K233751 · Soterix Medical, Inc. · PCC · Jun 3, 2024 · Neurology
Device Facts
Record ID
K233751
Device Name
Milieve (YPS-301BD)
Applicant
Soterix Medical, Inc.
Product Code
PCC · Neurology
Decision Date
Jun 3, 2024
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 882.5891
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Milieve is indicated for - The acute treatment of migraine with or without aura in patients 18 years of age or older. - The prophylactic treatment of episodic migraine in patients 18 years of age or older.
Device Story
Milieve is a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator (TENS) for migraine management; device placed on forehead to stimulate upper branch of trigeminal nerve. Operated by patient at home (OTC). Device comprises plastic casing, electrical components, and rechargeable 3.7V LiPo battery. Two fixed treatment programs: ACUTE (at onset of migraine) and PREVENT (daily preventative). Device delivers biphasic, symmetric, rectangular current impulses via self-adhesive electrodes connected via magnets. Output parameters include 16 mA max current, 250 µs pulse width, and fixed frequencies (100 Hz for acute, 60 Hz for prevent). Healthcare provider/patient uses device to reduce migraine frequency/severity; output affects clinical decision-making by providing non-pharmacological treatment option. Benefits include acute relief and prophylactic migraine management.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance parameters, software verification/validation, and risk management demonstrate substantial equivalence to the predicate. Human factors validation study confirmed the device weight and dimensions do not impact usability or safety.
Technological Characteristics
TENS device; plastic casing; rechargeable 3.7V LiPo battery. Biphasic, symmetric, rectangular current impulses; 16 mA max current; 250 µs pulse width; 100 Hz (acute) or 60 Hz (prevent) frequency. Self-adhesive electrodes with 2 conductive zones; magnetic connection. Dimensions: 44.05mm x 38.98mm x 14.5mm; Weight: 21g. Fixed program software.
Indications for Use
Indicated for acute treatment of migraine with/without aura and prophylactic treatment of episodic migraine in patients 18 years or older. Contraindications: implanted metallic/electronic devices in head, pain of unknown origin, cardiac pacemaker, or implanted/wearable defibrillator.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator to treat headache is a device used to apply an electrical current to a patient's cranium through electrodes placed on the skin.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are:(1) The patient-contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(2) Appropriate analysis/testing must validate electromagnetic compatibility and electrical, mechanical, and thermal safety.
(3) The technical parameters of the device, including waveform, output modes, maximum output voltage and current (with 500, 2,000, and 10,000 ohm loads), pulse duration, frequency, net charge (µC) per pulse, maximum phase charge at 500 ohms, maximum current density (mA/cm
2 , r.m.s.), maximum average current (mA), maximum average power density (W/cm2 ), and the type of impedance monitoring system must be fully characterized.(4) Electrical performance, adhesive integrity, shelf life, reusability, and current distribution testing of the electrodes must be conducted.
(5) Appropriate software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be performed.
(6) Clinical performance data must demonstrate that the device is safe and effective as a treatment for headache in the indicated patient population.
(7) Labeling must include the following:
(i) Appropriate contraindications such as not for use in subjects with an implanted metallic or electronic device in the head, a cardiac pacemaker, or an implanted or wearable defibrillator.
(ii) Appropriate warnings such as not to apply the device on the neck or chest, not to use the device in the presence of electronic monitoring equipment, not to use in the bath or shower, not to use while sleeping, not to use while driving, not to use while operating machinery.
(iii) Appropriate precautions such as the long-term effects of chronic use of the device are unknown.
(iv) A summary of the expected risks and benefits of using the device.
(v) A summary of the clinical performance data, including information on the patient population for which the device has and has not been demonstrated to be effective, and any adverse events and complications.
(vi) Information on how the device operates and the typical sensations experienced during treatment.
(vii) A detailed summary of the device technical parameters.
(viii) An expiration date/shelf life for the electrodes and the number of times they can be reused.
(ix) Disposal instructions.
In combination with the general controls of the Food Drug & Cosmetic Act, the Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulator to Treat Headache is subject to the following special controls:
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
June 3, 2024
Soterix Medical, Inc. Abhishek Datta CEO/CTO 1480 U.S. Highway 9 North Suite 204 Woodbridge, New Jersey 07095
Re: K233751
Trade/Device Name: Milieve (YPS-301BD) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.5891 Regulation Name: Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulator To Treat Headache Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: PCC Dated: May 3, 2024 Received: May 3, 2024
Dear Dr. Abhishek Datta:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device"
{1}------------------------------------------------
(https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30. Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90. Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review. the OS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
Jitendra V. Virani
-S
CDR Jitendra Virani Assistant Director DHT5B: Division of Neuromodulation and Rehabilitation Devices OHT5: Office of Neurological
{2}------------------------------------------------
and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
Submission Number (if known)
K233751
Device Name
Milieve (YPS-301BD)
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
The Milieve is indicated for
- The acute treatment of migraine with or without aura in patients 18 years of age or older.
