Chesapeake Stabilization System
K142487 · K2m, Inc. · OVD · May 7, 2015 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
| Record ID | K142487 |
| Device Name | Chesapeake Stabilization System |
| Applicant | K2m, Inc. |
| Product Code | OVD · Orthopedic |
| Decision Date | May 7, 2015 |
| Decision | SESE |
| Submission Type | Traditional |
| Regulation | 21 CFR 888.3080 |
| Device Class | Class 2 |
| Attributes | Therapeutic |
Intended Use
When used as a cervical intervertebral body fusion device, the CHESAPEAKE Stabilization System implants are indicated for spinal fusion procedures to be used with autogenous bone graft in skeletally mature patients. Cervical IBF implants are intended for use at one level in the cervical spine, from C2 to T1, for the treatment of cervical disc disease (defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radies), The cervical device is intended to be used in patients who have had six weeks of non-operative treatment. When used as a lumbar intervertebral body fusion device, the CHESAPEAKE Stabilization System implants are indicated for spinal fusion procedures to be used with autogenous bone graft in skeletally mature patients. The Lumbar IBF implants are intended for use at either one level or two contiguous levels in the lumbar spine, from L2 to S1, for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The lumbar device is intended to be used in patients who have had six months of non-operative treatment. The hyperlordotic lumbar implants (i.e., > 15°) must be used with supplemental fixation (i.e., posterior pedicle screw and rod system) cleared for use in the lumbar spine, in addition to the bone screws provided. Otherwise, the Chesapeake Stabilization System implants (i.e., ≤ 15°) may be used as a stand-alone device, which is intended to be used with the bone screws provided (i.e., 2 or 3 screw and 3-screw implants, respectively),
Device Story
Intervertebral body fusion system; provides spinal stabilization; cervical and lumbar segments. Implants inserted surgically; autogenous bone graft used for fusion. Hyperlordotic lumbar implants (>15°) require supplemental posterior pedicle screw/rod fixation; implants ≤15° used as stand-alone with provided bone screws. System supports spinal segments; facilitates fusion; treats discogenic pain/degeneration. Used by surgeons in clinical settings.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Mechanical testing performed per ASTM F2077 (static/dynamic compression, torsion) and ASTM F2267 (expulsion, subsidence). No clinical data provided.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: PEEK OPTIMA LT1 (ASTM F2026), CP titanium (ASTM F67), Tantalum (ASTM F560), Ti6Al4V (ASTM F1472). Mechanical fixation via integrated bone screws. Stand-alone or supplemental fixation depending on lordosis angle. Sterilization not specified.
Indications for Use
Indicated for spinal fusion in skeletally mature patients with cervical disc disease (C2-T1, 1 level, 6 weeks failed non-operative care) or lumbar degenerative disc disease with up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis (L2-S1, 1-2 levels, 6 months failed non-operative care).
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An intervertebral body fusion device is an implanted single or multiple component spinal device made from a variety of materials, including titanium and polymers. The device is inserted into the intervertebral body space of the cervical or lumbosacral spine, and is intended for intervertebral body fusion.
Special Controls
*Classification.* (1) Class II (special controls) for intervertebral body fusion devices that contain bone grafting material. The special control is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device.” See § 888.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.(2) Class III (premarket approval) for intervertebral body fusion devices that include any therapeutic biologic (e.g., bone morphogenic protein). Intervertebral body fusion devices that contain any therapeutic biologic require premarket approval.
(c)
*Date premarket approval application (PMA) or notice of product development protocol (PDP) is required.* Devices described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.
Predicate Devices
- K2M Chesapeake (K092211)
- K2M Chesapeake (K111439)
- K2M Chesapeake (K133494)
- K2M Aleutian (K082698)
- K2M Aleutian (K133614)
- NuVasive Brigade (K123045)
Related Devices
- K151481 — Sahara Stabilization System · K2m, Inc. · Dec 21, 2015
- K152987 — Xenco Medical Cervical Interbody System, Xenco Medical Lumbar Interbody System · Xenco Medical, LLC · Dec 11, 2015
- K141896 — COROENT SYSTEM · Nu Vasive, Incorporated · Nov 20, 2014
- K110783 — VENUS INTERBODY FIXATION SYSTEM- VENUS PLIF/TLIF, ALIF PEEK CAGE · L&K BIOMED Co., Ltd. · Oct 24, 2011
- K193418 — SeaSpine Skipjack System · SeaSpine Orthopedics Corporation · Mar 13, 2020
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized representation of three human profiles facing right, arranged in a way that suggests unity and connection. The profiles are black and are set against a white background. Encircling the profiles are the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" in a circular arrangement.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
May 7, 2015
K2M, Incorporated Ms. Nancv Giezen Manager, Regulatory Affairs 571 Miller Drive Southeast Leesburg, Virginia 20175
Re: K142487
Trade/Device Name: Chesapeake Stabilization System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3080 Regulation Name: Intervertebral body fusion device Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OVD, OVE Dated: April 21, 2015 Received: April 22, 2015
Dear Ms. Giezen:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set
{1}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Ms. Nancy Giezen
forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
# Mark N. Melkerson -S
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K142487
#### Device Name
Chesapeake Stabilization System
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
When used as a cervical intervertebral body fusion device, the CHESAPEAKE Stabilization System implants are indicated for spinal fusion procedures to be used with autogenous bone graft in skeletally mature patients. Cervical IBF implants are intended for use at one level in the cervical spine, from C2 to T1, for the treatment of cervical disc disease (defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radies), The cervical device is intended to be used in patients who have had six weeks of non-operative treatment. When used as a lumbar intervertebral body fusion device, the CHESAPEAKE Stabilization System implants are indicated for spinal fusion procedures to be used with autogenous bone graft in skeletally mature patients. The Lumbar IBF implants are intended for use at either one level or two contiguous levels in the lumbar spine, from L2 to S1, for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The lumbar device is intended to be used in patients who have had six months of non-operative treatment.
