K140207 · Vitrolife Sweden AB · MQK · Dec 18, 2014 · Obstetrics/Gynecology
Device Facts
Record ID
K140207
Device Name
RAPID-I KIT
Applicant
Vitrolife Sweden AB
Product Code
MQK · Obstetrics/Gynecology
Decision Date
Dec 18, 2014
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 884.6160
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K140207 · Dec 18, 2014
RAPID-I KIT
Vitrolife Sweden AB
Clinical site data (426 patients); CDC ART National Summary Report (2011)
Clinical performance data from 426 patients across four sites was used to demonstrate the device's effectiveness in blastocyst vitrification, with results compared to national benchmarks from the CDC ART report.
Clinical pregnancy rates; Blastocyst survival rate; ART national benchmarks
Patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures with blastocyst stage embryo transfer; Sample Size: 426 patients; Number of Sites: 4
CDC 2011 ART National Summary Report
Blastocyst survival rate, clinical pregnancy rate
Indications for Use
The Rapid-i™ Kit is a cryopreservation device designed to contain 4-8 cell and blastocyst stage human embryos.
Device Story
Rapid-i™ Kit is a cryopreservation system for human embryos; consists of PMMA stick, Mediprene straw, and stainless steel rod. Used in clinical embryology labs by trained personnel. Process: 30 nanoliter drop of vitrification solution containing embryos placed in capillary hole of PMMA stick; straw pre-cooled in liquid nitrogen; stainless steel rod removed; stick inserted into pre-cooled straw; straw sealed. Device maintains embryos in liquid nitrogen storage. Warming involves cutting straw, withdrawing stick, and immersing in warming media. System facilitates vitrification and storage, supporting embryo survival for later transfer. Benefits include standardized, effective cryopreservation of embryos.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical data from 426 patients across four sites using the device for blastocyst vitrification. Primary endpoints included embryo survival and clinical pregnancy rates. Results: average blastocyst survival rate of 91%; clinical pregnancy rates ranged from 32% to 47% (mean 42%), which is comparable to 2011 CDC ART national success rates (36.6%). 124 live births reported.
Indicated for cryopreservation of 4-8 cell and blastocyst stage human embryos in patients undergoing assisted reproductive procedures.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Assisted reproduction labware consists of laboratory equipment or supplies intended to prepare, store, manipulate, or transfer human gametes or embryos for in vitro fertilization (IVF), gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT), or other assisted reproduction procedures. These include syringes, IVF tissue culture dishes, IVF tissue culture plates, pipette tips, dishes, plates, and other vessels that come into physical contact with gametes, embryos or tissue culture media.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls) (mouse embryo assay information, endotoxin testing, sterilization validation, design specifications, labeling requirements, and clinical testing). The device, when it is a dish or plate intended for general assisted reproduction technology procedures, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 884.9.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized caduceus symbol, which is often associated with healthcare. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged around the symbol in a circular fashion. The logo is black and white.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
December 18, 2014
Vitrolife Sweden AB % Anthony T. Pavel Regulatory Counsel Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20004
Re: K140207
> Trade/Device Name: Rapid-i™ Kit Regulation Number: 21 CFR 884.6160 Regulation Name: Assisted reproduction labware Regulatory Class: II Product Code: MOK Dated: November 24, 2014 Received: November 25, 2014
Dear Anthony T. Pavel,
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device
{1}------------------------------------------------
related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Herbert P. Lerner -S
for
Benjamin R. Fisher, Ph.D. Director Division of Reproductive, Gastro-Renal, and Urological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K140207
Device Name Rapid-i™ Kit
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Rapid-i™ Kit is a cryopreservation device designed to contain 4-8 cell and blastocyst stage human embryos.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
2 Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
_ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
#### FOR FDA USE ONLY
Concurrence of Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) (Signature)
