OPTETRAK LOGIC POROUS FEMORAL COMPONENT

K123687 · Exactech, Inc. · JWH · Mar 20, 2013 · Orthopedic

Device Facts

Record IDK123687
Device NameOPTETRAK LOGIC POROUS FEMORAL COMPONENT
ApplicantExactech, Inc.
Product CodeJWH · Orthopedic
Decision DateMar 20, 2013
DecisionSESE
Submission TypeTraditional
Regulation21 CFR 888.3560
Device ClassClass 2
AttributesTherapeutic

Intended Use

The OPTETRAK Comprehensive Knee Systems are indicated for use in skeletally mature individuals undergoing primary surgery for total knee replacement due to osteoarthritis, osteonecrosis, rheumatoid arthritis and/or post-traumatic degenerative problems. They are also indicated for revision of failed previous reconstructions where sufficient bone stock and soft tissue integrity are present. In the USA, the OPTETRAK Comprehensive Knee System is indicated for cemented use only.

Device Story

The Optetrak Logic Porous Femoral Component is a modification of existing femoral components for total knee arthroplasty. The device consists of a cobalt-chrome femoral component with an added beaded, sintered porous coating on non-articulating surfaces to facilitate bone apposition. It is intended for use by orthopedic surgeons in clinical settings. The device is implanted during total knee replacement surgery to restore joint function. The porous coating design is based on previously cleared Exactech porous-coated components. The device is used in conjunction with cemented fixation as per US indications. Clinical benefit is derived from the mechanical replacement of the knee joint in patients with degenerative conditions.

Clinical Evidence

No clinical data provided. Evidence consists of bench testing: porosity/pore size/thickness (ASTM F1854-09), shear strength (ASTM F1044-05), tensile strength (ASTM F1147-05), shear fatigue (ASTM F1160-05), and abrasion resistance (ASTM F1978-12). All mechanical testing met or exceeded minimum requirements. A cadaver lab evaluation confirmed the prototype could be implanted without difficulty.

Technological Characteristics

Cobalt-chrome femoral component with sintered beaded porous coating. Porosity: 65.8%; mean pore size: 339.9 μm; coating thickness: 766.9 μm. Testing performed per ASTM F1854-09, F1044-05, F1147-05, F1160-05, and F1978-12. Device is a semi-constrained cemented prosthesis.

Indications for Use

Indicated for skeletally mature individuals undergoing primary total knee replacement or revision of failed reconstructions due to osteoarthritis, osteonecrosis, rheumatoid arthritis, or post-traumatic degenerative problems, provided sufficient bone stock and soft tissue integrity exist.

Regulatory Classification

Identification

A knee joint patellofemorotibial polymer/metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a knee joint. The device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. This generic type of device includes prostheses that have a femoral component made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, and a tibial component or components and a retropatellar resurfacing component made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. This generic type of device is limited to those prostheses intended for use with bone cement (§ 888.3027).

Predicate Devices

Related Devices

Submission Summary (Full Text)

