K242215 · Neurophet., Inc. · QIH · Oct 25, 2024 · Radiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K242215
Device Name
Neurophet AQUA (V3.1)
Applicant
Neurophet., Inc.
Product Code
QIH · Radiology
Decision Date
Oct 25, 2024
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 892.2050
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
AI/ML, Software as a Medical Device
AI Performance
Output
Algorithm
Acceptance
Observed
Dev DS
Dev Readers
Test DS
Test Readers
Brain lesion segmentation
Deep learning
Dice > 0.80
Dice > 0.80
—
—
Accuracy test dataset (136 images) and reproducibility test dataset (52 images) sourced from U.S. hospitals.
3 (US neuroradiologists)
Indications for Use
Neurophet AQUA is intended for Automatic labeling, visualization and volumetric quantification of segmentable brain structures and lesions from a set of MR images. Volumetric data may be compared to reference percentile data.
Device Story
Neurophet AQUA (V3.1) is an automated MR imaging post-processing software; inputs 3D T1 and T2 FLAIR MRI scans in DICOM format. The device uses a deep learning-based internal pipeline to perform segmentation, volume calculation, and lesion quantification. It produces segmented images with color overlays and morphometric reports comparing patient volumes to age/gender-matched reference percentile data. Used in clinical settings, the software operates on off-the-shelf Windows hardware; results are displayed on PACS or DICOM workstations. Clinicians review the output to support structural MRI assessment; the device provides automated quality control (scan protocol verification). By quantifying brain structures and lesions, the device assists in clinical decision-making and patient monitoring.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Accuracy and reproducibility of T2 FLAIR lesion segmentation were validated using 136 images for accuracy and 52 for reproducibility. Data sourced from U.S. hospitals across multiple vendors (Philips, Siemens, GE) included healthy subjects and patients with MCI, Alzheimer's, and MS. Ground truth established by three neuroradiologists. Results: Dice coefficient > 0.80 for segmentation accuracy; mean absolute lesion volume difference < 0.25cc for reproducibility. T1 performance was previously established under K220437.
Technological Characteristics
Software-only medical device; operates on off-the-shelf Windows hardware. Uses deep learning-based automated segmentation and quantification pipeline. Inputs: 3D T1 and T2 FLAIR MRI (DICOM). Outputs: Segmented images, morphometric reports, and percentile comparisons. Includes automated quality control (scan protocol verification).
Indications for Use
Indicated for automatic labeling, visualization, and volumetric quantification of brain structures and lesions from MR images in patients ranging from young adults to elderly, including healthy subjects and those with mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease, or multiple sclerosis.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A medical image management and processing system is a device that provides one or more capabilities relating to the review and digital processing of medical images for the purposes of interpretation by a trained practitioner of disease detection, diagnosis, or patient management. The software components may provide advanced or complex image processing functions for image manipulation, enhancement, or quantification that are intended for use in the interpretation and analysis of medical images. Advanced image manipulation functions may include image segmentation, multimodality image registration, or 3D visualization. Complex quantitative functions may include semi-automated measurements or time-series measurements.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls; voluntary standards—Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Std., Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) Std., Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) Test Pattern).
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the FDA logo is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
October 25, 2024
Neurophet. Inc. % Priscilla Chung Regulatory Affairs Consultant LK Consulting Group USA, Inc. 18881 Von Karman Ave STE 160 Irvine. California 92612
Re: K242215
Trade/Device Name: Neurophet AOUA (V3.1) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.2050 Regulation Name: Medical image management and processing system Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OIH, LLZ Dated: July 25, 2024 Received: July 29, 2024
#### Dear Priscilla Chung:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review. the OS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advicecomprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
{2}------------------------------------------------
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Daniel M. Krainak, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT8C: Division of Radiological Imaging and Radiation Therapy Devices OHT8: Office of Radiological Health Office of Product Evaluation and Ouality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
Submission Number (if known)
K242215
Device Name
Neurophet AQUA (V3.1)
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
Neurophet AQUA is intended for Automatic labeling, visualization and volumetric quantification of segmentable brain structures and lesions from a set of MR images. Volumetric data may be compared to reference percentile data.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary
This summary of 510(k) information is being submitted in accordance with requirements of 21 CFR Part 807.92.
#### 1. Date: 10/24/2024
#### 2. Applicant / Submitter
NEUROPHET, Inc. 12F, 124, Teheran-ro, Gangnam-gu Seoul, Republic of Korea Tel : +82-2-6954-7971 Fax : +82-2-6954-7972
#### 3. U.S. Designated Agent
Priscilla Chung LK Consulting Group USA, Inc. 18881 Von Karman Ave. STE 160 Irvine, CA 92612 Tel: 714.202.5789 Fax: 714.409.3357 Email: juhee.c@LKconsultingGroup.com
#### 4. Trade/Proprietary Name:
Neurophet AQUA (V3.1)
## 5. Common Name:
Medical Image Processing Software
#### 6. Classification:
- Automated Radiological Image Processing Software (21CFR 892.2050, Product code ● QIH, Class 2, Radiology)
- Medical Image Management and Processing System (21CFR 892.2050, Product code ● LLZ, Class 2, Radiology)
{5}------------------------------------------------
## 7. Device Description:
Neurophet AQUA is a fully automated MR imaging post-processing medical device software that provides automatic labeling, visualization, and volumetric quantification of brain structures from a set of MR images and returns segmented images and morphometric reports. The resulting output is provided in morphometric reports that can be displayed on Picture Archive and Communications Systems (PACS). The high throughput capability makes the software suitable for use in routine patient care as a support tool for clinicians in assessment of structural MRIs.