- The prophylactic treatment of episodic migraine in patients 18 years of age or older.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
X Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
## CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}------------------------------------------------
# K233751
# 510(k) SUMMARY
| Submission Date: | November 17th, 2023 |
|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Submitter Information: | |
| Company Name: | Soterix Medical, Inc. |
| | 1480 US Highway 9 North |
| | Suite 204 |
| | Woodbridge, NJ 07095 |
| Contact Person(s) : | Danielle Dadona (Regulatory Affairs Specialist) |
| | Abhishek Datta (CEO / CTO) |
| | Phone: 888-990-8327 |
| | Fax: 212-315-3232 |
| Device Information: | |
| Trade Name: | Milieve (YPS-301BD) |
| Common Name: | Milieve |
| Classification Name: | PCC - Stimulator, Nerve, Electrical, Transcutaneous, For Migraine |
| | (21 CFR 882.5891) |
| Device Class: | Class II |
| Predicate Device: | Cefaly Dual (K201895) |
| | CEFALY Technology |
| | Class II |
| Device Description: | The Milieve device is a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator (TENS) developed for the acute treatment of migraine and the prophylactic treatment of episodic migraine. The device is placed on the patient's |
| | There are two treatment programs: ACUTE and PREVENT. The ACUTE<br>treatment program is intended for treatment during migraine attack at the<br>onset of a migraine. The PREVENT treatment program is meant for daily<br>preventative treatment. |
| | The Mileve device comprises a plastic external casing and electrical<br>components. It is operated by an internal rechargeable battery. |
| Intended<br>Use/Indications: | The indications for use of the Mileve device for over-the-counter use<br>are:<br>- The acute treatment of migraine with or without aura in patients<br>18 years of age or older.<br>- The prophylactic treatment of episodic migraine in patients 18<br>years of age or older. |
| Technological<br>Comparison: | The Mileve uses the same technological principle as the predicate device<br>to accomplish its intended use, namely the stimulation of the upper branch<br>of the trigeminal nerve to treat and prevent migraine. In conjunction with<br>the Cefaly Dual approved for the treatment and prevention of migraine<br>Mileve's intended use is similar to that of the predicate. All output<br>specifications of the subject device are either identical or substantially<br>equivalent to the predicate device. |
forehead to stimulate the upper branch of the trigeminal nerve. It is harmless to the human body. The Milieve device is indicated for OTC use.
{5}------------------------------------------------
#### Basis for Equivalence:
| - <b>Performance Testing:</b> | Bench testing demonstrated that the performance parameters of the Milieve device are substantially equivalent to that of the predicate device. The subject device is compliant to the same international standards as the legally marketed predicate device. Further, software verification and validation and risk management demonstrate that Milieve is substantially equivalent to the predicate device. |
|-------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
- The labeling of the Milieve device is substantially equivalent to that of the -Labeling: predicate device.
- The Milieve device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device. The Conclusions from Testing: Milieve device is identical to its predicate device in intended use. Bench testing supports the conclusion that the performance parameters of the Milieve device is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices, and any differences between the devices do not pose new questions of safety and effectiveness.
