K080537 · Kiscomedica S.A. · MAX · Jun 30, 2008 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K080537
Device Name
L-VARLOCK
Applicant
Kiscomedica S.A.
Product Code
MAX · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Jun 30, 2008
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3080
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Intended Use
The L-Varlock Lumbar Cage is indicated for intervertebral body fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the lumbar spine at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. DDD is defined as discogenic pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s). L-Varlock Lumbar implants are to be used with autogenous bone graft and implanted via an open posterior approach. L-Varlock Lumbar implant is to be used with supplemental fixation. Patients should have at least six (6) months of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with an intervertebral cage.
Device Story
L-Varlock Lumbar Cage is an intervertebral body fusion device implanted via open posterior approach; used in pairs to provide stability during spinal fusion. Features include variable heights, widths, and lengths to accommodate patient anatomy; large graft space for autogenous bone; toothed outer walls to prevent migration; rounded anterior geometry to protect vascular structures. Device requires supplemental posterior fixation. Used by surgeons in clinical settings to treat discogenic pain associated with DDD. Benefits include structural support for bony fusion and foraminal enlargement.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Mechanical testing performed according to ASTM F2077 and F2267 standards to confirm the device meets required mechanical acceptance criteria.
Technological Characteristics
Material: Titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V-Eli, ASTM F136). Design: Intervertebral cage with toothed outer walls and rounded anterior geometry. Mechanical testing: ASTM F2077/F2267. No software or electronic components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for skeletally mature patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels (L2-S1), including those with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis, who have failed at least 6 months of non-operative treatment.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An intervertebral body fusion device is an implanted single or multiple component spinal device made from a variety of materials, including titanium and polymers. The device is inserted into the intervertebral body space of the cervical or lumbosacral spine, and is intended for intervertebral body fusion.
Special Controls
*Classification.* (1) Class II (special controls) for intervertebral body fusion devices that contain bone grafting material. The special control is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device.” See § 888.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.(2) Class III (premarket approval) for intervertebral body fusion devices that include any therapeutic biologic (e.g., bone morphogenic protein). Intervertebral body fusion devices that contain any therapeutic biologic require premarket approval.
(c)
*Date premarket approval application (PMA) or notice of product development protocol (PDP) is required.* Devices described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.
K213653 — 4CIS BLACK MARLIN PLIF CAGE SYSTEM, 4CIS DOLPHIN TLIF CAGE SYSTEM · Solco Biomedical Company India Private Limited · Dec 19, 2022
K083626 — DISTRACTABLE WAVE CAGE · Advanced Medical Technology, Inc. · Oct 19, 2009
K193645 — nva, nvp, and nvt · Nvision Biomedical Technologies, Inc. · Jan 13, 2020
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
K080537
Page 1 of 2
## 510(k) Summary for the L-Varlock Lumbar Cages
In accordance with 21 CFR 807.92 of the Federal Code of Regulations the following 510(k) summary is submitted for the L-Varlock Lumbar Cages
Date Prepared: February 20, 2008
| 1. Submitter: | Contact Person: |
|------------------------|----------------------------|
| Kiscomedica | J.D. Webb |
| Parc Technologique | The OrthoMedix Group, Inc. |
| 2 Place Berthe Morisot | 1001 Oakwood Blvd |
| 69800 ST PRIEST | Round Rock, TX 78681 |
| FRANCE | Telephone: 512-388-0199 |
| 2. Trade name: | L-Varlock Lumbar Cages |
|----------------------|-----------------------------------|
| Common Name: | intervertebral body fusion device |
| Classification Name: | intervertebral body fusion device |
| | Class II per CFR Section 888.3080 |
| | MAX |
#### Predicate or legally marketed devices which are substantially equivalent: 3.
The L-Varlock Lumbar Cage is substantially equivalent to similar previously cleared lumbar intervertebral body fusion devices.
#### 4. Description of the device:
L-Varlock Lumbar Cage is implanted via a posterior approach and supplemented by posterior fixation. Two devices are used. Main features of the L-Varlock lumbar cage are:
- Different heights for accurate enlargement of the foramina .
- Different widths and lengths to achieve excellent stability at the instrumented level . while preserving the patient's anatomy.
- Large graft space to achieve good bony fusion .
- Large cortical interface to ensure a good bony fusion. .
- Toothed outer walls prevent implant back out. ●
- The rounded geometry of the anterior end of the cage avoids damage to the anterior � vascular structures.
#### Materials:
L-Varlock lumbar Cages are manufactured from titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V-Eli, ASTM norm F136).
#### Function:
Lumbar interbody cages are one of the treatment options for low back pain.
#### 5. Intended Use:
The L-Varlock Lumbar Cage is indicated for intervertebral body fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the lumbar spine at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. DDD is defined as discogenic pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s).
{1}------------------------------------------------
K080537
Page 2 of 2
L-Varlock Lumbar implants are to be used with autogenous bone graft and implanted via an open posterior approach. L-Varlock Lumbar implant is to be used with supplemental fixation. Patients should have at least six (6) months of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with an intervertebral cage.
#### Comparison of the technological characteristics of the device to predicate and legally marketed 6. devices:
The L-Varlock Lumbar Cage is similar to the predicate devices in terms of indications for use, design, material, and function.
### 7. Summary of Nonclincal Tests
Tests performed according to ASTM F2077/F2267 indicate that the L-Varlock Lumbar Cages meet the required mechanical acceptance criteria.
{2}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/2/Picture/1 description: The image shows the seal of the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. The seal is circular, with the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the perimeter. In the center of the seal is an abstract image of an eagle.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
Kiscomedica % The OrthoMedix Group, Inc. Mr. J.D. Webb 1001 Oakwood Boulevard Round Rock, TX 78681
Re: K080537
> Trade/Device Name: L-Varlock Lumbar Cage Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3080 Regulation Name: Intervertebral body fusion device Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: MAX Dated: May 27, 2008 Received: May 29, 2008
Dear Mr. Webb:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
JUN 3 0 2008
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Mr. J.D. Webb
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance at (240) 276-0120. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding postmarket surveillance, please contact CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometric's (OSB's) Division of Postmarket Surveillance at (240) 276-3474. For questions regarding the reporting of device adverse events (Medical Device Reporting (MDR)), please contact the Division of Surveillance Systems at (240) 276-3464. You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (240) 276-3150 or the Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html.
Sincerely yours,
Mark M. Mulkerin
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of General, Restorative and Neurological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{4}------------------------------------------------
K080537
Page lot)
# Indications for Use
K-08053 510(k) Number (if known):
Device Name: L-Varlock Lumbar Cage
Indications for Use:
The L-Varlock Lumbar Cage is indicated for intervertebral body fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the lumbar spine at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. DDD is defined as discogenic pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s).
L-Varlock Lumbar implants are to be used with autogenous bone graft and implanted via an open posterior approach. L-Varlock Lumbar implant is to be used with supplemental fixation. Patients should have at least six (6) months of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with an intervertebral cage.
Prescription Use _ X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE OF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
(Division Sign-Off) Division of General, Restorative, and Neurological Devices
**510(k) Number** k086537
Panel 1
/
Sort by
Ready
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.