{0}------------------------------------------------ # K123687 # Exactech® Optetrak Logic® Porous Femoral Component Traditional 510(k) - 510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness MAR 2 0 2013 Exactech® Inc. Sponsor: 2320 N.W. 66th Court Gainesville, FL 32653 > Phone: (352) 327-4762 Fax: (352) 378-2617 FDA Establishment Number 1038671 - Patrick Hughes Contact: . Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist Date: March 18, 2013 ## Trade or Proprietary or Model Name(s): Exactech® Optetrak Logic® Porous Femoral Component #### Common Name: Cemented Total Knee Prosthesis #### Classification Name: Knee joint patellofemorotibial polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis ## Information on devices to which substantial equivalence is claimed: | 510(k) | Trade or Proprietary or Model Name | Manufacturer | |---------|-------------------------------------------------------------|----------------| | K093360 | Optetrak Logic Total Knee System | Exactech, Inc | | K111400 | Optetrak Logic CR Knee System | Exactech, Inc. | | K121307 | Optetrak Logic CR Knee System Sizes 0 & 6 | Exactech, Inc. | | K935726 | Optetrak Porous Coated Cruciate Retaining Femoral Component | Exactech, Inc | | K935773 | Exactech Posterior Stabilized Porous Femoral Component . | Exactech, Inc | ## Indications for Use: The OPTETRAK Comprehensive Knee Systems are indicated for use in skeletally mature individuals undergoing primary surgery for total knee replacement due to osteoarthritis, osteonecrosis, rheumatoid arthritis and/or post-traumatic degenerative problems. They are also indicated for revision of failed previous reconstructions where sufficient bone stock and soft tissue integrity are present. In the USA, the OPTETRAK Comprehensive Knee System is indicated for cemented use only. {1}------------------------------------------------ # Exactech® Optetrak Logic® Porous Femoral Component Traditional 510(k) - 510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness ## Device Description: The proposed Optetrak Logic Porous Femoral Component devices represent modifications to existing Optetrak Logic Total Knee System (K093360) and Optetrak Logic CR Knee System femoral components (K111400 and K121307) used in total knee arthroplasty. The only difference between proposed Optetrak Logic Porous Femoral Components and predicate Optetrak Logic femoral components is the addition of a beaded, sintered cobalt-chrome coating to specific non-articulating areas of the subject devices, similar to the coating added to predicate Optetrak Porous Coated Cruciate Retaining Femoral Component devices cleared per 510(k) K935726 and predicate Exactech Posterior Stabilized Porous Femoral Component devices cleared per 510(k) K935773. Both predicate and proposed devices share the following similarities: - the same indications for use . - . the same materials - . the same basic fundamental scientific technology - . the same device compatibility - the same materials and processes used for packaging and sterilization . ## Summary of Testing: | Evaluation | Results | |----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Porosity, pore size, and coating thickness<br>characterization per ASTM F1854-09 | Mean porosity: 65.8% Mean pore size: 339.9 μm Mean tissue-interface coating thickness: 766.9 μm* | | Shear strength evaluation per ASTM F1044-05 | Mean shear strength: 40.6 MPa All test samples exceeded minimum 20 MPa | | Tensile strength evaluation per ASTM F1147-05 | Mean shear strength: 46.9 MPa All test samples exceeded minimum 20 MPa | | Cadaver lab evaluation | Surgeon determined prototype was implanted without difficulty | | Shear fatigue testing per ASTM F1160-05 (n=5) | Specimen 1.3 withstood 10 million load cycles at maximum shear stress of 22.5 MPa, specimen 1.4 failed after 2.4 million cycles, specimen 1.5 failed at adhesive/coating interface after 7.5 million cycles. Remaining specimens tested at higher stresses failed at adhesive/coating interfaces. | | Abrasion resistance testing per ASTM F1978-12 | No visible abrasion marks or particle shedding. Average material change after 100 abrasion cycles = 11.3 ± 13.4 mg | | Chemical composition and material microstructure<br>analysis | Modified substrate of proposed device is equivalent to predicates per chemical composition, fine grain size, fine grain percentage, coarse grain size, grain size distribution, microstructure, and total average grain size. | * Coating thickness measurement modified from standard as described in Section 003 - Standards Form 1854 and Section 010. Per the Class II special controls guidance document Knee Joint Patellofemorotibial and Femorotibial Metal/Polymer Porous-Coated Uncemented Prostheses; Guidance for Industry and FDA issued January 16, 2003, FDA recommends that the porous coating have a volume porosity {2}------------------------------------------------ # Exactech® Optetrak Logic® Porous Femoral Component Traditional 510(k) - 510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness between 30 to 70 percent, an average pore size between 100 to 1,000 microns, and a porous coating thickness of 500 to 1,500 microns. # Substantial Equivalence Conclusion: Results of engineering studies referenced in this 510(k) submission demonstrate the proposed Optetrak Logic Porous Femoral Component devices are substantially equivalent to cited cleared predicate devices. {3}------------------------------------------------ Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized eagle or bird symbol on the right side. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES-USA" is arranged in a circular fashion around the bird symbol. #### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002 March 20, 2013 Exactech. Incorporated % Mr. Patrick Hughes Regulatory Affairs Specialist 2320 N.W. 66th Court Gainesville, Florida 32653 Re: K123687 Trade/Device Name: Exactech® Optetrak Logic® Porous Femoral Component Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3560 Regulation Name: Knee joint patellofemorotibial polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: JWH Dated: February 25, 2013 Received: March 04, 2013 Dear Mr. Hughes: We have reviewed vour Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you; however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading. If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21. Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set {4}------------------------------------------------ #### Page 2 – Mr. Patrick Hughes forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050. If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance. You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Sincerely yours. Erin.J.Keith Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health Enclosure {5}------------------------------------------------ # Exactech® Optetrak Logic® Porous Femoral Component Special 510(k) - Indications for Use K123687 510(k) Number: Device Name: Exactech® Optetrak Logic® Porous Femoral Component #### INDICATIONS The OPTETRAK Comprehensive Knee Systems are indicated for use in skeletally mature individuals undergoing primary surgery for total knee replacement due to osteoarthritis, osteonecrosis, rheumatoid arthritis and/or post-traumatic degenerative problems. They are also indicated for revision of failed previous reconstructions where sufficient bone stock and soft tissue integrity are present. In the USA, the OPTETRAK Comprehensive Knee System is indicated for cemented use only. Prescription Use X and/or (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 807 Subpart C) Please do not write below this line - use another page if needed. Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE) Casey L. Hanley, Ph.D. Division of Orthopaedic Devices Section 006 Page 1 of 1
Innolitics

Panel 1

/
Sort by
Ready

Predicate graph will load when search results are available.

Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.

PDF viewer will load when search results are available.

Loading panels...

Select an item from Submissions

Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.

Section Matches

Results will appear here.

Product Code Matches

Results will appear here.

Special Control Matches

Results will appear here.

Loading collections...