{6}------------------------------------------------
| Parameter | Milieve | Cefaly Dual<br>(Predicate Device) | Comparison |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|
| 510(k) | Proposed Device | K201895 | -- |
| Device Name and<br>Model | Milieve (YPS-301BD) | Cefaly Dual | -- |
| Manufacturer | Ybrain Inc. | CEFALY Technology | -- |
| Indications<br>For Use | The indications for use of the<br>Milieve for an over-the-counter<br>use are:<br>- The acute treatment of<br>migraine with or without aura in<br>patients 18 years of age or older.<br>- The prophylactic treatment of<br>episodic migraine in patients 18<br>years of age or older. | The indications for use of the<br>Cefaly Dual for an over-the-<br>counter use are:<br>- The acute treatment of<br>migraine with or without aura<br>in patients 18 years of age or<br>older.<br>- The prophylactic treatment<br>of episodic migraine in<br>patients 18 years of age or<br>older. | Identical |
| Classification<br>Name | Stimulator, Nerve, Electrical,<br>Transcutaneous, For Migraine | Stimulator, Nerve,<br>Electrical, Transcutaneous,<br>For Migraine | Identical |
| Product Code | PCC | PCC | Identical |
| Regulatory Class | Class II | Class II | Identical |
| Classification<br>Number | Sec 882.5891 | Sec 882.5891 | Identical |
| Contraindications<br>For Use | Subjects with implanted metallic<br>or electronic devices in the head.<br>Subjects suffering from pain of<br>unknown origin.<br>Subjects who have a cardiac<br>pacemaker or implanted or<br>wearable defibrillator. This<br>may cause interference with<br>pacing, electric shock, or death. | Subjects with implanted<br>metallic or electronic devices<br>in the head.<br>Subjects suffering from pain<br>of unknown origin. Subjects<br>who have a cardiac<br>pacemaker or implanted or<br>wearable defibrillator. This<br>may cause interference with<br>pacing, electric shock, or<br>death. | Identical |
| Parameter | Milieve | Cefaly Dual<br>(Predicate Device) | Comparison |
| Power Source | Rechargeable 3.7V LiPo Battery | Rechargeable 3.7V LiPo Battery | Identical |
| Software provided | 2 fixed programs:<br>- 1 fixed program for the acute treatment of migraine attacks (Program 1)<br>- 1 fixed program for prophylactic treatment of migraine (Program 2) | 2 fixed programs:<br>- 1 fixed program for the acute treatment of migraine attacks (Program 1)<br>- 1 fixed program for prophylactic treatment of migraine (Program 2) | Identical |
| Program 1:<br>Max. output current<br>Pulse width<br>Pulse frequency<br>Session duration | 16 mA<br>250 $\mu$ s<br>fixed 100 Hz<br>fixed 60 minutes | 16 mA<br>250 $\mu$ s<br>fixed 100 Hz<br>fixed 60 minutes | Identical |
| Program 2:<br>Max. output current<br>Pulse width<br>Pulse frequency<br>Session duration | 16 mA<br>250 $\mu$ s<br>fixed 60 Hz<br>fixed 20 minutes | 16 mA<br>250 $\mu$ s<br>fixed 60 Hz<br>fixed 20 minutes | Identical |
| Waveform | Biphasic, symmetric,<br>rectangular current impulses<br>with zero electrical mean | Biphasic, symmetric,<br>rectangular current impulses<br>with zero electrical mean | Identical |
| Phase Duration (or<br>Pulse width) | 250 $\mu$ s | 250 $\mu$ s | Identical |
| Inter Phase Interval | 5 $\mu$ s | 5 $\mu$ s | Identical |
| Maximum Current<br>Intensity (±10%)<br>@500 $\Omega$<br>@2000 $\Omega$<br>@10000 $\Omega$ | 16 mA<br>16 mA<br>6 mA | 16 mA<br>16 mA<br>6 mA | Identical |
| Maximum average<br>current @500 $\Omega$ | 0.48 mA | 0.48 mA | Identical |
| Maximum output<br>voltage (±10%) | | | Identical |
| Parameter | Milieve | Cefaly Dual<br>(Predicate Device) | Comparison |
| @500Ω<br>@2000Ω<br>@10000Ω | 8 V<br>32 V<br>60 V | 8 V<br>32 V<br>60 V | |
| Ramp up Time | 14 min | 14 min | Identical |
| Steady Time | 6 min | 6 min | Identical |
| Ramp down Time | 60 s | 45 s | SE<br>Note 1 |
| Maximum Phase<br>Charge @500 Ω | 4 µC | 4 µC | Identical |
| Net Charge per<br>Pulse | 0 | 0 | Identical |
| Maximum Current<br>Density @500 Ω | 2.37 mA/cm2 | 2.37 mA/cm2 | Identical |
| Maximum Average<br>Power Density<br>@500 Ω | 0.000047 W/cm2 | 0.000047 W/cm2 | Identical |
| Dimensions | 44.05 mm x 38.98 mm x 14.5 mm | 55 mm x 40 mm x 15 mm | SE<br>Note 2 |
| Weight | 21 g | 12 g | SE<br>Note 3 |
| Electrode | Self-adhesive with 2 conductive<br>zones | Self-adhesive with 2<br>conductive zones | Identical |
| Device output ports | 2 magnets for connection with<br>electrode | 2 magnets for connection with<br>electrode | Identical |
{7}------------------------------------------------
{8}------------------------------------------------
Note 1:
The subject device has a slightly longer ramp down time. This longer ramp time helps with subject comfort. This difference will not raise new questions of efficacy as the therapeutic session times (20 min and 60 min) are identical.
### Note 2:
The dimension of the subject device is slightly different from the predicate device. This minor difference will however not raise any new safety and effectiveness issues.
{9}------------------------------------------------
Note 3:
The weight of the subject device is slightly more than the predicate device. This minor weight increase has not impacted the ability to hold device and electrode reliably on the forehead in the in-house tests conducted and the human factors validation study. It is therefore expected to not raise any new safety and effectiveness issues.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.