HYDROVIEW COMPOSITE HYDROGEL FOLDABLE UV-ABSORBING POSTERIOR CHAMBER INTRAOCULAR LENS
P990014 · Bausch & Lomb, Inc. · HQL · Nov 12, 1999 · Ophthalmic
Device Facts
| Record ID | P990014 |
| Device Name | HYDROVIEW COMPOSITE HYDROGEL FOLDABLE UV-ABSORBING POSTERIOR CHAMBER INTRAOCULAR LENS |
| Applicant | Bausch & Lomb, Inc. |
| Product Code | HQL · Ophthalmic |
| Decision Date | Nov 12, 1999 |
| Decision | APWD |
| Regulation | 21 CFR 886.3600 |
| Device Class | Class 3 |
| Attributes | Therapeutic |
Intended Use
Bausch & Lomb Hydroview® Composite Hydrogel Foldable UV-Absorbing Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens – Model H60M, is indicated for primary implantation for the visual correction of aphakia in patients 60 years of age or older where a cataractous lens has been removed by extracapsular extraction methods. The lens is intended for placement in the capsular bag.
Device Story
Hydroview® Model H60M is a foldable, UV-absorbing posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) composed of composite hydrogel. Designed for surgical implantation into the capsular bag by an ophthalmologist following extracapsular cataract extraction. The device replaces the natural cataractous lens to restore visual acuity in elderly patients. Clinical performance evaluated via postoperative visual acuity outcomes and adverse event monitoring compared against historical FDA grid data. Benefits include improved visual acuity (20/40 or better) and low rates of surgical complications.
Clinical Evidence
Prospective clinical study of 387 patients (mean age 74.3 years) followed for 12 months. Primary endpoint: visual acuity (VA) compared to 1983 FDA historical grid. Results: 96.4% of all cases achieved VA of 20/40 or better (vs 88.0% grid). Best-case VA 98.9% (vs 94.0% grid). Cumulative adverse event rates (e.g., macular edema 2.6%, hyphema 0.3%) were generally lower than or comparable to historical grid values. No cases of endophthalmitis, lens dislocation, or retinal detachment reported.
Technological Characteristics
Composite hydrogel foldable IOL; UV-absorbing material. Designed for posterior chamber placement. Biocompatibility established via in-vivo/in-vitro toxicity testing. Sterilization validated per GMP requirements.
Indications for Use
Indicated for primary implantation for visual correction of aphakia in patients ≥60 years old following extracapsular cataract extraction. Intended for capsular bag placement.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An intraocular lens is a device made of materials such as glass or plastic intended to be implanted to replace the natural lens of an eye.
Reference Devices
- Stark WJ, et al. 1983. The FDA Report on Intraocular Lenses. Ophthalmology 90(4): 311-317 (Historical Controls)
Related Devices
- P080021 — XACT FOLDABLE HYDROPHOBIC ACRYLIC ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT-ABSORBING POSTERIOR CHAMBER INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) · Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated · Feb 2, 2009
- P090022 — LENSTEC SOFTEC HD POSTERIOR CHAMBER INTRAOCULAR LENS · Lenstec, Inc. · Apr 12, 2010
- P980040 — SENSAR SOFT ACRYLIC UV-LIGHT ABSORBING POSTERIOR CHAMBER INTRAOCULAR LENS · Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · Feb 3, 2000
- P210005 — IC-8 Apthera Intraocular Lens (IOL) · Acu Focus, Inc. · Jul 22, 2022
- P080004 — HOYA ISPHERIC MODEL YA-60BB INTRAOCULAR LENS · Hoya Surgical Optics, Inc. · Sep 26, 2008
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS DATA
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
A. Premarket Approval Application (PMA) Number: P990014
Date Filed: March 4, 1999
Date Approved:
B. Generic Name of Device: Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens (IOL)
C. Trade Name of Device: Hydroview® Composite Hydrogel Foldable UV-Absorbing Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens, Model H60M
D. Applicant's Name and Address: Bausch & Lomb Surgical, Inc.
21 Park Place Blvd., N.
Clearwater, FL 33759
E. Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) Inspection Date: September 12, 1997
Conclusion: The manufacturing site was found to be in compliance with device GMP requirements.
F. Ophthalmic Devices Panel (Panel):
Date Reviewed: July 23, 1999
Recommendation: Approvable
II. INDICATIONS
Bausch & Lomb Hydroview® Composite Hydrogel Foldable UV-Absorbing Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens – Model H60M, is indicated for primary implantation for the visual correction of aphakia in patients 60 years of age or older where a cataractous lens has been removed by extracapsular extraction methods. The lens is intended for placement in the capsular bag.
