ROSA Knee System

K182964 · Orthosoft Inc (D/B/A Zimmer Cas) · OLO · Jan 24, 2019 · Neurology

Device Facts

Record IDK182964
Device NameROSA Knee System
ApplicantOrthosoft Inc (D/B/A Zimmer Cas)
Product CodeOLO · Neurology
Decision DateJan 24, 2019
DecisionSESE
Submission TypeTraditional
Regulation21 CFR 882.4560
Device ClassClass 2

Intended Use

The ROSA® Knee System is indicated as a stereotaxic instrumentation system for total knee replacement (TKA) surgery. It is to assist the surgeon in providing software-defined spatial boundaries for orientation to identifiable anatomical structures for the accurate placement of knee implant components. The robotic arm placement is performed relative to anatomical landmarks as recorded using the system intraoperatively, and based on a surgical plan, optionally determined pre-operatively using compatible X-ray or MRI based surgical planning tools. It includes a robotic arm, an optical sensor navigation system and accessories, software system, surgical instruments and accessories. The targeted population has the same characteristics as the population that is suitable for the implants compatible with the ROSA® Knee System. The ROSA® Knee System is to be used with the following fixed bearing knee replacement systems in accordance with their indications and contraindications: NexGen® CR, NexGen CR-Flex, NexGen CR-Flex Gender, NexGen LPS, NexGen LPS-Flex, NexGen LPS-Flex Gender, Persona® CR, Persona PS, Vanguard® CR, and Vanguard PS.

Device Story

ROSA Knee System assists surgeons in TKA surgery by providing spatial boundaries for implant placement. Inputs include intraoperative anatomical landmarks (via optical navigation) and optional preoperative 3D bone models (from X-ray or MRI). System transforms inputs into a surgical plan; robotic arm positions cut guides relative to planned implant location. Used in OR by surgeons. Data managed via Zimmer Biomet Drive Portal. Output allows surgeon to perform bone resections and assess soft tissue balance. Benefits include increased accuracy in implant positioning and alignment compared to manual techniques.

Clinical Evidence

Bench testing only. Evidence includes biocompatibility (ISO 10993), electrical safety (IEC 60601-1), EMC (IEC 60601-1-2), and software V&V (IEC 62304). Validation lab testing performed on cadaveric specimens to confirm safety and effectiveness under simulated use.

Technological Characteristics

Stereotaxic robotic system; includes robotic arm, optical sensor navigation, software, and surgical instruments. Supports MR/X-ray image-based planning or imageless intraoperative planning. Connectivity via Zimmer Biomet Drive Portal. Software classified as major level of concern.

Indications for Use

Indicated for patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKA) surgery who are candidates for compatible fixed-bearing knee implants (NexGen or Persona/Vanguard series). Contraindicated in patients with significant hip pathology (bone loss, severe dysplasia, limited range of motion), active knee joint infections, or those requiring revision surgery.

Regulatory Classification

Identification

A stereotaxic instrument is a device consisting of a rigid frame with a calibrated guide mechanism for precisely positioning probes or other devices within a patient's brain, spinal cord, or other part of the nervous system.

Predicate Devices

Related Devices

Submission Summary (Full Text)

