CalliSpheres Embolic Microspheres and 8Spheres Embolic Microspheres are intended to be used for the embolization of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and hypervascular tumors, including uterine fibroids.
Device Story
Compressible hydrogel microspheres; PVA-based; non-resorbable; regular shape; smooth surface. Input: mixed with non-ionic contrast agent at time of use. Operation: delivered via microcatheter (1.7-4 Fr) under DSA guidance to target vasculature; blocks blood supply to tumor/malformation to induce shrinkage. Output: mechanical occlusion of target vessels. Used in clinical interventional radiology settings by physicians. Benefits: minimally invasive treatment for hypervascular tumors and AVMs.
Clinical Evidence
No human clinical data. Evidence includes extensive in-vitro bench testing (size, compressibility, deliverability, suspension, sterility, chemical characterization) and a comparative animal study (swine model, n=24) against Embosphere (K021397). Animal study evaluated recanalization, foreign body reaction, embolization effectiveness, and delivery ease at 2, 7, and 28 days; results showed comparable safety and effectiveness to the predicate.
Technological Characteristics
Hydrogel microspheres composed of PVA, NAAADA, and 2-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid sodium salt. 91-94% water content. 30% compressibility. Sizes 100-1200µm. Sterile, single-use, moist heat sterilized (121°C, 30 min). Packaged in borosilicate glass vials with 0.9% NaCl. Non-resorbable.
Indications for Use
Indicated for embolization of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and hypervascular tumors, including uterine fibroids.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A vascular embolization device is an intravascular implant intended to control hemorrhaging due to aneurysms, certain types of tumors (e.g., nephroma, hepatoma, uterine fibroids), and arteriovenous malformations. This does not include cyanoacrylates and other embolic agents, which act by polymerization or precipitation. Embolization devices used in neurovascular applications are also not included in this classification, see § 882.5950 of this chapter.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls.) The special control for this device is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Vascular and Neurovascular Embolization Devices.” For availability of this guidance document, see § 870.1(e).
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logos of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services and the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). The Department of Health & Human Services logo is on the left, featuring a stylized symbol. To the right is the FDA logo, with the letters 'FDA' in a blue square, followed by the words 'U.S. FOOD & DRUG' and 'ADMINISTRATION' in blue text.
September 17, 2018
Suzhou Hengrui Callisyn Biomedical Co., Ltd. Xiao Chen Regulatory Affairs Manager Building 9, No. 8 Jinfeng Road, New District Suzhou. Jiangsu Province 215163 China
Re: K173871
> Trade/Device Name: CalliSpheres Embolic Microspheres, 8Spheres Embolic Microspheres Regulation Number: 21 CFR§ 870.3300 Regulation Name: Vascular Embolization Device Regulatory Class: II Product Code: KRD, NAJ Dated: August 13, 2018 Received: August 15, 2018
Dear Xiao Chen:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies.
