Guardia Access Embryo Transfer Catheter Sets and Sydney IVF® Transfer Catheter
Applicant
Cook Incorporated
Product Code
MQF · Obstetrics/Gynecology
Decision Date
Apr 11, 2018
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 884.6110
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
Used to place in vitro fertilized (IVF) embryos into the uterine cavity.
Device Story
Guardia Access Embryo Transfer Catheter Sets and Sydney IVF Transfer Catheter are single-use devices used by clinicians to place IVF embryos into the uterine cavity. The system consists of a transfer catheter (with or without internal/external supporting cannula) and, for the Guardia Access family, a precurved guide catheter with a bulb-shaped tip. The transfer catheters feature depth indicators and optional echogenic bands for ultrasound visualization. The device is manually operated by a clinician. The clinician uses the guide catheter to navigate the cervical canal and the transfer catheter to deliver the embryo. The device benefits the patient by facilitating precise embryo placement during assisted reproduction procedures. All devices are sterilized via ethylene oxide.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Studies included sterilization validation (ISO 11135-1:2007), biocompatibility (ISO 10993-5, -10), endotoxin testing (USP <85>), package integrity (ASTM F2096-04, F88-09), and transportation simulation (ASTM D4169-05). Mouse Embryo Assay (MEA) confirmed no embryo toxicity (≥80% development to blastocyst). Bench performance testing verified dimensions, aspiration, leak resistance, tensile strength, and echogenicity.
Indicated for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) requiring embryo placement into the uterine cavity.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Assisted reproduction catheters are devices used in in vitro fertilization (IVF), gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT), or other assisted reproduction procedures to introduce or remove gametes, zygote(s), preembryo(s), and/or embryo(s) into or from the body. This generic type of device may include catheters, cannulae, introducers, dilators, sheaths, stylets, and component parts.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls) (mouse embryo assay information, endotoxin testing, sterilization validation, design specifications, labeling requirements, biocompatibility testing, and clinical testing).
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the FDA logo is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
April 11, 2018
Cook Incorporated Naomi Funkhouser, MBA Regulatory Affairs Specialist/Scientist 750 Daniels Way P.O. Box 489 Bloomington, IN 47402
Re: K173686
> Trade/Device Name: Guardia Access Embryo Transfer Catheter Sets and Sydney IVF® Transfer Catheter Regulation Number: 21 CFR§ 884.6110 Regulation Name: Assisted Reproduction Catheters Regulatory Class: II Product Code: MOF Dated: March 9, 2018 Received: March 13, 2018
Dear Naomi Funkhouser:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies.
{1}------------------------------------------------
You must comply with all the Act's requirements. including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Joyce M. Whang -S
for Benjamin R. Fisher, Ph.D. Director Division of Reproductive, Gastro-Renal, and Urological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K173686
#### Device Name
Guardia Access Embryo Transfer Catheter Sets and Sydney IVF® Transfer Catheter
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
Guardia Access Embryo Transfer Catheter Sets and Sydney IVF® Transfer Catheter: Used to place in vitro fertilized (IVF) embryos into the uterine cavity.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
| <div> <input checked="true" type="checkbox"/> Transaction(s) (Per 24 CFR 982.451, Subpart K) </div> | <div> <input type="checkbox"/> One-Time Exception(s) (Per 24 CFR 982.451, Subpart K) </div> |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
X | Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Cook Medical. The logo consists of the word "COOK" in white, block letters on a red background. Below the word "COOK" is the word "MEDICAL" in smaller, white block letters. The logo is simple and clean, with a focus on the company name.
# 510(k) Summary – K173686
| Submitted By: | |
|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Applicant: | Cook Incorporated |
| Contacts: | Naomi Funkhouser<br>Rohini Patel |
| Applicant Address: | Cook Incorporated<br>750 Daniels Way<br>Bloomington, IN 47404 |
| Contact Phone: | (812) 339-2235 x104371 |
| Contact Fax: | (812) 332-0281 |
| Date Prepared: | April 9, 2018 |
| Device Information: | |
| Trade Names: | Guardia Access Embryo Transfer Catheter Sets and Sydney<br>IVF® Transfer Catheter |
| Common Name: | Embryo Transfer Catheter |
| Classification Name: | Assisted Reproduction Catheters (21 CFR 884.6110) |
| Classification Regulation: | MQF (Catheter, Assisted Reproduction) |
| Regulatory Class | II |
## Predicate Device:
Embryo Transfer Catheter/Sets (K983594) manufactured by Cook Ob/Gyn. This predicate device has not been subject to any design related recalls.
### Device Description:
The Guardia Access Embryo Transfer Catheter Sets and Sydney IVF® Transfer Catheter cover six subject devices from two of COOK's device families, Guardia™ Access and Guardia™, as outlined in the table below:
| Product family | Device | Product Number | Component |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|------------------------------------------------|
| Guardia™<br>Access | Guardia™ Access Embryo Transfer<br>Catheter | K-JETS-6019 | Embryo transfer catheter<br>and guide catheter |
| | Guardia™ Access Embryo Transfer<br>Catheter with Internal Supporting Cannula | K-JETS-7019-INT | Embryo transfer catheter<br>and guide catheter |
| Guardia™<br>Access | Guardia™ Access Embryo Transfer<br>Catheter | K-JETS-7019 | Embryo transfer catheter<br>and guide catheter |
| | Guardia™ AccessET Embryo Transfer<br>Catheter | K-JETS-6019-ET | Embryo transfer catheter<br>and guide catheter |
| | Guardia™ AccessET Embryo Transfer<br>Catheter | K-JETS-7019-ET | Embryo transfer catheter<br>and guide catheter |
| Guardia™ | Sydney IVF® Embryo Transfer Catheter | K-JET-2823 | Embryo transfer catheter |
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/0 description: The image shows the Cook Medical logo. The logo has a red background with the word "COOK" in white, sans-serif font. Below the word "COOK" is the word "MEDICAL" in white, sans-serif font, on a red background that is slightly darker than the background behind the word "COOK".