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary
| Submitted by: | Vitrolife Sweden AB<br>Box 9080<br>SE-400 92 Göteborg<br>SWEDEN | |
|-------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: | December 16, 2014 | |
| Manufacturing<br>Sites: | Vitrolife Sweden AB<br>Box 9080<br>SE-400 92 Göteborg<br>SWEDEN | Vitrolife Inc.<br>3601 Inca Street<br>Englewood, CO 80110<br>USA |
| Contact<br>Person: | Nina Arvidsson<br>Regulatory Affairs Manager<br>Vitrolife Sweden AB<br>Box 9080<br>SE-400 92 Göteborg<br>SWEDEN<br>Tel: +46 31 721 80 77<br>Fax: +46 31 721 80 90<br>E-mail: narvidsson@vitrolife.com | |
| Establishment<br>Registration<br>Numbers: | 3003995932<br>Vitrolife Sweden AB | 9037178<br>Vitrolife Inc., Englewood, CO |
| Device Trade<br>Name: | Rapid-iTM Kit | |
| 510(k)<br>Number: | K140207 | |
| Device<br>Common<br>Name: | Cryopreservation container and microtool | |
| Device<br>Classification: | Regulation: 21 C.F.R. § 884.6160<br>Classification Name: Assisted Reproduction Labware<br>Product Code: MQK<br>Classification: Class II (special controls) | |
| Device<br>Classification: | Class II | |
{4}------------------------------------------------
| Predicate<br>Device: | Vitrolife Rapid-iTM (K090832) | | |
|----------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|----------------------------------|
| Indications for<br>Use: | The Rapid-iTM Kit is a cryopreservation device designed to contain, vitrify and<br>maintain 4-8 cell and blastocyst stage human embryos. | | |
| Device<br>Description<br>and Principles<br>of Operation: | Rapid-iTM Kit, a cryopreservation device designed to contain, vitrify and<br>maintain 4-8 cell and blastocyst stage human embryos, consists of the following<br>three items: | | |
| | • 80 mm PMMA stick (Rapid-iTM) | | |
| | • 135 mm Mediprene straw equipped with a stainless steel weight,<br>(RapidStraw) | | |
| | • 115 mm stainless steel rod inserted in the RapidStraw | | |
| Substantial<br>Equivalence to<br>Predicate<br>Devices: | 4-8 cell and blastocyst stage embryos are vitrified using the Rapid-iTM Kit by<br>pre-cooling the RapidStraw (steel rod inserted) with the open end extending<br>from the liquid nitrogen. A 30 nanoliter drop of vitrification solution holding<br>embryos is placed in a capillary sized hole in the Rapid-iTM. The stainless steel<br>rod is removed 20-30 seconds before the Rapid-iTM is inserted in the pre-cooled<br>RapidStraw in liquid nitrogen to effect vitrification of the embryos. The open<br>end of the straw is then sealed.<br><br>The Rapid-iTM Kit is substantially equivalent to the Rapid-iTM, as previously<br>cleared by FDA (K090832).<br><br>The following table compares the Rapid-iTM Kit to the predicate device (Rapid-<br>iTM) with respect to intended use, technological characteristics, and principles of<br>operation. | | |
| | Manufacturer | Vitrolife Sweden AB | Vitrolife Sweden AB |
| | Trade Name | Rapid-iTM Kit | Rapid-iTM |
| | 510(k) Number | K140207 | K090832 |
| | Product Code | MQK | MQK |
| | Regulation Number | 884.6160 | 884.6160 |
| | Regulation Name | Assisted Reproduction<br>Labware | Assisted Reproduction<br>Labware |
| | Indications for Use | The Rapid-iTM Kit is a | Rapid-iTM is a |
| Manufacturer | Vitrolife Sweden AB | Vitrolife Sweden AB |
|------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Trade Name | Rapid-iTM Kit | Rapid-iTM |
| 510(k) Number | K140207 | K090832 |
| Product Code | MQK | MQK |
| Regulation Number | 884.6160 | 884.6160 |
| Regulation Name | Assisted Reproduction<br>Labware | Assisted Reproduction<br>Labware |
| Indications for Use | The Rapid-iTM Kit is a<br>cryopreservation device<br>designed to contain,<br>vitrify and maintain 4-8<br>cell and blastocyst stage<br>human embryos. | Rapid-iTM is a<br>cryopreservation device<br>that is intended to be<br>used to contain, vitrify<br>and maintain 4-8 cell<br>stage embryos. |
| Manufacturer | Vitrolife Sweden AB | Vitrolife Sweden AB |
| Method of Action<br>(vitrification) | Precool a straw with the<br>open end extending<br>from the liquid<br>nitrogen. A 30 nanoliter<br>drop of vitrification<br>solution holding<br>embryos is placed in a<br>capillary sized hole in<br>the stick. The stick in<br>turn is inserted in the<br>pre cooled straw in<br>liquid nitrogen to effect<br>vitrification of the<br>embryos. Subsequently,<br>the open end of the<br>straw is sealed. | Precool a straw with the<br>open end extending<br>from the liquid<br>nitrogen. A 30 nanoliter<br>drop of vitrification<br>solution holding<br>embryos is placed in a<br>capillary sized hole in<br>the stick. The stick in<br>turn is inserted in the<br>pre cooled straw in<br>liquid nitrogen to effect<br>vitrification of the<br>embryos. Subsequently,<br>the open end of the<br>straw is sealed. |