{0}------------------------------------------------ Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logos of the Department of Health & Human Services and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The Department of Health & Human Services logo is on the left, and the FDA logo is on the right. The FDA logo includes the letters "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue text. Orthosoft Inc. (d/b/a Zimmer CAS) Paul Hardy Sr. Specialist, Regulatory Affairs 75 Queen Street Ste. 3300 Montreal QC, H3C 2N6 CA January 24, 2019 Re: K182964 Trade/Device Name: ROSA Knee System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.4560 Regulation Name: Stereotaxic Instrument Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OLO Dated: October 24, 2018 Received: October 25, 2018 Dear Paul Hardy: We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading. If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part {1}------------------------------------------------ 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/CombinationProducts/GuidanceRegulatoryInformation/ucm597488.htm); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm. For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100). Sincerely, Digitally signed Jesse by Jesse Muir -S Date: 2019.01.24 Muir -S Date: 2019.01.2 Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health Enclosure {2}------------------------------------------------ # Indications for Use 510(k) Number (if known) K182964 Device Name ROSA® Knee System #### Indications for Use (Describe) The ROSA® Knee System is indicated as a stereotaxic instrumentation system for total knee replacement (TKA) surgery. It is to assist the surgeon in providing software-defined spatial boundaries for orientation to identifiable anatomical structures for the accurate placement of knee implant components. The robotic arm placement is performed relative to anatomical landmarks as recorded using the system intraoperatively, and based on a surgical plan, optionally determined pre-operatively using compatible X-ray or MRI based surgical planning tools. It includes a robotic arm, an optical sensor navigation system and accessories, software system, surgical instruments and accessories. The targeted population has the same characteristics as the population that is suitable for the implants compatible with the ROSA® Knee System. The ROSA® Knee System is to be used with the following fixed bearing knee replacement systems in accordance with their indications and contraindications: NexGen® CR, NexGen CR-Flex, NexGen CR-Flex Gender, NexGen LPS, NexGen LPS-Flex, NexGen LPS-Flex Gender, Persona® CR, Persona PS, Vanguard® CR, and Vanguard PS. | Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | | |----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | <div> <span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) </span> </div> | <div> <span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) </span> </div> | #### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED. This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. #### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.* The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: > Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov "An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number." {3}------------------------------------------------ ### K182964 ## 510(k) Summary In accordance with 21 CFR §807.92 and the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990, the following information is provided for the ROSA® Knee System 510(k) premarket notification. The submission was prepared in accordance with the FDA guidance document, 'Format for Traditional and Abbreviated 510(k)s', issued on August 12, 2005. | Sponsor: | Zimmer CAS d/b/a Orthosoft, Inc.<br>75 Queen St., Suite 3300<br>Montreal, QC, CANADA H3C 2N6<br>Establishment Registration Number: 9617840 | |-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Contact Person: | Paul Hardy<br>Regulatory Affairs Sr. Specialist<br>Telephone: 574-372-6799 | | Date: | January 23, 2019 | | Subject Device: | Trade Name: ROSA® Knee System<br>Common Name: ROSA® Knee System | | | Classification Name:<br>• OLO- Orthopedic Stereotaxic Instrument (21 CFR<br>882.4560) | Predicate Device(s): | Manufacturer | Device Name | 510(k) Number | |------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------| | Medtech S.A. | ROSA Spine | K151511 | | MAKO Surgical<br>Corp. | Mako Total Knee<br>Application | K172219 | Purpose and Device Description: The ROSA® Knee System is used to assist surgeons in performing Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) with features to assist with the bone resections as well as assessing the state of the soft tissues to facilitate implant positioning intra-operatively. The ROSA® Knee System uses a Medical Device Data System (MDDS) called the Zimmer {4}------------------------------------------------ Biomet Drive Portal which manages the creation and tracking of surgical cases. The cases reside on the portal until it is uploaded to the ROSA® Knee System before surgeries. If the case is image-based, a 3D virtual bone model is generated pre-operatively by the PSI systems (X-PSI Knee System or CAS PSI Knee System) to create a model of the patient's femur/tibia and allows for the preparation of a pre-operative surgical plan as well as visualization of planned cuts. The pre-operative plan is then matched to the landmarks taken intra-operatively on the patient's bony anatomy. An imageless option is also available where landmarks taken intra-operatively on the patient's bony anatomy are used to create the surgical plan directly in the surgery. Accuracy of resections, knee state evaluation, and soft tissue assessment are the same between image-based and imageless options as they are always based on intra-operative landmarks. The intra-operative workflow and surgical concepts implemented in the system remain close to the conventional TKA workflow. As such, at the time of the surgery , the system mainly assists the surgeon in (1) determining reference alignment axes in relation to anatomical landmarks, (2) planning