{1}------------------------------------------------
You must comply with all the Act's requirements. including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see
https://www.fda.gov/CombinationProducts/GuidanceRegulatoryInformation/ucm597488.html; good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803). please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
# Sharon M. Andrews -S
for
Benjamin R. Fisher, Ph.D. Director Division of Reproductive, Gastro-Renal, and Urological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K173871
### Device Name
CalliSpheres Embolic Microspheres, 8Spheres Embolic Microspheres
Indications for Use (Describe)
Callispheres Embolic Microspheres and 8Spheres Embolic Microspheres are intended to be used for the embolization of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and hypervascular tumors, including uterine fibroids.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|-------------------------------------------------|--|
|-------------------------------------------------|--|
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
### 510(k) Summary
# CalliSpheres Embolic Microspheres, 8Spheres Embolic Microspheres
# (per 21 CFR 807.92)
#### 1 Submitter
Suzhou Hengrui Callisyn Biomedical Co., Ltd
Building 9, No. 8 Jinfeng Road, Science & Technology Tower,
New District, Suzhou,
Jiangsu Province,
P.R. China
Phone: +86-512-68050607
Fax: +86-512-66806133
Contact Person: Xiao Chen
Phone: +86-512-68050607
Fax: +86-512-66806133
Email: chenxiao@hrmedical.com.cn
Date Prepared: September 11, 2018
#### 2 Proposed Device
Name of Device: CalliSpheres Embolic Microspheres, 8Spheres Embolic Microspheres
Common or Usual Name: Polyvinyl Alcohol Embolic Microspheres
Classification Name: Vascular Embolization Device (21 CFR 870.3300)
Classification: Class II
Panel: Cardiovascular
{4}------------------------------------------------
Product Code: KRD (device, embolization, arterial). NAJ (agents, embolic, for treatment of uterine fibroids)
#### 3 Predicate Device
Device Name: Bead Block™ 510(k) number: K150876 Manufacturer: Biocompatibles UK Ltd. Regulation Number: 21CFR 870.3300 Product code: KRD (device, embolization, arterial),
NAJ (agents, embolic, for treatment of uterine fibroids)
The predicate device has not been subject to any design-related recall.
#### 4 Device Description
CalliSpheres and 8Spheres Embolic Microspheres are compressible hydrogel microspheres with a regular shape, smooth surface, and calibrated size, which are formed as a result of chemical modification on polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) materials. CalliSpheres and 8Spheres Embolic Microspheres consist of a macromer derived from polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), and are hydrophilic, non-resorbable, and are available in a range of sizes. The preservation solution is 0.9% sodium chloride solution. The water content of fully polymerized microsphere is 91% ~ 94%. Microspheres can tolerate compression of 30%. CalliSpheres Embolic Microspheres are dyed blue to aid in the visualization of the microspheres in the delivery syringe. 8Spheres Embolic Microspheres are undyed and with natural color. CalliSpheres and 8Spheres Embolic Microspheres are supplied sterile and packaged in sealed glass vials.
CalliSpheres Embolic Microspheres and 8Spheres Embolic Microspheres are intended to be used for the embolization of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and hypervascular tumors, including uterine fibroids. By blocking the blood supply to the target area, the tumor or malformation is starved of nutrients and shrinks in size.
CalliSpheres and 8Spheres Embolic Microspheres can be delivered through typical microcatheters in the 1.7- 4 Fr range. At the time of use, CalliSpheres and 8Spheres Embolic Microspheres are mixed with a nonionic contrast agent to form a suspension solution. CalliSpheres and 8Spheres Embolic Microspheres are intended for single use and are supplied sterile and non-pyrogenic. The device configurations of
{5}------------------------------------------------
CalliSpheres and 8Spheres Embolic Microsphere are described in Table 1 and Table 2 below. Product codes beginning with "B" represent CalliSpheres, while product codes beginning with "U" represent 8Spheres. Among the various size ranges of CalliSpheres Embolic Microspheres and 8Spheres Embolic Microspheres, the size ranges that can be used for uterine fibroid embolization are 500-700µm, 700-900µm and 900-1200μm.