| Cooling Rate | 1400°C/min at -50°C | 1400°C/min at -50°C |
| Method of Action<br>(rewarming) | While the distal end of<br>the straw remains in<br>liquid nitrogen, cut the<br>sealed proximal end of<br>the straw. Withdraw<br>the stick and directly<br>immerse the<br>stick/vitrified drop in<br>warming media. | While the distal end of<br>the straw remains in<br>liquid nitrogen, cut the<br>sealed proximal end of<br>the straw. Withdraw<br>the stick and directly<br>immerse the<br>stick/vitrified drop in<br>warming media. |
| Rewarming Rate | 10,000°C/min at -50°C | 10,000°C/min at -50°C |
| Warming: Contact<br>With the Warming<br>Medium | Direct immersion of<br>sample in the warming<br>solution for<br>simultaneous thawing<br>and dilution. | Direct immersion of<br>sample in the warming<br>solution for<br>simultaneous thawing<br>and dilution. |
| Materials in Contact<br>With Tissue (embryos) | Polymethyl<br>methacrylate (PMMA)<br>stick with hole, 2x80<br>mm | Polymethyl<br>methacrylate (PMMA)<br>stick with hole, 2x80<br>mm |
| Straw | Mediprene straw with<br>funnel and weight, OD<br>3.45 mm, ID 2.5 mm,<br>wall thickness 0.47 mm,<br>length 135 mm | Poly vinyl chloride<br>(PVC) straw with<br>funnel and weight, OD<br>3.3 mm, ID 2.6 mm,<br>wall thickness 0.35 mm,<br>and length 165 mm |
| Stainless Steel Rod | Stainless steel, 2.2 x<br>115 mm | ---- |
| Manufacturer | Vitrolife Sweden AB | Vitrolife Sweden AB |
| Sterility Assurance<br>Level | Sterilized by ethylene<br>oxide. SAL is 10-6 | Sterilized by ethylene<br>oxide. SAL is 10-6 |
| MEA Specification | Mouse Embryo Assay<br>(1 -cell)<br>% expanded blastocyst,<br>within 96h ≥80 | Mouse Embryo Assay<br>(1 -cell)<br>% expanded blastocyst<br>on day 5 ≥80 |
| Endotoxin<br>Specification | Bacterial endotoxins<br>(LAL assay) <1<br>EU/device | Bacterial endotoxins<br>(LAL assay) <1<br>EU/device |
| | liquid nitrogen storage tanks. The straw diameter was increased to aid in<br>insertion of the Rapid-i™ stick into the RapidStraw. Also, the wall thickness of<br>the straw was increased. None of these changes raises new questions of safety<br>or effectiveness. | |
| | Accordingly, Vitrolife has concluded that the technology of the proposed<br>device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device and that differences do<br>not raise new questions of safety or effectiveness. | |
| Nonclinical<br>Testing | The Rapid-i™ Kit is substantially equivalent to the previously-cleared Rapid-<br>i™ (K090832), and is subject to the following tests: | |
| | A. Mouse Embryo Assay | |
| | Rapid-i™ Kit is subject to the 1-cell Mouse Embryo Assay (MEA). | |
| | Specification: Mouse Embryo Assay (1-cell) [% expanded blastocyst within 96<br>hours] ≥ 80 %. | |
| | B. Endotoxin Testing | |
| | Rapid-i™ Kit is subject to bacterial endotoxin testing by use of the LAL assay. | |
| | Specification: Bacterial Endotoxins (LAL assay) ≤ 1.0 EU/device. | |
| | Testing is performed according to USP<85> Bacterial Endotoxins Test. | |
| | C. Sterilization Validation | |
| | Sterility of the device is assured through the use of ethylene oxide sterilization. | |
| | Specification: Sterilized using ethylene oxide SAL 10-6. | |
| | Sterilization validation was performed according to ISO 11737-2:2009<br>Sterilization of Medical devices – Microbiological Methods, Part 2: Tests of<br>Sterility Performed in the Validation of the Sterilization Process. | |
| | D. Design Validation | |
| | As part of the design validation process, the following tests were conducted on<br>the Rapid-i™ (K090832) (which is substantially similar to the Rapid-i™ Kit): | |
| | The design validation testing on the post-seal Rapid-i™ described below is<br>valid for Rapid-i™ Kit as well. The minimal physical differences between the<br>post-seal Rapid-i™ and the Rapid-i™ Kit are only in the straw material and the | |
{5}------------------------------------------------
{6}------------------------------------------------
### Discussion of Similarities and Differences
The indication for the cleared Rapid-i™ is "a cryopreservation device that is intended to be used to contain, vitrify and maintain 4-8 cell stage embryos." The addition of blastocyst stage embryos to the proposed device's indication does not represent a new intended use. Both the proposed and predicate devices are intended to cryopreserve embryos from patients undergoing assisted reproductive procedures for later use. Blastocyst stage embryos and 4-8 cell stage embryos are similar in size and morphology and therefore the same carrier devices may be used for the vitrification of embryos in both of these stages. Therefore, addition of blastocyst vitrification does not represent a new intended use as it does not raise different questions of safety or effectiveness.