III. SUMMARY
The applicant has performed nonclinical and clinical testing on the device, following the recommendations in the draft FDA guidance testing for intraocular lenses dated October 10, 1997. Data on 387 patients followed postoperatively for 12 months were evaluated against historical controls (Stark WJ, et al. 1983. The FDA Report on Intraocular Lenses. Ophthalmology 90(4): 311-317).
The population at risk for developing visually disabling cataracts and needing cataract surgery is typically elderly; the elderly population has a slightly higher proportion of females to males. The average age of the 387 cohort subjects was 74.3 years at the time of surgery; approximately 63% of the 387 cohort subjects were female and 37% were male. The inclusion/exclusion criteria did not exclude patients on the basis of gender or gender-related pathology. The cohort study population of 387 patients was
{1}
Page 2 – P990014 – Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data
96.4% Caucasian, 2.3% Black, and 1.3% other. This study, which began in 1995, included all patients who met the inclusion criteria.
Based on the analysis of the detailed data presented in the PMA, it was determined that the clinical performance of this device, i.e., adverse events and visual acuity results, compares favorably with FDA’s 1983 grid of historical data.
Most Hydroview® patients achieved a visual acuity of 20/40 or better. The rates for both overall and best-case visual acuity for both genders exceeded FDA grid values.
IV. SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS DATA
A. Nonclinical Studies
The applicant conducted a battery of in-vivo and in-vitro acute and chronic toxicity tests that establish the biocompatibility of the lens materials. These studies, combined with data from chemistry and engineering analyses, demonstrate the suitability of the material for use in intraocular lenses. The adequacy of the manufacturing processes, including sterilization, was established through a review of the manufacturing information in the PMA as well as thorough on-site inspections. Non-clinical testing demonstrates the safety and effectiveness of this device from microbiology, toxicology, engineering, and manufacturing perspectives.
B. Clinical Studies
| Visual Acuity (% 20/40 or better) | Model H60M | Grid |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Age | | |
| ≤ 59 | 100.0% [7/7] | 93.7% |
| 60-69 | 95.7% [89/93] | 90.8% |
| 70-79 | 99.3% [147/148] | 88.6% |
| ≥80 | 91.6% [76/83] | 75.2% |
| All Cases, All Ages | 96.4% [319/331] | 88.0% |
| Best Case, All Ages | 98.9% [269/272] | 94.0% |
| Cumulative Adverse Events | | |
| Endophthalmitis | 0.0% 0 | <0.1% |
| Hyphema | 0.3% 1 | 1.0% |
| Hypopyon | 0.0% 0 | 0.4% |
| Lens Dislocation | 0.0% 0 | 0.4% |
| Macular Edema | 2.6% 10 | 3.5% |
| Pupillary Block | 0.0% 0 | 0.3% |
| Retinal Detachment | 0.0% 0 | 0.5% |
| Lens Epithelial Ongrowth (Anterior Surface) | 1.0% 8 | |
| Secondary Surgical Intervention | 0.3% 1 | 2.0% |
| • Iridectomy for Pupillary Block | 0.0% 0 | |
| • Vitreous Aspiration for Pupillary Block | 0.0% 0 | |
| • Repositioning of Lens | 0.0% 0 | |
| • IOL Removal For Inflammation | 0.0% 0 | |
| • IOL Replacement | 0.0% 0 | |
| • Other (Not Lens Related) | 0.3% 1 | |
9
{2}
Page 3 - P990014 - Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data
| Persistent Adverse Events | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Corneal Edema | 0.0% | 0 | 0.6% |
| Hyphema | 0.0% | 0 | 1.0% |
| Iritis | 0.3% | 1 | 1.0% |
| Macular Edema | 0.0% | 0 | 0.8% |
| Secondary Glaucoma | 0.0% | 0 | 0.5% |
| Vitritis | 0.0% | 0 | 0.1% |
| Lens Epithelial Ongrowth (Anterior Surface) | 0.6% | 6 | |
## V. CONCLUSION
The Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) and the Panel reviewed the PMA and concluded that the PMA contained sufficient valid scientific evidence to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device under the prescribed indications for use. CDRH approved this PMA in a letter to the PMA applicant dated NOV 12 1999 and signed by the Deputy Director for Science and Regulatory Policy, Office of Device Evaluation.