the optimum patient treatment plan. It is intended to provide a report to be used by a competent health professional such as a radiation oncologist, medical physicist, radiation therapist or dosimetrist
Divi
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Reproductive, Abdominal, ENT, and Radiological D 510(k) Number
**Prescription Use**
(Per 21 CFR 801.109)
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.