| Product<br>Code | Calibrated<br>Size (µm) | Quantity | Indication | |
|-----------------|-------------------------|------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
| | | | Hypervascular<br>Tumors/<br>Arteriovenous<br>Malformations | Uterine Fibroid |
| B107S103 | 100-300 | 1ml microspheres : 7ml 0.9%<br>sodium chloride | Yes | No |
| B107S305 | 300-500 | 1ml microspheres : 7ml 0.9%<br>sodium chloride | Yes | No |
| B107S507 | 500-700 | 1ml microspheres : 7ml 0.9%<br>sodium chloride | Yes | Yes |
| B107S709 | 700-900 | 1ml microspheres : 7ml 0.9%<br>sodium chloride | Yes | Yes |
| B107S912 | 900-1200 | 1ml microspheres : 7ml 0.9%<br>sodium chloride | Yes | Yes |
| B207S103 | 100-300 | 2ml microspheres : 7ml 0.9%<br>sodium chloride | Yes | No |
| B207S305 | 300-500 | 2ml microspheres : 7ml 0.9%<br>sodium chloride | Yes | No |
| B207S507 | 500-700 | 2ml microspheres : 7ml 0.9%<br>sodium chloride | Yes | Yes |
| B207S709 | 700-900 | 2ml microspheres : 7ml 0.9%<br>sodium chloride | Yes | Yes |
| B207S912 | 900-1200 | 2ml microspheres : 7ml 0.9%<br>sodium chloride | Yes | Yes |
### Table 1: Device configurations of CalliSpheres Embolic Microspheres
Table 2: Product configurations of 8Spheres Embolic Microspheres
{6}------------------------------------------------
| | Calibrated<br>Size (um) | | Indication | |
|-----------------|-------------------------|------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
| Product<br>Code | | Quantity | Hypervascular<br>Tumors/<br>Arteriovenous<br>Malformations | Uterine Fibroid |
| U107S103 | 100-300 | 1ml microspheres : 7ml<br>0.9% sodium chloride | Yes | No |
| U107S305 | 300-500 | 1ml microspheres : 7ml<br>0.9% sodium chloride | Yes | No |
| U107S507 | 500-700 | 1ml microspheres : 7ml<br>0.9% sodium chloride | Yes | Yes |
| U107S709 | 700-900 | 1ml microspheres : 7ml<br>0.9% sodium chloride | Yes | Yes |
| U107S912 | 900-1200 | 1ml microspheres : 7ml<br>0.9% sodium chloride | Yes | Yes |
| U207S103 | 100-300 | 2ml microspheres : 7ml<br>0.9% sodium chloride | Yes | No |
| U207S305 | 300-500 | 2ml microspheres : 7ml<br>0.9% sodium chloride | Yes | No |
| U207S507 | 500-700 | 2ml microspheres : 7ml<br>0.9% sodium chloride | Yes | Yes |
| U207S709 | 700-900 | 2ml microspheres : 7ml<br>0.9% sodium chloride | Yes | Yes |
| U207S912 | 900-1200 | 2ml microspheres : 7ml<br>0.9% sodium chloride | Yes | Yes |
#### 5 Indications for Use
CalliSpheres Embolic Microspheres and 8Spheres Embolic Microspheres are intended to be used for the embolization of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and hypervascular tumors, including uterine fibroids.
{7}------------------------------------------------
#### Comparison of Technological Characteristics with the Predicate Device 6
The subject devices and predicate device have identical / similar technological characteristics as shown in Table 3.
| Items | Proposed Device | Predicate Device | Discussion of Differences |
|---------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Device Name | CalliSpheres Embolic Microspheres &<br>8Spheres Embolic Microspheres | Bead Block TM | N/A |
| 510(k) Number | K173871 | K150876 | N/A |
| Product Code | KRD, NAJ | KRD, NAJ | Identical |
| Intended Use /<br>Indications For Use | CalliSpheres Embolic Microspheres and<br>8Spheres Embolic Microspheres are<br>intended to be used for the embolization of<br>arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and<br>hypervascular tumors, including uterine<br>fibroids. | Bead Block microspheres are<br>intended to be used for the<br>embolization of hypervascular<br>tumors, including uterine fibroids<br>and arteriovenous malformations<br>(AVMs). | Identical: Indications for use of<br>the proposed device is identical<br>to that of Bead Block<br>(K150876). |
| Materials | Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), N-<br>acryloylaminoacetaldehyde dimethyl<br>acetal (NAAADA), 2-acrylamido-2-<br>methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid sodium<br>salt, 0.9% Sodium Chloride Solution,<br>Reactive Blue Dye #4 (only for<br>CalliSpheres Embolic Microspheres) | Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), N-<br>acryloylaminoacetaldehyde<br>dimethyl acetal (NAAADA), 2-<br>acrylamido-2-methyl-1-<br>propanesulfonic acid sodium salt,<br>buffered Saline, Reactive Blue<br>Dye #4 | Identical |