The hyperlordotic lumbar implants (i.e., > 15°) must be used with supplemental fixation
(i.e., posterior pedicle screw and rod system) cleared for use in the lumbar spine, in addition to the bone screws provided. Otherwise, the Chesapeake Stabilization System implants (i.e., ≤ 15°) may be used as a stand-alone device, which is intended to be used with the bone screws provided (i.e., 2 or 3 screw and 3-screw implants, respectively),
| Type of Use <i>(Select one or both, as applicable)</i> |
|--------------------------------------------------------|
|--------------------------------------------------------|
| | <span> <b> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) </b> </span> |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | <span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) </span> |
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
***DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.***
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the
time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
## 510(k) Summary Chesapeake Stabilization System K2M, Inc.
#### Submitter
K2M, Inc. 751 Miller Drive SE Leesburg, VA 20175 Contact Person: Nancy Giezen Telephone: 703-777-3155 Date Prepared: 05/05/2015
#### Classification
Trade Name: Chesapeake Stabilization System Common Name: Spinal Fixation System Regulatory Class: Class II
Classification Name(s):
Intervertebral Body Fusion Device with Integrated Fixation (21 CFR 888.3080, Product Code OVD. OVE)
### Predicate Device(s)
Primary Predicate: K2M Chesapeake (K092211) Additional Predicates: K2M Chesapeake (K111439, K133494) K2M Aleutian (K082698, K133614) NuVasive Brigade (K123045)
#### Device Description
The spacers are manufactured from Medical Grade PEEK (Polyetheretherketone) OPTIMA ® LT1 (Invibio™) per ISO 10993-1 USP Class VI, and ASTM F2026 and CP titanium per ASTM F67. Tantalum beads /rods to be Grade UNS R05200, UNS R05400 according to ASTM F560. The screws are fabricated from Ti6Al4V per ASTM 1472.
Function: The system functions as an intervertebral body fusion device to provide support and stabilization of the cervical and lumbar segments of the spine.
The purpose of this 510(k) submission is primarily to add additional cervical and lumbar lordotic implants.
#### Intended Use
When used as a cervical intervertebral body fusion device, the CHESAPEAKE Stabilization System implants are indicated for spinal fusion procedures to be used with autogenous bone graft
{4}------------------------------------------------
in skeletally mature patients. Cervical IBF implants are intended for use at one level in the cervical spine, from C2 to T1, for the treatment of cervical disc disease (defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies). The cervical device is intended to be used in patients who have had six weeks of non-operative treatment.
When used as a lumbar intervertebral body fusion device. the CHESAPEAKE Stabilization System implants are indicated for spinal fusion procedures to be used with autogenous bone graft in skeletally mature patients. The Lumbar IBF implants are intended for use at either one level or two contiguous levels in the lumbar spine, from L2 to S1, for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The lumbar device is intended to be used in patients who have had six months of non-operative treatment.
The hyperlordotic lumbar implants (i.e., > 15°) must be used with supplemental fixation (i.e., posterior pedicle screw and rod system) cleared for use in the lumbar spine, in addition to the bone screws provided. Otherwise, the Chesapeake Stabilization System implants (i.e., < 15°) may be used as a stand-alone device, which is intended to be used with the bone screws provided (i.e., 2 or 3 screws for the 2-screw and 3-screw implants, respectively).
#### Technological Comparison to Predicate(s)
The Chesapeake Stabilization System was compared to predicate systems and were found to be substantially the same as these systems.
# Non-clinical Performance Evaluation
Mechanical testing including static compression, static compression shear, dynamic compression and dynamic torsion (per ASTM F2077), expulsion, and subsidence (per ASTM F2267) was performed in support of this submission and the proposed implants were determined to be substantially equivalent to predicate devices.
# Conclusion
There are no significant differences between the proposed Chesapeake spacers and other devices currently being marketed which would adversely affect the use of the product. It is substantially equivalent to these other devices in design, function, material and intended use.