the orthopedic implants location based on these reference alignment axes and orthopedic implant geometry (planning optionally based on a pre-operative plan using pre-operative imaging),, and (3) precisely positioning the cut guide relative to the planned orthopedic implant location by using a robotic arm. Indications for Use: The ROSA® Knee System is indicated as a stereotaxic instrumentation system for total knee replacement (TKA) surgery. It is to assist the surgeon in providing softwaredefined spatial boundaries for orientation and reference information to identifiable anatomical structures for the accurate placement of knee implant components. > The robotic arm placement is performed relative to anatomical landmarks as recorded using the system intraoperatively, and based on a surgical plan, optionally determined pre-operatively using compatible X-ray or MRI based surgical planning tools. {5}------------------------------------------------ | | It includes a robotic arm, an optical sensor navigation<br>system and accessories, software system, surgical<br>instruments and accessories. | |----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | The targeted population has the same characteristics as the<br>population that is suitable for the implants compatible with<br>the ROSA® Knee System. The ROSA® Knee System is to<br>be used with the following fixed bearing knee replacement<br>systems in accordance with their indications and<br>contraindications: NexGen® CR, NexGen CR-Flex,<br>NexGen CR-Flex Gender, NexGen LPS, NexGen LPS-<br>Flex, NexGen LPS-Flex Gender, Persona® CR, Persona<br>PS, Vanguard® CR, and Vanguard PS. | | Contraindications: | The ROSA® Knee System may not be suitable for use in case<br>of: | | | hip pathology with significant bone loss (e.g. avascular<br>necrosis of the femoral head with collapse, severe dysplasia<br>of the femoral head or the acetabulum); hip pathology severely limiting range of motion (e.g.<br>arthrodesis, severe contractures, chronic severe dislocation); active infections of the knee joint area; knee replacement revision surgery; presence of strong infrared sources or infrared reflectors in<br>the vicinity of the trackers; contraindications for the implant as given by the implant<br>manufacturer; and implants that are not compatible with the system | | Summary of Technological<br>Characteristics: | The rationale for substantial equivalence is based on<br>consideration of the following characteristics: | | | The proposed and predicate device(s) are intended to assist<br>the surgeon in providing software defined spatial boundaries<br>for orientation | - The proposed and predicate device(s) assists in intraoperative ● navigation of the patient's anatomy and are utilized to facilitate implant positioning - . The propose and predicate device(s) assist in joint balancing techniques {6}------------------------------------------------ - The proposed and predicate device(s) utilizes image data that ● has been segmented to create a 3D model of the patient's bony anatomy - . The proposed and predicate device(s) consists of major components including a robotic arm, software system, navigation system, various instrumentation including reusable and disposable ### Summary of Performance Data (Nonclinical and/or Clinical) The following performance data was provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination: #### Biocompatibility Testing The biocompatibility evaluation for ROSA Knee was conducted in accordance with ISO 10993. The evaluation reveals that the ROSA Knee device meets biocompatibility requirements. ## Electrical Safety and Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) Electrical safety and EMC testing was conducted on ROSA Knee. The device complies with recognized electrical safety standards: IEC 60601-1 standard for electrical safety and IEC 60601-1-2 standard for electromagnetic compatibility. # Device Performance Testing Verification and Validation Testing for ROSA Knee was conducted with the following aspects: - Physical/Performance Tests- to ensure the performance of O the implemented features and verify related design inputs - Engineering Analysis- to ensure the performance of the O implemented features and verify related design inputs - Usability Engineering- addressed user interactions with the O ROSA Knee - Validation Lab- performed to validate that using the ROSA O Knee is safe and effective and that the performances of the ROSA Knee are acceptable under full simulated use on cadaveric specimens {7}------------------------------------------------ #### Software Verification and Validation Testing Software tests were conducted to satisfy the requirements of the FDA Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices and IEC 62304 (Medical Device Software- Life Cycle Process). The software was considered a "major" level of concern, since a failure of the software could result in serious injury or death to the patient. The testing demonstrates that the ROSA Knee does not raise any new issues of safety and effectiveness as compared to the predicate device(s). #### Substantial Equivalence Conclusion The proposed and predicate device(s) have the same intended use and similar technological characteristics with the exception that the proposed device utilizes Magnetic Resonance (MR) and X-Ray image data and the predicate device(s) uses Computed Tomography (CT). These imaging modalities have been used in various Zimmer Biomet platforms. In addition, the proposed device uses cutting blocks to assist with bone preparation similar to traditional manual total knee arthroplasty while the predicate device(s) are equipped with an automated cutting system that does not require cutting blocks or pedicle screws that are placed by the surgeon and surgical tools are inserted in tool guides on the robotic arm. In sum, any differences between the devices do not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness and the proposed device is at least as safe and effective as the legally marketed predicate device(s).
Innolitics
510(k) Summary
Decision Summary
Classification Order
Enter a record ID and click Load to view the document.
100%