PrePex is indicated for circumcision of adult males. PrePex is intended to be placed and removed by a health care professional trained in male circumcision and in use of the PrePex device.
Device Story
PrePex is a non-surgical circumcision device for adult males. It consists of three plastic components: an inner ring, an elastic outer clamping ring, and a placement ring. The device is applied by a trained healthcare professional in a clinical setting without anesthesia or sutures. The mechanism involves clamping the foreskin between the inner and outer rings to block blood supply, inducing necrosis of the tissue. The device remains in place for up to one week before removal by the clinician. This method provides a bloodless procedure, reduces operative time compared to traditional surgical circumcision, and allows patients to return to daily routines immediately. It benefits patients by eliminating the need for surgical cutting, suturing, and anesthesia.
Clinical Evidence
Two clinical studies conducted in Rwanda. Study 1: 50 healthy adult males (18-35 years); 100% achieved complete circumcision; no bleeding; median healing time 21 days post-removal. Study 2: Prospective, randomized, comparative study (120 PrePex vs. 60 surgical); PrePex procedure time (3m 11s) significantly shorter than surgical (15m 33s); no device-related adverse events in PrePex arm vs. 7 mild events in surgical arm; mean healing time 38 days (PrePex) vs. 30 days (surgical).
Technological Characteristics
Plastic circumcision clamp system comprising inner ring, elastic outer ring, and placement ring. Single-use, sterile. Biocompatibility tested per ISO 10993-1:2009 and FDA Blue Book #G95-1. Sizes range 26mm-36mm diameter. Mechanical clamping principle.
Indications for Use
Indicated for circumcision of adult males. Intended for use by trained healthcare professionals.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An obstetric-gynecologic specialized manual instrument is one of a group of devices used during obstetric-gynecologic procedures to perform manipulative diagnostic and surgical functions (e.g., dilating, grasping, measuring, and scraping), where structural integrity is the chief criterion of device performance. This type of device consists of the following:(1) An amniotome is an instrument used to rupture the fetal membranes. (2) A circumcision clamp is an instrument used to compress the foreskin of the penis during circumcision of a male infant. (3) An umbilical clamp is an instrument used to compress the umbilical cord. (4) A uterine curette is an instrument used to scrape and remove material from the uterus. (5) A fixed-size cervical dilator is any of a series of bougies of various sizes used to dilate the cervical os by stretching the cervix. (6) A uterine elevator is an instrument inserted into the uterus used to lift and manipulate the uterus. (7) A gynecological surgical forceps is an instrument with two blades and handles used to pull, grasp, or compress during gynecological examination. (8) A cervical cone knife is a cutting instrument used to excise and remove tissue from the cervix. (9) A gynecological cerclage needle is a looplike instrument used to suture the cervix. (10) A hook-type contraceptive intrauterine device (IUD) remover is an instrument used to remove an IUD from the uterus. (11) A gynecological fibroid screw is an instrument used to hold onto a fibroid. (12) A uterine sound is an instrument used to determine the depth of the uterus by inserting it into the uterine cavity. (13) A cytological cervical spatula is a blunt instrument used to scrape and remove cytological material from the surface of the cervix or vagina. (14) A gynecological biopsy forceps is an instrument with two blades and handles used for gynecological biopsy procedures. (15) A uterine tenaculum is a hooklike instrument used to seize and hold the cervix or fundus. (16) An internal pelvimeter is an instrument used within the vagina to measure the diameter and capacity of the pelvis. (17) A nonmetal vaginal speculum is a nonmetal instrument used to expose the interior of the vagina. (18) A fiberoptic nonmetal vaginal speculum is a nonmetal instrument, with fiberoptic light, used to expose and illuminate the interior of the vagina.
Special Controls
*Classification.* (1) Class II (special controls). The device, when it is an umbilical clamp with or without a cutter, a uterine tenaculum which is sterile and does not use suction and is intended for single use, a nonmetal vaginal speculum, or a fiberoptic nonmetal vaginal speculum, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 884.9.(2) Class I for the amniotome, uterine curette, cervical dilator (fixed-size bougies), cerclage needle, IUD remover, uterine sound, and gynecological biopsy forceps. The devices subject to this paragraph (b)(2) are exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 884.9.