Neurophet AQUA provides morphometric measurements based on T1 MRI series. The output of the software includes volumes that have been annotated with color overlays, with each color representing a particular segmented region, and morphometric reports that provide comparison of measured volumes to age and gender-matched reference percentile data. In addition, the adjunctive use of the T2 FLAIR MR series allows for improved identification of some brain abnormalities such as lesions, which are often associated with T2 FLAIR hyperintensities.
Neurophet AQUA processing architecture includes a proprietary automated internal pipeline that performs segmentation, volume calculation and report generation.
The results are displayed in a dedicated graphical user interface, allowing the user to:
- Browse the segmentations and the measures, .
- Compare the results of segmented brain structures to a reference healthy ● population,
- Read and print a PDF report
Additionally, automated safety measures include automated quality control functions, such as scan protocol verification. which validate that the imaging protocols adhere to system requirements.
#### 8. Indication for use:
Neurophet AQUA is intended for Automatic labeling, visualization and volumetric quantification of segmentable brain structures and lesions from a set of MR images. Volumetric data may be compared to reference percentile data.
## 9. Predicate Device:
- Primary Predicate: Neurophet AQUA v2.1 (K220437) by NEUROPHET, Inc.
- Reference Device: NeuroQuant® v2.2 (K170981) by CorTechs Labs, Inc.
{6}------------------------------------------------
# 10. Substantial Equivalence:
## Comparison Table
| | Subject Device | Primary predicate Device | Reference Device |
|------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Device name | Neurophet AQUA V3.1 | Neurophet AQUA v2.1 | NeuroQuant® v2.2 |
| 510(K) | K242215 | K220437 | K170981 |
| Manufacturer | NEUROPHET, Inc. | NEUROPHET, Inc. | CorTechs Labs, Inc |
| Product Code | QIH, LLZ | LLZ | LLZ |
| Indications for<br>Use | Neurophet AQUA is<br>intended for automatic<br>labeling, visualization and<br>volumetric quantification of<br>segmentable brain<br>structures and lesions from<br>a set of MR images.<br>Volumetric data may be<br>compared to reference<br>percentile data. | Neurophet AQUA is<br>intended for Automatic<br>labeling, visualization and<br>volumetric quantification of<br>segmentable brain<br>structures from a set of MR<br>images. Volumetric data<br>may be compared to<br>reference percentile data. | NeuroQuant is intended<br>for automatic labeling,<br>visualization and<br>volumetric quantification<br>of segmentable brain<br>structures and lesions from<br>a set of MR images.<br>Volumetric data may be<br>compared to reference<br>percentile data. |
| Target<br>Anatomical<br>Sites | Brain | Brain | Brain |
| Design and<br>Incorporated<br>Technology | • Automated measurement<br>of brain tissue volumes,<br>structures, and lesions<br>• Automatic segmentation<br>and quantification of brain<br>structures using deep<br>learning | • Automated measurement of<br>brain tissue volumes and<br>structures<br>• Automatic segmentation<br>and quantification of brain<br>structures using deep<br>learning | • Automated measurement of<br>brain tissue volumes and<br>structures and lesions<br>• Automatic segmentation<br>and quantification of brain<br>structures using a dynamic<br>probabilistic neuroanatomical<br>atlas, with age and gender<br>specificity, based on the MR<br>image intensity |
| Physical<br>characteristics | • Software package<br>• Operates on off-the-<br>shelf hardware (multiple<br>vendors) | • Software package<br>• Operates on off-the-shelf<br>hardware (multiple<br>vendors) | • Software package<br>• Operates on off-the-shelf<br>hardware (multiple<br>vendors) |
| Operating<br>System | Windows | Windows | Supports Linux, Mac OS<br>X and Windows. |
| Processing<br>Architecture | Automated internal<br>pipeline that performs:<br>• segmentation<br>• volume calculation<br>• lesion quantification<br>• report generation | Automated internal pipeline<br>that performs:<br>• segmentation<br>• volume calculation<br>• report generation | Automated internal<br>pipeline that performs:<br>• artifact correction<br>• segmentation<br>• lesion quantification<br>• volume calculation<br>• report generation |
| Data Source | • MRI scanner: 3D T1<br>and FLAIR MRI scans<br>acquired with specified<br>protocols<br>• Supports DICOM<br>format as input | • MRI scanner: 3D T1 scans<br>acquired with specified<br>protocols<br>• Supports DICOM format<br>as input | • MRI scanner: 3D T1 and<br>FLAIR MRI scans<br>acquired with specified<br>protocols<br>• Supports DICOM format<br>as input |