| Polymerization<br>Method | Suspension polymerization | Suspension polymerization | Identical |
| Resorption | Non-resorbable | Non-resorbable | Identical |
| | | | |
| Appearance | Hydrogel microspheres with regular shape,<br>smooth surface and calibrated size,<br>CalliSpheres: Blue dyed<br>8Spheres: Undyed | Hydrogel microspheres with<br>regular shape, smooth surface and<br>calibrated size,<br>Bead Block: Blue dyed | CalliSpheres are identical in<br>appearance to Bead Block,<br>8Spheres are undyed. 8Spheres<br>are identical to CalliSpheres<br>except for the color.<br>The lack of dye in 8spheres<br>does not raise different<br>questions of safety and<br>effectiveness from the<br>predicate. |
| Size Range<br>(um) | 100-300<br>300-500<br>500-700<br>700-900<br>900-1200 | 100-300<br>300-500<br>500-700<br>700-900<br>900-1200 | Identical |
| Sizes indicated for<br>UAE<br>(um) | 500-700<br>700-900<br>900-1200 | 700-900<br>900-1200 | Different. CalliSpheres and<br>8Spheres of 500-700um are<br>indicated for UAE.<br>The<br>difference in size does not raise<br>different questions of safety and<br>effectiveness. |
| Water content of<br>microspheres | 91% ~ 94% | Approximately 90-95% | Similar. Water content range of<br>proposed device is narrower<br>than that of predicate device.<br>The slight difference of water<br>content does not raise different<br>questions of safety and<br>effectiveness. |
| Storage media | 0.9% sodium chloride solution | Phosphate buffered saline (PBS) | Similar. Both 0.9% sodium<br>chloride solution and phosphate<br>buffered saline (PBS) can be<br>used for injection. |
| Quantity of<br>Microspheres | 1mL, 2mL | 1mL, 2mL | Identical |
| Quantity of Storage<br>Media | Both CalliSpheres and 8Spheres have the<br>following two quantities:<br>1)<br>1ml microspheres in 7ml 0.9%<br>sodium chloride solution to form a<br>total volume of 8mL<br>2)<br>2ml microspheres in 7ml 0.9%<br>sodium chloride solution to form a<br>total volume of 9mL. | Bead Block Compressible<br>Microspheres have the following<br>two quantities:<br>1)<br>1 mL microspheres in 6ml<br>PBS to form a total volume<br>of 7mL<br>2)<br>2 mL microspheres in 5ml<br>PBS to form a total volume<br>of 7mL. | Similar, the slight difference of<br>saline quantity does not raise<br>different questions of safety and<br>effectiveness. |
| Packaging | Both CalliSpheres and 8Spheres are sealed<br>in borosilicate glass vial. | Bead Block is sealed in<br>polycarbonate syringe | Similar. Packaging has been<br>verified by packaging<br>compatibility testing and does<br>not raise different questions of<br>safety and effectiveness. |
| Compressibility | 30% by diameter | Approximately 30% by diameter | Identical |
| Suspension | The time taken to achieve suspension is<br>less than 10 min, and the time maintaining<br>suspension is longer than 4 mins. | The time taken to achieve<br>suspension is less than 4 min, and<br>the time maintaining suspension is<br>longer than 4.5 mins. | Similar. The slight difference of<br>time does not raise different<br>questions of safety and<br>effectiveness. |
| Delivery Method | Delivered to target position by micro-<br>catheter under DSA. | Delivered to target position by<br>micro-catheter under DSA. | Identical |
| Compatible<br>Delivery Catheter | 1.7-4Fr | 1.5-5Fr | Similar. The specification for<br>CalliSpheres and 8Spheres lies<br>within the range of the<br>predicate. The slight difference<br>does not raise different<br>questions of safety and<br>effectiveness. |
| Radiopacity<br>Method | Mixed with non-ionic contrast agent prior<br>to injection | Mixed with non-ionic contrast<br>agent prior to injection | Identical |
| Method of Supply | Sterile and single use | Sterile and single use | Identical |
| Shelf Life | Two years | Two years | Identical |
| Sterilization | Moist heat and non-pyrogenic | Moist heat and non-pyrogenic | Identical |
# Table 3: Performance Characteristics Comparison Table of CalliSpheres & 8Spheres Embolic Microspheres verses Predicate Devices
{8}------------------------------------------------
{9}------------------------------------------------
{10}------------------------------------------------
Overall, the differences in technological characteristics between the subject and predicate do not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness.