The operation of both devices is substantially similar, as both involve the precooling of a straw with the open end extending from the liquid nitrogen. The proposed device utilizes a stainless steel rod, which acts to keep the straw straight and also helps limit condensation in the straw during the cooling procedure, and is removed prior to insertion of the Rapid-i™ stick. The inclusion of the stainless steel rod does not raise any new questions of safety or effectiveness. A 30 nanoliter drop of vitrification solution holding embryos is placed in a capillary sized hole in the stick. The stick in turn is inserted in the pre-cooled straw in liquid nitrogen to effect vitrification of the embryos. Subsequently, the open end of the straw is sealed. The warming procedures are the same for both devices, and the cooling and warming rates of the devices are the same, as are the materials in contact with the embryos.
The straw in the proposed device is comprised of mediprene (straw with funnel and weight, 3.45 x 135 mm), whereas in the predicate, the straw is comprised of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) (straw with funnel and weight, 3.3 x 165 mm).
The change in material from PVC to mediprene has no impact on function and was made because of improved color properties of the material. The difference in material does not raise any new questions of safety or effectiveness.
The RapidStraw was shortened to fit better in devices used to hold samples in
{7}------------------------------------------------
straw thickness. Neither of these parameters affects the embryo, as the straw is
{8}------------------------------------------------
not in direct or indirect contact with the embryo. The changes do not affect cooling or warming rates. Hence, the differences do not affect vitrification. warming, or embryo development after vitrification.
- Effects of sealing before and after vitrification- the purpose of the study ● was to evaluate different non-liquid nitrogen (LN2) contact vitrification methods of previously frozen day 1 embryos. The methods were: (a) post-seal Rapid-iTM (i.e., the predicate device); (b) pre-seal Rapid-i™; and (c) the HSV straw. A non-vitrified group was used as control. The methods were evaluated with respect to expanded blastocyst development, cell count of expanded blastocysts on day 5, and ease of use and time in the final solution prior to vitrification. The study showed that the three methods did not differ from each other significantly in terms of expanded blastocyst development.
- A comparative mouse study- similar to the study above, the purpose was . to evaluate different non-LN2 contact vitrification methods of fresh F1 mouse embryos. The methods were: (a) post-seal Rapid-i™ (i.e., the predicate device); (b) pre-seal Rapid-i™; and (c) the HSV straw. A non-vitrified group was used as control. The methods were evaluated with respect to blastocyst development on day 4 and 5 and cell count of expanded blastocysts on day 5. The study showed that the three methods did not differ from each other significantly in terms of blastocyst development on day 4 and 5.
- A comparative Swiss outbred study- similar to the studies above, the ● purpose was to evaluate different non-LN2 contact vitrification methods of Swiss outbred mice. The methods were: (a) post-seal Rapid-i™ (i.e., the predicate device); and (b) pre-seal Rapid-i™. A non-vitrified group was used as control. The methods were evaluated with respect to blastocyst development on day 4 and 5 and cell count of expanded blastocysts on day 5. The study showed that method (a) showed a significantly higher blastocyst development rate on day 5 and cell count of expanded blastocysts compared to method (b).