| Output | • Provides volumetric<br>measurements of brain<br>structures and lesions<br>• Includes segmented<br>color overlays and<br>morphometric reports<br>• Automatically<br>compares results to<br>reference percentile data<br>and to prior scans when<br>available<br>• Supports DICOM<br>format as output of<br>results that can be<br>displayed on DICOM<br>workstations and Picture<br>Archive and<br>Communications<br>Systems | • Provides volumetric<br>measurements of brain<br>structures<br>• Includes segmented color<br>overlays and<br>morphometric reports<br>• Automatically compares<br>results to reference<br>percentile data and to prior<br>scans when available<br>• Supports DICOM format<br>as output of results that can<br>be displayed on DICOM<br>workstations and Picture<br>Archive and<br>Communications Systems | • Provides volumetric<br>measurements of brain<br>structures and lesions<br>• Includes segmented color<br>overlays and<br>morphometric reports<br>• Automatically compares<br>results to reference<br>percentile data and to prior<br>scans when available<br>• Supports DICOM format<br>as output of results that<br>can be displayed on<br>DICOM workstations and<br>Picture Archive and<br>Communications Systems |
| Safety | • Automated quality<br>control functions<br>- Image artifact check<br>- Scan protocol<br>verification<br>• Results must be<br>reviewed by a trained<br>physician | • Automated quality control<br>functions<br>- Tissue contrast check<br>- Scan protocol verification<br>• Results must be reviewed<br>by a trained physician | • Automated quality<br>control functions<br>- Tissue contrast check<br>- Scan protocol<br>verification<br>- Atlas alignment check<br>• Results must be reviewed<br>by a trained physician |
{7}------------------------------------------------
#### Substantial Equivalence Discussion
Neurophet AQUA V3.1 is an update of the previous 510(k) cleared device, Neurophet AQUA v2.1 (K220437).
- · Except for the addition of "and lesions" words, both devices have same indications for use.
- · Physical characteristics, and operating system are same.
- · T1 MR image analysis algorithm and performance is same as previous.
New features of the device are as follows:
- · Quantitative analysis function of T2 FLAIR images is added.
A major update in this version is support for quantitative analysis of T2 FLAIR images. This feature was added after verifying the performance of the analysis algorithm. We verified the
{8}------------------------------------------------
accuracy and reproducibility of T2 FLAIR analysis considering various patients ages, ethnicities, and gender. The test results meet acceptance criteria based on the performance of the reference device, NeuroQuant v2.2 (K170981).
In conclusion, Neurophet AQUA V3.1 is substantially equivalent to the predicated device, Neurophet AQUA v2.1 (K220437).
## 11. Performance Data:
SW verification/validation test were conducted to establish the performance, functionality and reliability characteristics of the subject devices. The device passed all of the tests based on pre-determined Pass/Fail criteria.
About the deep learning algorithm, the analysis performance is tested and validated as below:
To demonstrate the T2-FLAIR analysis performance of Neurophet AQUA, the data primarily sourced from U.S. hospitals were utilized. The data presents a diverse mix of clinical, demographic, and technical variables, providing a foundation for both reliable and reproducible testing, as well as comprehensive accuracy assessment. The ground truth was established by consensus among three U.S.-based neuroradiologists. The multi-site data collection enhances statistical independence, while the inclusion of varied demographic groups, clinical conditions, and MR imaging parameters addresses potential confounders.
The accuracy test dataset comprised 136 images, and the reproducibility test dataset comprised 52 images. The sample size supports robust performance validation. The subjects upon whom the device was trained and tested include healthy subjects, mild cognitive impairment patients. Alzheimer's disease patients, and multiple sclerosis patients from young adults to elderlies. The multicenter study was adapted to collect scans from various vendors including Philips, Siemens, and GE and MR scans using general clinical protocols were collected.
Neurophet AQUA performance was then evaluated by comparing segmentation accuracy with expert manual segmentations and by measuring segmentation reproducibility between same subject scans. The system yields reproducible results that are well correlated with expert manual segmentation.
Neurophet AQUA's lesion segmentation accuracy compared to expert manual segmentations of T2 FLAIR scan was evaluated using Dice's coefficient metric, which exceeds 0.80. The brain lesion segmentation reproducibility was evaluated using repeated T2 FLAIR scan pairs of subjects with brain lesions. The mean absolute lesion volume difference was less than 0.25cc.
{9}------------------------------------------------
The segmentation accuracy and reproducibility for T1 images were evaluated under K220437.
## 12. Conclusion:
The subject device is substantially equivalent in the areas of technical characteristics, general function, application, and indications for use. The new device does not introduce a fundamentally new scientific technology, and the device has been validated through system level test. Therefore, we conclude that the subject device described in this submission is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.