#### 7 Summary of Non-clinical Performance Testing
The device is subject to Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff - Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Vascular and Neurovascular Embolization Devices issued on 29 December 2004 and was evaluated accordingly. The safety and effectiveness of CalliSpheres and 8Spheres have been evaluated by non-clinical testing including:
#### 7.1 In-Vitro Bench Testing
The test items, methods and method references of CalliSpheres and 8Spheres Embolic Microspheres are as follows:
| No. | Test items | Test methods and basis | Result |
|-----|---------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
| 1 | Appearance | USP 39 NF34 (2016) <1> Injections<br>and Implanted Drug Products<br>(Parenterals) -Product Quality Tests and<br><790> Visible Particulates In Injections | Met predefined acceptance<br>criteria |
| 2 | pH test | USP39 NF34 (2016) - <791> pH | Met predefined acceptance<br>criteria |
| 3 | Size range<br>confirmation | Method adapted from ISO 13322-1:2014<br>Particle size analysis - Image analysis<br>methods – Part 1: Static image analysis<br>methods. The particle sizes of<br>Callispheres and 8spheres Embolic<br>Microspheres were measured and<br>confirmed by optical microscope, digital<br>camera and corresponding particle size<br>measurement software which have been<br>calibrated and validated. | Met predefined acceptance<br>criteria |
| 4 | Compressibility<br>Test | A texture analyzer was used to test the<br>compressibility of microspheres;<br>microspheres were compressed of 30%<br>by diameter and maintained for 10s.<br>After the compression the microspheres | Met predefined acceptance<br>criteria |
| | | were inspected by microscope for<br>maintenance of shape and breakage. | |
| 5 | Catheter<br>deliverability test | Particles were delivered through 1.7Fr -<br>4.0Fr microcatheters to evaluate the<br>potential for clogging and breakage of<br>spheres. The size of the microcatheter<br>was selected based on the size of the<br>microspheres. In order to simulate the<br>tortuosity of the catheters used in<br>clinical practice, the microcatheters were<br>inserted into a model simulated to<br>human hepatic artery to conduct the<br>catheter deliverability test. Clogging was<br>assessed during the test, and<br>microspheres were inspected<br>microscopically following delivery for<br>signs of breakage or changes in shape. | Met predefined acceptance<br>criteria |
| 6 | Water content test | USP 39 NF34 (2016) - <731> Loss on<br>Drying | Met predefined<br>acceptance<br>criteria |
| 7 | Impurities and<br>Residual Solvents<br>Test | USP39 NF34 (2016) - <1086><br>Impurities in Drug Substances and Drug<br>Products, <467> Residual Solvents,<br><621> Chromatography, <857><br>Ultraviolet -Visible Spectroscopy | Met predefined acceptance<br>criteria |
| 8 | Suspension | A suspension study of all variants of<br>CalliSpheres and 8Spheres Embolic<br>Microspheres was conducted with three<br>commercially-available nonionic<br>contrast agents based upon the following<br>study:<br>Lewis AL et. al. Comparative in vitro<br>evaluation of microspherical<br>embolization agents. J Mater Sci Mater<br>Med. 2006 Dec: 17(12):1193-204. | Met predefined acceptance<br>criteria |
| 9 | Sterility Test | USP 39 -NF34 (2016) <71> Sterility<br>Tests | Met predefined acceptance<br>criteria |
| 10 | Bacterial | USP39 -NF34 (2016) - <85> | Met predefined acceptance |
{11}------------------------------------------------
{12}------------------------------------------------
Samples of CalliSpheres and 8Spheres Embolic Microspheres passed the performance tests listed above, indicating that device performance met the design requirements and is acceptable for the intended use.