All embryo transfer catheters have an outer diameter of 2.8 Fr and range in length from 23 to 25 cm. The transfer catheters have internal or external supporting cannula, depth indicators, and may have an echogenic band. The Guardia™ Access guide catheters are precurved and feature a bulb-shaped tip. They measure 6.6 Fr in outer diameter and are 16.7 to 17.3 cm in length.
All subject devices are single-use devices and sterilized by ethylene oxide exposure. They undergo lot release Mouse Embryo Assay (MEA) testing for embryo toxicity and USP endotoxin (LAL) testing for pyrogenicity. The subject devices are packaged in peel-open sterile barrier pouches with a three-year shelf life.
#### Indications for Use:
Guardia Access Embryo Transfer Catheter Sets and Sydney IVF® Transfer Catheter:
Used to place in vitro fertilized (IVF) embryos into the uterine cavity.
| Parameter | K173686 (subject device) | K983594 (predicate device) |
|-------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Indication for Use | Used to place in vitro<br>fertilized (IVF) embryos<br>in the uterine cavity. | The embryo transfer catheters/sets are<br>used to place embryos in the uterine<br>cavity. |
| Design - transfer catheter | Same as predicate | • Graduation marks<br>• Open end<br>• Locking hub<br>• With or without echotip |
| Design - guide catheter | Same as predicate | • No graduation marks<br>• Positioner<br>• Bulb tip<br>• Precurved<br>• No echotip |
| Dimension - transfer catheter | OD 2.8 Fr / Length 23-25 cm | OD 2-8 Fr / Length 12-30 cm |
| Dimensions – guide catheter | OD 6.6 Fr / Length 16.7 or 17.3 cm | OD 5-8.5 Fr / Length 12-30 cm |
| Materials - transfer catheter | Polyethylene, polyurethane,<br>stainless steel | Polyethylene, teflon, stainless steel |
| Materials - guide catheter | Polyurethane, silicone,<br>polymethylpentene | Polyethylene, echosight polyethylene,<br>teflon, stainless steel |
#### Comparison of Intended Use and Technological Characteristics with the Predicate Device:
The subject and predicate devices have the same intended use. They also have the comparable designs. There are differences in dimensions and materials between the subject and predicate devices, but these differences do not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness. The difference in dimensions can be addressed by bench performance testing. The differences in materials can be evaluated by biocompatibility testing and Mouse Embryo Assay Testing.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Cook Medical. The logo consists of the word "COOK" in white, uppercase letters on a red background. Below the word "COOK" is the word "MEDICAL" in white, uppercase letters on a red background. The red background for the word "MEDICAL" is in a rectangular shape with a diagonal cut on the left side.
### Summary of Non-Clinical Performance Testing:
The following studies have been performed to support substantial equivalence to the predicate device:
- . Sterilization Validation testing per ISO 11135-1:2007
- Biocompatibility studies, as follows: ●
- Cytotoxicity testing per 10993-5:2009 o
- Guinea Pig Maximization Sensitization testing per ISO 10993-10:2002 or ISO 10993o 10:2010
- Intracutaneous Irritation testing per ISO 10993-10:2002 or ISO 10993-10:2010 o
- Endotoxin testing per USP <85> and AAMI/ANSI ST72:2011/(R)2016 (<20 EU/device) ●
- Transportation Simulation study per ASTM D4169-05
- . Package Integrity testing after real-time aging:
- Bubble Leak test per ASTM F2096-04 o
- Seal Strength testing per ASTM F88-09 o
- Visual Inspection: No package displayed damage (tears, folds, puncture holes, etc.) o
- Mouse Embryo Assay (MEA) before and after aging: .
One-cell mouse embryos were exposed to subject devices and cultured at 37℃ in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2. The percent of embryos developed to the expanded blastocyst stage within 96 hours were assessed in comparison with the control group. The testing demonstrated that the devices met acceptance criterion of "1-cell MEA ≥80% embryos developed to blastocyst in 96 hours."
- Bench Performance studies before and after aging demondtrated that all predetermined acceptance criteria were met in the following tests:
- Dimensional verification of catheter Catheters are measured and verified against o device input requirements.
- Transfer Catheter Aspiration Test Testing ensures there is no air leaking into the O syringe through the transfer catheter.
- Transfer Catheter Leak Test Testing ensures that fluid path catheter assembly O does not leak under a predetermined injection pressure.
- o Tensile Testing (Catheter Hub- shaft) - Testing demonstates that the tensile strength value is greater than the predetermined acceptance criterion.
- Echotip Band Test Testing ensures that the outer diameter of the band does not O impede smooth passage through the guide catheter.
- Echotip Band Echogenicity Test Visual comparison testing by ultrasound imaging O of catheters with and without an EchoTip band verified that the band provides increased brightness.
{6}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/6/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Cook Medical. The logo is set against a red background. The word "COOK" is written in large, white, sans-serif font. Below "COOK" is the word "MEDICAL" in a smaller, white, sans-serif font, set against a dark red background.
COOK INCORPORATED 750 DANIELS WAY BLOOMINGTON, IN 47404 USA 812.339.2235 TOLL FREE: 800.457.4500 WWW.COOKMEDICAL.COM
## Conclusion:
The subject and predicate devices have the same intended use. Although there are differences in technological characteristics between the subject and predicate devices, these differences do not raise different questions of safety or effectiveness. The performance data demonstrate that the subject devices are substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.