- A vitrification study- the purpose of the study was to visually verify that ● the post-seal Rapid-i™ and pre-seal Rapid-i™ vitrification methods result in total vitrification of the media. The methods were: (a) post-seal Rapid-i™ (i.e., the predicate device) loaded with the final vitrification media: (b) pre-seal Rapid-i™ loaded with the final vitrification media: and (c) pre-seal Rapid-i™ loaded with the an intermediate vitrification media with lower osmolality. No embryo was used. The methods were evaluated by capturing images of the media in the device under LN2. The study showed that methods (a) and (b) resulted in transparent media indicating that vitrification had taken place and method (c) resulted in opaque media indicating that freezing had occurred.
{9}------------------------------------------------
# E. Shelf-life Evaluation
The initial shelf-life report provided in the prior submission (K090832) for the Rapid-i™ device was based on sterile integrity of the packaging. A verifying stability study was also performed on the Rapid-i™ device. The testing included sterility testing according to USP<71> Sterility Tests, bacterial endotoxins according to USP<85> Bacterial Endotoxins Test, and Mouse Embryo Assay.
The data provided supports the proposed shelf-life for the updated version of the device because:
- Sterility Testing (Negative, no growth): sterile integrity is dependent on . the primary packaging and the sealing procedure. This has not changed from the predicate.
- . Endotoxin (<1.0 EU/device): endotoxins do not change during the shelf life if packaging maintains a sterile barrier. This has not changed from the predicate.
Mouse Embryo Assay (re-expanded blastocyst within 96 hours ≥80%) has been performed on three individually tested samples from each of three lots of the proposed device. All devices met acceptance specifications, and support the 22 month shelf-life of the device.
## F. Cooling/Warming Rate Testing
Cooling and warming rate testing was conducted on the predicate device (K090832). New testing is not required for the current submission for the following reasons:
- The design of the Rapid-i™ stick has not changed. Therefore, this . component does not raise any new design features that may impact cooling/warming rates.
- . The RapidStraw material and dimensions have been modified in comparison to the predicate device (see Substantial Equivalence to Predicate Devices section above). These changes to the straw do not impact the cooling rate of the device for the following reasons (Note: the Rapid-i™ stick is removed from the RapidStraw prior to warming, and does not impact device warming rates):
- The RapidStraw is placed in an infinite heat sink (liquid nitrogen o bath) which assures that the temperature of the inside of the RapidStraw is very close in thermal balance with the surrounding liquid nitrogen prior to loading the Rapid-i™ stick. Changes in wall thickness and use of a comparable material support comparable cooling rates when using this pre-cooling procedure.
- Dimensional changes resulted in a decrease of 0.1 mm in the o internal diameter of the RapidStraw. Therefore, the amount of space containing air between inner RapidStraw wall and the
{10}------------------------------------------------
| | vitrification solution has decreased by 0.05 mm, which would have an insignificant impact on cooling rates when using the pre-cooling method described above. |
|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | G. Dimension Testing |
| | The dimensions of the finished product were measured to confirm conformance to the specifications. |
| Clinical Testing | The indication was modified to expand use with blastocyst stage embryos, and additional testing was performed to assess the ability to vitrify blastocyst stage embryos using the device, as discussed below. |
| | All laboratory procedures including embryo assessment were performed according to standard procedures. For vitrification and warming, respectively, Vitrolife's RapidVit Blast and RapidWarm Blast solutions were used while the Rapid-i™ Kit was used as a carrier device. During the vitrification and warming procedures, the instructions for use for the respective procedures were followed. After vitrification, blastocysts were stored in liquid nitrogen until the time of warming. After warming, cultured and surviving embryos were transferred into the uterus using standard procedures. |
| | The use of the Rapid-i™ Kit as carrier device for clinical blastocyst vitrification provides good results. The clinical pregnancy rates range between 32% and 47%, and to date, birth of 124 children. Clinical blastocyst vitrification was conducted at four sites, including 426 patients with embryo transfer. The average blastocyst survival rate was 91% and the average clinical pregnancy rate was 42%. |
| | When compared with the most recent Assisted Reproductive Technology ("ART") National Summary Report, published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC"), the success rates with the Rapid-i™ Kit are comparable to the 2011 ART success rates. For example, in 2011, CDC reported a mean of 36.6% of frozen embryos from nondonor eggs transferred (all ages combined) resulted in pregnancy. By comparison, the clinical pregnancy rates for the Rapid-i™ Kit ranged between 32% and 47%. |
| Conclusion | The nonclinical and clinical testing described above demonstrate that the Rapid-i™ Kit is substantially equivalent to the predicate device. |
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.