#### 7.2 Packaging Integrity and Shelf Life
CalliSpheres and 8Spheres Embolic Microspheres are supplied as sterile devices and packaged in sealed borosilicate glass vials.
According to ASTM F1980-16, accelerated aging tests equivalent to 2 years of shelf life were carried out on Callispheres and 8Spheres Embolic Microspheres, with 3 batches of each tested for all device specifications. Accelerated aging tests for package integrity were also carried out on the packaging materials including the bottles, rubber closures and aluminum-plastic covers.
The results of the performance tests of Callispheres and 8Spheres microspheres after accelerated aging demonstrated all samples met specifications. Therefore, the results support a 2 year shelf life of Callispheres and 8Spheres Embolic Microspheres.
# 7.3 Sterilization and Shelf Life
CalliSpheres and 8Spheres Embolic Microspheres are labeled as "Sterile" and " non pyrogenic." CalliSpheres & 8Spheres Embolic Microspheres are sterilized by moist heat sterilization with validated parameters (121°C, 30 min) after sealing the vials. Sterilization validation was completed to a sterility assurance level (SAL) of 10 6 using the Overkill Approach per ANSI/AAMI/ISO 17665-1:2006(R)2013.
Callispheres and 8Spheres were tested for bacterial endotoxins per USP <85> Bacterial Endotoxins Test to a level of not more than 0.5EU/mL in accordance with the requirements of FDA guidance document: Guidance for Industry: Pyrogen Endotoxins Testing: Questions and Answers, issued June 2012.
# 7.4 Chemical Characterization
Chemical characterization testing was conducted on the CalliSpheres and 8Spheres Embolic microspheres and the saline preservation solution. The testing consisted of exhaustive extraction of the CalliSpheres and 8Spheres Embolic microspheres in purified water, ethanol, and hexane and analyzing the extracts using FTIR, ICP/MS, GC/MS, GC/MS headspace, and UPLC/MS. A risk analysis using a worst case risk Page 10 of 16
{13}------------------------------------------------
assessment approach was conducted based upon the findings of the exhaustive extraction. Using this approach, it was determined that the margins of safety (MOS) for potential chemical exposures indicated a low risk of chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity.
# 7.5 Biocompatibility Evaluation
Tests for biocompatibility were conducted in accordance with ISO 10993-1 and ASTM standards.
The conducted biocompatibility testing is shown in the following table, and the subject devices were demonstrated to be biocompatible.