{0}------------------------------------------------
JAN 1 0 2012
# 510(K) Summary
[as required by section 807.92(c)] PrePex
# 510(k) Number K103695
Date:
January 6, 2012
# Applicant Name:
Circ MedTech 6 Hahoshlim St, First floor P.O Box 12006, Herzeliah 46722 Israel Phone: +972 7 76935607 Fax:
#### Company Contact:
Alon Kushnir, VP Regulations and Clinical Affairs Phone: +972 7 76935607 Email: alon@c-medtech.com
#### Contact Person:
Shoshana (Shosh) Friedman, RAC Address: 1914 ] N Pease Pl., Charlotte, NC 28262 Telephone: 704-430-8695 or 704-899-0092 Fax: 704-899-0098 E-mail: shosh@pushmed.com
## Trade Name:
PrePex
#### Classification Name:
Clamps, Circumcision, Obstetric-gynecologic specialized manual instrument
#### Classification:
FDA has classified circumcision clamps for specific uses as class II devices (product code HFX) and they are reviewed by the Obstetric-Gynecologic review committee.
# Reason for Submission:
New device
#### Predicate Devices:
Smart Klamp* Circumcision Clamp (Emergo Group, Inc.) cleared under K032091
{1}------------------------------------------------
#### Device Description:
The PrePex is a device composed of three components; a plastic Inner Ring, an Elastic outer clamping Ring and a Placement Ring for applying the clamping Elastic Ring. The PrePex System is sold sterile for single use and is available in multiple sizes to accommodate variances in adult patients. A sizing guide is separately available, sold clean for single use
# Intended Use:
PrePex is indicated for circumcision of adult males. PrePex is intended to be placed and removed by a health care professional trained in male circumcision and in use of the PrePex device.
#### Technological Characteristics:
The device is designed to block blood supply to the foreskin by clamping the foreskin between the outer Elastic Ring and the Inner Ring. The device remains on the patient foreskin until the physician determines to remove the foreskin. This can be immediate, after placing the device and up to 1 week later when the device is removed.
# Performance Pre-Clinical Data:
- The PrePex has been subject to biocompatibility testing per ISO 10993-. 1:2009 and FDA Blue Book Memorandum #G95-1 (cytotoxicity, dermal irritation, dermal sensitization). The results of these tests were negative and support the safe use of the PrePex in contact with non-intact skin.
- . The PrePex successfully passed a series of bench tests including Delivery Ring Test, Elastic Ring Elongation Test, Inner Ring Surface Smoothness Test, and Final Product Measurements Test.
#### Performance Clinical Data:
- The PrePex Device was subject to a clinical study initiated and sponsored . by the government of Rwanda. The objectives of the study were to assess the safety and efficacy of the PrePex Device for nonsurgical circumcision in adult males. A total of 50 healthy uncircumcised men aged 18 to 35 years were enrolled. The device was placed and removed by a physician or a nurse in a non-sterile setting, with no need for anesthesia or suturing. The subjects were seen regularly throughout the 6-week study, with pain assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) at each visit. The results of this study show that all subjects achieved the endpoint of complete circumcision with no cases of bleeding and no unexpected
adverse events related to the procedure or the device. Only 1 case of diffuse edema, which was resolved with minimal intervention (Ibuprofen), was reported following device removal. All subjects returned to their daily routines soon after device placement and removal, with no sick/absent days associated with the procedure. The median time for complete healing was 21 days after device removal, i.e., 28 days post-placement; the mean time was 25.3 days after device removal. There were no devicerelated incidents, the device functioned as expected in all subjects and there were no instances of erroneous placements of the device.
{2}------------------------------------------------
- As a result of the above mentioned study, the Government of Rwanda . sponsored a second study in which the performance of the PrePex device was compared to a WHO approved method of surgical circumcision in a prospective, randomized, comparative study. The study included a total of 180 participants randomly divided into 2 unbalanced study arms: PrePex arm of 120 subjects and surgical circumcision arm of 60 subjects. The study period per subject was 9 weeks.
