K233949 · Smith & Nephew, Inc. · JDQ · Mar 13, 2024 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K233949
Device Name
ACCORD Cable System
Applicant
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Product Code
JDQ · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Mar 13, 2024
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3010
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Smith & Nephew ACCORD Cable System is indicated for use in general orthopaedic repair procedures including general cerclage of the femur, trochanteric reattachment, fixation of fractures in conjunction with intramedullary prosthesis (i.e., femoral stem) and screw fixation techniques.
Device Story
ACCORD Cable System consists of cables (with/without clamps), trochanteric grips, and plates; used for long bone fracture fixation and general cerclage. Implants are single-use; manufactured from Cobalt Chrome or Titanium; Gamma sterilized. System used by surgeons in clinical/OR settings to provide mechanical stabilization of bone fragments. Output is physical fixation of bone; assists in fracture healing and structural restoration. No changes to design, materials, or function in this submission; labeling update only.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical or bench testing was required as the submission involves only labeling updates with no changes to device design, materials, or manufacturing methods.
Technological Characteristics
System components include Cobalt Chrome cables and Titanium trochanteric grips/plates. Single-use implants; Gamma sterilized. Mechanical fixation device; no software, electronics, or energy sources.
Indications for Use
Indicated for adult skeletally mature patients requiring general orthopaedic repair, including general cerclage of the femur, trochanteric reattachment, and fixation of fractures in conjunction with intramedullary prosthesis or screw fixation techniques.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A bone fixation cerclage is a device intended to be implanted that is made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, and that consists of a metallic ribbon or flat sheet or a wire. The device is wrapped around the shaft of a long bone, anchored to the bone with wire or screws, and used in the fixation of fractures.
{0}------------------------------------------------
March 13, 2024
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
Smith & Nephew, Inc. Anne Remington Regulatory Affairs Specialist 1450 Brooks Road Memphis, Tennessee 38116
#### Re: K233949
Trade/Device Name: ACCORD Cable System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3010 Regulation Name: Bone Fixation Cerclage Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: JDQ, HRS Dated: December 14, 2023 Received: December 14, 2023
### Dear Anne Remington:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
{1}------------------------------------------------
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
# Shumaya Ali -S
Shumaya Ali, M.P.H. Assistant Director DHT6C: Division of Restorative, Repair and Trauma Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
### Indications for Use
Submission Number (if known)
K233949
Device Name
ACCORD Cable System
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
The Smith & Nephew ACCORD Cable System is indicated for use in general orthopaedic repair procedures including general cerclage of the femur, trochanteric reattachment, fixation of fractures in conjunction with intramedullary prosthesis (i.e., femoral stem) and screw fixation techniques.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW."
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary
Prepared on: 2024-03-12
21 CFR 807.92(a)(1)
| Applicant Name | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|--------------|
| Applicant Address | 1450 Brooks Road Memphis TN 38116 United States | |
| Applicant Contact Telephone | 7043979060 | |
| Applicant Contact | Mrs. Anne Remington | |
| Applicant Contact Email | Anne.Remington@smith-nephew.com | |
| Device Trade Name | ACCORD Cable System | |
| Common Name | Bone fixation cerclage | |
| Classification Name | Cerclage, Fixation | |
| Regulation Number | 888.3010 | |
| Product Code | JDQ | |
| Predicate # | Predicate Trade Name (Primary Predicate is listed first) | Product Code |
| K223762 | Smith & Nephew ACCORD Cable System | JDQ |
| K031162 | Smith & Nephew Orthopaedic Cabling System | JDQ |
| K993106 | Smith & Nephew Bone Plate System | HRS |
| The purpose of this Traditional 510(k) is to notify the FDA of Smith & Nephew's intent to request clearance for labeling updates, which<br>include indication updates in the IFU/Package Insert, to Smith & Nephew's ACCORD Cable System. There is no significant change in<br>design, technological characteristics, function, sterilization or packaging of the devices as a result of this submission. | | |
| The ACCORD Cable System includes cables (with or without clamps), trochanteric grips, and plates. (K223762). | | |
| The subject Smith & Nephew ACCORD Cable System devices are identical in function, design features, materials, sterilization, packaging,<br>manufacturing methods and operational principles to what was previously 510k) cleared (K223762, K031162). These labeling | | |
The ACCORD Cable System is intended for use in long bone fracture fixation and general cerclage in adult skeletally mature patients.
The Smith & Nephew ACCORD Cable System consists of Cobalt Chrome cables (without clamps) to be used with the ACCORD Titanium trochanteric grips or ACCORD Titanium plates and also Stainless Steel and Cobalt Chrome cables with clamps to be used alone. These materials are identical to the material that has been previously cleared in K223762, K031162, and K993106.
The implants within this system are single-use and are Gamma sterilized.
updates do not affect the safety and effectiveness of the subject devices when used as labeled.
{4}------------------------------------------------
# Intended Use/Indications for Use
The Smith & Nephew ACCORD Cable System is indicated for use in general orthopaedic repair procedures including general cerclage of the femur, trochanteric reattachment, fixation of fractures in conjunction with intramedullary prosthesis (i.e., femoral stem) and screw fixation techniques.
# Indications for Use Comparison
The purpose of this Traditional 510(k) is to notify the FDA of our intent to request clearance for changes to Smith & Nephew's ACCORD Cable System labeling, including updated indications.
The main change described in this 510(k) is removal of indications that were not previously used or are not applicable to the subject devices from the Instructions for Use (K223762) to meet EU MDR requirements.
The Smith & Nephew ACCORD Cable System is identical in function, design features,
materials, sterilization, packaging methods and operational principles to the commercially available predicate devices Smith & Nephew ACCORD Cable System (K223762), Smith & Nephew Orthopaedic Cabling System (K031162), and Smith & Nephew Bone Plate System (K993106).
# Technological Comparison
The overall technological characteristic including device devices are identical to the predicates cleared under the premarket notifications Smith & Nephew ACCORD Cable System (K223762), Smith & Nephew Orthopaedic Cabling System (K031162), and Smith & Nephew Bone Plate System (K993106). As a result, all relevant testing makes references to existing information previously provided to the agency.
Non-Clinical and/or Clinical Tests Summary & Conclusions 21 CFR 807.92(b)
The purpose of this traditional 510(k) is to request clearance from FDA for labeling changes to the subject Smith & Nephew ACCORD System implants.
The subject Smith & Nephew ACCORD Cable System devices are identical in function, design features, materials, packaging, sterilization, manufacturing methods and operational principles to what was previously 510(k) cleared (K223762, K031162, These labeling updates do not affect the safety and effectiveness of the subject devices when used as labeled.
Therefore, since there are no changes to the design features, or manufacturing methods of the subject ACCORD Cable System devices, no performance testing (bench, animal, clinical) was required.
Not Applicable.
No modifications are being introduced to the subject devices as a result of this filing. The subject devices are substantially equivalent to the previously 510(k) cleared predicate devices (K223762, K031162, K993106).
# 21 CFR 807.92(a)(5)
# 21 CFR 807.92(a)(6)
### 21 CFR 807.92(a)(5)
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.