| Biocompatibility<br>Evaluation | Summary | |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
| Cytotoxicity Study Using<br>the ISO Elution Method | The test article, CalliSpheres Embolic Microspheres, was evaluated<br>for potential cytotoxic effects using an <i>in vitro</i> mammalian cell<br>culture test. This study was conducted following the guidelines of<br>ISO 10993-5, Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 5:<br>Tests for <i>in vitro</i> cytotoxicity. The test article extract showed no<br>evidence of causing cell lysis or toxicity. The test article extract<br>met the requirements of the test since the grade was less than a<br>grade 2 (mild reactivity). | |
| ISO Intracutaneous Study<br>in Rabbits | The test article, CalliSpheres Embolic Microspheres, was evaluated<br>for the potential to cause irritation following intracutaneous<br>injection in rabbits. This study was conducted based on ISO<br>10993-10, Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 10: Tests<br>for irritation and skin sensitization. The test article met the<br>requirements of the test. | |
| ISO Maximization<br>Sensitization Study | The test article, CalliSpheres Embolic Microspheres, was evaluated<br>for the potential to cause delayed dermal contact sensitization in a<br>guinea pig maximization test. This study was conducted based on<br>the requirements of ISO 10993-10, Biological evaluation of<br>medical devices - Part 10: Tests for irritation and skin sensitization.<br>The test article extracts showed no evidence of causing delayed<br>dermal contact sensitization in the guinea pig. The test article was<br>not considered a sensitizer in the guinea pig maximization test. | |
| ISO Systemic Toxicity<br>Study | The test article, CalliSpheres Embolic Microspheres, was evaluated<br>for acute systemic toxicity in mice. This study was conducted<br>based on ISO 10993-11, Biological evaluation of medical devices -<br>Part 11: Tests for systemic toxicity. There was no mortality or<br>evidence of systemic toxicity from the extracts injected into mice.<br>Each test article extract met the requirements of the study. | |
| Modified ASTM<br>Hemolysis Study | The test article, CalliSpheres Embolic Microspheres, was evaluated<br>for the potential to cause hemolysis. This study was conducted<br>based on ASTM F756, Standard Practice for Assessment of<br>Hemolytic Properties of Materials and ISO 10993-4, Biological<br>evaluation of medical devices - Part 4: Selection of tests tor<br>interactions with blood. The hemolytic index tor the test article in<br>direct contact with blood was 0.6% and the direct contact was non-<br>hemolytic. | |
| ASTM Partial<br>Thromboplastin Time | The test article, CalliSpheres Embolic Microspheres, was evaluated<br>to determine the potential to cause an effect on the coagulation<br>cascade via the intrinsic coagulation pathway. The study was<br>conducted in accordance to ASTM F2382: Standard Test Method<br>for Assessment of Circulating Blood-Contacting Medical Device<br>Materials on Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT). The test article<br>average clotting time was lower and was not statistically different<br>than the negative reference material. The test article met the<br>requirements of the test. | |
| SC5b-9 Complement<br>Activation Assay | The test article, CalliSpheres Embolic Microspheres, and sponsor<br>provided control (SPC), Embospheres, were evaluated for the<br>potential to activate the complement system. This study was<br>conducted based on ISO 10993-4, Biological evaluation of medical<br>devices - Part 4: Selection of tests for interactions with blood. The<br>test article, SPC, and comparative control were incubated in normal<br>human serum (NHS) and SC5b-9 was measured in the exposed<br>serum using an enzyme immunoassay. The test article was not<br>considered to be a potential activator of the complement system. | |
| USP Rabbit Pyrogen<br>Study | The test article, CalliSpheres Embolic Microspheres, was evaluated<br>for material mediated pyrogenicity in rabbits. The test was<br>conducted based on USP, General Chapter <151>, Pyrogen Test.<br>The procedure is recommended in ISO 10993-11, Biological<br>evaluation of medical devices - Part 11: Tests for systemic toxicity.<br>The total rise of rabbit temperatures during the 3 hour observation<br>period was within acceptable USP requirements. The test article<br>met the requirements for the absence of pyrogens. | |
| Genotoxicity: Bacterial<br>Reverse Mutation Study | The test article, CalliSpheres Embolic Microspheres and 8Spheres<br>Embolic Microspheres, were evaluated for the potential to cause<br>mutagenic changes at the histidine locus of the Salmonella<br>typhimurium tester strains TA98, TA100, TA1535. And TA1537 or<br>at the tryptophan locus of the Escherichia coli tester strain<br>WP2wv/v4. The study was conducted in the presence and absence<br>of S9 metabolic activation based on ISO 10993-3, Biological<br>evaluation of medical devices - Part 3: Tests for genotoxicity,<br>carcinogenicity and reproductive toxicity and OECD 471,<br>Guideline for Testing of Chemicals, Bacterial Reverse Mutation | |