The primary objective of the study was to assess the total operative time of the PrePex Device circumcision procedure versus the total operative time of surgical circumcision procedure, as defined in the Framework for Clinical Evaluation of Devices for Adult Male Circumcision (February 2011). Additionally, a number of secondary objectives were evaluated amongst them were: clinical adverse event rates, procedure preparation time and time to complete healing.
All PrePex Device procedures were performed by experienced operators who participated in the first study. The procedures were carried out in a clean environment in a minor surgery room. The procedure was bloodless, and was conducted with no anesthesia or sutures. Subjects participated in regular follow-up visits at specified intervals.
The surgical circumcision procedure used was the dorsal slit method which was performed by a surgeon highly experienced in adult male circumcision.
The study vielded the following results:
- o The average PrePex total procedure time of 3 minutes and 11 seconds is much shorter than the surgical circumcision (15 min. and 33 sec.).
- There were NO related AEs in the PrePex study arm compared to o 7 related mild AEs in the surgical arm.
- There were 3 mild un-related AEs and 1 moderate un-related AE o in the PrePex arm and 1 moderate un-related AE in the surgical arm.
- The average procedure preparation time was 3min and 24 sec for o the PrePex procedure compared to 8 min and 50 sec for the surgical procedure.
- Average time to complete healing was 38 days post PrePex device o removal and 30 days post surgery.
## Adverse Events
In the clinical studies there were no serious adverse events related to the PrePex device or the PrePex procedure.
In the first study, subjects reported minimal pain at all steps in the process except device removal. During device removal subjects experienced moderate pain, therefore, after the first 20 subjects, a 1-g dose of oral analgesia approximately 30 minutes before device placement and before device removal was administered. No additional painkiller was required in any subject.
{3}------------------------------------------------
## Substantial Equivalence:
| Substantial Equivalence | | |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Characteristic | SmartKlamp | PrePex |
| Intended use | indicated for<br>circumcision of<br>newborns and older<br>males, defined as<br>circumferential excision<br>of the foreskin or<br>prepuce at or near the<br>level of coronal sulcus,<br>with minimal amount<br>of preputial skin<br>remaining | indicated for circumcision<br>of adult males<br>intended to be placed and<br>removed by a health care<br>professional trained in<br>male circumcision and in<br>use of the PrePex device |
| Location of use | Foreskin | Foreskin |
| Target population | Male newborn and<br>adult | Male adult |
| Mode of operation | Blocks blood supply to<br>the foreskin by<br>clamping the foreskin | Blocks blood supply to<br>the foreskin by<br>clamping the foreskin |
| Mode of use | Single use | Single use |
| Material made | Plastic | Plastic |
| Accessories | Sizing device | Sizing device |
| Sizes | Sizes range from 10mm<br>to 25mm of diameter | Sizes from 26mm to<br>36mm of diameter |
# Conclusion:
Circ MedTech believes that, based on the information provided in this submission, the PrePex is substantially equivalent to its predicate device without raising any new safety and/or effectiveness issue.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized eagle with three legs and a circular border. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA" is arranged around the border of the circle.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room -WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Circ MedTech % Ms. Shoshana (Shosh) Friedman President & CEO PushMed LLC 1914 J.N. Pease Place CHARLOTTE NC 28262
JAN 1 0 2012
Re: K103695
Trade/Device Name: PrePex Regulation Number: 21 CFR§ 884.4530 Regulation Name: Obstetric-gynecologic specialized manual instrument Regulatory Class: II Product Code: HFX Dated: November 16, 2011 Received: November 23, 2011
Dear Ms. Friedman:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical
{5}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 -
device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Benjamin K. Reese
Benjam R. Fisher, Ph.D., Director Division of Reproductive, Gastro-Renal, and Grological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{6}------------------------------------------------
# INDICATIONS FOR USE STATEMENT
510(k) Number (if known): _ K103695
PrePex Device Name:
Indications for Use:
PrePex is indicated for circumcision of adult males. Prepex is intended to be placed and removed by a health care professional trained in male circumcision and in use of the PrePex device.
Prescription Use _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ (Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR
Over the Counter Use_
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE -CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Norm M. Whing
(Division Sign-Off)
. and
PrePex - Page 5-2
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.