| | Test. The test article was extracted in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and saline.<br>The DMSO and saline test article extracts were considered to be nonmutagenic to <i>S. typhimurium</i> tester strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA1537. and to <i>E. coli</i> tester strain WP2uvrA. | |
| Genotoxicity: Mouse<br>Lymphoma Assay | The test article, CalliSpheres Embolic Microspheres and 8Spheres Embolic Microspheres, were evaluated for mutagenic potential using the mouse lymphoma forward gene mutation assay. The mouse lymphoma L5178Y/TK+/ cell line, heterozygous at the thymidine kinase (TK) locus, was used for this assay. The test article was extracted in serum-free cell culture medium (RPMIo) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). The RPMIo and DMSO test article extracts did not cause a 2-fold or greater increase in the mean mutant frequency of the L5178Y/TK+/ cell line either in the presence or absence of metabolic activation. The test article was not mutagenic. | |
| ISO Muscle Implantation<br>Study in Rabbits, 4<br>Weeks | The test article, CalliSpheres Embolic Microspheres, was implanted in muscle tissue of the rabbit to evaluate the local tissue response in accordance with ISO 10993-6, Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 6: Tests for local effects after implantation. Sterile implant test articles were aseptically prepared. Negative control articles were sterilized by steam. The test article and negative control were intramuscularly implanted and animals were euthanized 4 weeks later. Muscle tissues were excised and the implant sites examined macroscopically. A microscopic evaluation of representative implant sites from each animal was conducted to further define any tissue response. The macroscopic reaction was not significant as compared to the negative control article. Microscopically, the test article caused a slight reaction as compared to the negative control article. | |
| ISO Systemic Toxicity<br>Study in Rats Following<br>Subcutaneous and<br>Muscle Implantation, 13<br>Weeks | The test article, CalliSpheres Embolic Microspheres, was surgically implanted in the gluteal muscle and subcutaneous tissue of the rat to evaluate potential systemic toxicity and local tissue response at the implantation sites. A separate group of animals was similarly implanted with high density polyethylene (HDPE) to serve as the control group. Twenty male and 20 female rats were randomly assigned to either the test or control group (10/sex/group). There were no changes in hematology or clinical chemistry values considered related to implantation with the test article. Microscopic evaluation of collected organs revealed no evidence of a systemic test article related response. Microscopic evaluation of the implantation sites indicated no difference in the local tissue response between the control and test articles. There was no evidence of systemic toxicity from the test article following | |
| | subcutaneous and muscle implantation in the rat. Microscopically, | |
| | the test article was classified as causing a minimal to no reaction | |
| | in both the subcutaneous tissue and the gluteal muscle. | |
| Chronic Systemic | We conducted a biological risk assessment for chronic toxicity and | |
| Toxicity and | carcinogenicity of proposed device based upon chemical | |
| Carcinogenicity | extractable/leachable analysis (described above). The CalliSpheres | |
| Evaluation | and 8Spheres Embolic Microspheres are not considered to have | |
| | chronic systemic toxicity and carcinogenicity risk. To evaluate the | |
| | biological safety of the device, consideration was given to the | |
| | following: type of patient contact; potential hazards of the | |
| | materials of construction, the history of clinical use and testing of | |
| | the materials of construction, biocompatibility and chemical | |
| | characterization testing on the device; and other information | |
| | available in the literature. | |
{14}------------------------------------------------
{15}------------------------------------------------
{16}------------------------------------------------
#### 8 Summary of Animal Performance Testing
An animal study was conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of CalliSpheres and 8Spheres Embolic Microsphere. The animal study was intended to simulate the clinical application of the embolization microspheres by interventional procedure for partial renal artery embolization. A pig model was chosen, with Embosphere Microspheres, manufactured by Biosphere Medical, Inc. (K021397) selected as the control group.
Random grouping method was used to assign treatment in the animals. The lower polar second branch artery and subordinated branch artery of 12 swine (female and male) were selected for embolization by CalliSpheres Embolic Microspheres (300-500um), and the other 12 swine (female and male) were selected for embolization with Embosphere microspheres (300-500um) in the lower polar second branch artery and subordinated branch artery. Several preoperative and postoperative observation time points were selected, including 2, 7 and…
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.